Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I Term Structure
I Introduction
I Identification: How to observe the term structure?
I Data
I Why is this important?
I Term Spread
I Spot rate VS Forward rate
I Arbitrage opportunity
I Before talking about the definition of stocks, do you remember stocks VS bonds?
I Definition: stocks (also known as equities) represent ownership interests in the firm
(although it is a tiny piece of the firm)
I Stocks have no specified maturity date (infinitely lived)
1. Common stock
I Represents residual claim on the firm’s cash flows: common shareholders get paid
after everyone else is paid.
I Can receive dividends at management’s discretion
I Elect a board of directors, which chooses top management.
2. Preferred stock
I Receives fixed dividend payments before common stockholders.
I Dividends can be skipped but any skipped dividend must be paid in full in the future.
I Usually preferred stockholders have no voting rights.
I Somewhat similar to bonds.
https://companiesmarketcap.com/usa/largest-companies-in-the-usa-by-market-cap/
https://www.tradingview.com/markets/stocks-hong-kong/market-movers-large-cap/
Q: Between small and large stocks, can you tell which one is more volatile?
I Cyclical Stocks
I Businesses are sensitive to economic trends.
I Stock prices are very volatile.
I Example: automobile, travel and leisure, banks, furniture, high-end clothing
retailers.
I Defensive Stocks
I Businesses are stable over business cycles.
I Cash flow is very stable, and they tend to pay high dividends.
I Examples: utilities, food, beverages, drugs, and insurance sectors.
Q: When do you think cyclical stocks perform better than defensive stocks?
I “Widely regarded as the best single gauge of the U.S. equities market, this world-renowned index
includes 500 leading companies in leading industries of the U.S. economy.” (Standard & Poors
website)”
I A stock market index that measures the performance of 30 large, publicly traded companies listed
on the stock exchange in the United States.
I It is one of the oldest (1896), and is often used as a benchmark for the overall performance of the
U.S. stock market.
I The DJIA is calculated by taking the sum of the prices of the 30 stocks and dividing it by a
divisor, which is adjusted to account for stock splits and other corporate actions.
I The DJIA is often reported in the media as a barometer of the stock market’s overall health.
P
I Pstock = 1 Dt
t=1 (1+re )t
I How is it di↵erent from bonds?
I Price today is the present value of expected future cash flows (it is unknown as of
today)
D1 + P 1
P0 =
1 + re
where re is the appropriate discount rate
I Is discount rate re larger or smaller than the one used for government bonds?
I Why did we not take D0 into account?
I re = D P1
P0 + P0
1
1: required returns = dividend yield + capital gain yield.
D2 + P2
P1 =
1 + re
X 1
D1 D2 D3 Dt
P0 = + 2
+ 3
+ ... =
1 + re (1 + re ) (1 + re ) t=1
(1 + re ) t
I So stock price = PV of expected dividend payments, and we can use the time value of
money techniques to value stocks that pay
I Dividends growing at a zero rate
I Dividends growing at a constant rate
I Dividends growing at di↵erent rates at di↵erent times
" ✓ ◆T #
C 1+g
I Recall ‘Growing Annuity’: PV = 1
r g 1+r
I Here, C = Dividend
I If you invest, you will get the same amount of dividend at the end of every year.
1.64
P0 = = $26.32
0.0623
VS the actual price was $61.39 (as of Jan. 18, 2022)
I If we do the same for Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) - $9.8, re = 7.68%, we would get
9.8
P0 = = $127.60
0.0768
VS the actual price was $372.62 (as of Jan. 18, 2022)
D1 1.64 · 1.0232
P0,Coca Cola = = = $42.92 (vs. $26.32 no growth, $61.39 in the real data)
re g 0.0623 0.0232
D1 9.8 · 1.0097
P0,Lockheed martin = = = $147.47 (vs. $127.6 no growth, $372.62 in the real data)
re g 0.0768 0.0097
I Dividends tend to grow at di↵erent rates depending on where the company is in its life cycle, the
economy, availability of positive NPV projects, cash flow uncertainty, etc.
I So it may be more realistic to use a di↵erential (rather than zero or constant) dividend growth
approach.
I Practically, we estimate dividends as precisely as possible in the foreseeable future, and assume a
constant growth rate thereafter:
D1 D2 DT DT (1 + g ) 1
P0 = + + ... + +
1 + re (1 + re )2 (1 + re )T re g (1 + re )T
| {z } | {z }
Precise valuation for short-term dividends Growing perpetuity
Why did we not take the $2 dividend that the firm just paid into account?
I Your turn:
I the company paid a dividend of $4.00 to its stockholders
I the dividend will grow at 18% over the next 2 years
I after 2 years, the dividends will grow at 10% for 2 years
I after that, dividends will be constant (growth rate of 0%)
I assume a required rate of return of 10%
I What is the price of one share of this stock?
$ 64 .
13
I Estimated price is very sensitive to small changes in our parameters: discount rate re
and dividend growth rate g
2.00
I For example, if D1 = 2.00, re = 10% and g = 5%, then P0 = = 40.00
0.10 0.05
I If re or g misestimated by just ±1%, the theoretical price could be:
2.00
I as low as P0 = = 28.57 or
0.11 0.04
2.00
I as high as P0 = = 66.67
0.09 0.06
I Where do re and g come from?
1. The simplest way to get g is to use the historical dividend growth rate
I e.g., average g over the last five years
2. The slightly less simple way is to estimate it as
Total Dividends
Retention Ratio = 1 Dividend Payout Ratio = 1
Net Income
Net Income
ROE =
Common Equity
Sales
-Cost of Goods sold (COGS)
Gross profit
-Operating expenses (SG&A)
Operating income (EBIT)
-Interest expenses
EBT
- Tax
Net income
I Net income is either paid out to shareholders as dividends or re-invested for the growth of a
company.
I EPS = Earnings Per share = Net income / # of shares outstanding.
I DPS = Dividend Per share = Net income ⇥ Dividend Payout ratio / # of shares outstanding.
I If Retention Ratio (RR) = 0, dividends cannot be bigger. For companies to grow, they
need money to invest (marketing, facilities, hiring, etc.)
I If ROE = 0, Net income = 0, there is no income left for a company to pay dividends.
EPS1
PE = ,
re
EPS1 EPS1
P0 = NPVGO + , NPVGO = P0
re re
I Consider a firm with EPS1 = $5 at the end of the first year, a dividend-payout ratio of 30%, a
discount rate of 16%, and a return on equity of 20%
I Dividend in one year will be D1 = $5 · 0.30 = $1.50 per share
I Retention ratio is 1 0.30 = 0.70, so g = 0.70 · 20% = 14%
I From the dividend growth model, the share price is
D1 1.50
P0 = = = $75.00
re g 0.16 0.14
I From the NPVGO model, the share price is
EPS1 5.00
P0 = + NPVGO = + NPVGO ) NPVGO = 75.00 31.25 = $43.75
re 0.16
I The growth prospect accounts for 58.3% (=43.75/75) of the stock value.
E (D1 ) E (P1 ) P0
re = +
P P0
| {z0 } | {z }
Expected Dividend Yield Expected Capital Gain
D1 D1
P0 = , which implies that re = +g
re g P0
D1 D1
P0 = , which implies that re = +g
re g P0
I For example, Hang Seng bank paid a $5.5 dividend over the last year
I ROE = 15.987/172.036 = 0.0929
I RR = 1-5.5/8.16 = 0.326
I g = ROE*RR = 0.0303
D1 5.5 · 1.0303
re = +g = + 0.0303 = 6.674%
P0 155.5
I This is more conditional expected return, not long-term equilibrium return.
I Previous example 6% annual payment, Three years to maturity, YTM 8%, and 1,000 of par.
I Coupon payment = 1,000 ⇥ 0.06 = 60, Bond price = 60 + 60 2 + 1,0603 = 948.46
1.08 1.08 1.08
I Macaulay Duration = 60 1
+ 60 2
+ 1,060 3
= 2.82
1.08 948.46 1.082 948.46 1.083 948.46
I w1 = 60 1
: Importance of CF in year 1
1.08 948.46
I w2 = 60 1
: Importance of CF in year 2
1.082 948.46
I w3 = 1,060 1
: Importance of CF in year 3,
w1 + w2 + w3 = 1
1.083 948.46
I Macaulay Duration = 1 ⇥ w1 + 2 ⇥ w2 + 3 ⇥ w3
I In Gordon’s model, P = D1
re g = D0 (1+g )
re g
I Duration of stock =
T
X 1
X D0 (1 + g )t t
CFt t
t
⇥ =
t=1
(1 + r ) P t=1
(1 + re )t P
X1 X1 X1
D0 (1 + g )t t D0 (1 + g )t (re g )t (1 + g )t 1
(re g )t 1 + re
t
= t
= =
t=1
(1 + re ) P t=1
(1 + re ) D0 (1 + g ) t=1
(1 + re )t 1 1 + re re g
1 + re
=
D1 /P0
P1
I The second last equality comes from t=1 xn 1
n= 1
(1 x)2 for 0 < x < 1
I If a firm does not pay dividends, the duration is high, meaning that it takes a longer time
to recover your investment.
I Tencent
I ROE = 179.619 / 1110.2267 = 0.1618
I RR = 1- 1.6/23.67 = 0.9324
I g = 0.1618 * 0.9324 = 0.1509
I re = D1 + g = 1.6⇤1.1509 + 0.1509 = 0.155.
P 0 452.4
I Duration = 1+0.1550 = 283.75!
0.155 0.1509
I Tech stocks are growth stocks. Their CF will be generated in the future. They don’t pay
dividends. Of course, duration is high ! Very sensitive to the interest rate.
I Does it mean that it takes 283.75 years to get your money back, so you shouldn’t invest in
Tencent?
VUG: Vanguard growth index fund, VTV: Vanguard value index fund
P0 1 NPVGO
= +
EPS1 re EPS
|{z} | {z 1 }
cost of capital Growth opportunities per unit of profit
I Book-to-market ratio: book equity value per share/market price per share
I Price-to-sales ratio
I Price-to-cash flow ratio
I Ratio of market value to earnings before interest and taxes
I EV/EBITDA
I EV = Market value of equity plus debt.
I EBITDA = EBIT + Depreciation + Amortization
I Many others.
These valuation multiples are only shortcuts for more fundamental discounted cash flow
valuation.