Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Characteristics of Construction
a) It is an art or process- The nature of construction which is to determine its intention of the
legislature results to uncertainty and subjectivity. It is an art or process because statutory
construction is not an exact science as it is not derived from formulas.
b) It involves the determination of legislative intent- This means that to ascertain and to give
effect are the primary objectives of construction. Consideration is vital in determining its
legislative intent.
c) It is necessary when the legislative intent cannot be readily ascertained- When the law is
clear and unambiguous, then there is no room for construction or interpretation. There is
only room for application.
d) It is a judicial function- The duty to construe laws is vested in the Judicial department. The
Legislative department is assigned to make and enact laws and the Executive department is
in charged in carrying out the provisions of the laws. The Judicial department interprets and
applies the said laws.
3. Verba Legis means the plain meaning rule. If the words used in the legislature correctly
expresses its intention and meaning, then it must be given its literal meaning and should be
applied without interpretation. This is given that the statute is clear, plain, and free from
ambiguity. On the other hand, Ratio Legis means the spirit of the law. This means that the
statute must be read in accordance with its spirit and intent.
Verba Legis and Ratio Legis should not oppose but they should rather complement each other. If
the law is clear, then there is no room for construction. Ratio Legis should not take over Verba
Legis. If the words used in the statute are not clear, then Verba Legis is not enough; Ratio Legis
should be applied to find the intention behind the law.
4. The presumption of justice is further explained in Article 10 of the Civil Code which states that,
“In case of doubt in the interpretation, or application of Laws, it is presumed that the lawmaking
body intended right and justice to prevail.” In the case of Floresca v. Philex Mining Corporation,
the issue raised is whether an injured employee or his heirs can avail an action pursuant to
Section 5 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Court held that the heirs may still file an
action for damages against Philex under the Civil Code as the Workmen’s Compensation Act is
different in giving damages compared to the Civil Code. If the legislative intent of Section 5 were
to allow the injured employee to sue his employer under the Civil Code, then the legislator could
easily have formulated the said first paragraph of Section 5. However, this was not done which
shows that the legislative intent did not allow for employee to sue the employer under the Civil
Code for injuries compensable under the Act. The constitutional policy protects the labor as well
as Article 10 of the Civil Code where it is presumed that the lawmaking body intended right and
justice to prevail.
Ejusdem generis means “of the same kind, class, or nature”. If there is an incompatibility
between specific and general words, then the doctrine of ejusdem generis will reconcile it so
that the statute can have its legal effect. The general words will follow a particular subject or
class and will only include things of the same kind, class, or nature.
The requisites for ejusdem generis to apply as enumerated by Justice Carpio from the case of
Belgica v. Ochoa are the following:
Principle of Autonomy of contracts- considers contracts as tools for realizing individual self-
determination by means of voluntarily entering legally binding agreements (Gutmann, 2013).
This means that parties are free to enter or not to enter into agreements.
Autonomy of contracts
The autonomous nature of contracts is enunciated in Article 1306 of the Civil Code.
Article 1306. The contracting parties may establish such stipulations, clauses, terms and
conditions as they may deem convenient, provided they are not contrary to law, morals, good
customs, public order, or public policy.
Obligations arising from contracts have the force of law between the parties and should be
complied with in good faith.10 In characterizing the contract as having the force of law between
the parties, the law stresses the obligatory nature of a binding and valid agreement.
The provision in the construction contract providing for a defects liability period was not shown
as contrary to law, morals, good customs, pubic order or public policy. By the nature of the
obligation in such contract, the provision limiting liability for defects and fixing specific guaranty
periods was not only fair and equitable; it was also necessary. Without such limitation, the
contractor would be expected to make a perpetual guarantee on all materials and workmanship.
Principle of Mutuality of contracts- Article 1308 of the Civil Code expresses what is known in law
as the principle of mutuality of contracts. It provides that "the contract must bind both the
contracting parties; its validity or compliance cannot be left to the will of one of them." This
binding effect of a contract on both parties is based on the principle that the obligations arising
from the contracts have the force of law between the contracting parties, and there must be
mutuality between them based essentially on their equality under which it is repugnant to have
one party bound by the contract while leaving the other free therefrom. The ultimate purpose is
to render void a contract containing a condition which makes its fulfillment dependent solely
upon the uncontrolled will of one of the contracting parties.
Principle of Relativity of contracts- contracts can only bind the parties who entered into it, and
cannot favor or prejudice a third person, even if he is aware of such contract and has acted with
knowledge thereof “Where there is no privity of contract, there is likewise no obligation or
liability to speak about.” Philippine National Bank v. Teresita Tan Dee, et al., G.R. No. 182128,
February 19, 2014.
According to the principle of relativity of contracts in Article 1311 of the Civil Code,31 a contract
takes effect only between the parties, their assigns, and heirs; except when the contract
contains a stipulation in favor of a third person, which gives said person the right to demand
fulfillment of said stipulation.