Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • The Issue Is Whether or Not The Summons Issued by Rasputin Against Concita Is Valid

    Uploaded by

    Aiman Lazman
    10 views1 page
    The validity of a summons issued by Rasputin against Concita is questioned. The Criminal Procedure Code defines a 'summons case' and outlines that courts must first determine if an offence requires a summons or warrant before issuing process. For a summons to be valid, it must be in writing, signed, bear the court seal, and preferably be personally served by showing the original and providing a sealed copy.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    The Issue is Whether or Not the Summons Issued by Rasputin Against Concita is Valid

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The validity of a summons issued by Rasputin against Concita is questioned. The Criminal Procedure Code defines a 'summons case' and outlines that courts must first determine if an offence requires a summons or warrant before issuing process. For a summons to be valid, it must be in writing, signed, bear the court seal, and preferably be personally served by showing the original and providing a sealed copy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views1 page

    The Issue Is Whether or Not The Summons Issued by Rasputin Against Concita Is Valid

    Uploaded by

    Aiman Lazman
    The validity of a summons issued by Rasputin against Concita is questioned. The Criminal Procedure Code defines a 'summons case' and outlines that courts must first determine if an offence requires a summons or warrant before issuing process. For a summons to be valid, it must be in writing, signed, bear the court seal, and preferably be personally served by showing the original and providing a sealed copy.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    The issue is whether or not the summons issued by Rasputin against Concita is valid.

    Section 2(1) CPC defines ‘summons case’ as a case relating to an offence and not being a warrant
    case. In order to issue the proper process to compel the attendance of an accused person, it is
    incumbent upon the court to firstly determine whether the offence falls under a summons or a
    warrant case. Section 34 of the CPC states that every summons to appear issued by a court under
    this code shall be in writing and signed as provided by the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, or the
    Subordinate Courts Act 1948, and shall bear the seal of the Court. Section 35(1) of the CPC futher
    states the summons shall if practicable be served personally on the person summoned by
    showing him the original summons and by tendering or delivery to him a copy thereof under the
    seal of the court.

    You might also like