You are on page 1of 2

Ultraviolet exposure in the Ironman triathlon

MATTHIAS MOEHRLE
Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, GERMANY

ABSTRACT
MOEHRLE, M. Ultraviolet exposure in the Ironman triathlon. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 33, No. 8, 2001, pp. 1385–1386. Purpose:
Skin cancer is increasing worldwide and exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is thought to be the most important environmental risk
factor. People practicing outdoor sports are exposed to considerable amounts of UV radiation from the sun. Methods: Three triathletes
participated in the Ironman Triathlon World Championships 1999 in Hawaii (3.9-km swim, 180.2-km bike, 42.4-km run). They attached
Bacillus subtilis spore film dosimeters (VioSpor) on the back between their shoulders. The dosimeter system measured cumulative
biologically weighted erythemal UV exposure. UV exposure is given in minimal erythema doses (1 MED corresponds to 250 J·m⫺2
at 298 nm). Results: The mean personal UV exposure was 8.3 MED (6.9 –9.7 MED) after 8:43 to 9:44 h of competition corresponding
to 0.8 to 1.3 MED·h⫺1 (bike and run). The athletes were sunburned despite the use of water-resistant sunscreen (SPF 25⫹) on sun
exposed skin. Conclusion: The International Radiation Protection Agency has issued guidelines for professional UV exposure. Ironman
triathletes considerably exceeded these limits of exposure similar to other outdoor sports. Professional and amateur athletes should be
aware of hazards caused by UV radiation. Adequate protection by water-resistant sunscreens and clothing as well as training and
competition schedules with low sun exposure seem to be a reasonable recommendation. Key Words: DOSIMETRY, EXPOSURE

U
ltraviolet (UV) radiation is estimated to be the most by a swimsuit. Written informed consent was obtained from
important environmental risk factor for the devel- all subjects.
opment of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer
(3,4). Practicing outdoor sports amateurs and professionals
RESULTS
may considerably be exposed to UV radiation from the sun
(5,8,9). Endurance athletes such as (Ironman distance) tria- The athletes needed between 8:43 and 9:44 h for the
thletes spend about 20 h·wk⫺1 training outdoors. The aim of whole distance. During the competition personal UV expo-
this study was to assess the UV exposure of athletes partic- sures from 6.9 to 9.7 MED (mean 8.3 MED) were measured,
ipating in the Ironman Triathlon World Championships corresponding to 0.8 –1.3 MED·h⫺1 during the cycling
1999 in Hawaii using a new biological dosimeter system. (180.2 km) and the marathon run (42.4 km).
Despite the use of water-resistant sunscreen (SPF 25⫹)
on sun exposed skin, there was visible erythema (sunburn).
MATERIALS AND METHODS It was more intense on the shoulders and thighs, as the
Dosimeter. A new method of UV measurement has Ironman rules prohibit the application of sunscreens on
been developed using a film dosimeter containing dried these sites.
spores of Bacillus subtilis. The spectral response of the
spore film (VioSpor, Biosense, Bornheim, Germany) has DISCUSSION
been verified using spectroradiometers and is quite similar
to the curve of erythema (2,7,12). The detector measures UV exposure limits issued by the International Commis-
cumulative biologically weighted erythemal UV exposure. sion for Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) (6) and
UV exposure is given in minimal erythema doses (1 MED the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hy-
⫽ 250 J·m⫺2 at 298 nm; 1 MED ⫽ the dose to generate gienists (ACGIH) (1) were exceeded more than 30 times
erythema (sunburn) in nontanned skin (skin type 2). during this triathlon competition. UV exposure of triathletes
Subjects. At the Ironman Triathlon World Champion- can be compared with UV doses that have been measured in
ships 1999 in Hawaii (3.9-km swim, 180.2-km cycling, other outdoor sports, such as professional cycling or moun-
42.4-km run), three male triathletes carried dosimeters at- taineering (8,9). In most outdoor activities with exposed
tached to the back of their sports dress. During the swim UV skin, even if performed for a short time in sunny conditions,
exposure was limited, because the detectors were covered the limit of exposure of 0.3 MED per 8-h workshift is likely
to be exceeded.
The sunscreens partially might have been washed off by
0195-9131/01/3308-1385/$3.00/0 the sea water and sweating, thus being less effective. In
MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE® addition, swimming in sea water (13) and sweating during
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Sports Medicine cycling and running may additionally have increased indi-
Submitted for publication June 2000. vidual UV sensitivity (11). Tanning always results from
Accepted for publication October 2000. low-dose UV-related DNA damage of the skin, requiring
1385
DNA repair. However, tanning may prevent acute damage head, were likely to receive higher UV doses. However,
(sunburn). The tan the athletes had from previous outdoor extended measurements, even with the small, lightweight
training and the use of water-resistant sunscreens was not dosimeters being used, would not have been tolerated by the
sufficient to prevent sunburn during the competition. In athletes during the Ironman competition. It could be dem-
addition, the rules and regulations of the Ironman competi- onstrated that the dosimeter system is suitable for UV mea-
tion prohibited sunscreen application on sites where race surements in extreme outdoor sports. In conclusion, UV
numbers were marked on the skin (14). Competitors should exposure of outdoor sport professionals as well as amateurs
be advised to use sunscreen on these sites after race numbers should be reduced by water-resistant sunscreens, adequate
had been marked. The application of sunscreen with a better clothing, and by training and competition schedules with
water resistance and/or higher SPF is desirable. low sun exposure.
Triathletes preparing for the Ironman competition spend
about 20 h·wk⫺1 training outdoors. As in other outdoor Special thanks to Matthias Klumpp for his active help during the
sports, protection of the skin by clothing should be extended Ironman 1999.
but is limited by discipline specific conditions. Most sports The study was performed with funds of the Department of Der-
matology, University of Tuebingen, Germany. There is no profes-
clothing offers good clinical protection against UV radia- sional relationship with companies or manufacturers who will benefit
tion, depending on color and type of the fabric (10). from the results of the present study. The results of the present
The study was limited by the small number of athletes and study do not constitute endorsement of the product by the authors
or the ACSM.
the lack of control (e.g., spectators, ambient radiation). UV
Address for correspondence: Dr. med. Matthias Moehrle, Depart-
exposure was measured at one single body site, on the back ment of Dermatology, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Ger-
between the shoulders. Other sites, such as shoulders or many; E-mail: matthias.moehrle@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

REFERENCES
1. AMERICAN CONFERENCE OF GOVERNMENTAL INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS. 8. MOEHRLE, M., and C. GARBE. Personal UV dosimetry by Bacillus
TLVs and BEI: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances subtilis spore films. Dermatology 200:1–5, 2000.
and Physical Agents, Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, 9. MOEHRLE, M., L. HEINRICH, A. SCHMID, and C. GARBE. Extreme UV
OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, exposure of professional cyclists. Dermatology 201:44 – 45, 2000.
1999, pp. 154 –158. 10. MOEHRLE, M, and C. GARBE. Solar UV-protective properties of
2. FURUSAWA, Y., L. E. QUINTERN, H. HOLTSCHMIDT, P. KOEPKE, and textiles. Dermatology 201:82, 2000.
M. SAITO. Determination of erythema effective solar radiation in 11. MOEHRLE, M., W. KOEHLE, K. DIETZ, and G. LISCHKA. Reduction of
Japan and Germany with a spore monolayer film optimized for the minimal erythema dose by sweating. Photodermatol. Photoimmu-
detection of UVB and UVA: results of a field campaign. Appl. nol. Photomed. 16:260 –262, 2000.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 50:597– 603, 1998. 12. QUINTERN, L. E., Y. FURUSAWA, K. FUKUTSU, and H. HOLTSCHMIDT.
3. GLASS, A. G., and R. N. HOOVER. The emerging epidemic of mela-
Characterization and application of UV detector spore films: the
noma and squamous cell skin cancer. JAMA 262:2097–2100. 1989.
sensitivity curve of a new detector system provides good similarity
4. GLOSTER, H. M. JR., and D. G. BRODLAND. The epidemiology of
to the action spectrum for UV-induced erythema in human skin.
skin cancer. Dermatol. Surg. 22:217–226, 1996.
5. HERLIHY, E., P. H. GIES, C. R. ROY, and M. JONES. Personal J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 37:158 –166, 1997.
dosimetry of solar UV radiation for different outdoor activities. 13. SCHEMPP, C. M., K. MULLER, M-J. SCHULTE, E. SCHOPF, and J. C.
Photochem. Photobiol. 60:288 –294, 1994. SIMON. Salt water bathing prior to UVB irradiation leads to a
6. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. decrease of the minimal erythema dose and an increased erythema
Guidelines on UV radiation exposure limits. Health Phys. 71:978, index without affecting skin pigmentation. Photochem. Photobiol.
1996. 69:341–344, 1999.
7. MCKINLAY, A. F., and B. L. DIFFEY. A reference action spectrum 14. WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION. Ironman Triathlon World Cham-
for ultraviolet induced erythema in human skin. CIE J. 6:17–22, pionship: Contestant Information Guide. October 23, 1999,
1987. Kailua-Kona, HI, 1999, p. 3.

1386 Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine http://www.acsm-msse.org

You might also like