National exams should not carry such high weight in determining access to higher education according to the document. The document argues that 3 years of secondary school work building an average can be undone by a poor performance on a 2 hour exam. National exams do not show what students are capable of or their achievements and difficulties in learning processes over the school year as assessed through other means like tests and classroom performance. The document concludes that the weight of national exams is excessive compared to continuous assessment and could compromise students' future choices, and therefore national exams should no longer exist.
National exams should not carry such high weight in determining access to higher education according to the document. The document argues that 3 years of secondary school work building an average can be undone by a poor performance on a 2 hour exam. National exams do not show what students are capable of or their achievements and difficulties in learning processes over the school year as assessed through other means like tests and classroom performance. The document concludes that the weight of national exams is excessive compared to continuous assessment and could compromise students' future choices, and therefore national exams should no longer exist.
National exams should not carry such high weight in determining access to higher education according to the document. The document argues that 3 years of secondary school work building an average can be undone by a poor performance on a 2 hour exam. National exams do not show what students are capable of or their achievements and difficulties in learning processes over the school year as assessed through other means like tests and classroom performance. The document concludes that the weight of national exams is excessive compared to continuous assessment and could compromise students' future choices, and therefore national exams should no longer exist.
I think that national exams should not have such a high weight in the final average for access to higher education.
We spent 3 years in secondary school building an average, working day by
day, striving to obtain positive results, preparing ourselves to achieve a good final average, to be able to follow what we want, to then in 120 minutes of exam, we can throw it all away, all the work we have done in 3 years. Fortunately, it doesn't happen to everyone, but it does happen to many. I think that only un exam can´t decide our future. I don’t believe that in that exam, in those two hours, it’s possible to see what the students are capable of. We are evaluated in different ways and throughout the year, either by tests or by evaluating our performance in the classroom. National exams say nothing about the achievements and difficulties of the learning processes. I think that we are diminishing the role of teachers in the classroom and promoting memorizing instead of logic, evaluating memory and not learning.
So, I think the weight of national exams is excessive compared to
continuous assessment, it can compromise the choices of our future, they