published by Penguin Books
“So important that no one can afford to neglect .
Fe Woec diecina ean nchnoogien Ss
[eploranat xii, erd sduoaton ‘omer cience
poesia tearriiasmerest :
Beer apsncsain tas ook sonata and Society
is no one’ - Guardian
Ina study which invites comparison with Hilary Rose and
J.D, Barnal's The Social Function of Science Steven Rose
(published before zhe bomb or the cracking of
the genetic code), a biochemist and a
sociologist attack the notion that science, like
fate, is ‘an unpredictable act of gods in white
oats’ Since itis the product of certain men in
certain societies, it can be controlled. In their
‘opening chapters they recount the history of
science in its relations with society from the
founding of the Royal Sociaty to the post - war
records of Conservative and Labour
‘gevernments. For comparison they add
Chapters on the position in America, Russia,
‘and other countries, and on the functions of
international bodies (from Pugwash to
UNESCO).
This book is recommended by New Scientist as
‘a helpful starting-pvint ... for the students of
the forthcoming Open University’ in
‘approaching the question of how science can
be atfectively harnessed for the good ot all
people.
The cove
sped by Germano Facet, incorpora
fagaical engraving
The Open Univeraty
Foundation Course |
aited Kingdom £1.00
Ne Zeoand 3.25 Science: Geral
esa 88.25 ssano1s,
USA 825 i278Penguin Books ted, Harmoadonerth,
Midd, Erland
Proguin Books Ine, 710 Ambanador Road,
Batis Maryland 21207, USA
‘esa Hook Atala Ringo,
‘engin Boks Camda Ld A Stodente Road Wes,
‘en Boks (02) El 12-190 Wan Ron,
inc plied Alen Lan The Pn Pe 1
Cope Diy Rowand Steven Rove, 1969
{Richard Cay (The Chaser Pre) Ld,
Sein Movotpe Tins
“Tis books sold subject 10 the condition that
resol, ied out, or otereis ated witout
‘ding or cover other shan tha fe whch te
Diblhed an wiht ser conaon
Fcuding tis coaien beng tose on te
‘snoen puchaee
‘To the memory of both our fathersContents
Acknowledgements ix
Introduction. xi
1 The Rise ofthe Scientife Society 1
2 Amateurs and Gentlemen: Britain in the Nineteenth Century 16
3. TheChemists' War 37
4. ThePhysists' War 58
5. The Aftermath: Science andthe End of Empire 72
6 TheNew Britain? 94
7. Science in Western Europe 131
8 America, Russa andthe Third World 150
9 International Science 179
10 International Gaps and Dra
M1 Ciitera for Choice 210
12 Decisions: Megamouse and CERN, 219
13. Science and Society 240
198
Bibliography and References 273
Index. 287Acknowledgements
It is always hard to list comprehensively all those whose influence
has been felt in the gestation of a book. Still more is this the ease
when, as now, an attempt has been made to synthesize material
from any sourees and diferent disciplines and, as with this book,
its writing has occupied us, on and off, for several years. Our
erst in this area, our belief that it was important to analyse the
intertelations of scence technology and society, perhaps began a
a response tothe writings of those physicists who confronted the
moral and politica dilemmas posed by the Bomb. But while the
intellectual evolution ofthe book from that poiat is our own, our
thinking on many points has been erysalized by informal dis-
cussions, seminars and mectings. Amongst these, in parcula we
would like to mention talks with Anthony Wedgwood Bean,
Jeremy Bray, Erie Buthop, Ritchie Calder, Tam Dalyel, Alexander
King and Tony Swain. Francis Aprahamian and Gary Wersky
sade unpublished material availabe tous. We have pursued hares
started at seminars arranged by the Higher Education Group at
LSE, by the Science of Science Foundation in London, the
Science Studies Unit in Edinburgh, the Science Policy Research
Unitin Sussex and the American Astociation for the Advancement
of Sclencein New York.Itisparticularlyappropritethat the book
‘was completed in thelight ofthe steady stream of discussion meet-
{ngs and each-ns that havefollowed the Bernal Library Conference
on Chenscal and Biological Warfare in 1968 and the subsequent
tstablishment of the Brish Society for Social Responsibility in
Science, In addition, and especially, we would ike to thank those
ieAcknowledgements
friends and colleagues who have read and commented on various
drafts and sections of the book, Desmond Bernal, Christopher
Freeman, Dennis Simms, Leslie Sklair and Tony Swain, We thank,
‘00, Minerva for permission to use material ‘Operation Mega
‘mouse’ of which an earlier version appeared there, and Derek de.
Solla Price forthe use of Figure 2. Dick Pountain and Elizabeth
Singh have at various times helped with the collection of data.
Finally, Simon and Ben Rose have patiently borne the brunt of
parental distraction at those times when dislectical discourse has
not run truly smooth.
‘None ofthese ofcourse is in any way responsible for errors and
‘misinterpretations that may remain; they are ours alone ~ even if
‘we ourselves will no doubt continue to discuss which of our faults
twas.
August 1969
BR.
SR.
“The year between the hardback and paperback editions of this
‘book has seen the rapid development of the ‘science and society”
debate, whose participants have ranged from government science
advisers through the television programme Doomivatch to the
critiques generated by the radical students. It is encouraging to
see the emergence of several university and technical college
courses which discuss these issues, in some cases, asin the Open
‘University, integrated into the science course itself.
We have taken the oppoctunity of this paperback edition to
correct one of two errors which had crept into the hardbeck
(hanks are due to those who pointed them out to us) and to
add an updating footnote on developments in British science
policy since 1969 at the end of Chapter 6.
June 1970 HR,
SR.
Introduction
+. Thereby swear and afirm. Affirm. On my ... Honour? By my
belief. My belief in... in. the technological revolution, the pres-
‘sing, growing, pressing urgent need for more and more sclentsts, and
more scientists, for more and more schools and aniversities and
‘universities and schools, the theme of change, realistic decisions
based on a highly developed and professional study of society by
people who really know thelr subject, the overdue need for us 10
‘adapt ourselves to diferent conditions, the theme and challenge of
‘suchrapid change, change, rapid change. Inthe ninty-sevenper cen,
ninety-seven, of al the scientists who have ever lived i the history of
the world since the days of Euclid, Pythagoras and Archimedes. Who,
‘who are alive and at work today, today, now, at this time, in the
inevitability of automation...
Bl Maliand in John Osborne's Znadmssible Evidence
_Ahundred years ago a speech by ay public figure was incomplete
‘without careful zeference to at least one member of the trinity of
‘Chureh, Queen and Nation. Today a similar speech demands atthe
{east its ritual bow in the direction of that indivisible pair: Science
and Technology. No political manifesto, company chairman's,
‘annual report or novelists reflections on the state ofthe times ean
afford to omit from its repertoire some passage aimed at science oF
the scientist. It can be argued that the rise in importance of the
scientists and their activities has made them into a new Estate of
the Realm. Certainly the extent to which scientific and techno
logical developments dominate public consciousness is something
xIntroduction
new and characteristic of our contemporary society. Without