Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OSHA and IBC Stair Design Guide For Safety
OSHA and IBC Stair Design Guide For Safety
www.lapeyrestair.com
Contents
OSHA Stairs vs IBC Stairs applications 3
A fixed or permanently installed stairway. Ship, spiral, and alternating tread-type stairs
Standard stairs N/A
are not considered standard stairs
Any equipment, device, or system that prevents an employee from falling from an
Fall Protection
elevation or mitigates the effect of such a fall
A system (including all components) an employer uses to provide protection from N/A
Personal Fall
falling or to safely arrest an employee's fall if one occurs. Examples of personal fall
Protection
protection systems include personal fall arrest systems, positioning systems, and travel
System restraint systems
The upright (vertical) or inclined member of a stair that is located at the back of a stair
Riser tread or platform and connects close to the front edge of the next higher tread, Riser Not specifically defined
platform, or landing
Tread A horizontal member of a stair or stairway, but does not include landings or platforms Tread Not specifically defined
Stair system design criteria
OSHA 1910.28 Employers duty to provide fall protection
1910.28(b)(1)(i) Except as provided elsewhere in this section, the employer
must ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an
unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is
protected from falling by one or more of the following:
PROJECTED
Minimum 9.5” Minimum 11” Minimum 11”
TREAD DEPTH
HANDRAIL
36” 34” to 38” 34” to 38”
HEIGHT
GUARDRAIL
Less than 19” sphere Less than 21” sphere Less than 4” sphere
OPENING
OSHA-compliant handrails
Image source: Memorandum From Acting Director Directorate of Enforcement Programs Patrick J. Kapust to Amanda Edens Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary,
September 23, 2019, Subject Correspondence, Enforcement of 29 CFR 1910.29(f)(1)(ii)(B) and 1910.29(f)(1)(iii)(A): Heights of Handrail and Stair Rail Systems
Space restrictions and
non-standard stairs
Applications with space restrictions
HORIZONTAL PROJECTION BY STAIR TYPE
Non-standard stairs or ladders VERTICAL
STAIR HEIGHT
STEEP-ANGLE
STAIR (68°)
OSHA-COMPLIANT
STANDARD STAIR (45°)
may be used in applications 4' 2'2" 4'3"
where space restrictions prohibit 6' 2'11" 5'10"
the use of standard stairs
8' 3'9" 8'2"
Ladder
As means of egress
Unoccupied roofs
Mezzanines up to 250 square feet serving up to five occupants
Guard towers, observation stations, and control rooms
Use-case for non-standard stairs
Standard stairs are used to provide access from one walking-working surface to another when
operations necessitate regular and routine travel between levels, including access to operating
platforms for equipment OSHA §1910.25(b)(7)
Spiral, ship, or alternating tread-type stairs are used only when the employer can demonstrate that it
is not feasible to provide standard stairs OSHA §1910.25(b)(8)
“OSHA believes that the language in the final rule gives employers greater flexibility (than the previous language.)
The final rule limits the use of non-standard stairs to those circumstances where, based on specific case-by-case
evaluations and demonstrations, it is not possible to use standard stairs.” Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 223
Typically, the use-case is space limitations. But, it could be any theoretical reason as
long as the employer can demonstrate that it is not possible to use a standard stair.
Common space-restricted applications
Small Storage Mezzanines Exterior Roof Access Maintenance Areas Conveyor Equipment Work Platforms
STEEP-ANGLE STAIRS
ALTERNATING
TREAD STAIRS
50° to 70° 50° to 70°
SHIP STAIRS 4” 5”
Z Values
200
231
Z-Index value 182
measures the 146
100
Perceived Difficulty in
Descent of a stairway. 12
0
The higher the index, IBC Stairs Standard OSHA Alternating Tread Spiral Stairs Ship Stairs
the more difficult the Stairs Stairs
stair is to descend
8.5” Minimum
tread depth 4”Minimum
tread depth
Virginia Polytech Institute study compared
alternating tread stairs to ship stairs
TEST SUBJECTS STRONGLY MORE MISSTEPS ON SHIP
PREFERRED ALTERNATING TREAD STAIRS THAN ALTERNATING TREAD STAIRS:
STAIRS OVER SHIP STAIRS FOR SAFETY AND COMFORT:
73% More overall
missteps
Source: Performance, Perceived Safety, and Comfort of the Alternating Tread Stair. Human Factors Engineering Laboratory, Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Other safety factors
for applications with
space restrictions
Tread surfaces and nosing contrast
Design induced risk factors:
Treads with abrasive, non-slip
Slippery and rough treads cause surfaces and contrast nosings
missteps reduce risk and improve safety
There may be confusing color
patterns on the tread or poor
visibility of nosing
Provided adequate tread depth, face forward descent
offers safety and ergonomic benefits vs backing down
19,630
15% 26%
Lost work-day injuries due Fractures
20%
to falls from ladders in 2018 Sprains
23
Bruises/Cuts
14% 25% Soreness
Median days away Other
from work per injury
38 Median days
away from work 45 Median days
away from work
SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Workplace Injuries & Illnesses Database; Central for Disease Control
Stairways are Safer than Ladders
Ladders Stairways