Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BIOCHEMISTRY
3 (1-2)
Coordinator:
Dr. Dian Herawati
http://fst.ipb.ac.id
Internationally Accredited Study Program by IFT and IUFoST
TPN 202
Enzyme Activity
Enzyme not
only recognizes
substrate, but
also induces
the formation of
transition state
www.themegallery.com
Adapted from Nelson & Cox (2004) Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry (3e) p.198
Why enzymes can lower activation energy?
It is a magic pocket
+
-
Preventing the influence of water sustains the formation of stable ionic bonds
Adapted from Alberts et al (2002) Molecular Biology of the Cell (4e) p.115
Additional catalytic mechanism
❖Additional catalytic mechanisms employed by enzymes
include general acid-base catalysis, covalent catalysis,
and metal ion catalysis.
B
A
A B Catalytic surface
Chemically C-O- is not stable, and possess free electron pair which return
the double bond with C. The C Atom will to degrade other bond (Oktet
Steps contribute to transition state
The protonated HisH+ now plays roles as acid. Giving H+ to substrate N, causing
breakdown of C-N, to give the product
Measuring Enzyme Activity
❖ Enzymes speed up the rate of a reaction by a definite
amount, proportional to quantity of enzyme present.
❖ Enzyme assay: the process or measuring enzyme
catalyzed reaction rate.
❖ Enzyme kinetics: mathematical analysis of how the
observed reaction rate varies with substrate
concentration; kinetic behaviour can be used to test
models of reaction mechanism (rules out wrong models)
Activity Measurement
❖ Separate the products and analyze each one, but it's a lot of work.
❖ Alternatively, measure the increase in total reactive terminal amino
groups by reaction with the amino acid detection reagent,
▪ ninhydrin reacts with N-terminal amino groups, not with peptide-
bonded NH groups.
❖ The enzyme reaction creates one new terminal amino group per
peptide bond hydrolyzed
Using synthetic substrate
Raveendran S,
Parameswaran B,
Ummalyma SB, et al.
Applications of Microbial
Enzymes in Food
Industry. Food Technol
Biotechnol.
2018;56(1):16-30.
doi:10.17113/ftb.56.01.18.
5491