Professional Documents
Culture Documents
First Question:
Paul Farmer has a talent for connecting with people whose backgrounds are seemingly
different than his own. I feel this stems from his upbringing and the dynamics of his family life.
Paul Farmer and his siblings were raised in an unconventional home that did not tolerate social
injustices within their unit, and Paul’s father (the Warden) did not like facades put on by others;
only humility would do as an appropriate disposition within those family dynamics. For
example, during the time Farmer attended Duke, he returned home for a visit wearing costly
apparel. He acted as if he could only wear a certain standard of clothing and the Warden
tactfully asserted that Paul would still behave as the rest of them; no matter what he was wearing,
he would be doing chores like the rest of them. This foundation gave Paul Farmer a humble
beginning, one that he could draw from for the rest of his life’s experiences (Kidder, 2004).
Also, Paul Farmer is sure to get on the same level with the person he is speaking with and
maintains eye contact. He speaks to others in a nonjudgmental manner that cultivates openness
and feelings of safety for conversations to freely flow. These nonverbal talents of communication
that Paul Farmer uses are explained in the book when he sits on the bed beside an HIV-positive
man while doing rounds in Brigham. He converses with him just as an old friend would, even
making jokes about how marijuana would be a less dangerous alternative, and Joe, the patient,
feels a connection with Farmer. Joe knew that he was being heard and not judged because he was
Second Question:
The epi-divide is the categorization of people that die from age-related illnesses, and
those that have early ages of mortality, dying from preventable causes. Oftentimes, this is the
difference between those that have access to healthcare and those that do not. This division was
manifested in Haiti by those that have access to TB treatments, and those that do not. The
unfortunate side of that division usually fell upon females with black or brown skin and almost
interpretation of her contraction of TB, and the cause of the disease being attributed to sorcery.
Through the study, Farmer discovered that his patients believed in science, and they understood
the disease as a process, even though they practiced Voodoo. They also understood that proper
medicine could cure the illness. The revelation came when the woman Farmer had interviewed
expressed that her TB infection was a result of sorcery and that someone had cursed her, sending
the disease upon her (Kidder, 2004). This was an important concept for Farmer, as well as for the
rest of us; to understand that we are complicated beings, and our beliefs are not simple. This
discovery has a broad application, especially in melting pot countries such as the United States.
Individuals should not have their beliefs easily dismissed because it mimics a misunderstanding
of science. For some, science is a manifestation of a higher power, and faith in a deity can be
confirmed through the miracles of science. C.S. Lewis said, “…most dogs cannot understand
pointing. You point to a bit of food on the floor; the dog, instead of looking at the floor, sniffs at
your finger. A finger is a finger to him, and that is all. His world is all fact and no meaning”
(Lewis, 2001, p.114-15). To understand only science is like a dog’s perspective of only
understanding the finger, but to believe in a deeper meaning behind the science, is to understand
Third Question:
way money and medicine are distributed throughout the world. The book has reinforced my
understanding of health disparities but has also made a connection for me about distribution
2
insufficiency regarding poverty, ethnicities, and nationalities. Light has been shed on the specific
inequalities of Haiti and the preferential treatment affluent countries are privileged to. In my
opinion, the distribution of monetary and medical resources is what differentiates people from
the haves and the have-nots. Those that are fortunate enough to have access to healthcare are
oftentimes oblivious of this privilege, taking it for granted. I must agree with Paul Farmer, that
2004).
The awareness of structural violence among the public, and the impact it has on
understanding the impact it has on certain groups, is the first step in changing disparities.
Advocating for my patients’ needs serves individuals and sitting on boards that create policies
that impact the people in the communities where I live, helps many individuals in the
Moral obligations are derived from a moral compass. Because of personal awareness of
what is right and what is wrong, I feel that change is needed concerning healthcare access across
the globe. Money isn’t everything, but not having it is. With that said, I do not feel as concerned
with the distribution of wealth as I am with access to healthcare. I understand these two generally
go hand in hand, but I also understand that the suffering of the poor is a lack of consideration
from those that hold wealth. A community that will function at its highest is one where they have
the same goals, objectives, and see with the ‘same eye’ and feel as ‘one heart’. Understanding
that when your neighbors are suffering, will undoubtedly create suffering in your own life, is an
awareness. To help your neighbor by lifting the burdens that are placed upon their shoulders is
3
an attribute of a highly functioning mentality and society. This does not require wealth, per se,
but it does require consideration. Politics and economics reflect the people’s concerns. The
people are the ones (especially in representative democracies) who hold the power, and the
government will act on those desires. If the majority does not care for the problems of those in
poverty, the government will do nothing to help. This means that if we want a change, we must
be the ones to do it first. With that said, not all countries can have policies and governments that
reflect the desires of their citizens; I believe that this is when other nations have a moral
No matter the location, the influence that Mountains Beyond Mountains (2004) has on my
nursing practice helps me to recognize that education does not equal emotional intelligence, and
that manners are not equivalent to grace. As I grow in my career, I look back at some of the
physicians that would volunteer to go to Tanzania and set up a clinic. Some practitioners never
went, but others would go, only to come back with a piece of their hearts left in Africa. I had my
favorite providers, and hindsight has helped me to realize that a line of eager compassion could
be drawn that singles out the very physicians I had favored. I aspire to be like these physicians,
not just superficially sympathetic, but one that others discern as approachable; characteristics
that stem from a compassionate empathy that bubbles from the depths of my soul.
Fourth Question:
There are several issues and assumptions about Farmer’s intentions throughout the book,
and many of them echo what is heard in America. Cynicism assuredly existed from a white man
coming to Haiti to help solve black problems, but Farmer won the community over by staying
consistent with his efforts, proving that he was genuine. Haiti becoming dependent upon the U.S.
and the charitable efforts of PIH in cultivating that dependency was a topic of conversation
4
between Farmer, Ophelia, and Jim Kim. On another applicable occasion, Farmer addressed an
audience in Cuba about the assumptions regarding women and HIV infection rates. He boils
down the infectious issue as economically derived, and poverty driven. He asserted the
unemployment rate directly affects the prevalence of infectious disease, and that help is given in
the form of employment and economic nurturing. Throughout the text, Farmer reiterates that
poverty is the culprit for most diseases in Haiti, and is responsible for all preventable diseases
(Kidder, 2004).
My experience as a nurse cannot compare to Paul Farmer’s life of selflessly serving the
underserved people of Haiti. But on a much smaller scale, I can relate. While working in
infectious disease, I saw some of those disparities firsthand. Many of our patients were homeless
and current or former drug users. When I first started, I did not fit in as a white, heterosexual
female, serving a population of predominantly black, homosexual males. There was a presence
of cynicism that could be felt, but through my consistent efforts, patients witnessed that I tried to
One situation comes to mind, where I had to administer a penicillin injection to a woman
because she had contracted syphilis. As carefully as I could, I administered the injection,
knowing that it is not an easy needle to accept. I always feel uneasy about those injections; the
size of the needle required, combined with the amount of solution to be delivered, especially if
the recipient is underweight, was concerning for me. After the woman received her injection, she
proceeded to thank me for treating her with kindness. She stated that the last nurse told her that
she knew what she was doing, and the injection was a minimal consequence for her actions. She
had caught syphilis from her husband who had cheated on her, but even without that background
knowledge, I had not treated her any differently than I would have any other patient. I do recall
5
my feelings when she explained what another had assumed about her, and I will never forget the
pain I saw in her eyes, and the injustice I beheld that day.
In the future, I will continue my professional journey with the same genuine approach. I
will do the job because that is what is needed, not because I have something to gain or because I
want praise for my efforts. Essentially, I will echo the same sentiment and joy Paul Farmer felt
while in Haiti; I am the best version of myself when I am helping others. Indeed, “[t]hat’s when I
6
Jessica Reynolds
References: