You are on page 1of 3

2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON

ADVANCES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING (ICADEE 2020)

Comparison of Transmission Losses and Voltage


Regulation of Overhead and Gas Insulated
Transmission Line
2020 IEEE International Conference on Advances and Developments in Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ICADEE) | 978-1-7281-9251-2/20/$31.00 ©2020 IEEE | DOI: 10.1109/ICADEE51157.2020.9368950

Ansari Habiburrahman, Research Scholar Dr. L. D. Arya, Professor


Department of Electrical Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering
Medi-Caps University Medi-Caps University
Indore, India Indore, India
habiburrahman.ansari@gmail.com ldarya@rediffmail.com

Abstract— In an Electrical power system, the generating transmission line. So generally, transmission through the
plants are located far away from the loads and gets transmitted overhead line with bulk power only prefers. Which is very
through transmission lines. The transmission line can be an dangerous to build and some barriers like public risk, Right
overhead line or underground cable. For the last forty-five of way, etc[2,12].
years, a new technology GITL has been presented as a
In South America and North America, similarly
substitute for underground cables. Since GITL is capable of
handling a large capacity of electrical power over to the Russia and South Africa handling with extra high voltage
overhead transmission lines. The area of the GITL conductor levels like 735kV, 765kV, and 1000kV. China also actively
is very large and due to that, the low resistances cause very low participated in UHV transmission lines which may be 1100
losses in the transmission lines. The parameters can maintain kV and India working on 1200 kV transmission lines. Plans
by pressurized insulated gases, GITL is best suitable for Extra are also underway in North America and Europe to connect
High voltage transmission. In metro cities where space and distant regenerative energy sources to the load centers by
Right of Way making overhead lines problematic, GITL may UHV lines [3,13,14].
be our future lines and it will solve big population issues. In
this paper, the percentage voltage regulation and losses of the II. TRANSMISSION LOSSES
same voltage rating overhead lines are compared with
compressed GITL lines. MATLAB is used for the simulation The transmission losses are an important evaluation factor
and the parameters of overhead and GITL lines of the same for high-power transmission systems. The transmission of
rating voltages (220kV, 400 kV, 765kV, 1100kV). The Losses is for the lifetime, and it contributes to huge amounts
transmission line length is taken as 200 km in all examples. The of energy and money. The next is heat losses, which are
losses and voltage regulation comparisons have been related to resistive losses in the power system. The inductive
represented. behavior of the load and transmission line produces reactive
power. For power factor compensation, additional
Keywords— Gas-insulated Transmission Line, Overhead
components are required. In the transmission line loses
Lines, Voltage regulation, Ultra High Voltage
produces in the form of heat causes large power loss.
Generally sending end voltage profile is greater than the load
I. INTRODUCTION end voltage profile. This low output voltage shows the poor
A gas-insulated Transmission Line is the best alternative percentage voltage regulation[1].
for high voltage and high power transmission systems. GITL
A. Overhead transmission losses
having lots of benefits like a large diameter of the conductor,
due to a heavy amount of current may pass easily as MATLAB is used for the simulation of the overhead
compared to high voltage overhead transmission line. The transmission system. The power generated in the three-phase
basic property of resistance, which is inversely proportional circuit is measured by a measurement block on both the input
to the area of the conductor. So that the resistance of GITL end and the output end. The line parameters are taken as
lines is very small as compared to convention overhead lines Standard for the overhead high voltage transmission line for
or underground cables. As the transmission line having low 200 km[8,9].
resistances, it will minimize the transmission losses[1]. The source voltage, like resistors, inductors, capacitance,
The research is going on to find the best size solution for Scope, bus-bar, and resistive load is used for the simulation.
ACSR bare conductor for better regulation and performance. The no capacitors are connected on the transmission line
Similarly, aluminum conductor and enclosure of GITL suited because it is taken as a medium 200 km distributed line. The
for different voltage levels are going on. The optimal measuring blocks are connected for measuring power at both
diameter of the enclosure and conductor for 400 kV GITL is the input end and output end. The line parameters for 200 km
about 495.4mm and 178 mm [2]. As for overhead lines transmission line are taken 220 kV, 400 kV, 765 kV, 1100
number of phases having double lines also with the change in kV of voltage levels. The result obtained from the simulation
the diameter of the conductor is about 17.37mm and for four is the following[4,5,9].
layers the falcon with three layers has 15.91mm[2]. The size
of the ACSR conductor increases as of voltage rating
increases, In a similar way size of GITL conductors also
increases concerning the line capacity. Very high voltage
overhead transmission is adopted to lower the losses in the

978-1-7281-9251-2/20/$31.00 ©2020 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universiti Malaysia Pahang. Downloaded on January 22,2023 at 03:23:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
ADVANCES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING (ICADEE 2020)

Table 1. Technical data for GITL parameters. III. RESULT COMPARISON


Parameters GITL (solid grounded)
After the simulation of GITL in MATLAB with a 200
Inductance per length L’b (mH/km) 0.22 km pi line model, with different power input end and output
Capacitance per length C’b (nF/km) 54 end power for every line are following.
Resistance per length R’ (m_/km) 9.4 Table 3. Voltage regulation of GITL and OHTL with different loads.
Surge impedance Z (Ÿ), where Z2 = L’b/C’b 63 GITL OHTL Voltage
Sr.
Load in MW voltage voltage regulation
No.
(Pu) (Pu) of OHTL
B. GITL losses 1 400 1.0PU 0.90 10%
2 500 1.0PU 0.89 11%
In the compressed Gas Insulated Transmission Line 3 600 1.0PU 0.85 15%
GITL, the basic and very important equipment’s used in the 4 700 1.0PU 0.81 19%
construction like a current-carrying aluminum conductor, 5 800 0.99PU 0.79 21%
aluminum pipe as an enclosure, insulating gases like Sulphur
hexafluoride SF6 and Nitrogen N2 (in between the enclosure
pipe and aluminum conductor), and insulators required in IV. CONCLUSION
between the aluminum conductor and enclosure pipe that is
epoxy resin insulators for maintaining the physical isolation For the transmission purpose, the use of underground
in between the high voltage conductor and the enclosure pipe cables is quite low as compared to overhead transmission
as figure 1 GITL unit shown below[10]. Normally the length lines. As in competition, GITL comes into the market with
of live conductors is very less as in few meters. Hence, the significant advantages. Day by day the power need and
shapes of aluminum enclosures are complicated. Welding is growing population rate, the difficulties come into the picture
used as a robotic and spot for joining the purpose of as the right of ways (ROWs) to construct high voltage
aluminum conductor and enclosure. The gap between overhead transmission line with a bulk quantity of metal
conductor and enclosure filled with compressed gas as the poles and steel towers. Also, there are more losses occurs in
capacitances [2,11]. overhead lines as line parameters are not constant and
capacitance of line capacitors is not controllable. So, the
As the voltage level of the GITL system is very high. alternative to the overhead transmission line and
Therefore the transmitting power capacity of GITL is also underground cables is necessary. Compressed gas is
very high in terms of MW. The losses that occurred in controlled by the external monitoring system. The output
overhead lines are more as compared with GIT lines. voltages mean the receiving end voltages of GITL are
Because of controlled capacitances of the line to ground. The sufficiently better than the receiving end voltage of the
operation of the Gas Insulated Transmission Line is the same overhead transmission line with the same capacity. As the
as of overhead transmission line. MATLAB Simulation is results mentioned in Table III, the percentage voltage
used for overhead and GITL lines. The line parameters of regulation of the Gas-insulated transmission line is better as
GITL are given in Table II[6,7,15]. compared to the same rating of the overhead transmission
system. Based on voltage regulation and transmission loss,
shortly GITL is the best solution for transmission of
electrical power. The normal high voltage transmission line
requires an external compensation device or equipment for
reactive power compensation. However, in the case of GITL,
no need for external compensation is required for voltage
profile improvement. Table III gives a clear idea regarding
different load conditions. MATLAB Simulink used for
model simulation and the parameter values taken from Table
II, It has been clear that the voltage regulation of GITL
would be better than the other existing system. So that the
use of GITL can advantageous in the future for
interconnections of grids. And help for upcoming new
Figure 1. GITL unit
transmission lines offshore and onshore.

REFERENCES
[1] Hadi Sadat, “Power System Analysis”, PSA Publishing.
Table 2. Losses and voltage drop at corresponding voltage levels. [2] Harmann Koch, “Gas-Insulated Transmission Line (GIL)”, IEEE
Voltage Sending end Receiving end Losses Voltage Press, A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication
Level voltage(kV) voltage(kV) (%) drops(kV) [3] Harmann D Koch, “Gas Insulated Transmission Lines (GITL)”, 7th
220 kV 220kV 208.8kV 5 11.2 International Conference on Properties and Application of Dielectric
Materials 2003, vol. 4, pp. 2480-2483
400 kV 400 kV 393.5kV 1.6 6.5
765 kV, 765kV, 763.7kV 0.16 1.3 [4] Current Capacity Evaluated at 758C Conductor Temperature, 258 C
1100 kV 1100kV 1102kV nil -2 air temperature, Wind Speed of 1.4 mi=h, and frequency of 60 Hz
sources: transmission line reference book 345kv and above 2nd ed.,
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 1987.
[5] Siemens, “Gas Insulated Transmission Lines GITL, High Power
Transmission Technology”, Answers for Energy,2012, pp. 2-7.

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universiti Malaysia Pahang. Downloaded on January 22,2023 at 03:23:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
ADVANCES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING (ICADEE 2020)

[6] G. Schoeffner and R. Graf. “Suitability of N2-SF6 Gas Mixtures for [11] T. Hillers, H. Koch Siemens AG. Erlangen, Germany “Gas Insulated
the application of Gas Insulated Transmission Lines GIL”, IEEE Transmission Lines for High Power Transmission over Long
Bologna power tech Conference, vol. 2, pp 6, June 2003 Distances”, IEEE catalogue No: 98Ex137, Vol. 2, pp. 613-618, Feb.
[7] K. Elnaddab, A. Haddad, “The Transmission Characteristics of Gas 1998
Insulated Lines (GIL) Over Long Distance”, 16th International Power [12] Roberto Benato, Claudio Di Mario, Hermann Koch, “High Capability
Electronics and Motion Control Conference and Exposition, 2014 Applications of Long Gas-Insulated Lines in Structures”, IEEE
IEEE Conference. transaction on power delivery, Vol 22, p 619-626, Jan. 2007
[8] Ansari H Rahman, “Comparision of Voltage Regulation of Gas [13] Hermann Koch, “Future Needs of High Power Interconnections
Insulated Transmission Line and XLPE Cable”, Internation Journal of solved with Gas-Insulated Transmission Line (GIL)”, Vol. 3, pp. 851-
modern trends in Engineering and Research, Volume 02, Issue 04, 1855, Feb. 2002
April – 2015 [14] H. Koch,” GAS-INSULATED LINE (GIL) OF THE 2ND
[9] Ansari H Rahman, “Optimal Sizing of Conductor and Enclosure for GENERATION”, AC-DC Power Transmission, Conference
400 kV Gas Insulated Line” IJSRD - International Journal for Publication No. 485 IEE, pp39-43, Nov.2001
Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 3, Issue 05, 2015. [15] Koch H., Long lengths high power gas-insulated high-voltage
[10] "IEEE Recommended Practice for the Interface of New Gas-Insulated transmission line, CIGRE Symposium, Shanghai, China, 2003.
Equipment in Existing Gas-Insulated Substations," in IEEE Std 1416-
1998 , vol., no., pp.1-12, 27 Jan. 1999.

Authorized licensed use limited to: Universiti Malaysia Pahang. Downloaded on January 22,2023 at 03:23:06 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like