Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DECISION
BRION, J : p
CONTRARY TO LAW. 5
CONTRARY TO LAW.
CONTRARY TO LAW.
The RTC found Abello guilty under the three Informations. The
dispositive portion of the decision states:
WHEREFORE, premises considered, judgment is hereby rendered
as follows:
The Issues
Our Ruling
Q: When was that when the accused placed his penis inside your
mouth?
Q: So, it cannot take one minute or thirty seconds that the penis of
the accused was inserted on (sic) your mouth open? AcHCED
Q: While the penis was inside your mouth, were you sleeping or
awaken already? HaAIES
The record also shows that AAA lived a sheltered life cared for by her
relatives because of herpolio. 26 Unless the contrary is shown, it is highly
unusual for her to have the worldly sophistication to invent or fabricate the
charges she made, particularly one made against her stepfather. A charge
against one's stepfather, too, is unusual in our socio-cultural context
because of the respect we give our elders, and is only understandable if
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2021 cdasiaonline.com
there is a deeply felt cause for complaint. We particularly note that no
imputation has been made at any time in the case that AAA is not normal,
save for her physical disability, or has a strained relationship with her
stepfather prior to the acts charged.
Based on these considerations and in the absence of clear indications
of errors in giving credence to AAA's testimony, we find no reason to disturb
the factual findings of the RTC and the CA.
Rape by sexual assault
R.A. No. 8353 which took effect on October 22, 1997 introduced into
the Philippine legal system the concept of rape by sexual assault. This
amendment not only reclassified rape as a crime against persons, but also
expanded the definition of rape from the traditional concept of a sexual
intercourse committed by a man against an unwilling woman.
The second paragraph of Article 266-A of the RPC, as amended defines
rape by sexual assault as committed by any person who, under any of the
circumstance mentioned in paragraph 1 . . . shall commit an act of sexual
assault by inserting his penis into another person's mouth or anal orifice, or
any instrument or object, into the genital or anal orifice of another person.
The elements of rape by sexual assault are:
(1) That the offender commits an act of sexual assault;
(2) That the act of sexual assault is committed by any of the
following means:
(a) By inserting his penis into another person's mouth or anal
orifice; or
xxx xxx xxx
(3) That the act of sexual assault is accomplished under any of the
following circumstances:
(a) By using force or intimidation;
(b) When a woman is deprived of reason or otherwise
unconscious; HTDcCE
The presence of the first and second elements of the offense has been
earlier discussed, albeit in the consideration of a charge under R.A. No.
7610. The prosecution established these elements through AAA's testimony
that her breasts were fondled while she was asleep. While she did not
actually see Abello fondling her (as the fondling was done while she was
asleep and stopped when she awakened), she related that she identified
Abello because she saw him enter her mother's room immediately after she
felt her breasts fondled and after he stepped with his knees on her hand. 36
AAA also testified that Abello was illuminated by a light coming from outside
their house. 37 Further, the perpetrator could only be Abello as the only other
occupants of the house at the time were her mother, her sister-in-law and
her young nephew who were all asleep. 38 The third element was proven by
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2021 cdasiaonline.com
her testimony that, on two occasions, Abello mashed her breasts while she
was sleeping. 39
As we discussed above, the Informations alleged the element of
violence and intimidation as the mode of committing the sexual abuses,
contrary to what the prosecution established during the trial that AAA was
asleep on the two occasions when the offenses were committed. Pursuant to
our above discussions citing Corpuz, 40 the deficiencies in the allegations will
not relieve Abello of liability under the circumstances of this case.
The Penalty
The three Informations all alleged the stepfather-stepdaughter
relationship between AAA and Abello. Relationship as an alternative
circumstance under Article 15 of the RPC, as amended, and is an
aggravating circumstance in crimes against chastity and in rape. 41 This
modifying circumstance, however, was not duly proven in the present case
due to the prosecution's failure to present the marriage contract between
Abello and AAA's mother. If the fact of marriage came out in the evidence at
all, it was via an admission by Abello of his marriage to AAA's mother. This
admission, however, is inconclusive evidence to prove the marriage to AAA's
mother, 42 as the marriage contract still remains the best evidence to prove
the fact of marriage. 43 This stricter requirement is only proper as
relationship is an aggravating circumstance that increases the imposable
penalty, and hence must be proven by competent evidence. IcDCaT
SO ORDERED.
Footnotes
* Designated Acting Chairperson of the Second Division per Special Order No.
592 dated March 19, 2009.
5. I Records, p. 1.
6. II Records, p. 1.
7. Id., p. 2.
8. In Criminal Case No. 19623-MN, the defense stipulated on the marking of the
prosecution's exhibits, i.e., Sworn Statement of AAA (Exhibit "A") and a
Referral Slip issued by the Navotas Police Department (Exhibit "B"). These
markings were adopted in Criminal Case Nos. 19624-MN and 19625-MN per
Joint Order dated September 24, 1998, II Records, p. 6.
43. People v. Victor , G.R. No. 127904, December 5, 2002, 393 SCRA 472, 481.
44. Article 64 (1) of the Revised Penal Code, as amended.
45. People v. Bunagan , G.R. No. 177161, June 30, 2008; People v. Hermocilla ,
G.R. No. 175830, July 10, 2007, 527 SCRA 296, 306; People v. Olaybar , G.R.
No. 150630-31, October 1, 2003, 412 SCRA 490, 502; and People v. Soriano ,
G.R. No. 142779-95, August 29, 2002, 388 SCRA 140, 172.
49. People v. Hermocilla, supra note 44, p. 306; People v. Ceballos, Jr., G.R. No.
169642, September 14, 2007, 533 SCRA 493, 515, and People v. Ortoa,
supra note 47.
50. Sec. 8. Designation of the offense. — The complaint or information shall
state the designation of the offense given by the statute, aver the acts or
omissions constituting the offense, and specify its qualifying and aggravating
circumstances. If there is no designation of the offense, reference shall be
made to the section or subsection of the statute punishing it.
53. G.R. No. 137842, August 23, 2001, 363 SCRA 621, 635. See People v.
Blancaflor, supra note 50, p. 366 and, People v. Diunsay-Jalandoni, G.R. No.
174277, February 8, 2007, 515 SCRA 227, 240-241.