Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT 1
Submitted To
ENGR. HUMAYUN SHAHID
Submitted By
SANAN AHMED (19-TE-96)
Q3. Why do you think investors would back a product that had not been
proven? Do you think investors—such as millionaires Rupert Mudoch,
Betsy DeVos, and the Walton family—were also susceptible to
overconfidence bias in their ability to pick and ride a winning start-
up? Why or why not?
Answer:
Investors would back a product that has the capability to bring
disruption in the market and create value for the target customers. Such products
often provide a higher return on the investment, as such for higher returns and
for first- mover advantage, investors back a product which has not been proven.
Investors are not susceptible to overconfidence bias in their ability to pick and
ride a winning start-up. Because investors are carefully study the business idea,
take expert opinions before making any investment. They will need to have
meetings with the board and hire a company to do the due diligence.
Q6. What harm was caused by Theranos and Holmes making false and
misleading statements? How can hype transform into overconfidence
or overoptimism?
Answer:
Overconfidence refers to one thinking of oneself and one’s abilities as
superior to others. This would make them decide on things that they would
decide things that are beyond their capability thus making errors in their decision
making. Over-optimism refers to expecting positive outcome every time without
having a back-up plan. Because they don’t prepare any back-up plan with an
expectation of
a positive outcome, they would get struck when they fail. Confirmation bias refers
to one choosing information and favoring them if they align with their previous
experience and exposure. They would avoid any contradictory ideas and thus
would fail to critically analyze their own beliefs and mistakes.
Q7. Why do you think Holmes would continue to push the same
narrative of personal and company success when faced with increased
scrutiny? Explain.
Answer:
Holmes continued to push her company's claims and her own narrative
of personal success. The company continued to show off its technology at
conferences. Building a fake blood-testing company that raises hundreds of
millions of dollars from investors is bad, certainly, but it's not really any worse
than any of the other securities fraud that we so often delight in around here.
Building a fake blood-testing company that performs fake blood tests on
thousands of people is much worse. Just imagine how the device could have save
many lives but due to the selfish and greedy, there were many people who killed
by this fraud. This has become a social issue caused by Theranos.