Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The head teller at the Union Dime Savings Bank in New York took advantage of an error correction
routine built into the computer system to embezzle $1.5 million over a period of three years. The head
teller was responsible for training new tellers in the operation of the bank’s on-line system. Because
these trainees made numerous errors, the head teller explained his entries to several accounts each day
using the error-correction routine as necessary to correct the errors of these trainees. Toward the end
of the embezzlement period he was making upwards of fifty supervisory corrections per day to support
a $30,000 per day gambling addiction. The following controls were prescribed for the system:
a) A daily review of all supervisory transactions was made by a control clerk at the center.
Although the control clerk had been told to look for an unusual volume of corrections,
such a condition for this branch did not cause any alarm because the condition had
existed since the first day the clerk performed the review.
b) A report of all supervisory corrections sent to the branch manager each day was ignored
by that individual because he did not understand the purpose of the report.
c) The head teller was required to take a vacation each year, but problems that arose
during his absence because of the defalcation were saved for him to resolve upon his
return.
d) Exceptions turned up by the auditors when they confirmed account balances were taken
to the head teller for resolution. Blaming the errors on recently hired tellers, he would
correct the misposting with the error-correction routine.
Requirements: