Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1− 1
1 −1
2 ⎤
1 ⎛ 1 ⎞ n ⎛ ∂u ⎞ n ⎛ ∂ u ⎞ 2 ⎥ (8)
+ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ − ∂ξ ⎟ ⎜⎜ − 2 ⎟⎟ + H u ⎥
1+ 1 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ∂ξ ⎠
nR n ⎥ ⎦
∂p
− = A0 + A1 cos ω t (2) From the constitutive equation of the Herschel-Bulkley
∂z fluid, we have
[ ]
⎧1 − A Lm0 −1 ( z − d ) − ( z − d )m a(t ) if d ≤ z ≤ d + L0
R( z , t ) = ⎨ 1
a(t )
1
1−
⎩ otherwise θ
⎛ 1 ⎞ n 1 ⎛ ∂u ⎞ n (12)
τ = + ⎜ ⎟ 1 n ⎜ − ∂ξ ⎟
(3) 2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ R ⎝ ⎠
a ( t ) = 1 − k cos (ωt − φ ) (4)
Finite difference method is applied to solve the
where u is the velocity in the axial direction, p is the
nonlinear partial differential Eq. (8) with the initial and
pressure, H is the Hartmann number, Re is the Reynolds
boundary conditions (8) – (11). Central difference formula
number, θ is the yield stress, R is the radius of the artery, k
is used for the spatial derivatives and forward difference
is the amplitude parameter associated with the artery
formula is applied to time derivative and these are listed
radius, ω is the frequency parameter, φ is the phase angle, below.
t is the time variable, A = (δ R0 L0 ) m (m m −1) , δ is the
∂u ( u )i, j +1 − ( u )i, j −1
k k
maximum depth of the stenosis, R0 is the radius of the
= ( u fx )
k
normal artery, L0 is the length of the stenosis, d is the = (13)
location of the stenosis, m is the stenosis shape parameter. ∂ξ 2Δξ i ,j
= ( us x )
k
boundary conditions are [14] =
∂ξ ( Δx )
2 2 i ,j
(14)
325327
III. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF RESULTS AND
∂ u ( u )i , j − ( u )i , j
k +1 k
= (15) DISCUSSION
∂t Δt
The objective of this section is to bring out the effects
where, ξ j = ( j − 1) Δξ , j = 1, 2,.....N + 1 such that of the magnetic field, power law index, phase angle,
pressure gradient, yield stress, stenosis shape parameter
ξ N +1 = 1; zi = ( i − 1) Δz, i = 1, 2, .... M + 1; and maximum depth of the stenosis on the velocity, flow
tk = ( k − 1) Δt , k = 1, 2,.... for the entire arterial rate, skin friction in blood flow through narrow artery
when blood is modeled as H-B fluid model. For the
segment under consideration with Δ ξ and Δ z being the numerical simulation of the various flow quantities and to
respective increments in the radial and axial directions validate the present results with the existing results, the
and Δt being the time increment. Using Eqs. (13) – (15) following parameter values (range) [14] are used in this
in Eq. (8), one can obtain the finite difference scheme for analysis.
the velocity distribution as below. d = z 0 = 7, z1 = 14, β = 0.025, A 0 = 0.2 A1 ,
Re = 300, t = 50; A 0 :0.2 − 0.8;
Δt ⎡ ⎛ ∂p ⎞
k +1
k +1 k θ k, ω : 0.02 − 0.05; φ : 0.2 − 0.5, H :0 − 4;
ui,j = u − ⎢−⎜ − ⎟
i.j + θ : 0 − 0.15; δ :0 − 0.25, t :0 − 90
Re ⎢⎣ ⎝ ∂z ⎠ 2Rik ξj
The flow region is discretized by taking the step size
1
1− 1
in the axial and radial directions as Δz = 0.05 and
+
1
1
⎛1⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝2⎠
n
{− (u fξ )
k
i,j } n
Δξ = 0.025 respectively and the time step is chosen as
ξ j (R )
k 1+
i
n
Δt = 0.0001 for convergence of the solution to the fifth
order.
1 1 ⎤
{− (u ) } {− (u ) }
1−
1 ⎛1⎞ n k n
−1 k ⎥
2 k
+ 1 ⎜ ⎟ f ξ i, j sξ i , j +H u ⎥i, j
A. Plug core radius
⎝2⎠
n(R i )
k 1+ n
⎥
⎦
Fig. 2 shows the variation of the plug core radius with
axial distance z for different values of k and δ with
(16) H = 1, θ = 0.1, Re = 300, β = 1.0, A0 = 0.5, ω = 0.05, m = 3
Using Eqs. (13) – (15) in the initial and boundary and t = 50 . It is seen that the plug core radius decreases
conditions (9) – (11), one can get as the axial distance increases from 0 to 5 and then it
increases as the axial distance increases from 5 to 8. One
⎧⎛ A + A ⎞ ⎧ I 0 ( H ξ j Ri1 ) ⎫ can notice that for a given value of δ , the plug core radius
⎪⎜ 0 1 ⎟ ⎪⎨1− ⎪
⎬ in the presence of magnetic field decreases as the amplitude parameter k of the artery
⎪⎝ H 2 ⎠ ⎪ I0 (H ) ⎪ radius increases marginally. It is found that the plug core
ui1, j =⎨ ⎩ ⎭
⎪⎛ A0 + A1 ⎞ radius increases significantly with the increase of the
⎪⎜
⎩⎝ 4 ⎠
(
⎟ 1 − ( ξ j Ri )
1 2
) in the abesence of magnetic field depth of the stenosis while k is kept as constant.
(17)
k k
u i ,1 =u i ,2 (18)
k
u i , N +1 =0 (19)
1
1
⎤n ⎡ 1 Fig. 2 Variation of plug core radius for different values
{ }
1−
θ ⎛1⎞
⎢ k − (u f ξ )
n k
(τ w )i = + ⎜ ⎟
k
⎥ (20) of k and δ with A0 = 0.5, ω = 0.05, Re = 300,
2 ⎝2⎠ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ( Ri ) i,N
β = 1.0, H = 1, θ = 0.1 and t = 50 .
⎡β 1
⎤ B. Velocity distribution
k k 2 k
( )
Qi = 2π Ri ⎢∫ ξ j ui, j dξ j + ∫ ξ j uik, j dξ j ⎥ (21) Fig. 3 depicts the velocity distribution for different
⎣⎢ 0 β ⎦⎥ value of the Hartmann number H with
where β is the plug core radius. A0 = 0.4, ω = 0.02, Re = 300, k = 0.02, β = 0.05, t = 50
H = 4, θ = 0.1 and δ = 0.1 . It is clear that the velocity of
the blood flow decreases significantly with the increases
326328
of the Hartmann number H. Fig 4 depicts the velocity
distribution for different value of amplitude A0 with
k = 0.02, θ = 0.1, φ = 0.2, H = 2, m = 2, ω = 0.02, δ = 0.1
and l0 = 8 . It is noticed that the velocity distribution
increases considerably with the increase of the amplitude
of the flow.
327329
[6] P. K. Mandal, S. Chakravarty, A. Mandal and Amin, Effect of
body acceleration on unsteady pulsatile flow of non-Newtonian
fluid through a stenosed artery, Appl. Math. Comput. 189 (2007)
766 – 779.
[7] P. Nagarani and G. Sarojamma, Effect of body acceleration on
pulsatile flow of Casson fluid through a mild stenosed artery,
Korea – Australia Rheology Journal 20 (2008) 189 – 196.
Voltairas PA, Fotiadis DI, Michalis LK (2002) Hydrodynamics of
magnetic drug targeting. J. Biomech. 35, 813 – 821.
[8] P. A. Voltairas, D. I. Fotiadis, L. K. Michalis, Hydrodynamics of
magnetic drug targeting, j. Biomech. 35 (2002) 813 – 821.
[9] V. P. Rathod, S. Tanveer, I. S. Rani, G. G. Rajput, Pulsatile flow of
blood with periodic body accelration and magnetic field through an
Fig. 7. Variation of skin friction with axial distance for expoentially diverging channel, Ultra Sci. Phys. 18 (2006) 417 –
426.
different value of δ and H with
[10] K. S. Mekheimer, M. A. Kot, Influence of magnetic field and hall
ω = 0.02, n = 0.95, A0 = 0.2, and θ = 0.1 . currentls on blood flow through a stenotic artery, Appl. Math.
Mech. – Eng. 29 (2008) 1093 – 1104.
[11] R. Bhargava, S. Rawat, H. S. Takhar, O. a. Beg, Pulsatile magneto-
biofluid flow and mass transfer in a non-Darcian porous medum
IV. CONCLUSION channel, Meccanica 42 (2007) 247 – 262.
The pulsatile flow of blood through a mild asymmetric [12] D. S. Sankar and Ahmad Izani Mohamed Ismail, Effect of periodic
stenosed artery in the presence of the magnetic field is body acceleration in the flow of blood through stenosed arteries –
A theoretical model, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. and Num. Simul. 11
analyzed using finite difference method by assuming (2010) 243 - 257.
blood as H-B model. The results indicate that the velocity [13] R. Bhargava, S. Sugandha, H. S. Takhar, O. A. Beg,
decreases with the increase of the Hartmann number, Computational simulation of biomagnetic micropolar blood flow in
amplitude of the flow and the reverse behavior is observed porous media, J. Biomech. 39 (2006) S648 – S649.
for skin friction. It is also found that the skin friction and [14] M. A. Ikbal, S. Chakravarty, K. L. Kelvin Wong, J. N. Mazumdar,
plug core radius increase with the increase of the depth of P. K. Mandal, Unsteady response of non-Newtonian blood flow
through stenosed artery in magnetic field, J. Computat. Appl.
the stenosis. One can predict the physiologically Math. 230 (2009) 243 – 249.
important flow quantities by using these numerical results
which may find applications in the clinical case studies.
Thus, the H-B fluid model has more applicability in
analyzing the blood flow through stenosed arteries.
Acknowledgement
The present work is financially supported by the
research university grant of Universiti Sains Malaysia,
Malaysia (Grant Ref. No: 1001/PMATHS/811177)
REFERENCES
[1] S.W. Galt, R.M. Zwolak, R.J. Wagner and J.J. Gilbertson,
Differential response of arteries and vein grafts to blood flow
reduction, J. Vascular Surgery 17 3 (1993) 563–570.
[2] C. A. Taylor, T. J. R. Hughes and C. K. Zarins, Finite element
modeling of blood flow in arteries, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech.
Engng. 158 (1998) 155 – 196.
[3] V.J. Dzau and G.H. Gibbons, Vascular remodeling: mechanisms
and implications, J. Cadiovascular Pharmacol. 21 (1993) S1–S5.
[4] A. Kamiya and T. Togawa, Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress
to flow change in the canine carotid artery, Am. J. Physiol. 239
(1980) H14–H21.
[5] V. K. Sud and G. S. Sekhon, Arterial flow under periodic body
acceleration, Bull. Math. Biol. 47 (1985) 35 – 52.
328330