Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Now a day the problem of extra judicial killing is increasing day by day. Now
Bangladesh democracy going down and extra judicial killing up rapidly. Extra
judicial killing is one kind of crime.
Human rights refer to the "basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are
entitled."Examples of rights and freedoms which have come to be commonly
thought of as human rights include civil and political rights, such as the right to
life and liberty, freedom of expression, and equality before the law; and social,
cultural and economic rights, including the right to participate in culture, the
right to food, the right to work, and the right to education.
Human right don’t need to be brought, earned or inherited, they are called
‘inalienable’ because no one has the right to take them away from another for
any reason. Human right mainly concern relationships between individuals and
the state. They control and regulate the exercise of state power over individuals,
grant freedoms to individuals in relation to the state, and they require states to
satisfy the basic human need within their jurisdiction.
Extra judicial killing is unethical. Because every person has the right to get
proper judgment. Although extra judicial killing reduce crime but it is not
acceptable. Because many general people are killing for this type of killing.
Another name of extrajudicial killings is Crossfire.
Sections 15 (1), (2) and (3) of the Prohibition to Torture and Death in Custody,
2013; Section 29 of The Police Act of 1861 protect the right to protection from
torture. Besides these, art. 7 of the ICCPR; art. 5 and 7 of the UDHR; art. 5 (2)
of ACHR; art. 3 of the ECHR; art. 1-3 & 13-16 of the CAT Convention; art. 32
of the Geneva Convention; art. 37 (a) of the CRC also ensure the right to
protection from torture.
1. Bangladesh have laws against all kinds of human rights violations but the
policing and justice systems are weak and often subservient to the
government of the day. The ‘violators’ in most cases go scot-free because
they either belong to the ruling party/clique or have enough money and
influence to escape the net of justice. Now-a-days law enforcement
agencies are being poppet of the government. Here the government does
not take any investigation about the extra judicial killing because some
time government does this for their own gain.
2. Some laws which make these killing lawful:
i. Right of private defence: According to section 96 to 106 of BPC every
person has the right of private defines to protect his life & properties and
others life & properties. In this regards a person can cause death or any
other harm to the assailant under some certain conditions.
ii. Section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: Under Section 54 (S54) of
the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898, individuals may be arrested
under suspicion of criminal activity without any order from a magistrate
or a warrant.
iii. Section 86 of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police Ordinances: Section 86 of
the Dhaka Metropolitan Police Ordinance echoes the provision of section
54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
iv. Special Powers Act 1974: The Special Powers Act of 1974 is deemed by
human rights activists and other members of civil society as a repressive
law. The use and abuse of this Act in the name of protecting the security
of the State has resulted in a steady pattern of human rights violations.
The Act provides ‘special measures’ for the prevention of pre judicial
activities, for a speedy trial and punishment for grave offences.Law
enforcing Agencies do Crossfire in exercise of their right of private
defines.
3. The RAB acknowledges that its officers have killed at least 622 people
since the force was established in 2004. The chairperson of the National
Human Rights Commission recommended in December 2009 that all
allegations of RAB killings be investigated by an independent
commission of inquiry. At this writing the government has taken no
action on this, and not a single member of the RAB has been criminally
prosecuted for involvement in torture or killings.
4. In one abortive attempt at justice, the High Court issued a suomo to ruling
calling on the government to explain why action should not be taken
against the RAB officers responsible for the "crossfire" killing of Lutfar
and KhairulKhalashi in November 2009. However, before a ruling could
be issued, the relevant judicial bench was reorganized and the case has
not since been heard by the court.[ Human Rights Commission
Report2011]
5. Though it is illegal and against human rights, it has some positive impact
on society, these are given below-
❖ In some cases like religious extremism, global terrorism, inter-state
and regional threat of internecine attack, extrajudicial killing is suggested
by many to be as legal considering saving many lives than killing one.
❖ Crossfire in border area is preferred to secure and ensure sovereignty
❖ Sometimes it is helpful for common people who are the victim of
terrorism because some cases under trial never ended.
❖ It helps to reduce corruption.
❖ To reduce terrorism, extrajudicial killing is preferred.
❖ It reduces illegal trade in border areas.
❖ It creates a fearful situation assuming that the chronic offender will be
vanished to commit future crime.
❖ It might also be beneficiary to the underworld kidnapping to hide the
real offender.
❖ Rapid extrajudicial killing will congenial to the parties involved in the
conflict of interest and political gain.
Recommendations