Professional Documents
Culture Documents
student outcomes (cognitive, affective, and ethical), fosters a more active citizenry, promotes a
“scholarship of engagement” among teachers and institutions, supports a more equitable society,
and reconnects colleges and universities with their local and regional communities (e.g., Astin et
Furco’s work and the Wingspread statement are emblematic of this dominant vision and the
goals of service-learning institutionalization and the two primary and divergent paths to
achieving such goals. Specifically, Furco’s work offers a systematic rubric for gauging the
Furco (2002) has developed a rubric for viewing the institutionalization of service-learning. The
rubric works as a road map that may be followed by individuals and institutions committed to
Furco operationalizes institutionalization across five distinct dimensions “which are considered
by most service learning experts to be key factors for higher education service-learning
institutionalization” (1): (1) philosophy and mission; (2) faculty support and involvement; (3)
student support and involvement; (4) community participation and partnerships; and (5)
institutional support. While Furco argues elsewhere (2001, 2003) that research shows faculty and
institutional support to be the key institutional factors, the rubric makes clear that “what is most
important is the overall status of the campus’ institutionalization progress rather than the
progress of individual components” (3). The real value and usefulness of the rubric is that it
clearly and succinctly lays out the step-by-step increments by which a campus can