Search... & " !

# % $ '

CrowdStrike leads in
keeping businesses, and Open

their reputations, secure.

CrowdStrike

& MENU

Judicial Precedent as a Source of Law ! > Legal Method > Judicial Precedent as a Source of Law

Search Here
Judicial Precedent as a Source of Law

CrowdStrike
Search

" legalpaathshala@gmail.com - # 15/12/2020 - $ Legal Method - % 0 Comments

Join Our WhatsApp Group

CrowdStrike
Is Our
#1
Reason
for
What is a Judicial Precedent?
Being #1
Meaning of Judicial Precedent: – Judicial precedent means the process whereby judges CrowdStrike

follow previously decided cases where the facts are of sufficient similarity. In judicial
precedent, similar cases have been decided in the past. Judicial precedents based on the
principle of stare decisis are also a source of law as they offer a backbone or support to rely on,
Open
in cases with similar facts. Judicial judgment is therefore based on the ‘doctrine of stare decisis’,
namely to “stand according to the decision already made”.

Contact Us Directly
A Judicial precedent is a principle or a rule or judgement that was declared or laid down in a
previous legal case. It is binding or advisory on tribunals and courts when a similar case with
similar facts arises before it. These are nothing but previous legal decisions that have been taken
by judges in similar cases in these courts that provide an outline as to what must be held in
similar cases that arise before the court or similar cases that arise in lower courts or similar cases
that arise before a lesser bench. A lesser bench is when the number of judges is lesser than
those that decided the case that the new bench will be basing their decision on. Recent Posts

Registration of Trademarks, Procedure To

Register A Trademark, Grounds for Refusal of
Trademarks

Introduction to Trademark Law in India

Patent Infringement and Defences

Compulsory Licensing

Rights of Patentee in India

Revocation of Patent
CrowdStrike

Procedure For Filing Patent Application

In the 18th century, the Government of India Act, 1935, held that decisions made in Federal Introduction to Patent Law
courts and in the Privy Councils would be binding on the courts during the reign of the British.
Introduction to Copyright Law
Since the 18th century, precedents have been a legal characteristic of the Indian legal system
Stages of Group Development
and have helped many judges form decisions and reverse decisions that later on were found to
be arbitrary or mindless.
CrowdStrike

There is a term, called the ‘doctrine of stare decisis’, which states that the judgment of the
court is an example to be followed in future cases of a similar nature. The reason a
precedent is recognized is that the judiciary’s decision is considered correct. The use of Is Our
#1
precedent helps to gain confidence in the litigation judicial system. The administration of judicial
decisions is just and fair.

What does Stare Decisis mean?

Meaning of Stare Decisis: – Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow
Reason
historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis ensures that cases with
similar scenarios and facts be approached in the same way. Simply put, it binds courts to follow
for
Being #1
legal precedents set byprevious decisions.

Stare decisis is the legal principle which requires judges to abide by and respect the precedents
laid down by similar prior decisions. The Latin maxim, Stare decisis et non quieta movere which
CrowdStrike
means, “to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed” forms the basis of this legal
principle. In the legal context, judges interpret as meaning to not disturb already settled matters to
allow for continuity. If varying judges gave their opinion in different matters in different courts,
having similar facts would lead to chaos and many parties would feel like their rights have been Open
infringed and they would feel helpless and like justice has not been served to them. This doctrine
is basically a rule or a requirement that a Court must follow the rules established by a superior
Categories
court.
Select Category %

Definition of Precedent by various Jurists

In general, the term precedent means, ‘a previous instance or case which is, or may be taken as
an example of rule for subsequent cases, or by which some similar act or circumstances may be
supported or justified.’

According to Gray, ‘ precedent covers everything said or done, which furnishes a rule for
subsequent practice.’

According to Keeton, ‘a judicial precedent is judicial to which authority has in some measure
been attached.’

According to Salmond, ‘in a loose sense, it includes merely reported case law which may be
cited & followed by courts.’ In a strict sense, that case law which not only has a great binding
authority but must also be followed.

According to Bentham precedents are ‘Judge made Law.’

According to Austin precedents are ‘Judiciary’s Law.’

In general, in the judicial field, it means the guidance or authority of past decisions for future
cases. Only such decisions as lay down some new rule or principle are called judicial precedents.
The application of such judicial decisions is governed by different principles in different legal
systems. These principles are called ‘Doctrine of Precedent’. For this case to be held, first such
precedents must be reported, maybe cited and may probably be followed by courts. Secondly,
the precedent under certain circumstances must be followed.

Thus it can be inferred that precedents are: –

1. Guidance or authority of past decisions for future cases.

2. Precedents must be reported, maybe cited and may probably be followed by courts.
3. Precedents must have opinio-juris.
4. These must be followed widely for a long time and must not violate any existing statue law.

What is the nature of precedents?

The nature of judicial precedents is that they must be purely constitutive and not abrogative
at all. This means that a judicial decision can make a law but cannot alter it. Where there is a
settled rule of law, it is the duty of the judges to follow the same. They cannot substitute their
opinions for the established rule of law. The function is limited to supplying the vacancies of the
legal systems, filling up with new law the gaps that exist.

Two rules that apply to the principle of Judicial Precedent are as follows: –

1. The first rule states that a court which is lower in a hierarchy is completely bound by the
decisions of the top courts.
2. The second rule states that high courts are generally bound by their judgments in cases
relating to preceding cases.

Supreme Court

1. The Supreme Court is the supreme authority and its decisions are binding on all other courts.
Article 141 of the Constitution states that any law decided by the Supreme Court shall be
binding on all courts of the country.
2. Article 141 states that all courts are legally bound to the judicial decisions of the Supreme
Court except for the Supreme Court itself. The Supreme Court is not bound by its own
decisions.
3. However, the Supreme Court’s past decisions cannot be changed, except on certain
circumstances. If the earlier decision is found to be wrong, the Supreme Court can change it.

High Court

1. The decisions of the High Court are binding on all subordinate courts. In case of conflict
between two benches of the same authority, the later decision of the high court is followed.
2. The higher the number of judges on a bench, the greater their authority.
3. The decision of one High Court does not bind on other High Courts.

What are the types of Judicial Precedent?

Types of Judicial Precedent are as follows: –

1. Declaratory and Original: – In declaratory precedents, the mere application of a rule in a

previous legal case is used. A declaratory precedent is the application of an existing precedent
in a particular case. A declaratory precedent involves declaring and putting into practice an
existing law, so it does not help in making new laws. Original precedents result in the creation
of new laws. Here new laws are created and applied. An example can be where we considered
that the power to amend the constitution was not restricted till it was decided that limits must
be placed on the same and that all laws in the Ninth Schedule henceforth must also be tested
against the basic structure.

2. Persuasive: – Persuasive Precedents include decisions taken by an inferior court that a High
Court or any other court is not bound to follow. It is up to the court to consider it or not. The
judge will rely heavily on this case and take it into consideration. It is not directly considered as
a source of law but is seen as a form of historical precedents. This is usually seen in High
Courts, where the judgements in one High Court can be considered as persuasive precedents
in another. This can be seen when similar cases arise in various High Courts the verdict can
be made by relying upon judgments from other High Courts. They will not be binding but will be
persuasive and will act in favour of the litigating party in whose favour the previous verdicts
have been made.

3. Absolutely Authoritative: – In these cases, the verdict that has been earlier must mandatorily
be followed by the judge. Even if the judge thinks that it is a wrong judgement they are
required to follow that precedent because of sheer numbers. This is usually seen in cases
where the bench is smaller than the bench that decided upon the precedent that the judge is
relying on. This is also possible in cases of hierarchy, where certain courts have to rely on
decisions made by superior courts. Binding Precedents are also known as authoritative
precedents. Once a decision is made, these precedents are bound to the lower court or other
equivalent courts.

4. Conditionally Authoritative: – In this case, the precedents by a general rule are considered
authoritative but can be disregarded in cases of the parties appearing before the Supreme
Court. The decision can also be overturned. An example can be where we considered that the
power to amend the constitution was complete till it was decided that limits must be placed on
the same and that all laws in the Ninth Schedule, henceforth must also be tested against the
basic structure.

Importance of Judicial Precedent

The primary function of the Judiciary is the settlement of disputes. Initially, while adjudicating, the
courts are guided by customs and their own sense of justice. Later on, legislations become the
main source of law and the Rule of Law is what judges base their decisions on.

1. Inductive Method: – A great amount of reliance is placed upon the decisions of the judges in
this method. The judges look into previously decided cases in the same or superior courts
before giving a final judgement, of a similar nature that have already been adjudicated upon
before. They consider general rules and principles from the previous case and apply them on
the cases before them. They then decide accordingly. This is known as the Inductive method.

2. Deductive Method: – In this method, a great amount of reliance is placed on legislatures and
the enacted statutes. It can be seen as a kind of positivist approach but most judges are now
free to interpret the law in any way they see fit to favour justice, equity and good conscience. In
such a system, the cases are decided on the basis of the enacted legislation and statute that
are codified and the judges decide cases on the basis of these statutes. Here the judges do
not decide on the basis of previously decided cases.

What are the parts of a decision?

The parts of a decision are as follows: –

1. Ratio Decidendi: – The ‘ratio decidendi’ is derived from a Latin word meaning reason for the
decision. It consists of a rule or principle established and formulated through judgment. The
principle applies in all future decisions that create the same facts; the fall in the ratio is binding
on all lower courts of the country.The ratio or cause of decision making is deducted from the
facts of the case and subsequently applied in all other cases, it forms the basis for accepting a
particular decision as precedent.

2. Obiter Dictum: – An obiter dictum is an opinion or comment made by a judge that does not
form an essential part of a court’s decision. Obiter dictum is a Latin word that means the way
things are done. The Obiter dictum mentions some opinions, examples, statements,
observations, etc., which are made by the judge while making the decision. These opinions are
not binding on all other courts, while they are only persuasive in nature.

What are the advantages of Judicial Precedent?

The advantages of Judicial Precedent are as follows: –

1. All people dealing with the same case are treated equally and there are equality and fairness
of justice.
2. It serves as guidelines to decide future cases.
3. For example, time is saved and convenience increases because the question once is already
settled and this saves the time and labor of judges and lawyers.
4. Precedents help formulate new statutory laws and adjust to the changing circumstances of
society.
5. Cases that make them more practical.
6. The binding precedent establishes a rule that helps maintain stability.

What are the disadvantages of Judicial Precedent?

The disadvantages of Judicial Precedent are as follows: –

1. A precedent bound a lower court to follow it which sometimes forces it to take less or harsher
decisions, which does not require in a case.
2. There are many examples of many cases and hence it becomes difficult to apply the right
example in the right case.
3. It is not mandatory to follow a precedent when a case is distinguished.
4. Some situations are not recognized under precedent because they are not taken into
consideration.

Types of Opinion

1. Dissenting Opinion: – Dissenting opinion, or disagreement, is the separate judicial opinion of

an appellate judge who disagreed with the majority’s decision explaining the disagreement.

2. Concurring Opinion: – A concurring opinion agrees with the outcome of the majority opinion,
but not necessarily the argument found in the majority opinion. The concurrent opinion gives
adjudicator an opportunity to clarify the legal logic of a case or to present a completely different
legal argument for adjudication.

Use of Precedent in the United States

The United States uses the common law system to some extent in its state courts and its lower
courts. The defined principle of common law requires that courts follow the decisions of higher-
level courts within the same jurisdiction.From this legacy of staring, it seems that according to the
law, somewhat predictable, consistent bodies have emerged.

The hierarchy of the court is clearly defined. The federal court system is based on a three-tier
structure, with United States district courts being trial-level courts; The United States Court of
Appeals is the first-level court of appeal, and the United States Supreme Court is the ultimate
arbiter of the law. The system includes both judge and jury and their respective roles.

Common law refers to judge-made laws otherwise referred to as case laws, these case laws
maybe based on constitutional provisions, statutory provisions or may be pure decisive case law.
Thus the case laws are properly recorded and also available to a common researcher.

The system of precedent is also very flexible, as the US Supreme Court rejected many of its
decisions. For example: Between 1946 and 1992, 130 of its decisions were dismissed. The
system, therefore, provides for the general rule of staring and effective implementation with a
flexible structure.

Good examples of Judicial Precedents

1. Vishakha and others vs. State of Rajasthan (Air 1997 SC 3011)

It is considered one of the historical cases in India as the case was the first of its kind to protect
women at their work sites. The case has its roots in the recollection of Bhanwari Devi, who was a
social worker and was gang-raped by men on the upside, as she opposed child marriage.

The determination of Bhanwari Devi attracted many women and a public interest petition
collectively under the forum of Visakha for violation of Articles 14,15,19 (1) (g) and 21.

The decision given by the bench of JS (PIL) induced to file. Varma, Sujata Manohar and BN
Kripal gave Vishaka guidelines to protect women from sexual harassment at the workplace, later
it was changed in 2013 to the Sexual Harassment of Women in Workplace Act, 2013, one of the
biggest victories of women enabled.

TAGS: WHAT IS A JUDICIAL PRECEDENT, JUDICIAL PRECEDENT, STARE DECISIS, DEFINITION OF PRECEDENT BY VARIOUS JURISTS,
JUDICIAL PRECEDENT NOTES, JUDICIAL PRECEDENT PDF, MERITS AND DEMERITS OF PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW, JUDICIAL
PRECEDENT IN INDIA, JUDICIAL PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW IN INDIA, IMPORTANCE OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE
OF LAW, PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW PPT, PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW PDF, DISADVANTAGES OF JUDICIAL
PRECEDENT, TYPES OF OPINION, USE OF PRECEDENT IN THE US, USE OF PRECEDENT IN THE UNITED STATES, GOOD EXAMPLES OF
PRECEDENTS, VISHAKHA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (AIR 1997 SC 3011), VISHAKHA AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF
RAJASTHAN, PRECEDENT, PRECEDENT AS SOURCE OF LAW, WHAT IS PRECEDENT?, WHAT IS PRECEDENT, SUPREME COURT, HIGH
COURT, TYPES OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT, ADVANTAGES OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT

Leave a Reply

Your comment here...

Name (required) Email (required) Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

POST C OM M EN T

Would You Like To Start A Project

With Us?

We are here to help. Article Writing, Research Paper,

Online Competitions, Quiz Competition, Moot Court
Competition, Internship Experience, Sponsorship,
Advertisement, etc. any contribution ensuring the dignity
of the law, we will acknowledge your work and advertise +91 9311515578
it. Our audience are Law Students, Aspirants Of Various
Competitive Examinations, Law Graduates, Eminent
lawyers, Business Professionals and various Legal Firms
and associates.

Join us today as we believe in Growth of All!

Follow Us On: Important Links Our Policies Get In Touch

! Home ! Terms and Conditions Tulip Tower, Gaur Saundaryam,
! " # $ % &
" Iteda, Greater Noida, Greater Noida,
! Subject Notes ! Privacy Policy Uttar Pradesh 201009

! Current A!airs ! About Us ! legalpaathshala@gmail.com

! Services ! Contact Us # +91 9311515578

! Collaborate ! Disclaimer & 09311515578

$ 0120 4974016

Copyright © 2022 Legal PaathShala | Powered by Legal PaathShala | Get Answers. Get Results

CrowdStrike leads in keeping businesses, Open

and their reputations, secure.