Civic Compliance Victoria Explained

Submitted by exfacie on Sat, 09/24/2011 - 13:57

Civic Compliance Victoria is the "body" that processes infringement notices,

infringement warrants and fines within the State of Victoria. This article provides a
description of exactly what Civic Compliance Victoria is (and is not), and the people
behind CCV.

Civic Compliance Victoria

The State Government of Victoria website for fines states, "Civic Compliance
Victoria (CCV) is an administrative body that is responsible for processing fines
issued by various government agencies and authorities within Victoria", and that, "all
enforcement orders and infringement warrants issued by the Infringements Court are
processed by Civic Compliance Victoria irrespective of the agency by which they
were originally issued." [1]

The fore mentioned website appears to be (grossly) misleading. In communications

with the Department of Justice - State of Victoria it was communicated that:

Civic Compliance Victoria (CCV) is the name created by the State to provide one
name for the integrated fines and enforcement system comprising the Traffic Camera
Office of Victoria Police,the Infringements Court and the Sheriff's Office. CCV has no
ABN number and is not registered as a business as it is neither a business nor a
company, nor a trading name. The name CCV is the intellectual property of the State
of Victoria. [2]

This statement is confirmed by the IP Australia website [3]. The following trade
marks are registered:
 Registered Trade Marks for CCV
Number Trade Mark Name Registrant
The Crown in the Right of the
933736 CCV
State of Victoria
CIVIC COMPLIANCE The Crown in the Right of the
933737
VICTORIA State of Victoria
The Crown in the Right of the
1010971 CCV (logo)
State of Victoria

Hence, Civic Compliance Victoria appears to be nothing more than a trade mark
registered by The Crown in the Right of the State of Victoria.

The State of Victoria and Tenix

In communications with the Department of Justice - State of Victoria it was

communicated that:

"The State's contractor, Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd, is licensed to use the names
'CCV' and 'Civic Compliance Victoria' in providing infringement management and
enforcement services for the State." [2]

In subsequent communications with the Department of Justice - State of Victoria it

was communicated that:

"... Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd is the only entity licensed to use the names 'CCV'
and 'Civic Compliance Victoria'". [4]

Hence, the Department of Justice - State of Victoria has communicated that Tenix
Solution IMES Pty Ltd has exclusive license to use the CCV trade marks.

Further information about the relationship between the State of Victoria and Tenix
Solutions IMES Pty Ltd can be obtained from the following sources:

• Infringement Management and Enforcement Services Project - Deed of

Charge, signed 26 July 2007 (available via ASIC).
 • Infringement Management and Enforcement Services Agreement; start date 29
July 2007 to 30 October 2012 (Contract 015-07-08) [5].

The estimate value of the contract is listed as $332,100,000 ($332.1M). Please note
that the contract available via the tenders.vic.gov.au website has sections redacted and
is not the complete document.

The reference in the contract to license of the trade marks is located in section 51.18
of the agreement; part of that section is presented (bold font emphasis added by
editor):

51.18 Licence to use the Trade Marks

(a) With effect from the Commencement Date, the State grants to the Contractor
for the Term a non-exclusive, royalty-free licence to use the Trade Marks in
Australia solely for the purposes of the Contractor fulfilling its obligations under this
Agreement.

(b) The State may from time to time during the Term impose in writing, reasonable
requirements regarding the use of the Trade Marks, and the Contractor must comply
with those requirements.

(c) Where the Trade Marks appear in any written material (including any electronic
material) published by or on behalf of the Contractor, unless otherwise authorised by
the State:

(i) the Trade Marks must appear with the ® symbol (or, if the Trade Mark is not
yet registered, the ™ symbol); and

(ii) the Trade Mark must be accompanied by the following footnote: The [insert
trade mark] trade mark is used by [insert Contractor's details] under licence
from the Crown in Right of the State of Victoria.

(d) The Contractor must comply with any standards, directions and specifications
notified in writing by the State from time to time during the Term as to the
appearance, colour, size and positioning of the Trade Marks and the footnote referred
to in clause 51.18(c)(ii) and allow the State to inspect its premises and items using the
Trade Marks at any time.

(e) The Contractor must not use the Trade Marks in a manner which is prejudicial to
the State or likely to prejudice the distinctiveness of the Trade Marks or the validity of
any registration for a Trade Mark. This provision will survive the expiry or
termination of this Agreement.

(f) The Contractor must not at any time during the Term use the Trade Marks in
juxtaposition to any other trade mark, embellishment or device without the prior
written consent of the State.

...
Note 1: Section 51.18(a) may conflict with advice provided by the Department of
Justice - State of Victoria.

Note 2: The author is unaware of any updates to this agreement, thus the contractual
terms may be out of date.

Who is Tenix?

Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd is a registered company in the Commonwealth of

Australia (ABN 47 126 390 378) [6]; the ultimate holding company is Olbia Pty Ltd
(ABN 64 000 305 304) [7]. Further company information can be obtained via ASIC
which will validate this fact; part of the company extract is provided as evidence [8].
The company structure/hierarchy is presented.

Hence, Tenix Solution IMES Pty Ltd is owned by Olbia Pty Ltd.

Who is Olbia?

Olbia Pty Ltd comprises of eight shareholders, four individual people and four
companies; the shareholder structure is presented (information obtained from ASIC
Company Extract [9]).
Without further investigation, it may be (wrongly) assumed that each of the four
company shareholders are owned or controlled by the respective individual
shareholders (Paul Salteri, Robert Salteri, Mary Victoria Shaw, Adriana Bianca
Gardos); the website manta.com provides information that Paul Salteri is a director of
Pasagean Pty Ltd and Adriana Bianca Gardos is a director of Clurname Pty Ltd [10]
[11].

The four individuals who are shareholders of Olbia Pty Ltd are children of the late
Carlo Salteri; Carlo Salteri died in 2010 [12].

Hence, Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd, the company that issues infringement
notices and infringement warrants is a family-owned company of the Salteri
family. According to the BRW Rich 200 list, the Salteri family was ranked as the 7th
wealthiest family in Australia ($1.18B). [13]

Summary
In summary, based on the evidence provided:

• Civic Compliance Victoria and CCV are trade marks.

• CCV is not a corporation, entity, government department or administrative
body.
• Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd has (exclusive) license to use the CCV trade
marks.
• Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd has a five year contract with the State of
Victoria valued at approximately $332.1M.
• The ultimate holding company of Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd is Olbia Pty
Ltd.
• Olbia Pty Ltd is owned by the billionaire Salteri family.

References

1. About Civic Compliance Victoria (online.fines.vic.gov.au)

2. Letter from Department of Justice, 28 June 2011 (exfacie.com)
3. IP Australia (ipaustralia.gov.au)
4. Letter from Department of Justice, 9 August 2011 (exfacie.com)
5. Contract 015-07-08, Infringement Management and Enforcement Services
Agreement (tenders.vic.gov.au)
6. ABN Lookup for Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd (abr.business.gov.au)
7. ABN Lookup for Olbia Pty Ltd (abr.business.gov.au)
8. ASIC Company Extract for Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd (part only)
(exfacie.com)
9. ASIC Company Extract for Olbia Pty Ltd (part only) (exfacie.com)
10. manta, About Clurname Pty Ltd (manta.com)
11. manta, About Pasagean Pty Ltd (manta.com)
12. Laying foundations of modern Australia, The Sydney Morning Herald
(smh.com.au)
13. BRW Rich 200 list (wikipedia.org)

From the above it becomes clear that Police, instead of working for the
People, are in fact working for a private contractor. Yet,

The very first thing, we ought to ask ourselves, is, what is an

infringement [notice]? Well, an infringement notice is an alleged claim
that you had violated a law. For example, the speed limit, or, the time
limit on your parking meter where you had parked, a Council regulation
etc. Now if you read an infringement notice, it benevolently suggest that
you may appeal to a court. But why would you? Is it not the duty of
the plaintiff /claimant to prove his case? Of course it is. However,
should you take that bait and appeal to a court, you are bound to lose
your appeal, guaranteed! There is nothing to appeal, because it has not
been proven that you committed any offence. It is only an opinion this
far. You are innocent until PROVEN guilty. And only after you are,
there will be a judgement order upon which the Sheriff may act and
collect. So obviously, the supposed grant that you may appeal to a court
is a TRAP, and one you must avoid at all times. You see, a Sheriff may
only act upon a judicial order. If the matter has not been to a proper
court, there can be no judgement order, and the Sheriff cannot lawfully
act.

Please note, that Police has no authority to collect fines, and most
certainly not, those that are merely alleged by infringement notices.

The name Civic Compliance had already been registered with some
folks in Geelong, Victoria. When this came to light, pressure was put on
the rightful owners of the name Civic Compliance, by the Justice
Department, from what I gather. But they refused to surrender the name
Civic Compliance, and the Government had to come up with alternative
name. They chose the more recent[trade] name 'Traffic Camera
Office'.

The crooked Victorian Legislature, then created a supposed alternative

court, named the Infringement Court to fast track fines and penalties,
imposed by way of Infringement Notice. This, was yet a further
attempt by the Victorian Government, to mislead the people, and have
them belief, that an actual judicial court had dealt with the Infringement
Notice, but in the absence of the alleged offender. That would then
allow the Sheriff's Officers to come to your house, and demand
payment, or take items equal to the value of the supposed penalty notice.

But this is just another fraud perpetrated, on those who pay the salaries
of Government, the Sheriff, his officers, and the Victorian police, by
namely, we, the Victorian tax payers. The Infringement Court is not a
judicial court that conducts hearings. The Infringement Court is only a
computer. Now pursuant to the Judicial Act, 1903, every court of a
State is vested with Federal Jurisdiction. This means, that any Court of
a State must comply with the conditions imposed on a Federal Court.
Now in law, everyone is innocent until proven guilty of a crime, or an
offence. Hence, each and every court must conduct a hearing where the
Plaintiff can raise his claim, and the Respondent is afforded the right of
reply. The Infringement Court, has no Judges or Magistrates and does
not hold hearings. It claims, to have five Commissioners, who process
the warrants. This process is totally fraudulent and subject to charges
under the Crimes Act, 1914.

It should be noted that the oath, Victorian Police take under the current
police Act, 2013 has been altered. Formerly, Police would take an oath
to protect the public. Nowadays, they take an oath to the queen. One can
only wonder, on what mandate the People's Parliament acted when they
removed the safeguards that were afforded to the People under common
law? In the old days in England, a police constable had to accompany a
crown agent, wishing to serve a summons. Police were required to be in
attendance to ensure that the Crown officer would not violate the
common law rights of recipient of the summons.

If you think about it, Police is not part of the Legislature, and not part of
Government, nor part of the Judiciary, whilst the Queen took an oath to
uphold our common law and customs, and obey the Laws of God?

In any event, a summons out of the Infringement Court has no legal

standing or effect, the Sheriff can only lawfully act on an order of a
judicial court, as recognised under the Judiciary Act, 1903, and Police
cannot collect fines, full stop. They can only issue infringement notices.

If the Sheriff, or his Deputies attempt to collect fines on summons of the

Infringement Court, they violate the Supreme Court of Victoria Act,
and thereby commit a criminal offence.

It should be noted, that laws are continually altered to intimidate the

population into conformity. This will soon be dealt with, big time, and
all the Deep State criminals will be removed.

WWG1WGA