Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recommendations
It is quite evident that even though being a lawyer and more so an advocate does not put one
in the front line of battle, it still remains a high-risk profession. As such the following are
recommendation on how the risks that advocates face can be eliminated or at the least
significantly reduced.
These principles are required to be respected and taken into account by Governments within
the framework of their national legislation and practice and should be brought to the attention
of lawyers as well as other persons, such as judges, prosecutors, members of the executive
and the legislature, and the public in general. 5 One of the principles provides that for it to be
possible to guarantee the functioning of lawyers some measures need to be in place. For
instance governments are required to ensure that lawyers are able to perform all of their
professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference.
Furthermore that where the security of lawyers is threatened as a result of discharging their
functions, they shall be adequately safeguarded by the authorities.6
1
The Constitution of Kenya (2010), article 161.
2
The Constitution of Kenya (2010), article 159.
3
The Constitution of Kenya (2010), article 94.
4
The Constitution of Kenya (2010), article 2(5) (6).
5
United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner, ‘Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers’
<https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/roleoflawyers.aspx> accessed on 5 April 2020.
6
Ibid.
The authorities that can be able to safeguard the security of advocates can only be law
enforcers who are under the executive arm of government.
NB : (yet to include a basic structure/suggestion of who will comprise this) and I think I will
be better placed to recommend more once I see what kind of threats have been mentioned –
eg for cyber threats- a diff recommendation would be applicable etc.