Professional Documents
Culture Documents
chalenoven123@gmail.com
Abstract
This study aims to barcode the DNA of Pyruvate decarboxylase of normal and mutant coconut.
Specifically it aims to: (1)isolate the DNA of Pyruvate decarboxylase; (2) determine the DNA sequence
of Pyruvate decarboxylase; and (3)Compare the DNA sequence of normal and mutant coconut Pyruvate
decarboxylase. Makapuno and normal coconut endosperms were used as sample. CTAB-PVPP method
was used to extaract the DNA. Amplification of DNA sequence was done through polymerase chain
reaction. PCR products was visualized through gel electrophoresis. Two replicates from normal coconut
had PCR product. No PCR product was obtain in makapuno, so comparison between the DNA sequence
of normal coconut and makupuno cannot be determined. No bands on the DNA of makapuno. So further
PCR troubleshooting must be done to successfully amplify the DNA. Moreover, the DNA for pyruvate
decarboxylase must come from a fresh sample to ensure a higher concentration of DNA.
Introduction
Matured coconut endosperm forms a hard kernel 0.5 to 1.5 cm thick ant it has cavity that
contains the residual nut water. There is a rare coconut endosperm mutation characterized by a
soft, extra-thick kernel, partially or completely filling the nut water cavity. This unusual mutation
affects only some of the fruit on the palm and such fruit will not normally germinate (Deva
Kumar, 2015). This mutated coconut was called Makapuno in the Philippines. In technical terms,
the macapuno is described as a ‘white viscous, translucent jelly’ (Ramirez & Mendoza 1998).
Makapuno was used in ice cream and macapuno meat is commonly processed into bottled
decarboxylase (Cnpdc) and two isoforms of ketoacyl-ACP synthase 1 (Cnkas 1-1 and Cnkas 1-2)
are involved in carbon metabolism in Makapuno. Gene from pyruvate decarboxylase was one of
hypothesized that the gDNA between the normal and mutant coconut will show a significant
difference.
Advance Genetics
This study aims to barcode the DNA of Pyruvate decarboxylase of normal and mutant
coconut.
decarboxylase.
Determining the gene responsible for the mutation in Makapuno has been going on for
decades. This study might give an essential clues that might explain the mutation of the
Makapuno
The study was limited on the DNA sequence of pyruvate decarboxylase in the endosperm
Endosperm from normal coconut and makapuno endosperm was used as biological
material for DNA extraction. Appropriate amount of CTAB isolation buffer was preheated in
65̊C water bath. 0.1 g of fresh samples was weighed and grinded. The samples were transferred
in a 2ml microfuge tube. 800 ul of CTAB isolation buffer was added to the samples and
incubated in 65̊C water bath for an hour.The tubes were then incubated at 65°C for 30 minutes
and inverted each 10 minutes for good solution of the crushed tissues with the buffer. The tubes
Advance Genetics
will be cooled at room temperature and 800 uL of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol mixture (24:1)
was added. The tubes will be then mixed gently by inversion to form an emulsion during 10
minutes. After that the tubes will be centrifuged 6000 xg for 10 minutes. The aqueous phase
present in each tube (~500 uL) will be transferred to a new 2ml microcentrifuge tube gently, to
avoid DNA shearing. Tube will be added 600 uL of cold isopropanol (Stored previously in 65̊C).
the samples was mixed gently by inverting the tubes for several times. The solution will kept in
romm temperature overnight. Sample will be then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1-2 minutes and
the supernatant was poured off. 800ul of ethanol was added to the DNA pellets and gently
swirled for 20 minutes. It was centrifuged for 3 minutes in 1200 rpm and the supernatant was
poured off. the pellet was air dried through inverting the tube to a paper towel. 100ul of High
Salt TE and 1ul of RNAse was added and was incubated for 30 minutes in 37̊C. The sample was
diluted with 200ul 1X TE10ul 10M sodium acetat (pH 5.2) and 250ul of 70% ETOH and the
DNA precipitate was mixed gently. The solution was centrifuged in 10,000xg for 10 minutes and
the supernatant was discarded. The sample was air dried until no traces of alcohol can be found.
Thhe sample was resuspend with 20ul TE buffer (10mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH8)) to
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) will be carried out using the universal barcoding
primers PDC1 (GAT CAC TGG GAT TTG GTG) and reverse primer PDC2 (TCC TCA TAA
ACA ATG GGG G). PCR will be performed in a final volume of 15 uL. Each reaction
contained:
denaturation in 95̊C for 1 minutes. Annealing was in 55̊C for 30 seconds and elongation period
of 72̊C for 1 minute and 30 seconds. Then, the final extension was 72̊C for 5 minutes. PCR
blank controls was incorporated. PCR products were visualized on 1.5% agarose gels stained
N1 N2 ML
Figure 2. Second PCR Product of Normal Coconut Endosperm and Makapuno Leaf. N1 (Normal
coconut replicate 1); N2 (Normal coconut replicate 2; ML (Makapuno Leaf).
Advance Genetics
As shown in Figure 2 there were bands from the two replicates of normal coconut
endosperm but there were no bands for Makapuno endosperm. One reason might be the proper
proportion for diluting the DNA sample. It also had primer dimers because the concentration of
the primer was 100uM instead instead of using 10uM. If the primer concentration is in extreme
excess over the template concentration, then the primers will be more likely to anneal to
themselves or each other over the DNA template (Lorenz, 2012). According to Poritz and Ririe
In Figure 1 showed no bands in the DNA. This might be because the DNA samples were
not diluted. Because after the samples were diluted in (2:50) ratio between DNA sample and
ultrapure water it showed bands in normal coconut indicating having a PCR product. Aside from
diluting the DNA, increasing the volume of Taq polymerase might have an effect on the the PCR
products in Figure 2. It may be necessary to increase the amount of Taq DNA Polymerase to 2-3
uL, if the PCR mixture contains inhibitors, for instance, due to contamination of the template
DNA (Thermo Scientific, 2012). This might also mean that the DNA samples do have
DNA viscous, glue like and non-amplifiable during amplification in the PCR reaction. It inhibits
the activity of Taq polymerase and interferes with the restriction enzyme (Porebski et al., 1997).
There were no bands for makapuno endosperm it might be because the DNA was not
extracted or the DNA was low in concentration. According Lorenz (2012) the quality and
CONCLUSION
Advance Genetics
in normal and mutant coconut endosperm can’t be determined. Because the DNA of makapuno is
not yet sequenced and so comparison between their genome can’t be carried out. Further PCR
troubleshooting must be done to successfully amplify the DNA. Moreover, the DNA for
pyruvate decarboxylase must come from a fresh sample to ensure a higher concentration of
DNA.
REFERENCE
POREBSKI, S., L.G. BAILEY, B.R. BAUM. 1997.Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction
protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant
Mol Biol Rep. 1997;15:8–15.
RAMIREZ, D.A. and E.M.T. MENDOZA. 1998. The Macapuno Mutant Coconut. Bicutan,
Taguig, Rizal: National Academy of Science & Technology
Advance Genetics