Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
An abstract must allow a rapid comprehension for helping the reader in assessing the
contents of the paper. Method: The abstract must be structured following this
template. The IMRAD format for the paper is recommended whenever possible.
Results and discussion: Your abstract should be no more than 150 words, without
reference. A list of up to 4 keywords separated by semicolons (;) follows the abstract,
as shown here.A concise and factual abstract is required (between 200 - 250 words).
The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and
major conclusions. It should be bold Italic.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Results should be clear and concise. Discussion should explore the significance of the
results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is
often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.
Figures should be designated with Arabic numerals and upper case letters for their
parts (Figure 1). Each legend should begin with a title and should be sufficiently
described so that without reading the text, figure should be understandable. All
figures, tables, etc. must have a caption, centre-justified. Tables and figures should
appear as close to their point of reference as satisfactory formatting of the final
document permits
CONCLUSIONS
A conclusion may review the main points of the paper, do not replicate the abstract as
the conclusion. A conclusion might elaborate on the importance of the work or
suggest applications and extensions. The first paragraph of this section presents the
main objective of the study. The 2nd paragraph discusses the summary of finding, the
3rd paragraph and succeeding paragraph presents the authors inferences based on
the findings of the study, implications to theoretical grounds of the study, and insights
from the study.
RECOMENDATIONS
The last paragraph focuses on the recommendations and future direction of the study
and the study limitations and how these limitations may be addressed in the study
replication.
REFERENCES
APA 7th edition
Agarwal, R. & Karahanna, E. (2000) Time Flies when You're having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and
Beliefs about Information Technology Usage, MIS Quarterly, 24, 4, 665-694.
Ajzen, I. (1988) Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior, The Dorsey Press, Chicago.
Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision
Processes, 50, 2, 179-211.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT