Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Frontispiece
eI
sT
'A
./
or
.s
> j
r j __
A. F. HUXLEY
J. Physiol. (1974), 243, pp. 1-43 1
With 1 plate and 12 text-figure8
Printed in Great Britain
REVIEW LECTURE
MUSCULAR CONTRACTION
GIVEN AT THE MEETING OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL SOCIETY AT
LEEDS UNIVERSITY ON 14--15 DECEMBER 1973
BY A. F. HUXLEY
From the Department of Physiology,
University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT
INTRODUCTION
It is a particular pleasure to me that this Review Lecture is being held
in the university where the late Professor W. T. Astbury worked. He was
among the first to investigate muscles by means of X-ray diffraction, and
his successes and his enthusiasm prepared the way for this technique to
become the most powerful method for investigating the submicroscopic
structure of living muscle and its changes during physiological activity.
In this lecture, I shall mainly be going over the development, during the
last 20 years, of ideas about the origin of the force produced by striated
muscle. In the same period there have also been great advances in other
aspects of muscle physiology, and by way of introduction I will first run
over the steps that are now believed to lead up to the contractile process
itself. Throughout, I shall confine myself to the twitch fibres of striated
muscle of amphibians and mammals, and I shall concentrate on experi-
ments with living muscle, especially those on isolated fibres. Structural
and biochemical investigations have been at least equally productive,
but I am not able to do justice to these aspects, and in any case, the
physiological side provides more than enough material for a single lecture.
1-2
1 *0'
08
0
C-
06
04
02
02 04 06 08 1-0
V/Vmax
Text-fig. 1. Force-velocity relation. The degree of curvature of the relation
varies between different preparations, and with temperature. Continuous
line: Hill's (1938) relation,
P/PO = (1-VVIV.)I(l + (PO/a) VIV..),
with P./a = 4, appropriate for frog muscle at 0° C.
This equation is a good fit to observations at loads below P0 (shortening).
In lengthening, Katz (1939) found the relation shown as a dotted line; in
addition there is 'give' which is limited in extent when P is only a little
greater than P0 but becomes very rapid and extensive as P approaches
1-8 P0 approx.
Crosses: Fenn & Marsh's (1935) relation, P = Woe aV-kV, with
WO = 0*95P0, a = 3.4/VI,, k = 0-03 P0/V., chosen to fit the continuous
line as well as possible. In their curve-fitting, Fenn & Marsh did not make
use of a measured P0.
Circles: values calculated from the theory of A. F. Huxley (1957).
6 A. F. HUXLEY
shorten at a speed which is a definite function of the load applied to
it (Fenn & Marsh, 1935). A. V. Hill (1938) showed that to a sufficient
degree of approximation, this function is part of a rectangular hyperbola
(Text-fig. 1).
F When a load greater than the isometric tetanus tension (PO) is
applied to a stimulated muscle, the steady speed of lengthening is much
smaller than would be expected from an extrapolation from speeds of
shortening at loads below P0 (Hill, 1938; Katz, 1939; Text-fig. 1). In
addition, the muscle 'gives' when the load is first applied; the extent of
this 'give' is small when the load is only a little greater than P0 but be-
comes very large, simulating complete relaxation, as the load approaches
a value of approximately 1-8 P0 (Katz, 1939).
025
Hill (1938)
Total
0.20
extra energy
Hill (1964) liberation
> 0110
C
0 05 M mechanical
g S~~~~~~~ower
SP
C.
0
0 50
a ~~~~~~~~A4
E
o
UIW
L
I1 b, 2 05 ,um
dii11
,llllllu 1 1111,,,,,, ,,,r I"1 ,.l,,, 1,1.11.11,
...,,....... .. ,H ,,,4 B........
1.|||1|||l111111111111Id lii .lll§11|1
Ill'Il~lW§|ll
I*- a, 1 60 Aim 01
005 jm
PM
1*- A band lIband -01 H zone -,
| ~ ~ ~~~I
I I I
this proposal was quickly accepted, and some observations which at first
seemed not to fit in with it have been satisfactorily explained. It is clearly
right to adopt it as a first approximation to what occurs when a muscle
changes its length; the following sections will discuss how far it can be
regarded as a complete account.
How nearly constant are the filament lengths? Although both light and
electron microscopy showed that the filament lengths stay approximately
constant, neither method would be capable of detecting changes of say a
few per cent if they were to occur either during passive length changes
or when a muscle is activated. The resolving power of the light micro-
scope is not sufficient, and electron microscope preparations are subject
12 A. F. HUXLEY
to uncertain amounts of shrinkage. The best available measurements are
those made by low-angle X-ray diffraction: H. E. Huxley & W. Brown
(1967) found no detectable change (i.e. less than a few tenths of one per
cent) in the thin-filament spacings, but an increase of about 1 % in the
thick-filament spacings, when the pattern from a muscle in isometric
contraction is compared with one from resting muscle. The filaments
must, of course, be extensible in some degree, and even an extension
of as little as 01 % as a direct consequence of the isometric tension
3:65 ,um (a+b)
105ma R
i (b+z)
6- M2
Myosin
filament
ActinA
filament
Equilibrium position laxly
of M site - I I
Velocity 3X 4 0n
transient
2
- 2kg/cm2
5 msec
.i
I-
II -.. I Iqw
I110nr
i ! i t....l....i....
Tension
transient ~ 3
{l
X kg/cm2
10 msec
Text-fig. 7. Mechanical transient responses in isolated frog muscle fibres,
during tetanic stimulation. Above: 'velocity transient', i.e. time course of
length change (upper t-ace) when load is suddenly altered (middle t ace).
Bottom trace is tension base line. Below: 'tension transient', i.e. time course
of tension change (middle trace) when length is suddenly altered (upper
trace). Bottom trace is tension base line. The numbers indicate corresponding
phases in the two types of transient response (see text and Table 1).
(From unpublished experiments by A. F. Huxley and R. M. Simmons.)
or might fall to zero or even reverse its direction; and finally it built up
again to its steady-state value, with sometimes a damped oscillation which
can be very conspicuous when the tension is changed only slightly from
its isometric value (Armstrong, A. F. Huxley & Julian, 1966). A more
recent record showing these features, obtained in our laboratory on an
isolated fibre, is shown in Text-fig. 7.
Still better time resolution can be attained in the converse type of
24 A. F. HUXLEY
Text-fig. 8. Family of transients. The records are obtained in the same way
as the bottom two traces in Text-fig. 7, but the time base is 10 times faster
and the step change of length (bottom panel) is complete in 0-2 ms while
the step in Text-fig. 7 took approx. 1 ins.
The distance specified in each of the upper panels is the amount of the
imposed length change in each half-sa-comere. (This Figure, and Text-
figs. 9 and 10, are from recent unpublished experiments by L. E. Ford,
A. F. Huxley and R. M. Simmons.)
26 A. F. HUXLEY
work. Detachment comes to an end first, since it has the higher rate con-
stant (points (c) and (d), p. 20), leaving attachment as the predominant
process in Phase 4. In order for detachment to cause a tendency for tension
to fall (Phase 3), it is necessary to suppose that accelerated detachment
begins when the cross-bridge is still in a position where it exerts positive
tension (A. F. Huxley & Simmons, 1973, pp. 673-4); this is a point of
difference from the 1957 theory. Julian, Sollins & Sollins (1973) have
worked out the time course of tension in Phase 3 and Phase 4 on a theory
of this kind, and obtained curves which resemble those given by real
muscle fibres very closely. I think that this kind of explanation of Phase 3
may well prove correct, though it is not excluded that there may be a
more direct 'de-activation by release' such as is widely postulated to
explain the oscillatory behaviour of the asynchronous flight muscles of
certain insects (Pringle. 1949, 1967).
Phase 2, the early tension recovery in the tension transient, is the aspect
of these phenomena to which our laboratory has so far been paying most
attention. It will be discussed in the next section.
The early tension recovery. Two main types of explanation for this phase
have been put forward. Podolsky and his colleagues (Podolsky, Nolan &
Zaveler, 1969; Podolsky & Nolan, 1973) propose that during an isometric
contraction, many cross-bridges are not attached because thin-filament
sites are not available at the required positions. The sliding movement of
the filaments during the shortening step brings some of these cross-bridges
within range of thin-filament sites; these cross-bridges attach rapidly and
exert tension as soon as they are attached. There is evidence (Huxley &
Simmons, 1971a; Text-fig. 10) that much or all of the instantaneous
compliance (phase 1 of the transients) resides in the cross-bridges, so that
the increase in number of attached cross-bridges postulated by Podolsky
should be accompanied by a decrease in this compliance. Tests made by
applying a second step when the early recovery phase is nearly complete
have shown that the stiffness is no greater than in the isometric condition
(Ford, A. F. Huxley & Simmons, 1974), so we are inclined to think that
little, if any, of the early tension recovery can be attributed to attachment
of cross-bridges that were free up to the moment of the original step change
of length.
The instantaneous tension drop followed by the early tension recovery
is roughly similar to the response of a 'Voigt element', i.e. a spring in
series with a parallel combination of spring and dashpot. If both of the
springs obey Hooke's law, straight lines will be obtained when T1 (the
extreme tension reached simultaneously with the length step) and T2
(the tension approached during the early recovery) are plotted against y,
the amount of the length change. Text-fig. 9 shows that the T1 curve
MUSCULAR CONTRACTION 27
from a real muscle fibre is in fact nearly straight, becoming a little less
steep as tension gets smaller - a type of behaviour commonly found in the
passive elasticity of biological materials. The T2 curve, however, deviates
grossly from a straight line: for moderate-sized shortening steps it is
almost horizontal, and then curves downwards, approaching a slope
14
12
Muscle fibre
08 E
E
0
06 °
04 0
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 +2
Filament displacement in each half sarcomere (nm)
Text-fig. 9. Above: tension transient response in an ideal Voigt element,
i.e. spring in series with parallel combination of spring and dashpot.
T., extreme tension reached; T2, tension approached asymptotically. Both
T1 and T2 give straight lines when plotted against the size of the imposed
step change of length. Below: T1 and T2 curves constructed from a family
of records such as is shown in Text-fig. 8.
28 A. P. HUXLEY
somewhat less than that of the T1 curve. This immediately suggests that
the structures responsible for the tension recovery are not just passive
visco-elastic elements but are the tension generators themselves, i.e. the
cross-bridges. The fact that the main part of the T2 curve lies some 6 nm
to the left of the T1 curve suggests that some 'active' element in the cross-
bridge is capable of taking up approximately 6 nm of shortening while
maintaining a tension not much less than what it exerts in an isometric
contraction.
As mentioned in the last paragraph, the characteristics of the instant-
aneous elasticity suggest that it is a purely passive property of some part
of the muscle fibre. At first we thought (Huxley & Simmons, 1970) that
1-4
E
0
0
-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 +2
Filament displacement in each half-sarcomere (nm)
Text-fig. 10. T, and T2 curves obtained from tension transients recorded
from the same muscle fibre at two different lengths. - , copied from the
lower part of Text-fig. 9; sarcomere length 2-2 /tm, i.e. all cross-bridges
are overlapped by thin filaments. +, T1, and x, T2, from the same fibre
stretched to sarcomere length 3-1 ,tm, i.e. overlap reduced to approx. 39 %.
Interrupted curves: scaled down from the continuous curves by the factor
0 39.
If the filament structure were completely rigid and each cross-bridge
overlapped by thin filament produced the same contribution to the
tension, whatever the fibre length, then the points should fall on the
scaled-down curve; it is seen that they do so to a fair degree of approxi-
mation. This interpretation implies that the elastic component, as well as
the active element, is located within the cross-bridges themselves. If, for
example, the elastic element were separate from the cross-bridges and had
properties independent of the degree of stretch of the fibre, the T, curve
would be displaced to the right at the increased length, instead of becoming
scaled down.
MUSCULAR CONTRACTION 29
it resided in the filaments and perhaps the Z line, constituting a true 'series
elastic component' whose properties were independent of the state of the
force generators themselves. There was, however, nothing to exclude the
possibility that it was due to some part of the cross-bridges. In order to
decide between these possibilities, we recorded tension transients during
tetani with the fibre stretched to different lengths, i.e. with reduced
amounts of overlap of thick and thin filaments. The result was simple
(Huxley & Simmons, 1971 a; Text-fig. 10): both the T1 and T2 curves
scaled down in direct proportion to the amount of overlap. The straight-
forward interpretation is that the instantaneous elasticity, as well as the
early recovery, is attributable to the cross-bridges, the filament arrays
being almost completely rigid. The filaments must of course possess some
compliance, and it is difficult to put a limit to its possible amount, but we
think it unlikely to be large enough to lead to serious error if, as a first
approximation, it is disregarded. We therefore assume, provisionally,
that the whole of the instantaneous compliance resides in some component
of the cross-bridges.
Two components within each cross-bridge. Thus, each cross-bridge seems
to contain (1) an instantaneous elastic element, and (2), in series with it,
an element which can maintain tension while taking up limited but sub-
stantial amounts of length change. The total range over which element
(2) actively generates movement is probably 10-12 nm; it is likely to be
greater than the 6 nm mentioned above because, after attaching, it
presumably has to generate a movement of the order of 5 nm so as to
stretch the elastic element, even in an isometric contraction. This estimate
of the range of action agrees as well as can be expected with the values
calculated by H. E. Huxley (1960, p. 452) and by Davies (1963) from esti-
mates of the tension per cross-bridge and the work that can be done per
mole of ATP utilized. They assume (as do most authors) that one molecule
of ATP is hydrolysed per cross-bridge cycle. Tonomura (1972, p. 390),
however, proposes a cycle that utilizes two molecules of ATP, which would
require the range of action to be twice as great.
Can a cross-bridge exert negative tension? Another interesting feature of
the T1 curve is that it approaches the base line at a definite angle and not
tangentially or asymptotically. The measured T. values are all higher
than they would be if a truly instantaneous length step were applied, since
the early recovery begins before the step is complete, and this effect is
relatively greater in the large steps because the early recovery is more
rapid (see below). The true T1 curve is therefore straighter (and steeper)
than what we have been able to record, and it would approach the
abscissa in an even more angular manner than is seen in Text-fig. 9.
Blange, Karemaker & Kramer (1972) claimed that the curve approached
30 A. F. HUXLEY
the base line tangentially, and interpreted this by supposing that cross-
bridges could not support negative tension and that more and more of
them became slack as the size of shortening step was increased, reducing
the stiffness of the fibre and therefore the slope of the T1 curve. Our
results do not confirm Blange et al. (1972), and the fact that we find a
sharp approach to the base line is evidence that the cross-bridges are able
to exert negative tension.
Evidence for stepwise action. When the time course of the early tension
recovery is examined (Text-fig. 8), another interesting non-linear feature
a
I
I
11
Thick filament Thick filament -
LMM S LMM I- 2
s-I1 2 s-I 2
f0011 1 11
REFERENCES
ABBOTT, B. C. & AuIBERT, X. M. (1951). Changes of energy in a muscle during very
slow stretches. Proc. R. Soc. B 139, 104-117.
ABBOTT, B. C., AUBERT, X. M. & HILL, A. V. (1951). The absorption of work by a
muscle stretched during a single twitch or a short tetanus. Proc. R. Soc. B 139,
86-104.
ADRIAN, E. D. (1922). The relation between the stimulus and the electric response
in a single muscle fibre. Archs ngerl. Physiol. 7, 330-332.
ADRIAN, R. H. & PEACHEY, L. D. (1973). Reconstruction of the action potential of
frog sartorius muscle. J. Physiol. 235, 103-131.
ARMSTRONG, C. M., HUXLEY, A. F. & JULIAN, F. J. (1966). Oscillatory responses in
frog skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 186, 26-27P.
ARRONET, N. I. (1973). Motile Muscle and Cell Models (translated from Russian by
B. Haigh). New York and London: Consultants Bureau.
ASAKURA, S., TANIGUCHI, M. & OOSAWA, F. (1963). Mechano-chemical behaviour
of F-actin. J. molec. Biol. 7, 55-69.
ASHLEY, C. C. & RIDOWAY, E. B. (1970). On the relationships between membrane
potential, calcium transient and tension in single barnacle muscle fibres. J. P. hysiol.
209, 105-130.
ASTBURY, W. T. (1947). On the structure of biological fibres and the problem of
muscle. Proc. R. Soc. B 134, 303-328.
ATWOOD, H. L., HOYLE, G. & SMYTH, T. Jr. (1965). Mechanical and electrical
responses of single innervated crab-muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 180, 449-482.
AUBER, J. & COUTEAUX, R. (1963). Ultrastructure de la strie Z dans des muscles
de dipteres. J. Microscopie 2, 309-324.
AUBERT, X. (1944a). La chaleur degagee par un muscle soumis A un travail en cycle.
C. r. Sganc. Soc. Biol. 138, 1011-1013.
AUBERT, X. (1944b). L'influence du delai de relachement sur la chaleur d6gag6e
par un muscle soumis a un travail en cycle. C. r. Sganc. Soc. Biol. 138, 1048-1050.
AUBERT, X. (1948). Reversibilite partielle de la contraction musculaire au cours de
l'absorption du travail en cycle. Archs int. Phy8iol. 55, 348-361.
AUBERT, X. & LEBACQ, J. (1971). The heat of shortening during the plateau of
tetanic contraction and at the end of relaxation. J. Physiol. 216, 181-200.
BAGSHAW, C. R., ECCLESTON, J. F., TRENTHAM, D. R., YATES, D. W. & GOODY, R. S.
(1973). Transient kinetic studies of the Mg++-dependent ATPase of myosin and
its proteolytic subfragments. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 127-135.
BAILEY, K. (1948). Tropomyosin: a new asymmetric protein component of the
muscle fibril. Biochem. J. 43, 271-279.
BARANY, E. H., EDMAN, K. A. P. & PALIS, A. (1952). The influence of electrolytes
on the rate of viscosity drop in ATP-actomyosin mixtures. Acta physiol. scand.
24, 361-367.
BLANCo, T., KAREMAKER, J. M. & KRAMER, A. E. J. L. (1972). Elasticity as an
expression of cross-bridge activity in rat muscle. Pflugers Arch. 336, 277-288.
BOTTS, J., COOKE, R., DOS REMEDIOS, C., DUKE, J., MENDELSON, R., MORALES,
M. F., TOKIWA, T. & VINIEGRA, G. (1973). Does a myosin cross-bridge progress
a-m-over-arm on the actin filament? Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37,
195-200.
BROWN, L. M., GONZALEZ-SERRATOS, H. & HUXLEY, A. F. (1970). Electron micro-
scopy of frog muscle fibres in extreme passive shortening. J. Physiol. 208, 86-88P.
BUCHTHAL, F. & KAISER, E. (1951). The rheology of the cross striated muscle fibre
(pp. 233-291). Biol. meadr 21, no. 7.
MUSCULAR CONTRACTION 37
CAIN, D. F., INFANTE, A. A. & DAVIES, R. E. (1962). Chemistry of muscle contrac-
tion. Adenosine triphosphate and phosphorylcreatine as energy supplies for single
contractions of working muscle. Nature, Lond. 196, 214-217.
CARLSEN, F., KNAPPEIS, G. G. & BUCHTHAL, F. (1961). Ultrastructure of the resting
and contracted striated muscle fiber at different degrees of stretch. J. biophy8.
biochem. Cytol. 11, 95-117.
CARLSON, F. D., BONNER, R. & FRASER, A. (1973). Intensity fluctuation auto.
correlation studies of resting and contracting frog sartorius muscle. Cold Spring
Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 389-396.
CASELLA, C. (1950). Tensile force in total striated muscle, isolated fibre and sarco-
lemma. Acta physiol. 8cand. 21, 380-401.
CHAPLAIN, R. A. & FROMMELT, B. (1971). A mechanochemical model for muscular
contraction. I. The rate of energy liberation at steady state velocities of shortening
and lengthening. J. Mechanochem. Cell Motility 1, 41-56.
CIVAN, M. M. & PODOLSKY, R. J. (1966). Contraction kinetics of striated muscle
fibres following quick changes in load. J. Physiol. 184, 511-534.
COSTANTIN, L. L. (1970). The role of sodium current in the radial spread of con-
traction in frog muscle fibers. J. gen. Physiol. 55, 703-715.
COSTANTIN, L. L. & TAYLOR, S. R. (1971). Active and passive shortening in voltage-
clamped frog muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 218, 13-15P.
CURTIN, N. A. & DAVIES, R. E. (1973). Chemical and mechanical changes during
stretching of activated frog skeletal muscle. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.
37, 619-626.
DAINTY, M., KLEINZELLER, A., LAWRENCE, A. S. C., MIALL, M., NEEDHAM, J.,
NEEDHAM, D. M. & SHEN, S.-C. (1944). Studies on the anomalous viscosity and
flow-birefringence of protein solutions. III. Changes in these properties of myosin
solutions in relation to adenosinetriphosphate and muscular contraction. J. gen.
Physiol. 27, 355-399.
DAVIES, R. E. (1963). A molecular theory of muscle contraction: calcium-dependent
contractions with hydrogen bond formation plus ATP-dependent extensions of
part of the myosin-actin cross-bridges. Nature, Lond. 199, 1068-1074.
DESHCHEREVSKII, V. J. (1968). Two models of muscular contraction. Biophysics 13
(1969), 1093-1101.
DICKINSON, V. A. & WOLEDGE, R. C. (1973). The thermal effects of shortening in
tetanic contractions of frog muscle. J. Physiol. 233, 659-671.
EBASHI, S. (1963). Third component participating in the superprecipitation of
'natural actomyosin'. Nature, Lond. 200, 1010.
EBASHI, S. & ENDO, M. (1968). Calcium ion and muscle contraction. Prog. Biophys.
molec. Biol. 18, 123-183.
EBASHI, S., ENDO, M. & OHTSUKI, I. (1969). Control of muscle contraction. Q. Rev.
Biophys. 2, 351-384.
EBASHI, S. & KODAMA, A. (1965). A new protein factor promoting aggregation of
tropomyosin. J. Biochem. 58, 107-108.
ELLIOTT, G. F., RoME, E. M. & SPENCER, M. (1970). A type of contraction hypothesis
applicable to all muscles. Nature, Lond. 226, 417-420.
ENDO, M. (1964). Entry of a dye into the sarcotubular system of muscle. Nat'gre,
Lond. 202, 1115-1116.
ENDO, M. (1966). Entry of fluorescent dyes into the sarcotubular system of the frog
muscle. J. Physiol. 185, 224-238.
ENGELHARDT, V. A. & LyuBIMOVA, M. N. (1939). Myosine and adenosinetriphos-
phatase. Nature, Lond. 144, 668-669.
38 A. F. HUXLEY
ENGELHARDT, V. A., LYUBIMOVA, M. N. & MEITINA, R. A. (1941). Chemistry and
mechanics of the muscle studied on myosin threads. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30,
644.
FENN, W. 0. (1923). A quantitative comparison between the energy liberated and
the work performed by the isolated sartorius muscle of the frog. J. Phy8iol. 58,
175-203.
FENN, W. 0. (1924). The relation between the work performed and the energy
liberated in muscular contraction. J. Physiol. 58, 373-395.
FENN, W. 0. & MARSH, B. S. (1935). Muscular force at different speeds of shortening.
J. Phyaiol. 85, 277-297.
FIELDS, R. W. & FABER, J. J. (1970). Biophysical analysis of the mechanical
properties of the sarcolemma. Can. J. Phy8iol. Pharmacol. 48, 394-404.
FORD, L. E., HUXLEY, A. F. & SIMMONS, R. M. (1974). Mechanism of early tension
recovery after a quick release in tetanized muscle fibres. J. Phy8iol. 240, 42-43P.
FRANZINI-ARMSTRONG, C. & PORTER, K. R. (1964). Sarcolemmal invaginations
constituting the T system in fish muscle fibers. J. Cell Biol. 22, 675-696.
GASsER, H. S. & HILL, A. V. (1924). The dynamics of muscular contraction. Proc.
R. Soc. B 96, 398-437.
GELFAN, S. (1931). Studies of single muscle fibres. III. Further evidence of graded
responses in single fibres. Am. J. Phy8iol. 96, 16-20.
GELFAN, S. (1933). The submaximal responses of the single muscle fibre. J. Phy8iol.
80, 285-295.
GILBERT, C., KRETZSCHMAR, K. M., WILKIE, D. R. & WOLEDGE, R. C. (1971).
Chemical change and energy output during muscular contraction. J. Physiol.
218, 163-193.
GONZkLEZ-SERRATOS, H. (1971). Inward spread of activation in vertebrate muscle
fibres. J. Physiol. 212, 777-799.
GORDON, A. M., HUXLEY, A. F. & JULIAN, F. J. (1966a). Tension development in
highly stretched vertebrate muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 184, 143-169.
GORDON, A. M., HUXivY, A. F. & JULIAN, F. J. (1966b). The variation in isometric
tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J. Phy8iol. 184, 170-192.
HALL, C. E., JAKus, M. A. & SCHMITT, F. 0. (1946). An investigation of cross
striations and myosin filaments in muscle. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab. Wood8 Hole
90, 32-50.
HANSON, J. (1968). Recent X-ray diffraction studies of muscle. Q. Rev. Biophy&. 1,
177-216.
HANSON, J. & HUXLEY, H. E. (1953). Structural basis of the cross-striations in
muscle. Nature, Lond. 172, 530-532.
HANSON, J. & HUXLEY, H. E. (1955). The structural basis of contraction in striated
muscle. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 9, 228--264.
HARMAN, J. W. (1954). Contractions of skeletal muscle myofibrils by phase micro-
scopy. Fedn Proc. 13, 430.
HASSELBACH, W. (1953). Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Muskel-
fibrillen bei totaler und partieller Extraktion des L-Myosins. Z. Naturf. 8b,
449-454.
HILL, A. V. (193S). The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle.
Proc. R. Soc. B 126, 136-195.
HILL, A. V. (1949 a). The heat of activation and the heat of shortening in a muscle.
twitch. Proc. R. Soc. B 136, 195-211.
HILL, A. V. (1949 b). Work and heat in a muscle twitch. Proc. R. Soc. B 136, 220-228.
HILL, A. V. (1964). The effect of load on the heat of shortening of muscle. Proc. R.
Soc. B 159, 297-318.
MUSCULAR CONTRACTION 39
HILL, A. V. (1965). Trails and Trials in Physiology. London: Arnold.
HruL, A. V. & HOWARTH, J. V. (1959). The reversal of chemical reactions in con-
tracting muscle during an applied stretch. Proc. R. Soc. B 151, 169-193.
HILL, D. K. (1964). The space accessible to albumin within the striated muscle
fibre of the toad. J. Physiol. 175, 275-294.
HODGKIN, A. L. (1951). The ionic basis of electrical activity in nerve and muscle.
Biol. Rev. 26, 339-409.
HOYLE, G. (1968). In Symposium on Mwucle, ed. ERNST, E. & STRAUB, F. B.,
pp. 34-48. Budapest: Akad6mia-i Kiad6.
HUXLEY, A. F. (1952). Applications of an interference microscope. J. Physiol. 117,
52-53P.
HUXLEY, A. F. (1954). A high-power interference microscope. J. Physiol. 125,
11-13P.
HUXLEY, A. F. (1957). Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog. Biophys.
biophys. Chem. 7, 255-318.
HUXLEY, A. F. (1973). A note suggesting that the cross-bridge attachment during
muscle contraction may take place in two stages. Proc. R. Soc. B 183, 83-86.
HUXLEY, A. F. & GORDON, A. M. (1962). Striation patterns in active and passive
shortening of muscle. Nature, Lond. 193, 280-281.
HUXLEY, A. F. & JuLIAN, F. J. (1964). Speed of unloaded shortening in frog striated-
muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 177, 60-61 P.
HUXLEY, A. F. & NIEDERGERKE, R. (1954). Interference microscopy of living
muscle fibres. Nature, Lond. 173, 971-973.
HUXLEY, A. F. & NIEDERGERKE, R. (1958). Measurement of the striations of isolated
muscle fibres with the interference microscope. J. Physiol. 144, 403-425.
HUXLEY, A. F. & PEACHEY, L. D. (1961). The maximum length for contraction in
vertebrate striated muscle. J. Physiol. 156, 150-165.
HUXLEY, A. F. & SImMONs, R. M. (1970). A quick phase in the series-elastic com-
ponent of striated muscle, demonstrated in isolated fibres from the frog. J. Physiol.
208, 52-53P.
HUXLEY, A. F. & SIMMONs, R. M. (1971a). Mechanical properties of the cross-bridges
of frog striated muscle. J. Physiol. 218, 59-60P.
HUXLEY, A. F. & SIMMONs, R. M. (1971 b). Proposed mechanism of force generation
in striated muscle. Nature, Lond. 233, 533-538.
HUXLEY, A. F. & SIMMONs, R. M. (1973). Mechanical transients and the origin of
muscular force. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 669-680.
HUXLEY, A. F. & STRAUB, R. W. (1958). Local activation and interfibrillar structures
in striated muscle. J. Physiol. 143, 40-41P.
HUXLEY, A. F. & TAYLOR, R. E. (1955). Function of Krause's membrane. Nature,
Lond. 176, 1068.
HUXLEY, A. F. & TAYLOR, Et. E. (1958). Local activation of striated muscle fibres.
J. Physiol. 144, 426-441.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1953a). X-ray analysis and the problem of muscle. Proc. R. Soc.
B 141, 59-62.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1953b). Electron microscope studies of the organisation of the
filaments in striated muscle. Biochim. biophys. Acta 12, 387-394.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1957). The double array of filaments in cross-striated muscle.
J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 3, 631-648.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1960). Muscle Cells. In The Cell, vol. iv, ed. BRACHET, J. & MIRSKY,
A. E., pp. 365-481. New York: Academic Press.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1963). Electron microscope studies on the structure of natural
and synthetic protein filaments from striated muscle. J. molec. Biol. 7, 281-308.
40 A. F. HUXLEY
HUXLEY, H. E. (1964a). Evidence for continuity between the central elements of
the triads and extracellular space in frog sartorius muscle. Nature, Lond. 202,
1067-1071.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1964b). Structural arrangements and the contraction mechanism in
striated muscle. Proc. R. Soc. B 160, 442-448.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1969). The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science, N.Y. 164,
1356-1366.
HUXLEY, H. E. (1971). The structural basis of muscular contraction. Proc. R. Soc.
B 178, 131-149.
HUXLEY, H. E. & BROWN, W. (1967). The low-angle X-ray diagram of vertebrate
striated muscle and its behaviour during contraction and rigor. J. molec. Biol. 30,
383-434.
HUXLEY, H. E. & HANSON, J. (1954). Changes in the cross-striations of muscle
during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature, Lond.
173, 973-976.
HUXLEY, H. E. & HANSON, J. (1957). Quantitative studies on the structure of
cross-striated myofibrils. I. Investigations by interference microscopy. Biochim.
biophy8. Acta 23, 229-249.
JASPER, H. H. & PEZARD, A. (1934). Relation entre la rapidity d'un muscle
strike et sa structure histologique. C. r. hebd. SNanc. Acad. Sci., Paria 198, 499-501.
JOBSIS, F. F. & O'CONNOR, M. J. (1966). Calcium release and reabsorption in the
sartorius muscle of the toad. Biochem. biophys. Re8. Commun. 25, 246-252.
JORDAN, H. E. (1934). Structural changes during contraction in the striped muscle
of the frog. Am. J. Anat. 55, 117-133.
JULIAN, F. J., SOLLINS, K. R. & SOLLINS, M. R. (1973). A model for muscle
contraction in which cross-bridge attachment and force generation are distinct.
Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 685-688.
KATZ, B. (1939). The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction.
J. Physiol. 96, 45-64.
KUFFLER, S. W. (1946). The relation of electric potential changes to contracture in
skeletal muscle. J. Neurophysiol. 9, 367-377.
KtHNE, W. (1864). Untersuchungen uiber das Protoplama und die Contractilitdt.
Leipzig: Engelmann.
KUSHMERICK, M. J., LARSON, R. E. & DAVIES, R. E. (1969). The chemical energetic
of muscle contraction. I. Activation heat, heat of shortening and ATP utilization
for activation-relaxation processes. Proc. R. Soc. B 174, 293-313.
LEVIN, A. & WYMAN, J. (1927). The viscous elastic properties of muscle. Proc. R.
Soc. B 101, 218-243.
LYMN, R. W. & TAYLOR, E. W. (1971). Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate
hydrolysis by actomyosin. Biochemistry 10, 4617-4624.
MCCLARE, C. W. F. (1971). Chemical machines, Maxwell's demon and living
organisms. J. theor. Biol. 30, 1-34.
MCCLARE, C. W. F. (1972). A 'molecular energy' muscle model. J. theor. Biol. 35,
569-595.
MONEILL, P. A. & HOYLE, G. (1967). Evidence for superthin filaments. Am. Zool. 7,
483-498.
MATSUBARA, I. & ELLIOTT, G. F. (1972). X-ray diffraction studies on skinned single
fibres of frog skeletal muscle. J. molec. Biol. 72, 657-669.
MENCKEN, H. L. (1936). The American Language, 4th edn. p. 312. New York:
A. A. Knopf.
MEYER, K. H. (1929). 'Ober Feinbau, Festigkeit und Kontraktilitat tierischer
Gewebe. Biochem. Z. 214, 253-281.
MUSCULAR CONTRACTION 41
MOMMAERTS, W. F. H. M. (1951). The scattering of light in myosin solutions.
I. The angular dissymmetry and the molecular length. J. biol. Chem. 188,
553-557.
MOMMAERTS, W. F. H. M. (1956). The effect of adenosinetriphosphate upon acto-
myosin solutions, studied with a recording dual beam light-scattering photometer.
J. gen. Physiol. 39, 821-830.
Moos, C. (1973). Actin activation of heavy meromyosin and subfragment-1 ATPases;
steady state kinetics studies. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 137-143.
MORALES, M. & BOTTS, J. (1952). A model for the elementary process in muscle
action. Archs Biochem. Biophys. 37, 283-300.
NEEDHAM, D. M. (1950). Myosin and adenosinetriphosphate in relation to muscle
contraction. Biochim. biophys. Acta 4, 42-49.
NEEDHAM, D. M. (1971). Machina Carnis. The Biochemistry of Muscular Contraction
in its Historical Development. Cambridge: University Press.
NEEDHAM, J., SHEN, S.-C., NEEDHAM, D. M. & LAWRENCE, A. S. C. (1941). Myosin
birefringence and adenylpyrophosphate. Nature, Lond. 147, 766-768.
OPLATKA, A. (1972). On the mechanochemistry of muscular contraction. J. theor.
Biol. 34, 379-403.
PAGE, S. (1964). The organization of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in frog muscle.
J. Physiol. 175, 10-1IP.
PAGE, S. G. (1968). Fine structure of tortoise skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 197,
709-715.
PAGE, S. G. (1969). Structure and some contractile properties of fast and slow
muscles of the chicken. J. Physiol. 205, 131-145.
PAGE, S. G. & HUXLEY, H. E. (1963). Filament lengths in striated muscle. J. Cell
Biol. 19, 369-390.
PODOLSiY, R. J. (1959). The chemical thermodynamics and molecular mechanism
of muscular contraction. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 72 (12), 522-537.
PODOLSxY, R. J. (1960). Kinetics of muscular contraction: the approach to the
steady state. Nature, Lond. 188, 666-668.
PODOLSKY, R. J. (1964). The maximum sarcomere length for contraction of isolated
myofibrils. J. Physiol. 170, 110-123.
PODOLSKY, R. J. & NOLAN, A. C. (1973). Muscle contraction transients, cross-bridge
kinetics, and the Fenn effect. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 661-668.
PODOLSKY, R. J., NOLAN, A. C. & ZAVELER, S. A. (1969). Cross-bridge properties
derived from muscle isotonic velocity transients. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
64, 504-511.
PoLissAR, M. J. (1952). Physical chemistry of contractile process in muscle. I-IV.
Am. J. Physiol. 168, 766-811.
PORTZEHL, H. (1950). Masse und Masze des L-Myosins. Z. Naturf. 5b, 75-78.
PRINGLE, J. W. S. (1949). The excitation and contraction of the flight muscles of
insects. J. Physiol. 108, 226-232.
PRiNGLE, J. W. S. (1967). The contractile mechanism of insect fibrillar muscle.
Prog. Biophys. molec. Biol. 17, 1-60.
PRYOR, M. G. M. (1950). Mechanical properties of fibres and muscles. Prog. Biophys.
biophys. Chem. 1, 216-268.
RAMSEY, R. W. & STREET, S. F. (1940). The isometric length-tension diagram of
isolated skeletal muscle fibers of the frog. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 15, 11-34.
RAPOPORT, S. I. (1972). Mechanical properties of the sarcolemma and myoplasm in
frog muscle as a function of sarcomere length. J. gen. Physiol. 59, 559-585.
RIcE, R. V. (1961). Conformation of individual macromolecular particles from
myosin solutions. Biochim. biophys. Acta 52, 602-604.
42 A. F. HUXLEY
RIDGWAY, E. B. & ASHLEY, C. C. (1967). Calcium transients in single muscle fibers.
Biochem. biophys. Re8. Commun. 29, 229-234.
ROWE, A. J. (1964). The contractile proteins of skeletal muscle. Proc. R. Soc. B 160,
437-441.
RozSA, G., SZENT-GYORGYI, A. & WYCKOFF, R. W. G. (1950). The fine structure of
myofibrils. Expi Cell Re8. 1, 194-205.
RUDEL, R. & TAYLOR, S. R. (1971). Striated muscle fibers: facilitation of contraction
at short lengths by caffeine. Science, N.Y. 172, 387-388.
RUDEL, R. & TAYLOR, S. R. (1973). Aequorin luminescence during contraction of
amphibian skeletal muscle. J. Phy8iol. 233, 5-6 P.
SCHNEIDER, M. F. & CHANDLER, W. K. (1973). Voltage dependent charge movement
in skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature,
Lond. 242, 244-246.
SEIDEL, J. C. & GERGELY, J. (1973). Investigation of conformational changes in
spin-labeled myosin: implications for the molecular mechanism of muscle
contraction. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37, 187-193.
SHIMOMURA, O., JOHNSON, F. H. & SAIGA, Y. (1962). Extraction, purification and
properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan,
Aequorea. J. cell. comp. Phyajol. 59, 223-239.
SJOSTRAND, F. S. (1962). The connections between A- and I-band filaments in
striated frog muscle. J. Ultrastruc. Res. 7, 225-246.
SPENCER, M. & WORTHINGTON, C. R. (1960). A hypothesis of contraction in striated
muscle. Nature, Lond. 187, 388-391.
STEIGER, G. J., RUEGG, J. C., BOLDT, K. M., LUBBERS, D. W. & BREULL, W. (1973).
Changes in the polarization of tryptophan fluorescence in the actomyosin
system of working muscle fibers. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 37,
377-378.
STRAUB, F. B. (1943). Actin. Stud. Inst. med. Chem. Univ. Szeged (1942) 2, 3-15.
STRICKHOLM, A. (1962). Excitation currents and impedence of a small electrically
isolated area of the muscle cell surface. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 60, 149-167.
STRICKHOLM, A. (1966). Local sarcomere contraction in fast muscle fibres. Nature,
Lond. 212, 835-836.
SUGI, H. & OCHI, R. (1967). The mode of transverse spread of contraction initiated
by local activation in single frog muscle fibers. J. gen. Physiol. 50, 2167-2176.
SZENT-GYORGYI, A. (1943). Discussion. Stud. Int. med. Chem. Univ. Szeged (1941-2)
1, 67-71.
TAYLOR, E. W. (1972). Chemistry of muscle contraction. A. Rev. Biochem. 41,
577-616.
TAYLOR, S. R. & RUDEL, R. (1970). Striated muscle fibers: inactivation of contraction
induced by shortening. Science, N.Y. 167, 882-884.
TONOMURA, Y. (1972). Muscle Proteins, Muscle Contraction and Cation Transport.
Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
TONOMURA, Y. & WATANABE, S. (1952). Effect of adenosine triphosphate on the
light-scattering of actomyosin solution. Nature, Lond. 169, 112-113.
TONOMURA, Y., YAGI, K., Ku-Bo, S. & KITAGAWA, S. (1961). A molecular mechanism
of muscle contraction. J. Res. Inst. Catalysis, Hokkaido Univ. 9, 256-286.
ULLRICK, W. C. (1967). A theory of contraction for striated muscle. J. theor. Biol.
15, 53-69.
WALCOTT, B. & RIDGWAY, E. B. (1967). The ultrastructure of myosin-extracted
striated muscle fibers. Am. Zool. 7, 499-504.
WEBER, H. H. (1956). In Verhandlungen der Deutachen orthopadiachen Gesellachaft,
44th Congress, pp. 13-27. Stuttgart: Enke.
The Journal of Physiology, Vol. 243, NS o. 1 Plate 1
0
+
IA
_,-_i.
-
-Snat1
10 Jim
EXPLANATION OF PLATE
Active and passive shortening within a living isolated frog muscle fibre The fibre
is stimulated by a slowly increasing current; the cathode is near the edge of the
fibre which is seen near the bottom of each micrograph. The fibre does not give
action potentials in these responses.
The micrographs are single frames from a cine film taken through an interference
microscope (A. F. Huxley, 1952, 1954). The upper pair of pictures are taken with
the microscope adjusted so as to give positive contrast (dark indicates high refractive
index, i.e. A bands, Z lines and contraction bands are dark). For the contraction
shown in the lower pair of pictures, the microscope has been readjusted to give
negative. contrast (A bands, Z lines and contraction bands light).
In each pair of pictures, the left-hand one is before, and the right-hand one during,
the stimulus. The right-hand pictures show that during the shortening the myofibrils
near the depolarized surface of the fibre remain straight, and must therefore be
contracting actively, while the myofibrils nearer the centre of the fibre (upper part
of picture) are thrown into waves and must therefore be shortening passively. In
these passively shortened fibrils, the resting pattern of dark and light bands persists
(the A bands appear somewhat narrowed, but this is due to the obliquity of the
fibrils). In the actively contracting fibrils near the edge, however, the pattern has
changed to one with narrow dense lines. These are the C. contraction bands, placed
at the centre of the original A bands; on further shortening the Cz contraction
bands, at the position of the Z lines, appear as a second set of thin dense lines
midway between the successive C. bands.
From a film taken by A. F. Huxley and A. M. Gordon, 3 November 1961; cf.
Huxley & Gordon (1962).