Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10.1109 Aero.2009.4839658 6mmd
10.1109 Aero.2009.4839658 6mmd
Takashi Yoneyama,
Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica – ITA
Praça Marechal Eduardo Gomes, 50 - Vila das Acácias
São José dos Campos, SP Brasil 12.228-900
takashi@ita.br
Abstract—A model-based approach to Prognostics and PHM has become a great field of research due to its
Health Monitoring (PHM) for an electro-hydraulic flight capability of health assessment and failure prediction,
control actuator is presented. The aim of this paper is to generating technical and financial benefits for any kind of
show a model-based methodology to detect, diagnose and plant. Especially the cost has received a lot of attention for
prognosticate a fault in an electro-hydraulic primary flight critical plants, like chemical, aerospace and aeronautic
control actuator that precedes an imminent failure. The systems.
model-based approach is versatile and can be easily applied
on another system, whose model is available. The PHM This technology can lead to potentially considerable savings
solution proposed is dedicated to health monitoring and in aeronautical industry, reducing the number of delays and
failure prediction of a generic primary flight control increasing safety. As PHM aims to anticipate failures, these
actuator. This model-based approach systematically events could be avoided if the monitoring solution is
assesses health state and the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) available to an operator. The estimation of current and
and consists of developing a model of the system for future health state of components in aircraft may also guide
different flight conditions, the introduction of the failure the maintenance activities and spare parts logistics [2].
mode. The RUL calculated is a time-to-failure whose
confidence level depends on several conditions, such as This task is gradually being accomplished, as more and
model fidelity, sensor noise and precision of the data more field data become available, correlated with the failure
recorder.12 reports and the maintenance actions history. PHM is about
making aircraft more competitive by making them more
TABLE OF CONTENTS maintainable, and will probably represent an important
competitive advantage in the near future [3].
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1
2. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION ................................................. 2
Although the need for PHM in aircrafts is clearly
3. PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MONITORING
recognized, the problem of detecting faults and predicting
METHODOLOGIES ............................................................... 2
failures in actuators is complex. The failure modes comprise
4. CASE STUDY .................................................................... 4
electrical, mechanical and hydraulic components and can be
5. SIMULATED RESULTS ...................................................... 7
disguised by aerodynamic loads and other varying forces
6. CONCLUSION AND REMARKS .......................................... 7
[4].
REFERENCES ....................................................................... 8
BIOGRAPHY ......................................................................... 9
Traditionally, PHM has been heavily based on data-driven
approach, yielding significant results for some applications.
However, this approach typically gives considerable
1. INTRODUCTION dispersion. This paper shows a model-based methodology to
Prognostics and Health Monitoring (PHM) is a technique detect, diagnostic and prognostic a fault in a generic electro-
which uses observations of measurements to assess health hydraulic actuator that precedes a failure.
state and develop a prediction of impending failure of
chosen components [1]. This paper is organized in six sections. Section 2 contains
the problem description, presenting a high level description
1 of the system modeled and the failure mode. Section 3
1
978-1-4244-2622-5/09/$25.00 ©2009 IEEE describes the proposed PHM methodology, showing the
2
IEEEAC paper#1293, Version 4, Updated 2008:12:19
1
basic steps that should be followed. Section 4 presents a
case study showing the effects of the failure mode chosen
and the PHM formulation adopted. Section 5 presents the
numerical results. The last section presents the conclusion
and some remarks.
2. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
In general, a flight control system is developed to comply Fig. 2. Actuation control loop.
with performance and safety requirements. However, during
in-service life, the system tends to degrade, which happens As shown in Fig. 2, the controller generates an electrical
at different rates, mainly depending on the operational signal. This signal commands the Electro-Hydraulic Servo-
conditions. For this reason, it may happen that the Line Valve (EHSV) of the actuator causing flow through the
Replaceable Units (LRU) which are part of the system fail valve. The position of the ram is then controlled by the
before the scheduled replacement time. This causes closed-loop configuration abovementioned. The flight
unscheduled stops, logistic problems, higher maintenance control surface position is proportional to the ram position.
costs and loss of profit.
The model of the system includes the control law inside the
To address this problem, a PHM methodology dedicated to controller, consisting on a gain schedule based on flight
one failure mode is proposed. The failure mode was chosen conditions and the difference between the desired and the
using a conventional FMECA (Failure Mode, Effects, and current ram position. Also, the EHSV is modeled as a
Criticality Analysis). As a representative failure mode of an conventional two stage jet-pipe valve with incompressible
electro-hydraulic system, the clogging of the Electro- flow [5]. The nominal model was validated by experimental
Hydraulic Servo-Valve (EHSV) output was chosen. tests and real data collected from a new aircraft.
2
typical clogging evolution [10]. As a result, a trend line is Fault Diagnostic
built up to extrapolate the fault until the failure, giving the
Diagnostics is the process of fault isolation and
mean time to failure and variance according to the data.
identification [6]. However, in this paper just one fault is
analyzed, so this step is concerned only with the fault
In the PHM design phase, the steps presented on Fig. 4 were
identification. In other words, specifically for PHM
followed.
purposes, the magnitude of the fault or failure mode due to
the fault evaluation is identified based on the residue
between the electrical current measured in the system and
calculated by the model.
Failure Criteria
For other than total loss of function, the end-of-life
definition depends on the application. Actuator frequency
analysis is one possible source of failure information [7].
Typically, to meet the requirements, the frequency response
has to be within specified limits. A general flight control
actuator frequency response is presented in Fig. 5 as an
example of nominal frequency response of the actuator
(solid line) and requirements (dashed lines).
The first step was modeling the system. The model should
be validated with real data. The next steps are described
below.
Fault Evaluation
The failure mode implemented was clogging in the output
of the EHSV. The fault was implemented in the model of
the system related to a severity index.
Feature Extraction
Many comparisons between the parameters measured
should be done in order to identify the failure precursors,
which are the most sensitive parameter that might be
identified to detect and evaluate the failure mode accurately. Fig. 5. Frequency response requirements.
3
parameters are correctly identified and the system is close to The selection of the most sensitive parameters to clogging is
failure, there would be no significant differences between valuable because it can reduce the sample rate necessary to
the techniques of extrapolation [16]. detect and quantify the fault. In order to give the same
information using only the output of the system (ram
As a result, the confidence interval can be calculated using position), a higher sample rate is necessary, e.g. [4].
simple statistical tools and the prognostic process becomes
quite simple in terms of mathematical formulation. A simple way to determine the most sensitive parameter is
to compare the relative difference between the integral of
The following section presents a specific case study for the the nominal response and the integral of the failed response.
clogging failure mode, where prognostic process is The comparison between the sensitivities of the electrical
illustrated. current in the EHSV and the ram position is shown in Fig.
6.
4. CASE STUDY 60
Sensitivity
Fault Evaluation
Percentual Sensitivity
40
4
EHSV Current Residue As a result, the non-linear function maps the value of
1 10% Clogging degraded system electrical current integral into a
30% Clogging degradation index. This index is linearly related to clogging,
EHSV Current Residue (normalized)
0.8
60% Clogging as depicted in Fig. 8. The correlation achieved was very
close to 1, considering the clogging varying from 0% to
0.6 40%.
0.2 45
40
0
35
-0.2
Clogging (%)
30
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (s) 25
20
Fig. 7. EHSV current residue under different clogging
conditions. 15
10
Other approach to evaluate the most suitable parameters to
5
diagnostic the fault is to evaluate the correlation with the
severity index [15]. The integral of electrical current has a 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
high correlation with the degradation index. Degradation Index
d (t ) = f ( I , I N ) (2)
5
Bode Diagram
10
Magnitude
-10
Nominal
-20 20% Clogging
40% Clogging
-30 60% Clogging
-40
-1 0 1 2
10 10 10 10
-50
Phase
-100
Nominal
20% Clogging
-150 40% Clogging
60% Clogging
-200
-1 0 1 2
10 10 10 10
Frequency
As illustrated in Fig. 9, the threshold estimated is 40% of As a result, the RUL is assumed as a random Gaussian
clogging, i.e. severity index equal to 0.4. This value variable, and its mean is evaluated when the degradation
corresponds to a frequency response tangent to the index reaches the failure threshold, as showed in (5).
requirements in a critical condition.
dˆ ( RUL ) = f (5)
Simulated results have shown that phase information does
not improve diagnostic performance in this failure mode, as
long as the magnitude requirement is the critical. Where d̂ is the estimated degradation index and f is the
threshold.
Prognostics
Finally, the prognostic is the last step to be accomplished in The bounds are calculated assuming a Gaussian distribution
order to calculate the RUL. of the RUL. Since a linear regression is fitted, the
confidence interval of the estimation in a future instant tf is
A linear regression was performed using a linear least calculated using (6) [11].
squares method to evaluate degradation, as demonstrates
( )
(4). The assumption of linear model lies in the fact that 1 (t f − t )
2
d (t ) = a t + b + ε (4) where:
Where d is the degradation index, t is time, a and b are the dˆ (t ) = aˆ t + bˆ is the predicted degradation index;
estimated coefficients and ε is the estimation error.
α = 1 - γ and γ is the confidence coefficient for prediction;
6
0 Prognostics: RUL=11.0141
1
s= ∑ [d (ti ) − dˆ (ti )]2
N − 2 i = N −1 is the standard deviation 1
of estimation error;
( )
T α , N − 2 is the percentile (1 − α/2) of a Student-T
2
0.8
d(t)
Data
0
1
t=
N
∑ (t ) i 0.4
tmean = 11.01
i = − N +1 is the average of past instants t; thigh = 17.13
0 tlow = 5.06
Stt = ∑ ( ti − t ) 2
i = − N +1
0.2
Threshold
is the variance of past instants t; Model
0
-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
t
7
Also, the model was used to define the failure criteria. To [5] H. E. Merritt, Hydraulic Control Systems. New York:
do so, the frequency response of the model with different John Wiley & Sons, 1967.
intensities of clogging was calculated and compared with
the requirements. The first value of clogging that made the [6] J. J. Gertler, Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering
system not comply with requirements was used as the Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1998.
failure threshold.
[7] D. S. Bodden, N. S. Clements, B. Schley, G. Jenney,
For comparison, in a strictly data-driven approach a bench “Seeded failure testing and analysis of an electro-mechanical
test would have to be implemented to find out which actuator”, Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2007.
parameters might be measured to give the desired
information and component end-of-life. [8] M. J. Roemer, C. S. Byington, G. J. Kacprzynski, G.
Vachtsevanos, “An overview of selected prognostic
A linear regression of the degradation index evolution was technologies with reference to an integrated PHM
calculated. As a result, the RUL was evaluated with architecture”, Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2005.
confidence bounds.
[9] M. A. O. Alves Jr, D. Cabral, K. T. Fitzgibbon, “Model-
Finally, these results show evidence that the use of a based failure severity prediction based on robust residual
detailed and validated model of the system can produce a design”, Proc. 15th Mediterranean Conference on Control and
complete PHM process of good performance. Future steps Automation, 2007.
of this work will validate the methodology.
[10] A. Pérez-Paricio, “Integrated modeling of clogging
process in artificial groundwater recharge”, Ph.D. Thesis,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT Dept. Geotechnical Eng., Technical University of Catalonia,
This work was supported in part by Financiadora de Barcelona, Spain, 2001.
Estudos e Projetos (FINEP), Brazil.
[11] N. R. Draper and H. Smith, Applied Regression
C. O. Bizarria would like to thank Mr. M. A. O. Alves Jr. Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
and Mr. R. R. Starr for their support in this work.
[12] R. Isermann, Fault-Diagnosis Systems: An Introduction
from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance. Berlin, Germany:
Springer, 2006.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Vohnout, D. Goodman, J. Judkins, M. Kozak, K. [13] C. Hajiyev, F. Calistan, Fault Diagnosis and
Harris, “Electronic prognostics system implementation on Reconfiguration in Flight Control Systems. Norwell, MA:
power actuator components”, Proc. IEEE Aerospace Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
Conference, 2008.
[14] M. J. Roemer, G. J. Kacprzynski, E. O. Nwadiogbu, G.
[2] G. Vachtsevanos, F. L. Lewis, M. Roemer, A. Hess, and Bloor, “Development of Diagnostic and Prognostic
B. Wu, Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Technologies for Aerospace Health Management
Engineering Systems: Methods and Case Studies. Hoboken, Applications”, Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2001.
NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[15] M. J. Roemer, “Introduction to PHM Design Analysis”,
[3] L. C. Puttini, K. T. Fitzgibbon, R. H. K. Galvão, T. Prognostics Tutorial Track, presented on International
Yoneyama, “Prognostics and health monitoring solution Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 2008.
applied to aeronautic heat exchangers”, Proc. 11th Joint
NASA/FAA/DoD Conference on Aging Aircraft, 2008. [16] K. Goebel, “Methods for Making Predictions”,
Prognostics Tutorial Track, presented on International
[4] C. S. Byington, M. Watson, D. Edwards, P. Stoelting, “A Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, 2008.
model-based approach to prognostics and health management
for flight control actuators”, Proc. IEEE Aerospace
Conference, 2004.
8
BIOGRAPHY
Cintia O. Bizarria is a development
engineer for aeronautical systems at
Embraer since 2007. She has joined a
R&D group to perform research on
PHM technology for aeronautical
applications. She holds a bachelor’s
degree on Mechatronics Engineering
from Universidade de Brasília (UnB),
Brazil, and she is currently a graduate student in
Aeronautical Engineering at Instituto Tecnológico de
Aeronáutica (ITA), Brazil.