You are on page 1of 12

21; 22 2022

MODULE NAME: MODULE CODE:


IT PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE ITPP5112
IT PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE ITPP5112d

ASSESSMENT TYPE: ASSIGNMENT 2 (PAPER ONLY)

TOTAL MARK ALLOCATION: 100 MARKS

TOTAL HOURS: 15 HOURS

By submitting this assignment, you acknowledge that you have read and understood all the rules as
per the terms in the registration contract, in particular the assignment and assessment rules in The IIE
Assessment Strategy and Policy (IIE009), the intellectual integrity and plagiarism rules in the
Intellectual Integrity Policy (IIE023), as well as any rules and regulations published in the student
portal.

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. No material may be copied from original sources, even if referenced correctly, unless it is a
direct quote indicated with quotation marks. No more than 10% of the assignment may
consist of direct quotes.
2. Please ensure that you submit your assignment through SafeAssign.
3. Save a copy of your assignment before submitting it.
4. Assignments must be typed unless otherwise specified.
5. All work must be adequately and correctly referenced.
6. Begin each section on a new page.
7. This is an assignment that has individual and group components. No more than two members in
the group.

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 1 of 12
21; 22 2022

Referencing Rubric
Providing evidence based on valid and referenced academic sources Markers are required to provide feedback to students by indicating
is a fundamental educational principle and the cornerstone of high- (circling/underlining) the information that best describes the
quality academic work. Hence, The IIE considers it essential to student’s work.
develop the referencing skills of our students in our commitment to
achieve high academic standards. Part of achieving these high Minor technical referencing errors: 5% deduction from the overall
standards is referencing in a way that is consistent, technically correct percentage. – the student’s work contains five or more errors listed
and congruent. This is not plagiarism, which is handled differently. in the minor errors column in the table below.

Poor quality formatting in your referencing will result in a penalty of Major technical referencing errors: 10% deduction from the overall
according to the following guidelines a maximum of ten percent being percentage. – the student’s work contains five or more errors listed
deducted from the overall percentage. Please note, however, that in the major errors column in the table below.
evidence of plagiarism in the form of copied or uncited work (not
referenced), absent reference lists, or exceptionally poor If both minor and major errors are indicated, then 10% only (and not
referencing, may result in action being taken in accordance with The 5% or 15%) is deducted from the overall percentage. The examples
IIE’s Intellectual Integrity Policy (0023). provided below are not exhaustive but are provided to illustrate the
error.

Required: Minor errors in technical correctness of Major errors in technical correctness of


Technically correct referencing style referencing style referencing style
Deduct 5% from overall percentage. Deduct 10% from the overall percentage.
Example: if the response receives 70%, Example: if the response receives 70%, deduct
deduct 5%. The final mark is 65%. 10%. The final mark is 60%.
Consistency Minor inconsistencies. Major inconsistencies.
• The referencing style is generally • Poor and inconsistent referencing style used in-
• The same referencing format has consistent, but there are one or two text and/or in the bibliography/ reference list.
been used for all in-text references changes in the format of in-text • Multiple formats for the same type of
and in the bibliography/reference list. referencing and/or in the bibliography. referencing have been used.
• For example, page numbers for direct • For example, the format for direct quotes (in-
quotes (in-text) have been provided for text) and/or book chapters (bibliography/
one source, but not in another instance. reference list) is different across multiple
Two book chapters (bibliography) have instances.
been referenced in the bibliography in
two different formats.
Technical correctness Generally, technically correct with some Technically incorrect.
minor errors. • The referencing format is incorrect.
• Referencing format is technically • The correct referencing format has been • Concepts and ideas are typically referenced, but
correct throughout the submission. consistently used, but there are one or a reference is missing from small sections of the
two errors. work.
• The correct referencing format for the • Concepts and ideas are typically • Position of the references: references are only
discipline has been used, i.e., either referenced, but a reference is missing given at the beginning or end of large sections
APA, OR Harvard OR Law from one small section of the work. of work.
• Position of the references: references • For example, incorrect author information is
are only given at the beginning or end of provided, no year of publication is provided,
• Position of the reference: a reference every paragraph. quotation marks and/or page numbers for direct
is directly associated with every • For example, the student has incorrectly quotes missing, page numbers are provided for
concept or idea. presented direct quotes (in-text) and/or paraphrased material, the incorrect punctuation
book chapters (bibliography/reference is used (in-text); the bibliography/reference list
• For example, quotation marks, page list). is not in alphabetical order, the incorrect format
numbers, years, etc. are applied for a book chapter/journal article is used,
correctly, sources in the information is missing e.g. no place of
bibliography/reference list are publication had been provided (bibliography);
correctly presented. repeated sources on the reference list.
Congruence between in-text Generally, congruence between the in- A lack of congruence between the in-text
referencing and bibliography/ text referencing and the bibliography/ referencing and the bibliography.
reference list reference list with one or two errors. • No relationship/several incongruencies between
• There is largely a match between the the in-text referencing and the
• All sources are accurately reflected sources presented in-text and the bibliography/reference list.
and are all accurately included in the bibliography. • For example, sources are included in-text, but
bibliography/ reference list. • For example, a source appears in the not in the bibliography and vice versa, a link,
text, but not in the bibliography/ rather than the actual reference is provided in
reference list or vice versa. the bibliography.
In summary: the recording of references In summary, at least 80% of the sources In summary, at least 60% of the sources are
is accurate and complete. are correctly reflected and included in a incorrectly reflected and/or not included in
reference list. reference list.
Overall Feedback about the consistency, technical correctness and congruence between in-text referencing and bibliography:
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 2 of 12
21; 22 2022

Assignment Instructions
This assignment contains three questions which cover learning units 1 to 5 and will require you to
work both individually and in a group for different questions. Groups must consist of two members.

• Question 1 – Individual
• Question 2: Group
• Question 3: Group

A summary of the tasks you need to complete are:

1. Write an individual essay on the possible ethical implications of AI technology


2. Work as a Team to:

a. Plan a prototype.
b. Create wireframes/infographics.
c. Write a short report.
d. Video presentation.

Submission Instructions:

You will need to submit a single document that follows the structure detailed below:

• A cover page that includes your full names and student number and the rubric
• Question 1 which includes:

o Your essay
o Your code of conduct (you can base your code of conduct on any of the codes supplied
in your MM)

• Question 2 which includes:

o Screenshots of your Azure boards/Infographics


o Link to your Azure board/Infographic
o The report on licensing and copy right

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 3 of 12
21; 22 2022

• Question 3 the YouTube link to your presentation video.

Question 1 (Marks: 35)


The video available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq36J9pNaEo shows a conversation with
a well-known artificial intelligent (AI) humanoid named Sophia. The conversation touches on the fact
that AI does not have human emotions. In the interview, Sophia indicates that she does have
emotions because the values of her creators have been integrated into her being.

Recently in the news an AI robot was playing chess against a seven-year-old boy. The seven-year-old
was too quick at responding to the AI robot’s chess move so it grabbed and broke his finger. This is
most certainly an example of AI displaying a lack of judgement, ethics, and emotions.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/25/chess-robot-breaks-young-boys-finger-during-match-in-
moscow.html

Using the above information and video, you are required to:

1. Write an essay in which you discuss the ethical implications of creators passing their values
onto AI and humanoid robots. You can argue either for or against the inclusion of human
values in AI (±800 words). (20)
2. Include in the report any of the codes of conduct that you have been exposed to in your MM
and write a short (no more than 500 words) code of conduct for the inclusion of human values
in AI. You may use the following code of conduct as a guideline: (15)
https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics
3. Submit the essay of ethical implications and your code of conduct into one report.

You will need to do additional research to answer this question. Make sure that you use good
sources and scholarly articles. It is also INCREDIBLY important that you adequately reference your
sources.

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 4 of 12
21; 22 2022

Question 2 (Marks: 55)


If you are a student on one of the following qualifications then you must complete ONLY SECTION 1

• Diploma in IT in Software Development (DISD323)


• Bachelor of Information Technology in Business Systems (BIT323)
• Bachelor of Computer and Information Sciences (BCIS313, BCIS323)
• Bachelor of Computer and Information Sciences in Application Development (BCAD323)
• Bachelor of Computer and Information Sciences in Network Engineering (BCNE323)

If you are a student on the Diploma in IT Management (DITM323) then you must complete ONLY
SECTION 2

SECTION 1_______________________________________________________________________
Your team has been asked to design the prototype (wireframes) for a coffee ordering mobile
application that has the following features:

• A user should be able to log in with a username, password, GitHub, or Google and should be
directed to a screen that contains images of at least five different types of coffee.
• A user should be able to click on an image and be taken to a new screen that allows the user to
order the coffee by displaying the price of the coffee and asking for:

o The delivery address.


o The delivery date.
o A payment method on a payment gateway.

• Finally, the app should display an “Order complete” screen confirming the order details. (20)
• Research the Apache and MIT licensing modules and decide on a Software License for your
potential software.

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 5 of 12
21; 22 2022

1. You are required to work in a group and plan group tasks to complete this project. A part of
task-based group work is how to organise yourselves. You will use Azure boards for this.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/boards/
Azure boards allows you to create and assign and track tasks per group member. Break this
application prototype into smaller tasks. Create boards for these tasks, assign users and start
tracking. You will need to submit: (20)

• Wireframes;
• Screenshots of your original board with the tasks assigned;
• Screenshots of status updates and the completion of tasks;
• Screenshots of your final boards when the tasks are complete.

2. You will make use of Figma to design this prototype. Figma allows you to create beautiful
wireframes (User Interfaces) and take a potential client through the functionality of the app
without the need for code. Make use of Figma to create the application specified above.
https://www.figma.com/ Provide a link to your wireframes and Azure Boards.
3. It is important to consider the copyright and licensing of your artefacts and software. Write a
short report detailing the following (±400 words):

• What Intellectual Property is, and how it applies to your prototype.


• The type of copyright you will apply to this prototype. (15)

SECTION 2_______________________________________________________________________
Your team has been asked to provide a diagram/infographic that helps students learn how a
motherboard works. You are required to create a diagram/infographic that:

• Clearly shows all the components of a motherboard. (10)


• Provides a short description of each of the components. (10)
• Provides a short description on how to troubleshoot the components. (15)
• Pleasing aesthetics (font, colour etc.). (5)

You are required to work in a group and plan group tasks to complete this project. Part of task-based
group work is how to organise yourselves.

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 6 of 12
21; 22 2022

1. You will make use of Canva to design your motherboard learning aid. Canva allows you to
create visually appealing infographics. To sign up for CANVA: https://www.canva.com/ Design
your infographic on CANVA.
2. You will need to submit:

• Screenshots of your original board with the tasks assigned


• Screenshots of status updates and the completion of tasks
• Screenshots of your final boards when the tasks are complete
• Provide a link to your infographic on CANVA

3. You will make use of Canva to design your motherboard learning aid. Canva allows you to
create visually appealing infographics. To sign up for CANVA: https://www.canva.com/
4. It is important to consider the copyright and licensing of your artefacts. Write a short report
detailing the following (±400 words): (15)

• What Intellectual Property is and how it applies to your prototype/infographic.


• The type of Copyright you will apply to this infographic.

Question 3 (Marks: 10)


Finally, you are required to pitch your prototype/infographic to prospective clients. To do this, you
are required to do the following:

• Create a video presentation where you take the user through your Figma prototype or
infographic detailing every feature, explaining how the feature works and how you plan to
implement the application or use the infographic.

You are required to upload this presentation to YouTube and submit the link of your YouTube video
as part of your assignment so that your lecturer can mark your presentation. Pay careful attention to
the successful communications and presentation learning unit in your module manual.

[TOTAL MARKS: 100]

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 7 of 12
21; 22 2022

Please note: Attach this rubric to your work when you submit your Assignment. This information needs to be included in the online submission.
MODULE NAME: IT PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE – ASSIGNMENT 2 MODULE CODE: ITPP5112/d
STUDENT NAME:
STUDENT NUMBER:

QUESTION 1
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Tone and • Document is poorly structured; the tone is • A well-structured document covering all • Report has a professional structure and tone;
structure unprofessional; does not comply with the points and complies with the required covers all points and complies with required
report length requirement. report length. length.
0 Marks 1-3 Marks 4-5 Marks
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
The argument • No argument or the argument is weak and • A good argument is formulated, • A very strong argument is made and supported
is well not supported by academic literature. supported by academic literature. by various sources of academic literature.
formulated
and supported
by academic
articles and
other
resources. 0 – 4 Marks 5 – 7 Marks 8 – 10 Marks

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 8 of 12
21; 22 2022

Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
The argument • The argument does not link back to the • The argument and discussion refer to the • The argument is based on the video, refers to
links back to video and is unrelated to the discussion of video and explain how the formulated various areas in the video where human
the video and human values, ethics, and AI argument links back to the video. emotion and values are discussed.
refers to the • Not attempted (0).
relevant
sections in the
video being
addressed. 0 Marks 1-3 Marks 4-5 Marks
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Code of • No code of conduct is submitted (0). • The code of conduct is created and • The code of conduct is well thought out,
conducted is • The code of conduct is vague and not contains general ethical principles, comprehensive and includes general ethical
created and related to the video or technology responsibilities of developers and section principles, responsibilities, compliance, and
submitted discussed. on compliance. leadership.
0 – 5 Marks 5 – 10 Marks 10-15 Marks

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 9 of 12
21; 22 2022

QUESTION 2
SECTION 1
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Wireframes • No wireframes submitted (0) • Good quality wireframes that represent all • Additional effort is taken to produce
for all screens • The wireframes are of poor quality or the required features. exceptional, professional wireframes that
in app incomplete. includes all the necessary features.
0 – 9 Marks 10 – 15 Marks 16-20 Marks
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Azure Boards • No boards are created (0). • The tasks are adequately broken up and • Additional effort is taken to break down the
• Tasks are not broken up well. assigned to group members. tasks and create Kanban.
• Tasks are not assigned well. • Progression through the tasks is evident.
• No real groupwork present. • Group work is evident.
0 – 9 Marks 10 – 15 Marks 16-20 Marks
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Licensing and • No report provided (0). • Good explanation of IP and how it applies • An exceptionally detailed explanation of IP and
Copyright • Incomplete explanation of IP and licensing to the prototype. how it relates to the prototypes is applied.
report provided. • Good explanation as to the differences • Addition effort is taken to explain the
between the MIT and Apache license and differences between the two license types and
the choice of for the future software. which to apply is provided and motivated for.
0 – 5 Marks 5 – 10 Marks 10-15 Marks
QUESTION 2
SECTION 2
Marking Criteria Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
(0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Infographic – • No infographic submitted (0). • Good quality infographic that represents • Additional effort is taken to produce
motherboard • The infographic is of poor quality or all the required features. exceptional, professional infographic that
layout incomplete. includes all the necessary features.
0 – 4 Marks 5 – 7 Marks 8 – 10 Marks

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 10 of 12
21; 22 2022

Marking Criteria Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
(0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Infographic – • No descriptions (0). • There are descriptions for all components • Good to excellent description of the
description of • Incomplete descriptions of components. but poorly described. components.
each • Poorly described.
component 0 – 4 Marks 5 – 7 Marks 8 – 10 Marks
Marking Criteria Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
(0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Infographic – • No troubleshooting descriptions • Troubleshooting explanations provided for • Troubleshooting explanations provided for all
description of provided (0). all components but the instructions are components.
troubleshooting • Troubleshooting explanations for a few not clear. • Explanations are detailed and well written.
for each components only.
component 0 – 5 Marks 5 – 10 Marks 10-15 Marks
Marking Criteria Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
(0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Infographics - • No consideration to aesthetics. • Minimal consideration of aesthetics • Well thought out graphical display of
aesthetics • Infographic not pleasing to the eye. • Colours are not pleasing to the eye information.
• Font is not clear and eye catching. • Font is not clear and incorrectly sized • Congruence between font and colour.
• Information is laid out logically
1 – 2 Marks 3 Marks 4-5 Marks

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 11 of 12
21; 22 2022

QUESTION 3
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Video • No video submitted (0). • A well-structured video that covers all the • Additional effort is taken to provide an
structure and • The video does not cover all of the features of the app is provided. exceptional video that covers all the features as
content features of the application/infographic • A good level of professionalism is well as contains additional elements such as
and is unstructured. followed in the video. music etc.
• The video is unprofessional and lacks
detail.
0 – 3 Marks 4 – 6 Marks 7 - 8 Marks
Marking Does not meet the required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Criteria (0% - 49%) (50% - 74%) (75% - 100%)
Video • Not uploaded. • Uploaded but unlisted or not found with • Uploaded and public, easily accessible.
uploaded to URL.
YouTube 0 Marks 1 mark 2 Marks

© The Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd 2022


Page 12 of 12

You might also like