Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOCIAL MEDIA
BEHAVIOUR
GROUP 5
1
GROUP 5
NGUYỄN HẢI ÂU- 21001214
2
TABLE OF CONTENT
PART 2 ANALYSE 7
3
PART I : SAMPLE
SAMPLE
A survey questionnaire was used to analyse and distribute online via email.
The data were collected from a sample of students at Western Sydney
University and other acquaintances.
The total sample size was 116, and English was the primary language. Overall,
the age of the participants ranged from 13 to 26, with 47.41% from 18-20, and
a noticeably most significant number of respondents aged 19, with 25 people.
Notably, approximately 60% of the respondents were female.
Total size
116
19 years old
21.55%
Respondents and Age
60%
Were female
Respondents were asked about the frequency rate on using social media
sites. The social media sites include Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, and
Tiktok. The respondents have 5 options to choose:
Participants were asked about how much time was spent on social media
daily. As the data were nominal, these data were converted into ratio data by
calculating the average of each answer. For instance, with the result "1-3
hours" will be converted into the average from 1 to 3, it is 2.
5
FREQUENCY OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE
This survey asked users of each platform how often they engage with the
site, whether rarely, sometimes, often or always . This question was
designed as a Likert scale question that respondents have to rate their
frequency of social media use.
There are four options for respondents to choose from based on their
preferences about favourite social media site (Facebook, Youtube, Instagram
and Tiktok).
6
PART II: ANALYSE
CONTINGENCY TABLES - APPLYING PROBABILITY
-Using marginal probability, for example, in terms of column totals, 116 out of 464 so
the marginal probability of Instagram usage rate as a social media platform is P(R2) =
116/464= 0.25
The proportion of students who use social media site like Instagram regarding to
any frequency is about 25%.
Besides, using row totals, the marginal probability of Often is P(F2)= 177/464= 0.38
There is a 38% of people using social media (Facebook, Instagram, Youtube,
Tiktok) often.
-For Joint probability, the upper right-hand cell is the joint event that people rarely use
TikTok as a social media site. So it can be written P(F1 and R4). The joint probability is
P(F1 and R4) = 21/464= 0.05. This means that there is about 4.5% of respondents who
rarely use Tiktok.
-Conditional probability: P(R1|F4)= 51/464= 0.102. In other words, there is about 11%
of participants who use Facebook, given that the frequency is always.
After analysing the collected data, it is unknown that whether there were
any statistically significant differences between the means of 4
independent groups. Therefore, a technique named One-way ANOVA was
used to determine it.
8
1. F – TEST METHOD [RONALD A. FISHER IN THE 1930S]
To determine whether all the means of 4 groups are equal, the F-test
method was used:
Step 4: Because Fcalc > Fcrit, it is concluded that all the means of 4
groups are not equal
9
2. POST HOC TESTS WITH ANOVA
To determine exactly which group means are different, a Tukey post hoc
test was performed:
Step 4: If tcalc > tcrit for each groups, the hypotheses would be rejected. It
could be concluded that there were 3 groups which have the same means:
Instagram
Youtube
Tiktok
10
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTIC
11
SIMPLE REGRESSION
After collected and interpreted the data, age and average of using rate
were 2 variables. To particularly identify that if the age and the
average using rate have any relationship. The data will be tested for
significant correlation using Student’s t and test for significant slope.
With the aim of identifying the linear model: y= 𝜷𝟎 + 𝜷𝟏 × 𝒙 and state that if 𝜷1 is not equal to 0 so that
Firstly, by applying the formula, the fundamental data were found to primarily identify the
Secondly, with 2 found data, tcalc and tcrit will be calculated. Because the goal is to find if age
Finally, there is a comparison between tcalc and tcrit, as a final result, tcalc < tcrit (0.55<2.17) so
it is fail to reject the hypothesis. Therefore, age will not influence the using rate.