You are on page 1of 6

AI notes onGreek tragedy

Greek tragedy refers to a form of theater that originated in ancient


Greece in the 5th century BC. These plays were performed as part of
religious festivals and were written in verse, usually by a single
playwright. The themes of Greek tragedies often revolved around the
struggles of individuals with fate, the gods, and their own inner
conflicts.
Greek tragedies typically featured a chorus that commented on the
action of the play and provided a moral or philosophical perspective
on the events. The plays were performed by male actors wearing
masks, and the performance space typically included a stage, an
orchestra, and a skene (a building used for changing costumes and as
a backdrop).
Some of the most famous Greek tragedians include Aeschylus,
Sophocles, and Euripides. Their works, such as Aeschylus' "Oresteia,"
Sophocles' "Oedipus Rex," and Euripides' "Medea," are still studied
and performed today, and their influence can be seen in modern
drama and literature.
Greek tragedy refers to a form of theater that originated in ancient
Greece in the 5th century BC. These plays were performed as part of
religious festivals and were written in verse, usually by a single
playwright. The themes of Greek tragedies often revolved around the
struggles of individuals with fate, the gods, and their own inner
conflicts.
Greek tragedies typically featured a chorus that commented on the
action of the play and provided a moral or philosophical perspective
on the events. The plays were performed by male actors wearing
masks, and the performance space typically included a stage, an
orchestra, and a skene (a building used for changing costumes and as
a backdrop).

1|Page
Some of the most famous Greek tragedians include Aeschylus,
Sophocles, and Euripides. Their works, such as Aeschylus' "Oresteia,"
Sophocles' "Oedipus Rex," and Euripides' "Medea," are still studied
and performed today, and their influence can be seen in modern
drama and literature.

Definition of tragedy by Aristotle. what was tragedy according to


him?
Aristotle defined tragedy in his work "Poetics," which he wrote in the
4th century BC. According to Aristotle, tragedy is a form of drama
that tells the story of a serious and complete action, which has
magnitude, and that is represented in a dramatic form. He identified
six main elements that a tragedy should contain:
1. Plot: The plot is the most important element of a tragedy. It
should be a complete and unified action that has a beginning, a
middle, and an end. The plot should be structured in a way that
the events are causally linked and lead to the tragic outcome.
2. Character: The characters in a tragedy should be morally
complex and have a tragic flaw or error in judgment that leads to
their downfall. The audience should be able to empathize with
the characters and feel both pity and fear for them.
3. Thought: The thought, or theme, of a tragedy should be
universal and address important moral and philosophical
questions.
4. Diction: The language used in a tragedy should be poetic, yet
natural and appropriate to the characters and the situation.
5. Spectacle: The spectacle includes the visual and auditory
elements of the play, such as costumes, scenery, and music.

2|Page
According to Aristotle, spectacle is the least important element
of a tragedy.
6. Melody: The melody, or music, should be used to enhance the
emotional impact of the play, but should not be the main focus.
Overall, Aristotle saw tragedy as a form of art that had the power to
evoke catharsis, or a release of emotions, in the audience. The tragic
experience, according to him, allows the audience to confront the
complexities of human nature and to learn from the moral lessons
presented in the play.

How is tragedy minesis as per Aristotle?


Mimesis, which means "imitation" or "representation" in Greek, was a
central concept in Aristotle's philosophy of art. According to
Aristotle, tragedy is a form of mimesis, specifically an imitation of
serious and complete action that is represented in a dramatic form.
Aristotle believed that the purpose of tragedy was to imitate actions
that are both serious and complete, and to represent them in a way
that evokes emotions such as pity and fear in the audience. He
believed that by watching a tragic play, the audience could experience
a catharsis, or a purging of their own emotions, as they identify with
the characters and their struggles.
Aristotle also believed that tragedy should imitate the actions of
people who are better than the average person, but who also have a
tragic flaw or error in judgment that leads to their downfall. By
imitating the actions of such characters, the audience is able to learn
moral lessons and to understand the complexities of human nature.
In summary, Aristotle saw tragedy as a form of mimesis that imitates
serious and complete action in a way that evokes emotions and allows
the audience to learn from the moral lessons presented in the play.
3|Page
According to Aristotle, tragedy should imitate serious and complete
action, which means that it should represent a coherent and self-
contained story. Therefore, it is possible that a tragedy could represent
a complete and self-contained story that encompasses the entirety of a
person's life, but Aristotle did not specifically address this question in
his work "Poetics."
That being said, Aristotle did emphasize that the plot of a tragedy
should have a beginning, middle, and end, and that the action should
be focused on a single protagonist who experiences a reversal of
fortune. This suggests that a tragedy that encompasses an entire life
might be more challenging to structure in a way that meets Aristotle's
criteria for a well-formed plot.
In addition, Aristotle believed that the characters in a tragedy should
be morally complex and have a tragic flaw or error in judgment that
leads to their downfall. It is possible that this level of complexity
might be difficult to convey over the course of an entire life, as most
people's lives are a mixture of successes and failures, rather than a
single tragic flaw.
Overall, while Aristotle did not explicitly address whether life could
be projected in tragedy in its entirety, his criteria for a well-formed
tragedy suggest that it might be challenging to create a tragedy that
encompasses an entire life.

How is tragedy superior form of literature as per Aristotle?


Aristotle considered tragedy to be the most superior form of literature
because it has the power to evoke a cathartic emotional response in
the audience. He believed that tragedy is able to do this because it

4|Page
imitates serious and complete actions, and presents them in a dramatic
form.
Aristotle argued that tragedy is able to evoke emotions such as pity
and fear in the audience by presenting characters who are better than
the average person, but who also have a tragic flaw or error in
judgment that leads to their downfall. By imitating the actions of such
characters, the audience is able to learn moral lessons and to
understand the complexities of human nature.
In addition, Aristotle believed that tragedy is able to achieve a unity
of action, character, and language that is not possible in other forms
of literature. He argued that the plot of a tragedy should have a
beginning, middle, and end, and that the events should be causally
linked and lead to the tragic outcome. The characters in a tragedy
should be morally complex and have a tragic flaw, and the language
should be poetic and appropriate to the characters and the situation.
Overall, Aristotle believed that tragedy was the most superior form of
literature because it had the power to evoke catharsis and to teach
important moral and philosophical lessons to the audience. He saw
tragedy as a unique and powerful art form that was able to achieve a
level of unity and emotional impact that was not possible in other
forms of literature.

Unity of time, place and action by Aristotle


Aristotle's concept of unity of time, place, and action is a central
component of his theory of tragedy, as outlined in his work "Poetics."
According to Aristotle, a well-formed tragedy should have the
following characteristics:
1. Unity of Action: The plot of a tragedy should have a clear
beginning, middle, and end, and the events should be causally

5|Page
linked, leading to the tragic outcome. The actions of the
characters should be consistent with their personalities and
motivations, and the plot should be focused on a single
protagonist who experiences a reversal of fortune.
2. Unity of Time: The events of a tragedy should take place within
a single day or a time period that is not much longer than a day.
This helps to create a sense of urgency and to maintain the
audience's attention.
3. Unity of Place: The events of a tragedy should take place in a
single location, such as a single room or a single city. This helps
to create a sense of intimacy and to focus the audience's
attention on the actions of the characters.
The idea behind these principles is to create a sense of coherence and
unity in the play, so that the audience can follow the action and feel
emotionally engaged with the characters. By limiting the time, place,
and scope of the action, the playwright is able to focus the audience's
attention and create a heightened sense of drama and intensity.
Aristotle believed that these principles of unity were essential to
creating a well-formed tragedy, and that they helped to achieve the
goal of evoking catharsis in the audience. By experiencing the
emotional ups and downs of the tragic protagonist, the audience is
able to purge their own emotions and learn important moral and
philosophical lessons about the human condition.

6|Page

You might also like