Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTEMPORARY CHRISTIAN
By Wirsiy Kingsly M, 2017
Introduction
Tithe simply means one out of ten. It refers to one-tenth of any property or
produce. There can be one-tenth of anything that one has worked for or has simply been
The focus of this theological paper is mainly on what the Bible teaches about tithes
because it is God alone who through the lines of his Word can teach us what tithing really is
and what its place or role in the Christians of the contemporary setting is. Looking at what the
Bible teaches about tithes, this researcher will treat the subject in two sections. The first
section will be on what the Old Testament teaches about tithes and the second section will be
Furthermore, these two views will be brought together and analyzed in order to see
the link between the two testaments with respect to the subject matter. Here the focus will be
to find out how the theme has been developed in the Old Testament and how it finds its
Thereafter, our findings will lead us to a conclusion which will answer the
question, “What is the implication of the biblical perspective on tithing to the contemporary
Christian?”
The practice of paying tithes is a very ancient one that started right in the Old
Testament.1 For us to have a good grasp of what the Old Testament teaches us about paying
1
Alexander Cruden, A Complete Concordance to the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New
Testament (Oberlin, Ohio: E. J. Goodrich, Publisher, 1879), 634.
1
2
tithes, we will need to know and have a good understanding of how the relationship that
existed between God and his people in the Old Testament times was.
In the Old Testament times, the relationship that existed between God and his
people was governed by the law – the commands of the Lord. The law is generally referred to
as the first five books of the Bible called the Pentateuch. In the Old Testament we have the
Law, the Prophets, and the Writings that make up the Old Testament canon. But the
commandments of the Lord to govern the living standards of the people were dominantly
rooted in the Law. Every individual was required to do as the law demanded and not having
to decide by oneself what one desires to do else it was sin. Timothy Palmer notes that in the
Old Testament, the Mosaic Law was given to regulate the lives of the members of the
covenant.2 The primary function of the law was to guide the believer in his or her life. 3The
law is the instrument of the covenant, and demands absolute trust and obedience.4
Since it was a given that the law demanded absolute obedience, it was lawful for
every one of God’s people (the Jews) to tithe. The obvious question that comes up is, “How
Basically, there were two main principles that governed the practice of tithing in
- All of God’s people were required to tithe all the yield of their seed (Deut. 12:1, 6, 11,
2
Timothy Palmer, Christian Theology in an African Context (Kaduna – Nigeria: Prudent Universal
Press & Publishing Co. Ltd., 2015), 69.
3
Ibid.
4
Hendrickus Berkhof, Christian Faith, Revised Edition. Translated by S. Woudstra (Grand Rapids,
Michigan: Eerdmans, 1986), 236.
3
With respect to the first principle stated above, worthy of note are the words “all”
in Deuteronomy 14:22 and “every” in Leviticus 27:30. This means that tithes were supposed
to be given from everything that they were blessed with. This entails that it was not to be
given from one’s particular kind of produce and the other things left out. The law required
that people should give tithes from every yield of their seed.
From the second principle, Leviticus 27:31 states that, “If a man wishes to redeem
some of his tithe, he shall add a fifth to it.” This means that if one has failed to pay the tithe
of a particular produce this season, when the next season comes and the normal tithe from
that produce is given, the rest will still be divided into five and one of the five will be added
to the normal tithe as penalty for having redeemed (withheld) its tithe.
Tithes in the Old Testament were not just given for giving sake. There were a
1. Tithes were given to help the Levites who were strangers in Israel and had no land to
cultivate their own crops neither had they any means of income (Deut. 14:28-29;
26:12-15; 15:10).
2. Tithes were given to serve as incentives for the Lord’s priests. This was done in the
sense that when all the tithes were brought and given to the Levites, they were
supposed to also divide the whole tithes and give a tithe from it to the Lord’s priests
(Neh. 10:37-38).
From among the reasons why tithes were given in the Old Testament, these two
stand out as very foundational. The fact that tithes were given to help the Levites and to also
ensure that those who work in the house of God as priests were supported was crucial.
Given that tithing in the Old Testament was a requirement of the law, it means that
failure to tithe was a taboo, hence considered as robbing God and anyone who robbed God
4
was cursed (Mal. 3:8-9). Leviticus 27:31-34 is there to point us to the fact that tithing was
such a serious issue in the Old Testament not to joke with. The following points are important
to note because since tithes were to be given from all that God had blessed people with,
- If one were to tithe from the farm produce, it was supposed to be measured
proportionately into ten equal portions, and then one portion given as tithe to God.
People have thought that surely, there were usually eye witnesses to ensure that no
- If one were to tithe from animals, a staff was held so that as the animals pass under it,
the tenth was the Lord’s and the rest will continue to pass under it until they were
finished. After that all the number “tens” were given to God as tithe as seen in
Leviticus 27:32-33.
This practice of tithing was supposed to be carried out in the Old Testament
without anybody altering anything from what God had instructed. Going out of what was
stated as the commandment of God (Lev. 27:33) was a taboo, and the consequences were
great.
In the New Testament, we live under a new covenant which was sealed by the
blood of Jesus Christ at his death on the cross. Palmer argues that the Sinaitic covenant
ceased at the end of the Old Testament and God made a new covenant which was fulfilled in
Jesus Christ.5 He further explains his point that Jeremiah prophesied this new covenant (Jer.
31:31-33), and Jesus fulfilled it as the book of Hebrews tells us pointing to him [Jesus] as the
5
Palmer, 68.
5
“mediator” of this new covenant (Heb. 8:6).6 Still on this note of the dispensations regarding
the Old covenant and the New covenant, I. Howard Marshall states that:
For Paul the difference between those under the law and those under grace is that the
former are like slaves and the latter are like sons and daughters to God. Their new
status is ascribed to two factors. On the one hand, they become children of God
through faith in Christ (Gal 3.26). Faith is expressed in the act of baptism. Baptism
is “into Christ”, which appears to mean that through this act the person is brought
into a spiritual relationship with Christ, which can also be expressed in terms of
being clothed with Christ. On the other hand, God sends the Spirit of his Son into
the hearts of his children. This appears to mean that the Spirit is sent in response to
faith and that the Spirit then makes the status of sonship effective by enabling
believers to address God as their Father.7
However, I would love to describe the New Testament era as the era of fulfilled
grace given that in the Old Testament there are evidences of God’s grace revealed at different
points. The deliverance of the Israelites from Egypt was a graceful act of God; showing love
for them in the wilderness instead of allowing his wrath to fall on them when they sinned was
a graceful act of God; when they were captured by Babylonians as captives and God
delivered them at the appointed time, he was demonstrating his graciousness just to name a
few. The grace of God that has been fulfilled in the New Testament in the person of Jesus
Christ has brought salvation to all (Titus 2:11). For anybody to become a part of this
covenant he has to put his full trust in Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior.
Tithing is presented in the New Testament differently from how it is in the Old
Testament. The Old Testament considered tithing as an activity that no one of God’s people
was exempted from performing, but in the New Testament, neither our Lord Jesus Christ nor
his apostles have commanded anything in this affair of tithes.8 This is not to say that there is
no mention of tithes anywhere in the New Testament. There are actually a good number of
places in the New Testament where tithe(s) is mentioned. But the issue here is that in those
Ibid.
7
I. Howard Marshall, New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel (Downers Grove,
Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2004), 233.
8
places where the term is used, they do not stand commandments that we are to obey. In most
of those places, they stand as references to what the Old Testament has said with respect to
tithes.
Occurrences of Tithes in the New Testament and What they stand for
1. Matthew 23:23
In this verse, Jesus Christ is simply challenging the Scribes and the Pharisees’
hypocrisy. These people were claiming self-righteousness because they offered tithes of mint
and dill cumin. Probably they had read about tithes in the Old Testament. But Jesus Christ in
this text was rather emphasizing the fact that they have neglected justice and mercy.
People have argued from this text of Scripture that if Jesus said, “these you ought
to have done, without neglecting the others,” it means that Christians are expected to pay
their tithes. But something that note should be taken on is that during Jesus’ life time, the old
covenant of law was still binding until his death and resurrection, and Jesus’ challenge to
these Scribes and Pharisees was that they did not keep the whole law as required. Gary J.
Arnold reiterates this when he states that, “Many believe that Matthew 23:23 shows that
tithing is still required in the New Testament. This is a common mistake made by those who
are confused as to when the New Testament begins. Jesus was speaking to the law keepers
Furthermore, what Jesus said in this portion of Scripture was not in any way a
command for the New Testament Christians to tithe. It is a similar thing that Luke says in
Luke 11:42.
2. Luke 18:12
9
Gary J. Arnold, Tithing Today, Third Edition (copyright © 2009 by Gary J. Arnold),
www.tithingtoday.com. Browsed October 28, 2017.
7
Tithe is mentioned here to expose the self-pride of the Pharisee who was praying
with a tax collector in the temple. According to this Pharisee, he thought that because of his
tithes, he was going to be heard and helped by God unlike the tax collector. But in the New
Testament, we are not taught anywhere to tithe so that God will answer our prayers. Tithe is
3. Hebrews 7:1-14
looking at the context of this passage, one would notice that the main idea communicated in
the text is that Melchizedek, King of Salem, was indeed the priest of the most high God that
even Abraham gave him a tithe. This is an example of the New Testament text that is
mentioning tithe simply as a reference to an event that took place in the Old Testament (Gen.
With these occurrences of tithe(s) in the New Testament and some that perhaps
have not been pointed out, there is no place where it appears as a command for the Christians.
The question as to whether the contemporary Christians are required to tithe or not
has been a heated debate among Bible scholars. There are those who say we are required to
tithe and there are those who say we are not required to.
Arnold highlights that, “In the Old Testament, Book of Genesis, Chapter 14, we
first find the subject of tithing. Many pastors use this text as an example to show that tithing
existed as far back as Genesis and that it sets the standard for all time.”10 But he moves on
and points out, and I think rightly so, that considering Genesis 14:8-24 and Hebrews 7:4,
Abraham gave to King Melchizedek ten percent of the war spoils. Note that he gave
the rest to the King of Sodom. Abraham kept nothing for himself. Abraham did
NOT give ten percent of his income, or ten percent of all he owned. He gave ten
10
Ibid.
8
percent of the war spoils that he, himself, said didn’t belong to him. He gave nothing
of his own. The scripture does not tell us that Abraham was required to tithe, or give
a tenth, of the war spoils. Whether a gift or not, Abraham said the goods didn’t
belong to him, and he kept nothing for himself.11
Even though the two groups of people who argue, one for and the other against, try
their best to bring up biblical backings to their positions; it is very important that in tackling
this question one must take into consideration the fact that the context of a particular text of
Scripture, and the context of the Bible as a whole with respect to a particular text of Scripture
Given the covenant relationship that existed between God and his people in the Old
Testament as established earlier, it is obvious that tithing was a requirement for the people in
that era. The law required that they should and the only thing for them to do was either to
tithe and be blessed or not to tithe and be cursed (Mal. 3:8-12). But coming to the New
Testament, the case is different. The teaching of the New Testament does not point out that
tithing is a requirement for the Christians. Nevertheless, Christians are taught to give and to
This brings us to a crossroads. The Old Testament teaches about giving together
with tithes as a requirement, but the New Testament teaches generally about giving without
projecting tithes as a requirement. So which should the contemporary Christians go by? This
is the question that must be answered with a lot of care and objectivity.
answering this one: “If tithing is not taught as a requirement in the New Testament, what then
becomes of the Old Testament texts that teach it thus for the Contemporary Christian
11
Ibid. I agree with Arnold that there is nothing in the scripture to indicate this event has anything
to do with the New Testament Church. It was a one-time event. There is no evidence in the scriptures to show
that Abraham ever tithed before or after this event. Therefore, I believe it is wrong to use this example to show
that tithing had been established before the law and therefore, was brought into the New Testament. Since
Abraham gave nothing of his own, it is wrong to pull the concept of the tithe out of context and now apply it to
one’s own income or property.
9
What is very crucial here with respect to the question raised above has to do with
how we interpret those Old Testament texts with respect to the New Testament teaching. The
interpretation of the Old Testament has to be done with the consideration of the fact that it
was a foundational revelation that was progressively going to find its fulfillment in the New
Testament. Thus we must interpret the Old Testament with the following questions in mind:
- What theme of the Bible is the text addressing so that it can be traced throughout the
With these questions in mind as one tries to interpret the Old Testament texts
1. Tithing was a command that God gave to his people in the Old Testament.
2. Tithing falls under giving. Thus in handling the subject, the Bible interpreter will be
tracing the theme of giving from the Old Testament to the New Testament.
3. Tracing the theme of giving from the Old to the New Testament, one would find out
that in the New Testament Teaching, tithing is modified and kind of swallowed up in
Putting these together, one can see clearly that the right teaching for the
contemporary Christians as far as the issue of tithing is concerned is to teach them how to
give as taught in the Bible. Teaching people how to give as taught in the Bible means that we
read what the Old Testament says (commands) about giving, and then trace how it relates to
and finds its fulfillment in the New Testament before getting into how practically it can be
applied to our lives. The Old Testament teaching of giving with tithes inclusive culminates in
10
the New Testament teaching on giving and is summed up in the following summary on how
- Christians are to give as they have purposed in their hearts, and are to so cheerfully (2
Cor. 9:7).
Coming back to the main question of this section, “Is tithing therefore a
requirement for the contemporary Christian?” one can conclude thus: Given the analysis
above with respect to proper interpretation of Scripture, it will be improper for us to place
tithing before the contemporary Christians as a requirement. Even though Arthur W. Pink
advocates for tithing being a requirement to the contemporary Christian by stating that:
Tithing is even more obligatory on the saints of the New Testament than it was upon
God’s people in Old Testament days—not equally binding, but more binding, and
that for two reasons: first, on the principle of “unto whomsoever much is given, of
him shall be much required” (Luke 12:48). The obligations of God’s saints today are
much greater than the obligations of the saints in Old Testament times, because our
privileges and our blessings are greater. As grace is more potent than law, as love is
more constraining than fear, as the Holy Spirit is more powerful than the flesh, so
our obligations to tithe are greater, for we have a deeper incentive to do that which is
pleasing to God. Listen! The Christian should tithe for the very same reason he
keeps all the other commandments of God, and for the same reason he keeps the
laws of his country—not because he must do so, but because he desires to do so. As
a law abiding citizen in the kingdom of God, he desires to maintain the government
of God and to do that which is pleasing in His sight. Again, in proportion as the
priesthood of Christ is superior to the priesthood of Aaron, so are our obligations to
render tithes to Him … Therefore, in proportion to the greater blessings and
privileges that we enjoy, we are under deeper obligations to God; and in proportion
as Christ’s priesthood is superior to that of the Levites, so is our obligation the
greater to render tithes unto the Lord today, than that under which His people lived
in Old Testament times,12
it would be out of place for any biblically sound theologian to accept that argument for at
12
Arthur W. Pink, Tithing, Article, Joseph Kreifels (Place and Date of Publication not found).
11
He argues that tithing is more obligatory on the NT saints than it was on God’s
people in the OT because our privileges as NT saints are greater than those of the OT people;
yet he says that the Christian should tithe not because he must do so, but because he desires
to do so. On that note, he is trying to bring two things together of which they cannot stand
together – an obligation and a desire to do something not as a “must” are two distinct things
that stand independently from each other. Furthermore, one can deduce that his main concern
is that our giving as NT saints should surpass that of God’s people in OT times, in which case
he should be encouraging generous giving and not an obligation to tithe. This is because it is
obvious that any Christian who is committed to giving with the understanding of what Christ
has accomplished for him which is much better than what was for the people in the OT times
will do so far more than just a tenth of what God has blessed him with.
God generously and cheerfully as God has blessed them. That way we are to be consistently
committed to the sound teaching of the Bible. In fact there is no doubt that if the
contemporary Christians are taught the truth of Scripture this way in regards to giving, and in
consideration of what Jesus Christ has accomplished for us on the cross which no amount of
money can pay, what our churches will realize as income through giving will blow one’s
Conclusion
To tithe or not to tithe has indeed been a heated debate among scholars. It is still as
hot today as it was in the past. The goal of this paper has been an attempt to figure out if
tithing is a requirement for the contemporary Christians from the biblical perspective. The
findings have shown that the primary issue has been centered on the problem of proper
out that tithing falls under giving and as far as the contemporary Christians are concerned, it
12
is not supposed to be a requirement for them to most tithe. The contemporary Christians are
to be encouraged to give cheerfully, generously, and as the Lord has blessed them.
surrender their lives to the Lordship of Jesus Christ. This is the act of giving oneself to God
We want you to know, brothers, about the grace of God that has been given among
the churches of Macedonia, for in a severe test of affliction, their abundance of joy
and their extreme poverty have overflowed in a wealth of generosity on their part.
For they gave according to their means, as I can testify, and beyond their means, of
their own accord, begging us earnestly for the favor of taking part in the relief of the
saints – and this, not as we expected, but they gave themselves first to the Lord and
then by the will of God to us.13
The reason why their giving was that much as the apostle Paul could testify was
because they first gave themselves to God. Then as a result, they knew that all they had
belonged to God and that moved them to give to his course generously.
It will be very important therefore, that the pastors and teachers of the Word should
not take lightly the work of proper exegesis of any given text of Scripture in order that the
application(s) thereof will not distance the Christians from the truth of what God intended for
them to walk in. this study, even though not exhaustive, can help the members of the body of
Christ to live their lives practicing nothing but the truth of Scripture in the domain of giving.
Others may pick up from here and develop more writings on other aspects of giving such as,
the importance of record keeping in giving, the necessity of setting some amount aside for
giving to the church perhaps on a monthly basis besides the usual offerings on weekly basis,
etc.
13
2 Corinthians 8:1-5