Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accessibility Assignment
Student’s Name
Instructor
Date
2
Consenting
assignment, a laptop occasionally used by three family members was used. On weekly basis, the
laptop was used by two employed members of the family. As a result, they inquired if
accomplishing the needs of the assignment would interfere with the functionality of the laptop. I
was prompted to ascertain that the DOJSAC assignment only aimed at evaluating a specific
software and would not lead to any changes in the device. Also, following the reassurance of
their queries, I was then accorded full permission to complete the assignment by accessing
Microsoft PowerPoint.
Background
Accordingly, to completing the DOJSAC assignment, the evaluator accessed the family
laptop in their living room where there were minimum distractions. Also, the place provided a
strong network connection to facilitate every process. To ensure effectiveness in the process, the
checklist was printed prior to the assignment and acted as a source of reference. There was no
complexity in accessing Microsoft PowerPoint and associate software settings as the laptop was
well managed and icons well arranged to ease the processes. Through professionalism and
experience, it was easy for the evaluator to identify assistive technology which helps guide
individuals to access services using the device. As the family was not in during the evaluation, it
provided a comfortable and conducive environment to carry out necessary tests for the
assignment.
3
Assessment
The assessment checklist was completed in approximately two hours. As highlighted, this
was conducted at the family’s living room as this provided a good environment and suitable
location with minimal concerns from individual distractions, network connection problems, as
well as complexities in accessing the software. The laptop used was fast and reliable constituting
assignment, the evaluator requested access to a PowerPoint document saved in the device to
Results
During the evaluation, several elements of Microsoft PowerPoint software were assessed
Elements Findings
Keyboard access Microsoft PowerPoint offers users keyboard equivalents for mouse
across the menu, text boxes, and fields. The software presents users
system features.
Timing Since the family gave full access to the software, there were timed
Screen elements Microsoft PowerPoint provides field descriptions placed above the
tables. Further, every window, object, and control was well labeled to
standard control.
equivalents and icon selections on the menu, tools, and format bars.
integrated into the operating system. To settings tab allows the user
Display The software displays on a patterned background but allows the user
to override and default fonts for printing and text display. Moreover,
users can adjust rotation, flashing, and moving displays through the
operating system.
Colors Microsoft PowerPoint does not allow for color-coding as the primary
Size Size settings were easily identified, however, if the software draws its
screen elements, it does not adhere to the size settings selected by the
documentation, and ASCII text files but a user cannot have any
training There was the availability of special training provided through online
Interpretation
From the evaluation, it is vital to note that Microsoft PowerPoint is easily accessible and
easy to use by all users regardless of their condition. This is facilitated by the easily available
software settings provided by the operating system (Rutledge & Mucciolo, 2021). Considering
that the owners provided a comprehensive document to accomplish the accessibility assignment,
it was possible to evaluate all areas of the software. As a result, it was possible to identify how
the software function and provided necessary recommendations that aim at integrating necessary
highlighted.
Recommendation
6
Noteworthy, with a majority of the features complying with the expected standards of
accessible software, it was however necessary to recommend a change that allows the software
alternative and reliable navigation tools since users without a mouse or keyboard find it very
difficult to navigate through the software. In addition, it is essential to ensure that the software
supports the presentation of audio information in a visual format (Molochkov, 2017). Since the
software supports patterned display, it would benefit the users by allowing for the presentation of
a primary blank to give the user full control in selecting the appropriate display design to use in
operating the software. Besides, it was impossible to print files in the ASCII format with the
available online tutorials not providing reliable outcomes as the steps were not compatible with
training to ensure that users are able to navigate through the software and incorporate assistive
technology.
Application
software effectively with the aid of a mouse and keyboard. Here, I try to resolve any
complexities that result from the system and highly advocate for the use of shortcuts. However, it
was challenging to use shortcuts only to find the software and navigate through with the aid of
the operating system when an owner-drawn control is not available (Huddleston, 2018).
Subsequently, it is a challenge to complete certain tasks using the system necessitating aid from
subscriptions which limits the number of users benefiting from the help (Petrie & Bevan, 2019).
Additionally, for individuals with disabilities, it is challenging to identify and use navigation
7
functions and shortcuts if they are not efficiently trained. This contributes to unanticipated
concerns for Microsoft PowerPoint users which highlights the need for professionals to educate
other users on how to apply the identified concepts when using the software.
References
8
https://scholarspace.jccc.edu/c2c_sidlit/2018/friday/1/
Petrie, H., & Bevan, N. (2019). Evaluation of Microsoft PowerPoint Accessibility, Usability, and
Rutledge, P. A., & Mucciolo, T. (2021). Using Microsoft PowerPoint 2002. Que Publishing.