Dear Expert Validator,

We are currently conducting a research project entitled “Development and Validation of Mindful Coping Scale of Co
requirement for our course in Psychological Assessment 1.

The purpose of this paper is to identify the reliability coefficient of the Mindful Coping Scale among College Studen
intended for 60 college students in Holy Angel University ages 18 to 25.

The proposed instrument is based on the Mindfulness to Meaning Theory (MMT) by Garland et al. (2015) which is a
to the downstream cognitive-affective mechanisms by which mindfulness promotes health and resilience.

As expert validator, you will be asked to give information about yourself as it is deemed vital in establishing the inte
treated with utmost confidentiality. By answering the questions in the next sheet, it is deemed that your consent i
instrument.

Validation Directions:

This tool asks for your evaluation of the questionnaire being developed to measure the levels of how college stude
requested to give your honest assessment using the criteria below:

Does the item capture the essence of the A Priori (Theoretical Framework)?
How essential is the item in assessing Student Mindful Coping Scale?
3 = essential
2= useful but not essential
1= not essential

How essential is the item in assessing Student Mindful Scale?

3 = essential
2= useful but not essential
1= not essential

How can the item be improved?

Should there be any questions or clarifications please feel free to message us at: eglecaros@student.hau.edu.ph

Respectfully,

Names of Researchers:
Cayanan, Allenior
De Leon, Jasmine Rose
Lecaros, Estelle Amor
Marquez, Kyle Andrei
Vergara, Angela Neove
Mindful Coping Scale of College Students in a Hybrid Learning Environment: A Pilot Test”. This is a terminal

ale among College Students and item-total correlation of the proposed Mindful Coping Scale. It is intended It is

land et al. (2015) which is a temporal dynamic process model of mindful positive influence regulation that points
th and resilience.

vital in establishing the integrity of this paper. However, rest assured that all information provided shall be
eemed that your consent is given to provide such information and to review the items in this proposed

evels of how college students cope (mindfulness) in a hybrid learning environment. You are

os@student.hau.edu.ph
Full Name of Expert Validator

Occupation/Profession

Organization/Affiliation

Highest Educational Attainment/Degree

School Graduated

No. of Years in Teaching

Complete Mailing Address

Email Address:

Contact number:
 Scale items

Per subscale if any

# Code ITEMS
I am able to separate myself from my thoughts
1 MCSQ
and feelings about myself and others.

I am able to reflect on my thoughts and emotions

2 MCSQ
in an objective manner before acting on them.

I am able to stay active as a way to distract myself

3 MCSQ
from negative emotions.
I am aware that my thoughts and feelings about
4 MCSQ myself and others does not always correspond to
reality.

5 MCSQ I am able notice the subtle changes in my mood.

6 MCSQ I am able to focus on one thing at a time.
I am able to consider what is actually going on,
7 MCSQ
not how I wish it should be.

I am able to accept that others have opinions

8 MCSQ
different from mine in a discussion.

I am able to accept that another person’s current

9 MCSQ
situation or mood might influence their behavior.
 I am able to notice how my mood affects how I act
10 MCSQ
toward other people.
I am able to take time to form my thoughts before
11 MCSQ
speaking or typing out a text.
I am able to think positively in a stressful
12 MCSQ
situation to feel better.
I am able to stay focused on the goal I want to
13 MCSQ achieve that I lose touch with what I am doing
right now to get there.
14 MCSQ I am able to focus on the present moment.
I am able to accept the thoughts and feelings I
15 MCSQ
have.

* Please ensure that all items have been validated

before proceeeding to the next factor. Thank you.
Does the item capture the How essential is How essential is
essence of the A Priori the item in the item in
(Theoretical Framework)? assessing assessing
_________? _________?

3 = essential 3 = essential
2= useful but not 2= useful but not
essential essential
1= not essential 1= not essential

YES NO Rate 3, 2 or 1 Rate 3, 2 or 1

How can the item be improved? (feedback
and revision suggestions)