Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ON
“THE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN
MPPKVVCL”
SESSION: 2022-23
Submitted By
Aditya Pandey
MBA 2RD SEMESTER
FORWARD
HEAD OF DEPARTMENT
Dr. ATUL PANDEY
DECLARATION
The matter reported in this project is neither being used elsewhere nor
has been submitted earlier for the award of degree of Master of
Business Administration.
ADITYA PANDEY
M.B.A. 2nd Sem. (HR)
A.P.S. University Rewa
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ADITYA PANDEY
M.B.A. 2nd Sem. (HR)
A.P.S. University Rewa
INDEX
Executive Summary 1
1.
Introduction of Topic 2 - 15
2.
Company Profile 16 – 28
3.
Research Methodology 30 - 39
5.
Limitations 62
8.
Conclusion 63 – 64
9.
Bibliography 65
10.
CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Human Resource Management focuses on the most key element of the
organization. There are several resources needed by the organization but most
effective one is the human resources. Human resource functions are broadly
recognized by all organization, among these important functions performance
appraisal is a remarkable one. The report of the internship has been titled as; “A
Study on Employees Performance Appraisal of MPPKVVCL”. The study
basically based on the study overall employees’ performance appraisal.
Literally, performance appraisal, performance assessment and performance
management, all the terms refer to the process of comparing the actual
performance with the relative standards, here employees performances are
evaluated to determine the extent to which employees performances contribute
to strategize organization goals.
“The internship is an integral part of the MBA PROGRAM. The organization
that I choose for my internship is MPPKVVCL, JABALPUR (M.P.), During my
six week internship, I learnt many application of management which enhances
my skills is real manner.
A STUDY OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM IN MPPKVVCL
JABALPUR” was the topic I choose for my project I analyzed how
performance appraisal is important for the employees for analysis, data is
collected from the trainees (employees) I also analyzed the working
environment of the center and collected feedback. The feedback and
suggestions from staff members were taken, compiled and interpreted as result.
The area of project work is NAYA GAON, JABALPUR CITY, where the
survey has been undertaken.
The report actually aimed at having a pragmatic notion on performance
appraisal process and how effects in the development of human resources and
organization development. Here the study also has fulfilled some other relevant
purposes, such as; having a view of assessment of the organization to discuss
critically and recommend on the shortcomings that found.
The report has been a means of significance, because it has contained so many
dimensions including; describing the key areas of assessment with relevant
criticism and some realistic recommendations based on descriptive assumptions.
CHAPTER 2: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
Performance appraisal is also known as employee evaluation, merit rating,
employee assessment, etc. It is a systematic process of appraising an
employee’s current and past performance relative to his/her performance
parameters. The employee’s performance should be based on organizational
expectations and employee’s actual performance. The idea that performal
evaluation improves employee’s performance is not a new one but it is seen in
the roots of development of mankind. Each person is motivated when he is told
about his actual perormance and accepts what were his/her previous mistakes.
Performance appraisal process may be held annually or monthly as per needed.
Performance appraisal system is the right instrument that plays a vital role
directly or indirectly in achieving the above. It improves the interpersonal
relationship among the employees and employers in the organization. It reflects
an evaluative judgment of the traits, characteristics and the work performance
of the employees on jobs. It is a continuous process to reach the desirous goal
of not only the organization but also the employees.
c) It aims at providing data to managers with which they may judge future job
assignments and compensation.
Performance appraisal is a formal system that evaluates the quality of a
worker’s performance. The appraisal measures skills and accomplishments with
reasonable accuracy and uniformity. It provides a way to help identify areas for
performance enhancement and to help promote professional growth. It should
not, however, be considered the supervisor’s only communication tool. Open
lines of communication throughout the year help to make effective working
relationships. Performance appraisal is the process which assessing the
performance and progress of an employee on a given job for his future
development, and it mainly consists formal procedures.
Each employee is entitled to a thoughtful and careful appraisal. The success of
the process depends on the supervisor’s willingness to complete a constructive
and objective appraisal and on the employee’s willingness to respond to
constructive suggestions and to work with the supervisor to reach future goals.
MEANING
A performance appraisal is a regular review of an employee's job performance
and contribution to a company. Companies use performance appraisals to
determine which employees have contributed the most to the company's growth,
review progress, and reward high-achieving workers.
DEFINITION
“Performance appraisal is a record of progress for apprentices and regular
employees, as a guide in making promotions, transfer or demotions, as a guide
in making lists for bonus distribution, for seniority consideration and for rates of
pay, as an instrument for discovering hidden genius, and as a source of
information that makes conferences with employees helpful”.
-According to scott, clothier and sprigal
Traditional Methods:
Ranking Method:
It is the oldest and simplest formal systematic method of performance appraisal
in which employee is compared with all others for the purpose of placing order
of worth. The employees are ranked from the highest to the lowest or from the
best to the worst.
Paired Comparison:
In this method, each employee is compared with other employees on one- on
one basis, usually based on one trait only. The rater is provided with a bunch of
slips each coining pair of names, the rater puts a tick mark against the employee
whom he insiders the better of the two. The number of times this employee is
compared as better with others determines his or her final ranking.
Grading Method:
In this method, certain categories of worth are established in advance and
carefully defined. There can be three categories established for employees:
outstanding, satisfactory and unsatisfactory. There can be more than three
grades. Employee performance is compared with grade definitions. The
employee is, then, allocated to the grade that best describes his or her perfor-
mance.
Check-List Method:
The basic purpose of utilizing check-list method is to ease the evaluation burden
upon the rater. In this method, a series of statements, i.e., questions with their
answers in ‘yes’ or ‘no’ are prepared by the HR department . The check-list is,
then, presented to the rater to tick appropriate answers relevant to the appraisee.
Each question carries a weight-age in relationship to their importance.
Essay Method:
Essay method is the simplest one among various appraisal methods available. In
this method, the rater writes a narrative description on an employee’s strengths,
weaknesses, past performance, potential and suggestions for improvement. Its
positive point is that it is simple in use. It does not require complex formats and
extensive/specific training to complete it.
Modern Methods:
Management by Objectives (MBO):
Most of the traditional methods of performance appraisal are subject to the
antagonistic judgments of the raters. It was to overcome this problem; Peter F.
Drucker propounded a new concept, namely, management by objectives (MBO)
way back in 1954 in his book.
In other words, stripped to its essentials, MBO requires the manager to goals
with each employee and then periodically discuss his or her progress toward
these goals.
As with other methods, it also suffers from some limitations as catalogued
below:
(i) Setting Un-measurable Objectives
(ii) Time-consuming
(iii) Tug of War
(iv) Lack of Trust
360 – Degree Appraisal:
Under 360 – degree appraisal, performance information such as employee’s
skills, abilities and behaviours, is collected “all around” an employee, i.e., from
his/her supervisors, subordinates, peers and even customers and clients.
In 360 – degree feedback, performance appraisal being based on feedback “all
around”, an employee is likely to be more correct and realistic. Nonetheless,
like other traditional methods, this method is also subject to suffer from the
subjectivity on the part of the appraiser. For example, while supervisor may
penalise the employee by providing negative feedback, a peer, being influenced
by ‘give and take feeling’ may give a rave review on his/her colleague.
Assessment Centres:
In business field, assessment centres are mainly used for evaluating executive or
supervisory potential. By definition, an assessment centre is a central location
where managers come together to participate in well-designed simulated
exercises. They are assessed by senior managers supplemented by the
psychologists and the HR specialists for 2-3 days.
MPPKVVCL
TECHNICAL NON-
TECHNICAL
JE,AE,EE,SE,CE LINE
STAFF,MANAGERIAL,
ETC. ACCOUNT,IT,ETC.
Performance Appraisal impact
i. Higher Pay :
9 years , 18 years , 30 years.
ii. Promotion :
Promotions are based on the appraisal of the
performance makes employees feel satisfied because by
being promoted they will get better income and prestige whch
affects to the employees' motivation to give the best for the
organization.
D Adverse 0
Minimum Marks
For Technical : 13 Marks
For Non Technical : 3B + 2C
JE - Junior Engineer
AE - Assistant Engineer
EE - Executive Engineer
SE - Superintending Engineer
CE - Chief Engineer
MD - Managing Director
P.S - Principal Secretary
EM – Energy Minister
CM - Chief minister
Proforma
The revised proforma for the annual performance appraisal comprises
of 4 sections. The requirement under each section and the authority
responsible for filling up these sections is indicated in the table below.
Appraisee Section II
Number of Circles 21
Number of Divisions 53
OBJECTIVE
The main objectives are to achieving efficiency gains and making necessary
changes to make the Company commercially viable, progressively self-
sustainable and less government dependent and at the same time, balancing the
interest of the consumers in regard to quality of service and economical tariff.
The plan would include among other things, metering, billing, collection,
identifying the present deficiencies and the improvements to be made, mapping
supply feeders, measurement of energy supplied to feeders and energy audit,
study of losses and scheme for progressive reduction, reduction in input costs,
consumer affairs handling, investments required for improvements in the
distribution system etc.
MISSION
Our Mission is to provide quality electricity supply services to each customer
satisfying his / her needs in most efficient and effective manner at reasonable
prices through continuous innovations and by maintaining commercial &
financial viability of the company along with employee’s satisfaction.
VISSION
MPPKVVCL aspires to be the best electricity supply company in India
by continuously enhancing its technological leadership and commercial acumen
to satisfy its customers.
CORE VALUE
To achieve its mission, the Company and its employees commit themselves to
honesty and integrity, result oriented work, transparency in work, dedication to
duty, Cost consciousness, openness to suggestions and feedback from all stake
holders.
The List Of Awarded Officer And Employee For His Excellent Works And
Best Circle Division Awards On Occasion Of Independence Day 2016
Awards to MP Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd. for its Automatic Meter
Reading Project.
Recognition By Government Of MP
Rated best application in e-Governance initiatives by Government of Madhya
Pradesh for the year 2007-08 and awarded ‘AWARD OF EXCELLENCE’.
International Award
Manthan South Asia Award 2009
Manthan South Asia Award 2022.
National e-Governance award
MADHYA PRADESH POORV KSHETRA MAP
CENTRAL TRAINING INSTITUTE
ABOUT CTI
The Central Training Institute Nayagaon, Jabalpur also imparts training to the
employees of other organizations as per their request, such as MPPGCL,
AKVN, Municipal Corporation Jabalpur, Military Engineering Services, Lanco
Power Company etc.
THE INSTITUTE
The audio-visual class rooms are equipped with air conditioners, overhead
projectors, multi-media Interactive touch screens, Internet access unit, VHS,
CD/VCD units which are being used for trainees and faculty activities like
classroom presentations, meetings, conferences and lectures
The Seminar hall is well equipped with multi-media projection system, audio-
video facilities, and recording systems.
AWARDS
2.To identify whether the employee are aware of the Performance Appraisal.
5.To know the level of satisfaction toward the Performance Appraisal handling
procedure in MPPKVVCL.
RESEARCH
The research design of this project is exploratory. Though each research study has
its own specific purpose but the research design of this project on MPPKVVCL is
exploratory in nature as the objective is the development of the hypothesis rather
than their testing . the research designs methods of financial analysis. Through of
comparative balance sheet in comparative statement, I am studying on balance sheet
of MPPKVVCL of five year. So taking comparative statement, I am going to
analyzed of five years balance sheet of MPKVVCL.
METHODOLOGY
Every project work is based on certain methodology, which is a way to
systematically solve the problem or attain its objectives. It is a very important
guideline and lead to completion of any project work through observation, data
collection and data analysis. “Research Methodology comprises of defining &
evaluating data, making deductions& researching to conclusions.”
MEANING
Research is a process in which the researcher wishes to find out the results for a
given problem and thus the solution helps in future course of action. According to
Clifford research comprises defining and redefining problems, formulating
hypothesis or suggested solution, collecting, organizing and evaluating data,
making deductions and reaching conclusions and at carefully testing the
conclusions to determine whether they fit the formulating hypothesis.
DEFINITION
Research methodology is a way of explaining how a researcher intends to carry out
their research. It's a logical, systematic plan to resolve a research problem. A
methodology details a researcher's approach to the research to ensure reliable, valid
results that address their aims and objectives.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research methodology of defining and redefining problem, formulating hypothesis
or suggested solutions, collecting, organizing and evaluating data, reaching
conclusions, testing conclusions to determine whether they fit the formulated
hypothesis.
The term research refers to the systematic method consisting of enynciating the
problem, formulating hypothesis, collecting the facts or data, analyzing the facts
and reaching certain conclusions either in the form of solutions towards the
concerned problem or in certain generalization for some theoretical formulation.
It is essentially an investigation, a recording and an analysis of evidence for the
purpose of gaining knowledge.
1. Qualitative research
2. Quantitative research
Quantitative research is outlined as a scientific investigation of phenomena by
gathering quantitative information and activity applied mathematics, or procedure
techniques. The gathering of data in quantitative analysis is what makes it aside
from other different types. Quantitative analysis is targeted specifically on
numerical data and it conjointly uses mathematical analysis to research what is
being determined, the information collected should be in numbers. The general
structure for quantitative research is predicted on the scientific approach. It uses the
tactic and method of aggregation and using that information at intervals within the
victimization of the matter for sharing the analysis and conclusions.
3. Mixed research
Mixed methods research, also known as hybrid methods research, is an evolving
research methodology that involves the methodical integration or combination of
quantitative and qualitative research approaches within a single research study.
Mixed methods research incorporates the strength of both qualitative and
quantitative methods, facilitating researchers in investigating diverse perspectives
and discovering relationships between the complex layers of sophisticated research
questions.
Research methodology consists of the following steps:
Sampling Design
RESEARCH DESIGN:
The design in such studies must be rigid and not flexible and must focus attention
on the following:
(a) Formulating the objective of the study.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE:
A sample design is a definite plan for obtaining a sample from a given population.
It refers to the procedure the researcher would adopt in selecting items for the
sample. Sample design is determined before the data are collected.
Non-probability sampling:
In this type of sampling the organizers of the sampling purposively choose
particular units of the universe. Under this type of sample design every unit
of the population does not have equal chance of inclusion in the sample.
This is also called as judgment sampling or purposive sampling.
Probability sampling:
It is also known as ‘Random Sampling’ or chance sampling under this
sampling design ,every unit of the universe chance has an equal chance of
inclusion in sample. we can measure the errors of estimation or the
significance of results obtained from a random sample.
Schedule Method
Interview Method
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Hypothesis simply means a mere assumption or some supposition to be proved or
disproved
To test a Hypothesis means to tell on the basis of the data collected whether or not
the hypothesis set seems to be valid or not. A hypothesis is a preliminary or
tentative explanation or postulate by the researcher of what the researcher considers
the outcome of an investigation will be. It is an informed/educated guess. It
indicates the expectations of the researcher. In hypothesis the main question is
whether to accept the null hypothesis or not.
METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION:
The data’s were collected through Primary and secondary sources.
Primary source:
Primary data are in the form of “raw material” to which statistical methods are
applied for the purpose of analysis and interpretations.
The primary sources for collecting data from trainees and employees were through:
Questionnaire, Personal Interview and also by discussion with them.
PRIMARY DATA
SURVEY METHOD
INFORMAL INTERVIEW
OBSERVATION METHOD
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Questionnaire for trainees
Questionnaire consists of both close ended and open ended questions.
2. Primary data collected from staff members through personal interview &
questionnaire.
Secondary source:
Secondary data’s are in the form of finished products as they have already been
treated statistically in some form or other. The secondary data mainly consists of
data and information collected from records, company websites and also discussion
with the management of the organization. Secondary data was also collected from
company’s own data base that is modules of the training programme.
Various websites, newspaper, business magazines and books do collection of this
kind of data.
RESEARCH DETAILS
Source list: -
Newspapers
.
Methods used for research:-
Survey Method.
Data Collected:
Primary and Secondary data.
Responses
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
100 %people say that performance appraisal is done yearly.
0% Respondents say that it is done on quarterly basis.
0% respondents say it is done weekly while 0% respondents choose others as
the option.
Q2. Can you agree your performance has significant impact on your salary in
MPPKVVCL?
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Disagree
d. Strongly Disagree
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Strongly agree 15 50%
Neutral 08 27%
Disagree 04 13%
Strongly Disagree 3 10%
TOTAL 30 100%
RESPONSES
10%
Strongly agree
13% Neutral
Disagree
50% Strongly Disagree
27%
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
50% people strongly agree that their performance has significant impact on their
salary.
27% people feel neutral that their performance has significant impact on their
salary.
13% people disagree that performance impact on their salary.
And 10% people strongly disagree that their performance appraisal has
significant impact on their salary.
RESPONSES
30
25
20
15
10
0
Agree Neutral Disagree
Series 1
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
58% of people agree that performance appraisal improves motivation and job
satisfaction.
10% of people feel neutral that performance appraisal improve motivation and
satisfaction.
32% of people disagree that performance appraisal improves motivation and
satisfaction.
Q4. Do the promotions strictly based on the Performance Appraisal Process in
MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
RESPONSES
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Yes RESPONSES No
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
100% of people say YES that the promotions strictly based on the Performance
Appraisal Process.
0% of people say NO that the promotions strictly based on the Performance
Appraisal Process.
Q5. Are you satisfied with the current performance appraisal system in
MPPKVVCL?
a. Satisfied
b. Neutral
c. Not satisfied
RESPONSES
30
25
20
15
10
0
Satisfied Neutral Not satisfied
Series 1
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
87% people are satisfied with the current performance appraisal system.
13% people feel neutral that satisfied with the current performance appraisal
system.
0% people are not satisfied with the current performance appraisal system.
Q6. Are you satisfied with the existing Performance Management Process in
MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
RESPONSES
30
25
20
15
10
0
Satisfied Neutral
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
93 % of people say YES that satisfied with the existing Performance
Management Process.
2% of people say NO that satisfied with the existing Performance Management
Process.
RESPONSES
25
20
15
10
0
Superiors Subordinates Clients All
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
73 % of people say Superiors are rates the performances in MPPKVVCL.
10 % of people say Subordinates are rates the performances in MPPKVVCL
0 % of people say Clients are rates the performances in MPPKVVCL
17% of people say All are rates the performances in MPPKVVCL.
Q8. Does any change arise after appraising the performances of employees in
MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Yes 29 97%
No 1 3%
Total 30 100%
RESPONSES
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Yes No
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
97% of people say Yes that any change arise after appraising the performances
of employees.
30% of people say No their understand the purpose of performance appraisal.
Q9. Is there any conflict arise between employees after performance appraisal is
made in MPPKVVCL?
a. Frequently
b. Often
c. Sometimes
d. Never
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Frequently 01 3%
Often 06 20%
Sometimes 02 7%
Never 21 70%
TOTAL 50 100%
RESPONSES
25
20
15
10
0
Frequently Often Sometimes Never
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
3% of people say Frequently that conflict arise between employees after
performance appraisal
20% of people say often that conflict arise between employees after
performance appraisal
07% of people say sometimes that conflict arise between employees after
performance appraisal.
70% of people say Never that conflict arise between employees after
performance appraisal
Q10. Do you think performance appraisal helps people set and achieve
meaningful goals in MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Yes 30 100%
No 0 0%
Total 30 100%
RESPONSES
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Yes No
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
100% of people think Yes performance appraisal helps people set and achieve
meaningful goals
0% of people think No performance appraisal helps people set and achieve
meaningful goals
Q11. In your opinion, does the Performance Appraisal System give a proper
assessment of your contribution in MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Yes 28 93%
No 2 7%
Total 30 100%
RESPONSES
30
25
20
15
10
0
Yes No
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
93% of people say Yes the Performance Appraisal System give a proper
assessment of your contribution
7% of people say No the Performance Appraisal System give a proper
assessment of your contribution
Q12. How often does your Performance assessment match to your expectations
in MPPKVVCL?
a. Never
b. Rarely
c. Sometimes
d. Often
e. Every time
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Never 03 10%
Rarely 05 17%
Sometimes 03 10%
Often 18 60%
Every time 01 3%
TOTAL 50 100%
RESPONSES
20
18
16
14
12
10
0
Never Rarely Sometimes Often Every time
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
10% of people say Never your Performance assessment match to your
expectations.
17% of people say Rarely your Performance assessment match to your
expectations.
10% of people say Sometimes your Performance assessment match to your
expectations.
60% of people say Often your Performance assessment match to your
expectations.
3% of people say Every time your Performance assessment match to your
expectations.
Q13. Do you feel comfortable discussing any difference of opinion about your
Performance Rating with your appraiser in MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Yes 28 93%
No 02 7%
Total 30 100%
RESPONSES
30
25
20
15
10
0
Yes No
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
93% of people feel Yes comfortable discussing any difference of opinion about
your Performance Rating with your appraiser.
7% of people feel No comfortable discussing any difference of opinion about
your Performance Rating with your appraiser.Q14. How do you find the
Performance Appraisal Model in MPPKVVCL ?
a. Simple
b. Complicated
c. Objective
d. Subjective
e.Efficient
f. Inefficient
OPTIONS RESPONSES PERCENTAGES
Simple 15 50%
Complicated 02 07%
Objective 07 23%
Subjective 03 10%
Efficient 02 07%
Inefficient 01 03%
TOTAL 30 100%
RESPONSES
7% 3% Simple
Complicated
10% Objective
Subjective
50% Efficient
Inefficient
23%
7%
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents,
50% of people say Simple Performance Appraisal Model.
07% of people say Complicated Performance Appraisal Model.
23% of people say Objective Performance Appraisal Model.
10% of people say Subjective Performance Appraisal Model.
07% of people say Efficient Performance Appraisal Model.
03% of people say Inefficient Performance Appraisal Model.
12
10
0
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
RESPONSES
INTERPRETATION
Out of 30 respondents.
40% people are strongly agree that top level management partial in performance
appraisal.
40% people are agree that top level management partial in performance
appraisal.
17% people feel neutral that top level management partial in performance
appraisal.
03% people are disagree that top level management partial in performance
appraisal.
03% people are Strongly disagree that top level management partial in
performance appraisal.
CHAPTER 7- FINDINGS & SUGGESTIONS
FINDINGS
After being a part of entire survey i.e. from preparation of questionnaire to
the
preparation of final report, I was able to identify the benefits from the survey
conducted and also recognized some of the areas where Employees showed
Dissatisfaction, which are as follows.
Employees were pleased to work with MPPKVVCL.
People expressed their confidence in management of MPPKVVCL.
Most of the Employees were not clear about the mission & vision
statement of MPPKVVCL.
Employees are unhappy with the Pantry & Conference facilities provided
to them.
Most of the Employees are displeased with their Compensation and
benefits part.
Employees are very much happy with their respective team leads.
Individuals working in teams are happy with cooperation which they get
from their respective teams.
SUGGESTONS
In general, level of employee satisfaction in the company is quite high.
However as
far as satisfaction goes, sky is the limit and there is no end to expectations.
Following
suggestions are made with the intention of further improvement.
System of reward and recognition may be improved. Though there is no
bias in rewards, employees have a feeling that their good work is not
given credit in time.
Company should make policy for fixed and user price for all students so
that fair game will be played & student would not to compromise on their
expectation & margin of safety can be maintained.
CHAPTER 8 : LIMITATION OF THE
RESEARCH
The survey covered limited number of employees (30).
information.
Some employee’s did not understand the questions and they also got
CONTRIBUTION:
I learnt how many employees are satisfied with the facilities provide
to them.
I also observed how they are doing the performance appraisal on
basis of the achievement of the targets by the employees in the time
given to them.
I got the idea about the challenges what the employees are facing
while performing their work.
They emphasis on providing proper working environment to their
employees so that the employees can work efficiently & smoothly.
The company should give the compensation as per to the skills, so
that the employees could do the efficient work.
Organizations must enhance work force motivation to improve
productivity. Workers must be encouraged and motivated to develop
a customer satisfaction mind set.
Organizations need to empower their workers by allowing them
greater autonomy and control and to design jobs that are more
stimulating. This will enhance the personal productivity.
Trainings schedule is worked out well here with proper planning
schedule recruitment proper planned, structured according to
openings in plant, new vacancies.
Goal setting programs undertaken with schedule to find potential
prospective employees for higher posts, giving training, discussing
the on job responsibilities.
The employee goals are well studied and structured, the key related
areas are properly designed& clearly mentioned to employees.
CHAPTER 10 : BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS-
QUESTIONNAIRE
Q1. When is performance appraisal made in MPPKVVCL?
e. Yearly
f. Quarterly
g. Weekly
h. Others
Q2. Can you agree your performance has significant impact on your salary in
MPPKVVCL?
e. Strongly agree
f. Neutral
g. Disagree
h. Strongly Disagree
Q3. Do you think performance appraisal improves motivation and job
satisfaction in MPPKVVCL?
d. Agree
e. Neutral
f. Disagree
a. Yes
b. No
Q5. Are you satisfied with the current performance appraisal system in
MPPKVVCL?
d. Satisfied
e. Neutral
f. Not satisfied
Q6. Are you satisfied with the existing Performance Management Process in
MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
Q10. Do you think performance appraisal helps people set and achieve
meaningful goals in MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
Q11. In your opinion, does the Performance Appraisal System give a proper
assessment of your contribution in MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
Q12. How often does your Performance assessment match to your expectations
in MPPKVVCL?
a. Never
b. Rarely
c. Sometimes
d. Often
e. Every time
Q13. Do you feel comfortable discussing any difference of opinion about your
Performance Rating with your appraiser in MPPKVVCL?
a. Yes
b. No
Q14. How do you find the Performance Appraisal Model in MPPKVVCL ?
a. Simple
b. Complicated
c. Objective
d. Subjective
e.Efficient
f. Inefficient
Q15. In your opinion is the top level management partial in performance
appraisal?
a. Strongly agree
b. Agree
c. Neutral
d. Disagree
e. Strongly disagree