Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Natural Muscles
Muscle is the natural contractile system that artificial systems attempt to emulate.
For proper emulation it is evidently necessary to understand the basic underlying
mechanism. In the material that follows, we consider the evidence that muscle is
a polymer gel, and that the gel’s polymeric filaments contract by a polymer-gel
phase-transition. This is an unorthodox conclusion, and we therefore begin by
considering the relevant background.
53
with more detailed follow up [Huxley and Niedergerke, 1958], these studies
became the field’s pivotal works.
These studies examined relaxed and activated specimens alike. Relaxed
specimens were manually stretched and released. During these maneuvers, the
width of the A-band remained absolutely invariant. Since A-band width
corresponds to the length of the thick filament (Fig. 1), the result implied that
thick filaments did not change length. This strengthened the emerging notion of
filament sliding.
Less conclusive, however, were the results obtained when muscle length
changed actively, for in this case sarcomere shortening was sometimes
accompanied by A-band narrowing. The narrowing was dismissed as
quantitatively inconsequential in the Huxley–Hanson study, and in the Huxley–
Niedergerke study it was relegated to the microscope’s limited resolution. With
these dismissals, all results could remain interpretable within the framework of
constant-length filaments.
These back-to-back papers by the Huxleys dispatched the protein-folding
paradigm to the heap of forgotten notions. The constant filament-length paradigm
took hold, and has held remarkably firm ever since—notwithstanding subsequent
Figure 5: Top: Thin section of honeybee flight muscle in which thin filaments had
been withdrawn to increase clarity of thick filament zone. Arrows denote
interconnections. Bottom: cross-section through A-band of moderately stretched
sarcomere that grazed tips of thin filaments, the latter seen as occasional small
dots. Interconnections between thick filaments are evident.
On the other hand, these essentially static elements may explain why attempts to
detect myosin-head tilting have failed; rungs cannot tilt.
Cross-links align the filaments and thereby confer regularity on the lattice;
that is why the A–I junctions are so distinct. They also maintain lattice integrity
by limiting swelling. Highly charged polymers such as those in the sarcomere
can imbibe water up to thousands of times their volume [Osada and Gong, 1993],
and may ultimately dissolve if not cross-linked. The muscle-filament lattice,
then, is essentially a highly cross-linked, water-filled polymer gel.
Like the polymer gel, the cross-linked polymer network of the sarcomere is
invested with solvent—an aqueous salt solution. The solvent remains trapped
within the network; it does not leak out. This can be seen in specimens whose
membranes have been removed (skinned fibers): such specimens do not easily
lose solvent. Again, this phenomenon is similar to that of the gel, the solvent
presumably held by strong hydrophilic forces that retain the water within the
sarcomere’s polymeric framework [Pollack, 2001]. Thus, muscle exhibits the
essential features of polymer gels—except that its polymers are well organized
into a regular framework and not randomly dispersed.
If muscle contraction were to involve a phase transition, the resulting
dimensional change would be axial because polymers are naturally aligned along
the axis of the muscle; hence, polymer shortening would produce shortening
along the axis of the muscle. On the other hand, polymeric fragments of actin and
myosin can be used to construct random or semi-random gels, in which case
contraction should be isotropic, as in the gel of Fig. 6, above. The behavior
illustrated in Fig. 6 is rather similar to the behavior of polyacrylamide gels
exposed to varying ratios of organic/inorganic solvents [Tanaka, 1981]. Not only
is contraction fairly isotropic, but it also has a critical nature: no change at all
until the stimulus reaches a threshold, and then massive condensation.
Critical behavior is also seen when muscle polymers are naturally oriented,
as they are in striated muscle. In Fig. 7 the concentration of calcium, the
physiological trigger, is progressively increased. Stripped of its membrane, the
contractile specimen is immersed in a physiological solution in which the level of
free calcium is progressively elevated. Once the concentration crosses threshold,
full tension is observed within a narrow concentration window. Similar behavior
is observed when calcium is replaced by other divalent cations such as barium or
strontium. Contraction is essentially all-or-none.
Critical behavior is also seen when an organic solvent surrounding the
specimen is progressively replaced by an aqueous solvent; see Fig. 8. Again, the
contraction is largely all-or-none, within a narrow window of organic/aqueous
solvent ratio. Such behavior is a classical signature of a polymer gel phase-
transition. Thus, critical “razor-edge” behavior is preserved in the naturally
oriented polymeric system just as it is in the random muscle gel.
The evidence above implies that muscle contracts in the same way as an
ordinary polymer gel contracts. How, then, might such behavior be manifested at
the molecular level? The evidence is most consistent with a mechanism in which
the polymers themselves can contract. In fact, evidence in the literature, as shown
below, implies that all three polymers can shorten.
Connecting filaments are springlike polymers that retract when stretched. When
unactivated muscles are forcibly stretched, the connecting filaments are strained.
If the muscle is then released, connecting filaments retract and their tension is
relieved. Connecting filaments are thereby responsible for the muscle’s so-called
resting tension. Resting tension ensures that the stretched sarcomere returns to its
natural length, and also keeps the thick filament centered in the sarcomere. All of
these considerations refer to muscles that are not stimulated to contract actively;
thus, the force range under consideration is relatively modest.
Dynamics of the connecting filament have been revealed in elegant
experiments on isolated molecules of titin [Rief et al., 1997; Tskhovrebova et al.,
1997]. In the Rief et al. study, ramp-length changes imposed on single titin
molecules elicited sawtoothlike tension changes. This implied a one-by-one
unfolding of the filament’s tandem immunoglobulinlike domains—each
unfolding event giving rise to one “tooth” in the sawtooth-tension waveform. The
length change occurs as each immunoglobulin “beta-barrel” domain gives way to
an extended random structure (Fig. 9). Many such unfoldings lengthen the
filament in steplike fashion.
In a conceptually similar experiment [Tskhovrebova et al., 1997], single titin
molecules were stretched and held. During the holding phase, the decline of
tension (stress-relaxation) occurred in stepwise fashion, not smoothly. Again, the
implication is a progression of discrete unfolding events, each one dropping the
tension by an increment.
The thick filament is built of successive repeats of the myosin molecule. Myosin
contains a long alpha-helical rodlike tail, most of which lies in the thick filament
backbone (extensions of the angled lines in Fig. 2); it also contains two globular
heads, or cross-bridges, which radiate from the filament backbone at nominally
right angles. The rodlike tails overlap in a staggered, helical pattern. The filament
is mirror-symmetrical about its midpoint.
Although it is generally accepted that thick filaments do not change length
during contraction, the evidence is mixed. Classical studies imply a constancy of
filament length under most conditions. But some thirty-plus papers published
since those classical studies report substantial shortening during contraction [for
review, cf. Pollack, 1983]. These studies were conducted on vertebrate heart and
skeletal muscles as well as invertebrate muscles; they employed techniques
ranging from electron microscopy through various types of optical microscopy,
and they included isolated thick filaments extracted from the muscle and exposed
to physiological activating agents. The evidence for thick-filament shortening is
therefore appreciable.
A way in which thick filaments might shorten is if myosin rods were able to
slide past one another. The filament could then “telescope” to a shorter length.
The driving force for such telescopic action would lie in the filament itself,
presumably in the myosin rods that comprise the backbone. In this context it has
been shown in many experiments that the alpha-helical rod is able to shorten by a
helix-coil transition [for review, cf. Pollack, 1990]. The helix-coil transition is a
phase transition in which the molecular structure undergoes radical change. It is a
force-producing process: because the equilibrium length of the random coil is
near zero, the coil will always wants to shorten from its extended length. The
retractive force depends on the degree of extension, much like a spring. Thus, the
transition shortens the myosin molecule in much the same way as a wool sweater
is shortened by excess heat. Here, however, the transition is reversible.
A model illustrating how localized shortening in a myosin rod could generate
rod sliding is shown in Fig. 11. Adjacent molecules are held together by cohesive
forces derived from molecular surface charges that alternate semi-regularly along
the surface. The unstable zone of one molecule lying near the filament’s
midpoint undergoes a helix-coil transition. (The transitions would occur
symmetrically about the filament’s midpoint.) The transition results in local
shortening, which draws the remainder of the filament toward the mid-zone.
Then the same shortening event occurs in the next molecule along the filament,
and the next, etc. In such a way the filament shortens step by step, on either side
of the midpoint. And because molecules are cross-linked to respective molecules
on the next filament in parallel, the transition is cooperative over the muscle
cross section.
Figure 11: Mechanism by which local shortening in one myosin rod can propel
the adjacent rod to slide. Only two of the many molecules are shown.
Thin filaments may bring about stepwise length changes as well. Unlike the thick
and connecting filaments, whose shortening can directly shorten the sarcomere,
thin filaments are differently situated (Fig. 1). Because of their arrangement, they
would need to facilitate contraction in a different way. One potential mechanism
is an inchwormlike process, similar to that reported in PAMPS gels [Osada and
Gong, 1993]. In that mechanism the cylindrical gel undergoes repeated cycles of
curling and straightening. The ends of the gel are hooked to a ratchet in such a
way that each bending cycle results in a step advance. Repeated cycling advances
the gel by a significant magnitude.
The same principle could apply in the actin filament. If the filament were to
pass through cycles of curling and straightening, such action could be harnessed
to propel the filament toward the center of the sarcomere. More realistically, any
such curling would arise from a local phase-change, which would then propagate
along the filament to produce a wormlike reptation. Each cycle of propagation
would result in a step of filament translation. The extent of translation would be a
function of the number of cycles. A schematic illustration of such an inchworm
process is shown in Fig. 12.
The wavelike motion that would be anticipated in the actin filament is
broadly observed [for review, cf. Pollack, 1996]. The evidence draws from as
early as four decades ago when undulations were directly observed to propagate
along actin-filament bundles responsible for active streaming. It also follows
from modern studies of single actin filaments. Such motion could be generated
by a local molecular structural change, which is observed in the electron
microscope [Menetret et al., 1991] and in actin crystals [Schutt and Lindberg,
1992]. That structural changes can propagate along the filament is supported by
the observation that the binding of a ligand to one end of the actin filament
affects the physical and mechanical properties of the entire filament
[Prochniewicz et al., 1996]. Indeed, direct microscopic visualization of actin
filaments shows a translation pattern quite strikingly characteristic of snakelike
motion [deBeer et al., 1997].
Figure 12: Reptation model explaining translation of thin filament over thick
filament. Black dots represent myosin cross-bridges. In this model a phase-
transition propagates from tail to head, advancing the thin filament by one notch.
Figure 13: Histogram of step size measured during active contraction of single
isolated myofibrils. Spacing between major peaks is 2.7 nm [Yakovenko et al.,
2002]. (Courtesy of the American Physiological Society.)
Figure 14: Inchworm advance. The model predicts that the size of the step
advance will be an integer multiple of the actin monomer spacing.
Of particular interest is the fact that these active contraction steps are
preserved at higher levels of organization. Not only do the steps appear in the
single sarcomere, they appear as well at the level of the single cell [Pollack et al.,
1977]. If the process is considered as a phase transition, the transition is, again,
highly cooperative.
produce [Harrington, 1979]. Thus, the muscle polymer gel capitalizes on the
strengths of all three proteins. This is perhaps why muscle, a highly evolved
organelle, is as versatile as it is.
One upshot of these considerations is that the mechanism in muscle
contraction is not as different from the mechanisms used to construct artificial
muscles as had been thought. Both employ polymer-gel phase transitions. Like
the polymer gel, the muscle can be triggered by any variety of stimuli ranging
from a change of pH, salt, temperature, solvent type, and even electrical current.
Therefore, it may be possible to construct artificial muscles with greater speed
and efficacy by looking more closely at how nature accomplishes the task of
biological contraction.
This can be approached in several ways. One way is to use gels constructed
of polymers having some of the same features as muscle proteins. It may be
possible, for example, to construct simple gels of only one of the three protein
filaments. These polymers could be arranged randomly, or perhaps cross-linked
to one another along their length in a parallel arrangement. The parallel, cross-
linked arrangement may be particularly advantageous for achieving high speed:
cooperativity may be enhanced because the linked units must act in unison, or not
at all. Muscle can contract very rapidly. A common difference between natural
and artificial muscle is that natural muscle filaments (as well as other biological
filaments) are generally parallel and cross-linked, whereas artificial gels are
typically random. It may be that the parallel arrangement is a critical factor for
high speed.
Cross-linking may also be critical. Muscle filaments are hydrophilic and tend
to adsorb water. It is common experience that muscle water is difficult to
remove, even by centrifugation. In the absence of cross-linking, muscle-filament
polymers will swell, much like the gel of Fig. 6. Cross-links keep filaments
closely packed and unable to swell appreciably. The cross-linked matrix
therefore has more potential energy than the uncross-linked matrix, and may use
some of this chemical potential to contract more powerfully.
A related consideration is size. One conspicuous feature of muscle is that it is
built of many parallel units, or myofibrils (Fig. 1). Myofibril diameter is
consistently 1–2 μm, rarely more. This diminutive structure is surrounded by its
own activating system, called the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which supplies the
activating signal. Thus, diffusion distances are only 1–2 μm in natural muscle,
which presumably contributes to high speed. Emulation of this kind of
arrangement could result in higher contraction speed in artificial actuators.
As for the type of polymer that might be most effective, again, copying
nature’s design could lead to materials more responsive than those used to date.
For high force applications, the choice may be a myosinlike polymer. The
myosin melt force, as mentioned, is sufficient to account for full muscle tension.
For small-scale snakelike movements, the actin-based gel may be a better choice.
For bending, nature often employs microtubules, built of the protein tubulin. The
axostyle, for example, consists of a bundle of parallel microtubules cross-linked
along their length. Bending of the axostyle is frequently associated with
2.6 References
Baatsen, P. H. W. W., K. Trombitas, and G. H. Pollack, “Thick filaments of
striated muscle are laterally interconnected,” J. Ultras. & Mol. Str. Res. 97,
39-49, 1988.
Blyakhman, F., T. Shklyar, G. H. Pollack, “Quantal length changes in single
contracting sarcomeres,” J. Mus Res. Cell Motility, 20, 529-538, 1999.
Cooke, R., “Actomyosin interaction in striated muscle,” Physiol. Rev. 77(3): 671-
697, 1997.
deBeer, E. L., A. M. A T. A. Sontrop, M. S. Z. Kellermayer, G. H. Pollack,
“Actin-filament motion in the in vitro motility assay has a periodic
component,” Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 38, 341-50, 1997.
Granzier, H. L. M., and G. H. Pollack, “Stepwise shortening in unstimulated frog
skeletal muscle fibres,” J. Physiol. 362, 173-88, 1985.
Harrington, W. F., “On the origin of the contractile force in skeletal muscle,”
Proc. Nat’l. Acad. Sci. 76, 5066-70, 1979.
Hoffman, A. S., “Conventional and environmentally-sensitive hydrogels for
medical and industrial uses: a review paper,” Polymer Gels 268(5): 82-87,
1991.
Hoyle, G., Muscles and their Neural Control, Wiley, N. Y. 1983.
Huxley, A. F., “Muscle structure and theories of contraction,” Prog. Biophys.
Biophys. Chem. 7: 255-318, 1957.
Huxley, A. F., and R. Niedergerke, “Structural changes in muscle during
contraction: Interference microscopy of living muscle fibres,” Nature 173:
971-973, 1954.
Huxley, A. F., and R. Niedergerke, “Measurement of the striations of isolated
muscle fibres with the interference microscope,” J. Physiol. 144: 403-425,
1958.
Huxley, H. E., “A personal view of muscle and motility mechanisms,” Ann. Rev.
Physiol. 58: 1-19, 1996.
Huxley, H. E., and J. Hanson, “Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during
contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation,” Nature 173: 973-
976, 1954.
Huxley, H. E., and W. Brown, “The low angle X-ray diagram of vertebrate
striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor,” J. Mol. Biol.
39, 383-434, 1967.
Iwazumi, T, “A new field theory of muscle contraction,” Ph. D. Dissertation,
Univ. of Pennsylvania, 1970.