You are on page 1of 3

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/247685442

The Strategy Paradox. Edited by Michael Raynor

Article  in  R& D Management · June 2009


DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00556.x

CITATIONS READS

0 2,466

1 author:

Adrian Kuah
James Cook University Singapore
59 PUBLICATIONS   458 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Circular economy View project

Global Business Systems View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Adrian Kuah on 06 April 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Book Reviews

The Strategy Paradox. Edited by Michael Raynor. able strategies are ‘extreme’ in nature. Successful
Doubleday Business, 2007, ISBN 0385516228, companies should position themselves as either
hardback, d19.26, pp. 272. differentiated (to be radically different) or be a
cost leader (the absolute low cost provider). Either
Strategy Paradox is not the first book to observe of these would require organisations to invest
that the future, in terms of technology and market heavily in R&D and product innovation to pro-
forces, is unpredictable and strategy-making must vide the most radical but functional products, or to
take uncertainties into account. However, the add the greatest value at the lowest cost. Invest-
book transmits a strong message that uncertainty ment and commitment to such extreme positions,
must not be placed as an afterthought. Like many the author argues, expose firms to the greatest risk.
other books, it advocates the separation of roles Chapter 4 contends that organisational adapt-
between the management of commitments and ability is an insufficient response when environ-
the management of strategic uncertainty. What is mental change is too fast, or when multi-
unique is that it expands on leading theories, for environment change occurs. In Chapter 5 the
example, generic strategies (Chapter 3), forecast- author argues that forecasting is not able to cater
ing (Chapter 5), strategy and structure (Chapter for multi-environment uncertainty, as there are
6), scenario planning (Chapter 9) and real options simply too many variables in the environment.
(Chapter 10). The specificity of each concept Strategies arising from any forecast will have
comes from different domains of management certain assumptions about the future embedded
and strategy, and often beyond the grasps of in them. A high degree of environmental uncer-
one discipline. Michael Raynor successfully inte- tainty, especially in the long-term, will be beyond
grates such concepts and provides new insights in the limits of traditional forecasting.
this book. What is possibly the main weakness Chapter 6 relates to the landmark work of
with this book is that it lacks original ideas. Alfred Chandler’s Strategy and Structure from
Chapter 1 is an extensive overview that would 1963, but differs substantially in driving its unique
probably be most difficult to digest; however, it argument. Chandler argues that strategy for
sets the stage for the remaining chapters. It argues growth through diversification necessitated a
that strategic commitments are based upon beliefs change in organisational structure in order to
about the future. Excellent strategies, however, cope with its complexity. Raynor presents a new
can fail because the conditions under which those dimension where the operating and functional
commitments would have been appropriate did divisions should focus on driving commitments,
not materialise. The Strategy Paradox is visible while the Board and Corporate levels must focus
when one examines strategies whose only flaw was on strategic uncertainty over a longer horizon.
that they flopped. The next chapter illustrates Chapter 7 introduces Vivendi Universal, BCE
Sony’s inability to build in, and cater to, the Inc. and Microsoft Inc. to illustrate how commit-
uncertainty of the market conditions through ments are implemented and monitored at differ-
the case studies of Betamax and MiniDisc. De- ent levels of organisations. This chapter argues
spite brilliantly executed strategies and product that the success of an options-based corporate
development, the two products are examples of strategy largely depended on the charisma and
the market (environment) being not quite ready influence of the CEO. An explicit process-based
for them. Each venture failed because of insuffi- approach, where managers at all levels can con-
cient attention to the salient uncertainties, accord- tribute to managing uncertainty and capturing
ing to Raynor. opportunities is important. A point well illu-
Chapter 3 reinforces Michael Porter’s Competi- strated by the Johnson and Johnson case pre-
tive Strategy from the 1980s that the most profit- sented in Chapter 8.

R&D Management 39, 3, 2009. r 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation r 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 305
9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA, 02148, USA
Book Reviews

The concept of strategic flexibility combines levels of the organisation. Scenarios are placed in
scenario-based planning and real options, de- the centre of strategic planning as they are excep-
scribed in Chapters 9 and 10, respectively. While tional in defining key uncertainties that an orga-
Chapter 9 illustrates the usefulness of the sce- nisation faces. Strategy development will focus on
nario-based approach, strategy formulation has identifying the risks a company will accept, hedge
very different objectives in the context of requisite or avoid, rather than just a determination of the
uncertainty. Scenarios can reflect a set of invest- commitments a company will make. The book
ments that a company makes. The five-step meth- makes a valuable read for practitioners and
odology for scenario creation follows quite decision-makers, as well as MBA students, as
closely to the established literature (e.g. Shell’s the fundamental concepts are well grounded
scenario-based planning). In Chapter 10, Raynor with additional insights provided. The concepts
adopts the concept of efficiency frontiers in finan- are generally applicable to companies with the
cial investment to argue that only by creating ambition to succeed. The book combines existing
options based on the contingent elements would concepts to create high profitability and manage
the firm reach the ‘strategic frontier’ of strategic uncertainty in a strategic context – most impor-
investments. Finally, Chapter 11 is a concluding tant in today’s economic landscape.
chapter that perhaps could be expanded to in-
clude some useful practical implications for the
technique.
Strategy Paradox advocates that uncertainty is ADRIAN T. H. KUAH
at the heart of decision-making at the highest University of Bradford, Bradford, UK

The Venturesome Economy: How Innovation particular what he sees as the all-important
Sustains Prosperity in a More Connected World. ‘mid-level innovation’, namely ‘the willingness
Edited by Amar Bhide, Princeton University and ability of intermediate producers and indivi-
Press: Princeton, 2008, ISBN 978-0691135175, dual consumers to take a chance on and effec-
hardback, d24, pp. 520. tively use new know-how and products’.
The author organises his argument into what
The central role of the new venture in the opera- he calls two books. Book 1 presents the findings
tion of national economies and particularly in the of many interviews with VC-backed businesses
global knowledge economy is well established. about their cross-border interactions. This focus
The characteristic feature of a venture is that it is justified on two grounds: ‘VC-backed busi-
involves a business enterprise engaging in risk nesses are relatively uncomplicated players’ and
with the expectation of gain. Interestingly, the ‘they provide a window on the middle level of the
noun venture almost never appears without the innovation game in terms of both product
accompanying adjective new (old ventures are just and knowhow’. Book 2 generalises from these
companies or businesses), or joint, or as a qualifier findings ‘to rebut techno-nationalist alarmism
of capital. about the erosion of the US lead in cutting-edge
Could it therefore be revealing that, late in science and technology’ and consequent policy
2008, there appears to be a quest for a suitable formulation.
generic adjectival form of venture. Thus in Aus- In fact, there is also an interesting Book 3
tralia, a major review of the national innovation running in parallel in which the author engages
system was entitled Venturous Australia: Building in an extended epistemological narrative to justify
Strength in Innovation.1 This unfamiliar word can his eschewal of a narrow hypothesis-testing ap-
be traced to early English as a ‘disposition to proach in favour of an inductive, ‘common-law
venture, or take risks’. type of inquiry’ through which various theories,
Bhide uses the more familiar but nevertheless facts and conjectures are assembled and tested
clumsy adjective venturesome, to characterise not against common sense.
only economies, but also a form of consumption But the justification for the detailed data and
that is a crucial driver of innovation, and in case studies presented in Book 1, fascinating and

306 R&D Management 39, 3, 2009 r 2009 The Authors


Journal compilation r 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

View publication stats

You might also like