Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • PT 1

    Uploaded by

    Mickaella Martir
    10 views1 page
    The document describes a grading rubric for answering a problem with evidence. A score of 20 is achieved for answering correctly with 5 pieces of evidence. A score of 19 is achieved for answering incorrectly but still providing 5 pieces of evidence. A score of 18 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 4 out of 5 scenarios, or answering correctly but providing evidence for 3 scenarios. A score of 17 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 3 scenarios. A score of 16 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 2 scenarios. Late submissions are penalized 2 points.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    PT-1 (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document describes a grading rubric for answering a problem with evidence. A score of 20 is achieved for answering correctly with 5 pieces of evidence. A score of 19 is achieved for answering incorrectly but still providing 5 pieces of evidence. A score of 18 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 4 out of 5 scenarios, or answering correctly but providing evidence for 3 scenarios. A score of 17 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 3 scenarios. A score of 16 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 2 scenarios. Late submissions are penalized 2 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views1 page

    PT 1

    Uploaded by

    Mickaella Martir
    The document describes a grading rubric for answering a problem with evidence. A score of 20 is achieved for answering correctly with 5 pieces of evidence. A score of 19 is achieved for answering incorrectly but still providing 5 pieces of evidence. A score of 18 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 4 out of 5 scenarios, or answering correctly but providing evidence for 3 scenarios. A score of 17 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 3 scenarios. A score of 16 is achieved for answering incorrectly but providing evidence for 2 scenarios. Late submissions are penalized 2 points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    20 - (Exemplary) the student answered the problem correctly and provided 5 evidences.

    19 - (Proficient) the student answered the problem incorrectly but provided 5 evidences.
    OR
    Answered correctly but only provided 4/5 sufficient evidences.
    18 - (Proficient) the student answered the problem incorrectly but provided sufficient responses for 4 of the 5 Scenarios OR
    the student answered the problem correctly but provided sufficient responses for 3 of the 5 Scenarios

    17- (Lacks Proficiency)


    the student answered the problem incorrectly but provided sufficient responses for 3 of the 5 Scenarios

    16- (Lacks Proficiency)


    the student answered the problem incorrectly but provided sufficient response for 2 of the 5 Scenarios

    *2 points deductions for late submission


    Goal Your goal is to help investors decide on what bank would help them cater their financial interest.

    Role you are a financial adviser for investors

    Audience future investors


    Situation Mr. Lopez would like to invest P10,000,000. He could not decide which bank would he invest his money. He asked
    you to help him decide on this matter. He asked you to present to him 5 banks from the Philippines which you
    think would best cater his interest.

    Product a written report with proof of the 5 possible banks where Mr Lopez could invest his money. Then identify the best
    bank that may cater his needs.

    You might also like