You are on page 1of 7
538 fe 2] 4a ae aa Journal of the Korean Society for Nondestructive Testing Vol. 20, No. 6 (2000. 12) AINA SSIS BA APSE] vps] GR Nondestructive Inspection of Steel Structures Using Phased Array Ultrasonic Technique Alea, 6484, AA Hyeon Jae Shin, Sung~Jin Song and You Hyun Jang 2H QTwS) UES GIs se] psp] Bhs H+ se due asa Wy awe dee aad 7S ASHSS MWA. AV ISS ALE OH] SMa SPAMS olFojz glen] Aw 18S] wh ARGH TFS FE ZSIIIS THE + YES Aolgleh MAE seh AA weg AVS 4e9] a aS VE AAW) NA VERE AVE S429] As elw wisps] G4 CaS Arson WOE TSA = Aolich QFLEA AE MAGS Arison As}r|sef ¥71-8]ba}e a (Boundary Difiraction Wave Mode: olB8o}] 2G49] Wb QS ALEeo)A eheteh, Tela A-scanlSS Selo Vals aabeh of Folal Vala Ast FAA (scan lined] RUSS ASILS se Le BPEL Aer Salad Sol de MES AAAS Zasisic. MA Aust Ae Wiel GS-49) Qeaehe aah Msgs ee ol] Bead ah, A)gelo] uo] Als ACG HALO Ae A-ccantl SS AOR AGE + sale FSO: HAS, VY, YASS, Wal Sash at Abstract A phased array ultrasonic nondestructive inspection system is being developed to obtain images of the interior of ste! structures by modifying a medical ultrasound imaging system, The medical system consists of 64 individual transceiver channels that can drive 123 array elements, Several modifications of the system were required mainly due to the change of sound speed. It was necessary to fabricate array transducers for steel structure and to obtain A-scan signal that is necessary for the nondestructive testing. Boundary diffraction wave model was used for the prediction of radiation beam field from array transckcers, which provided guidelines to design array transducers. And a RF data acquisition board was fabricated for the A-scan signal acquisition along a selected scan line within an image. For the proper beam forming in the transmission and reception for stocl structure, delay time was controlled. To demonstrate the performance of the developed system and fabricated transducers, images of artificial specimens and A-scan signals for selected scan lines were obtained in a real time fashion. Keywords: phased aray, image, radiation field, boundary diffraction wave model Lae ABs”) wo el AHOSHES vlols) ayrvle oh Heleh 2} A-scan YE BAe ]eeke 71ee] eee Ade deel desta lated False, 2s} Aaks Selel aabso] Bess alto zap) Atel BE DVIS ap] BAe eb AMS wheel, Wave) we} gates} Gell Tela we, (AF: 2000, 11 6) = AERA SP SL geae) ebay} Grae|Salety and Structural Integrity Research Center and School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746) ulspydAtetsial al 20 a al 6 & (20008 128) 539 lad 2oa We ah dah aah ea sls] a we Zuo] We} Ces AE CS Ae ALS 8] WA} Aske 71S8h BasH= Ge] Selsb] ech. clit: 719) aoc} Gd rive] dae seek sc ls) See AAS asi] Ae Meow el4y slo] Aa awe At asia gle WE sat @ Ses} Sb 7ieleh. aia Ash Gd 7S je] AS] via Walks Palel we Geb ALS SP o} AUS zleks AGI) Ast Se ds 9 AB dies sage, aez, agsh dee] Ga A) 22s] ele Wala} WeHwols ARS alae Agae] AUB UNS] WIE AOS aaa F LTA] AeA ASSIME ABL Ze At ob & Bade Go NCEE odie Zest So} gehel dal ake @ + 9S Beh oh ye} clays} a 438 WH + oss Be uh Aas 24S AD ARE ABT > oleh FAH RSE YS Aa] ULE Bs} S71 Hay GS SH} De] AasloilI-Al, Bao] ASS ASG ARS YA at Awe] Vet BUS wo} watslo] leh. Le} Bele] 7}2te] satel WE oye} % FAR wolae ZSah2] aAspeyo] elaol, w]ate} oO} Maes, 16 SbSy7he setts Fe] ae tok MNS 71M ae at Ee aL ac. oleh SATE BOF9 BAS AE Haha Agel 41 As Bt B89] Fa HHS At S44 pal AS Vi dynamic receiving focusing method)s} 7H (6) S21 sic. bus Peal chet 71 elie Kino SA a] LH Aol Pels|sou{7-sl, aZolok ya} AS AS Aaa Bsa} aol ge APLD-12) S Soe syed ZA 71s aetalol Ae ap) 9b GE ASI atch Time Array elay element AV sybiel PS AGE AAS algste) bt oh) date WE wel} wee daw ach sey oly] Jaa] Ae sigeieladel Fee sep at ole Bae) Leo] AFLES| isIE 4 w srawaage ash: Ae rhb) Bae Ait 2 Gag # obeh elm) oF ee SS GA) See UR Me FRE oh] ohyhE exh 2 eB GPAHS UNS Waa} ste} shal ails @ 4 ole bad Rest GY ays NE arlslh lee 2Esh BvaNeIS neste Ae S Se FHA weld AE Seo) wale ale ale Yo) Aas} BRE Ae Bats) aap sel visha| Bo Bae A-scan UES Isher ze] Sith APRS TNE MRS Ake Ale Age ASIAS}Z Boundary Diffraction Wave Model) 188i] 2Esto] WISH Bake A1eEelle] aisle TelR A-sconles ASei7iee BS abaelo| Fold abel] Awe FAHscan line)! RUSS HSES sisieh Ke BAB ast A Seago] WF LES alee Zaeisic Bom Mal Ags} Aad wel Gato] asa} 9a adad Mee ade aah, Ages) a #9] Sash Aa FAM AY Asem ISS 2A HOE WHYS GSE ws. 2. ASMAAS Se 2m oY 2a WIGS tes G2 + de 7 2 a Ae UME EyE Wise 285] WTS WHILs RAslo ASah Wa asks Webt AalE 2Msteering) st WeXfocusing)stA WH + HE Zl colt Fig. 1@ 94H 7S o]ae RG Bo] z Fig. 1 Schematic ciarams of ultrasonic beam (a) steering, and (b) steering and focusing by ohased array system 540 Aaa, S32, BHA BR MSS MoE Weld. Azts] wit aap (array element AS. CE Azo 7Psto}2 a7] BA of Sa] 2S3HE Walsheal, 4 a7}s] dae 4 83) ZAVOSA We Babi Uo Zea ys} as Way ast ee Bald + eh ole Aaah Babi adpaow aatolaje eats) wake 2H Sal Hoe WS dela Bobet eet 7h] eee Psi Hee A] aISS Bs cE ASHE Ashe Helo} assy Poe z a2] Wella FASSS Sola] offen ash © E40] He AGES HY F Sol BeinoisedS A aah + le, WAS aoe 2 web} Js gale ASS] Usa + AES sb] HR ASHE AL UPA SAILOR FAK scan) F sah Beh ola 2 FAL Wola] UAH] Ssh ASS] Aish Yeh = Behe debits MHAlscan linehS veo] BUSt LAE Ute] 24 aS ISS} gleh Aah B89] FS] SES Hie Ae Fae Bl So) suele] asec aA Sue ab Slaxial resolution) 9} 4923 SHE (ateral resolution PW UF ae. Soe Wee esos We Base HE] LES} BA(pulse)®] ole ela aasya, Be ase Tas Pas Salo] 285 Wel Holl Set Aa. Fig. 2 Salto ABeh= (a) a 88 BACone point fixed focusing) (b) KEYS (2one based focusing)®] 7AMESIE. RAGHIS 718 & Bask: Ae] Wels oe] 7s) Maaeoe 4 Fa A RNB oa Sa ASS she WAR ae] Abas We) Hal ole] Wh Falaee slo} of splat uaa Aol viel SEs Yo) 7s Sel + 2] WISE wok. EA, BAe] 7S BA ae Ba Je meas] FE Zoln Be AOy we] gold Ree Bal AAS] FE welt, o]euh 84] FAdynamic aperture) 71S AML] 93) wall GE Ags Ye) Wb ale Below wale + ah Lest Zo] SHIMANE oles Wass ae S91 WS AHP 2aL + lol Aa) LORE BS FUE Ave AS ASH + US Bt oh] , AU WIS AwAoe soe + gla) se AY aA Sas AS sel MsbTeas| WA ES a ASD AH ER, MA SEs WHE AST @ Beam with (2) Fixed focusing (8) Zone based focusing wih émamic aoeture size Fig. 2 Schematic representation of transmitted beam widths in cases of (a) one point fixed focusing and (b) zone based focusing with dynamic aperture size $ Aste) aio] AGES Blo] HAT FEE] a abs 7Hsabil sich. 3. AMA SST wD Bs A\A go] Wet APSE SS] WHS Mawel Ae Pals mes aat Ae AK ARS 2S Be] B ashe Belgie. AM] 88 Ags Bae ME NS Ae wes aa we Yaa BSS] OM H88h AMBS|age. Ley ATE 9] Vs Poe zl] AE LR AEP BAAM1E Aas] a sesoH/Wwrlsgde ole al +4) vie) 2boealzis} apes] So} 7k Al HWE WEE eas eS ade + alc Se ato AMe ke Aft gales cle: oA] 7 SARNOSS 64712] See RS S41 AS} MDWRIS yilnslen ahe+2)ei7+ IMA ol] MHz Abo) 25 SHE Zoe RES] Bhs 3] G808 AZo] BH zelghe. ZG) GS7t UAVS IMOns ol BFLEOY AVE Svs 17] He) IAB Sesh Bakes AMGoR NEE AME sEeSwel oe} Seo} Palsjoyzoht eh azn egies 2 WE RF AS} BES) PIES Heh A ARBOR RPV) YES ee HW $7710) ») S121 aba] 2] af) 20 all 6 & (20004 128) S41 Bea eater al ‘ |S) osel eCard Sind l cued RF Das Ain Boa Fig. 3. Block diagram of RF data acquisiton board attached on beamforring board Fig. 4 RF board attached on beamforming board of ath Se saul Waals 4 ALBA AAs|o} AlAtsojor ath Fig. 32 SAR8002) H/Wel 37131 RFE AIS; 2A) (RF board?) 7 Z Shek wigs Sx}o 4} ala AE AD BI receive eanformen 38014 Gee YEA OE ABsh as wise ALES] scan ALES} “LaHA] RP boar beamformer board of 4}8}o} RF Ae t PCA A-scan 4 29] Aba sath avast Sepia) ule Aas atpl era jo} 71S 7+ beamforming boardo# SAV #5151 7H eagelgice, oe Ade RF boardei|4] Bo} Balch ciel BARBS) SEA AIRE 2 ant 4. Aswe Zea seate] dAbes 2ae 4.1, BABS owe fe} ABS shat Aslolob ee BH S48 aap] sieio] 2SsHo] WANE: ASE $ als VA Sash 2 ABounda Wave Mode): aleisi tc} da Be Ae dele] Baad alo B29) AL BAA AS a7} Sete] Ae Bey, 449] wASseIe was} 84 AOR ARI + SIEHE Rayleigh: Sommerfeld awe e} A}aRECHIS). Ze}, ole Rayleigh- Sommerfeld A#2 28 WAS +Peoh Se ARS] BRIS Ha > sea] aa oleh ajo, 2 44- aV alee] UF he] Ace aie) sleH{ld]. eh ole] WAS Stoke's theoremg: ol gael 4 (ol Uehd Lael dao Weald + SEM, olga aA a] ARE AGS A714 No] al S12} BelCBoundary Difraction Wave Mode BDWIDe}<}5} 1 pexplitr) (nxe,)-ds = py] @expika)——L [Ped aa ms mI | M 1 for yy in S O={1/2 for yy on C 0 for y_ ouside S 4 (Dal deb xe aM Ae, yor Fig. 8 Geometrical terms when pressure is evaluated at a point x 542 AMA, $44, A 0) eet Suey el Fao) 3 Bel} ME dels, ee yo Bx} 7a] BWI aaah % Welolm, Ai St xFel ole ARE, ree ol) 8a} vhs] ode ashe aa elertz, ne BAA wel Fale ACD 2) G9) Mel, Ot 9h mate] AE, KE A cE vd i ois] ast i, pte alo) US ope 28 Wise Ba eo} Sele} 4] Gol Sa] Asie al Sas} WO Rest ojo] Wie] Bt oped Ble) BS THO aa SYS HHA oR Bete] aed SHS aaa, NE APs Ade Lal) dis aa 34a 2g oleh. EY, BA Sas: Bde VY GAA Bebo] oF uel Hale 2a ele] ea VS Be Bar 3) Mae wet dae FeHeeM, gs aes FA BA AL WASBS| WLS MA hab Bd + WL ¥ APM oleld Bae olealal, Yd shel ABs Hare Fale Ae deel Mle Walled] Woe Wea ARLE ol, 2 iz, Wades] Ue ga ale AE alle aaeio} Fal loa, Mhiel GodRHe] Yok Rest Wo] al BAS aMIsatG. ole, 4 ula, walabal Agee Ad Wve sae] 2AM, Ad Be ashe AE 2G Ee YS zie 4.2, AtBellold saul AB Warts] WAL God AEA Bae se 2Sah Cate) Aa dese sie AS Fig, Gof Uehilstch. s1gwhal geal) wl 2 2: PE} 6 Moly, 2 Abs} 271 02 mm x 6 mm ols, Aa SAS] ACK 03 mmole, SARASE 75 Mibolth ed 2 FRE SoA) Sate) VE °F O79 ment Bk 4 AIL BANGinter element gaph& O1 mms so} a welals}o} aya) Ae ab Bcross-talldS FU 4 SH AAA, Fig. 7@ Edel BPA) Sebel Vea we 2% QSAG 10 74 WAS Yeh ack ol DHS Barb) SIS Ae Fale dol sislebst go, Wawel} Zo] wee 10 mm dAez 5 ELI, 2a] Bol 5 mm sMAlol4) OZ 10 mm Zi 22.5 MEEFIO® # 10 Wolk o) HE VE A 0.2mm, 0.8mm p.imm. L— ‘9.4mm Fig, 6 Geometry of an atray transducer Array transducer tet tee bes tea Li Bene ine Lateral Axial 50mm Fig. 7 Focal points in a steel specimen ae Bhat] aie GF BS vil Rasiol De A) Bela tole 2a} Wel A alge Ts aE S Ade ld Ads 4 la wala eats, AZ Sol, Fig. 79) Fl Aas} 34, ae Bol DM mm 2 AE HV ISS BG Use Role. Fig. 82 Alzialed Glo} WAH Sats} Fe, F5, FOF 2G Aso] WHS SS VT ass vole, Yo] HES 24 a AFIS Sle] Sole] sy al EB ASS Tete ZUAGgrating lobe)| ws wel Aso] 2 he AE DF eb ole Fig. Goll YEP a gle BHrhe) ada) wwe] gel esas S Ws, oles aal WS ole] 7 et 282% WEBS OA OT ASHE ae Adel all E% Fig. So) Heb Gabe aswel, Jezel BSao] WAGER WHA olFolA] Yo} 34-2 eel DAE 22 + ale. He as got delalss, aja Be as Doles Le Ae] APS, AS BY Sap aire AVS BF wlek visa] aAres|2) af 20-2 a 6 & (200088 124) 543. @ b) Fig. 8 Raciation fields from the array transducer when the beam is focused at (a) infinity with 3 e s 2 296 8 © oo ow @ id) ut stoering, (b) F2, (c) F5, and (d) F10 by electronic delay time @ tb) Fig. 9 The aray trensduners having the center frequency of 75 MHz (a) Aray transducer having 128 elements for linear scan (b) Array transducer having 64 elements for sectoral soan a) ©) Fig. 10 Experimental resuts of phased aay trast techniques showing images and A-scan data for the selected scan lines 5. Hamel ERAS) AIA B) SSB Ne Fig. 9 Sage 4x} Sole o] Haase) a) Fig. Xa) 9} 128749} v4 linear scan&: SHES AVAHARL, (b) 2 we Fase} aS-oWe 67H 9} oI WAAR SHASIO} sectoral scan SEH 7 astaich Fig. 10 A448 B4HS ole ae gs aa wolZd, ealjoe aad £8 FYS rAIz aA ols ists} adebeh Adel dat Acscan 4 29} ch, Fig, 10(a) SHOE Fig, Kbiol 221 BHAT ©} Gs}e}_ sectoral @ Avte|a Fig. 10c)= Fig. Xaod we & astoleh 2 Arcana ANS: sige, ae AG 1gste} aes} 9 you ah 2 sie 6a2 a ast } VS Ade H) ag 712 AABSHE. BA Blast Baas] 3 AML WAS ARE ryattT noe 544 Alda, $a, BHA aie 2esh Yeahs dalshoe ala sisich ald Waals} Husl aie 2eahbd Nae o]Be) of £8 TUS AA AM] de ds ade Fst fags) ast Asean WSR Alzhoe Beeb UG. BF Past A-scan S92] WY OR Aes] SH} AM a71G APE NWS ALY Male, #7 8 aRE Bplay VHiePPeAsi sR lsaahparlevbaaat aataaepat abeteolgeel AA SHAE] AP} alo} slat olFo}zl alow, clo) atalat ele} 2b atueh a22a [1] Gehibach, S. M_ and Alvarez, RoE, “Digital Ulrasound Imaging Techniques using Vector Sampling and Raster Line Reconstruction’, Ultrasonic Imaging, Vol. 3 po. 83-107, (1981) (2) Mucci, RA, “A Comparison of Efficient Beamforming Algorithms’, IEEE Trans. Acoust. ‘Speech Signal Processing, ASSP-32, pp. 548-558, (198) [3] Petterson, D. K and Kino, GS, "Real-time Digital Image Reconstruction: A Description of Imaging Hardware and an Analysis of Quantitizaion Errors", IEEE ‘Trans, Sonics, Uttasonies SU-31, pp. 337-351, (1984) [al Kim, J. HL, Song, T. K, and Park, SB, “A Pipelined Sampled Delay Focusing in Ultrasound Imaging Systems’, Utrasonic Imaging 9, pp. 75-91, se) (5) Lamarre, A, Moles, M, Lasien, V., "Phased Array Ultrasonic Inspection of Friction Stir Weldments”, 2th Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, eds, D. . Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, Vol, 198, pp. 1333-1348, (1980) (6) Hiwang, J. S, Shin, HJ, Song, S.J, Song, T. K, “Digital Phased Array Ultrasonic Inspection system with Dynamic Focusing”, 25th Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, es, D. ©. Thompson and DE. Chimenti, Vol 198, pp. 1087-1088, (1999) [7] Kino, GS, Acoustic waves : devices, imaging, and analog signal processing , Englewood Cifls, NJ: Prentice-Hall, (1987) [8] Mecovski, A, “Ultrasonic Imaging using Arrays’, Proceedings of the IEFE, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 484 6, (1979) [5] Azar, L., Wook, S.C, “Experimental Characterization of Ultrasonic Phased Arrays for the Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete Structures", Materials evaluations, Vol, 75, No. 2, pp. 134-0, (1999) U0] Clay, AC, Wooh, S.C, Azar, L, Wang, J, “Experimental study of Phased Array Beam, Steering Characteristics", Joumal of NDE, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 59-71, (1990) [11] Song, S. J, Shin, HL J, Jang, Y. H,, “Ultrasonic Phased Array Transducers for Nondestructive Evaluation of Steel Suuctures’, sth Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, eds, D. ©, Thompson and D. E, Chimenti, Vol 19, pp. 1079-1085, (1999) [12] Wooh, S.C, Shi, ¥, “A Simulation of the Beam Steering Characteristics for Linear Phased! Arrays", Joumal of NDE, Vol 18 No. 2, pp. 30-57, (1988) (13) Schmem, LW. Jr, Fundamentals of Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation, a Modeling Approach , Plenum Press, New York, pa. 167-181, (2988) (4g) 482, dee, “ee ao] Bel 28oh Be Als Ab Gat Be 71Y, vlstslas}stalal, al 202 A128, pp. 91-101, (2000) US) Schmem, L. W. Jr, Sedov, A, Lerch, T, P, “A Boundary Diffraction Wave Model for a Spherically Focused Ultrasonic ‘Transducer’, The Joumal of the Acoustical Society of America. Vol. 101, No. 3, pp, 1259-1277, (1997)

You might also like