Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advertising:
Direct &
Indirect
Michaelmas Term 2022 E100: Microeconomics. Dr. Rupert Gatti 8
The seller’s problem
I will initially model the seller’s problem like this:
The seller has a single item it wishes to sell.
There a N possible buyers.
The value (willingness to pay) of the item to buyer i is given by
𝑢𝑖 = 𝛾 where 𝛾 is an iid r.v. drawn from a distn F(.)
and is known only to buyer i.
These valuations are private values
that is, the value agent i places on the item is entirely
independent to the value agent j places on the item.
So, even if i learns j’s value – it will not change i’s value.
Question: How should the seller sell the item to maximise expected revenue?
Something else?
Of course First degree price discrimination is the best the seller can do.
But when valuations are private knowledge,
the same pricing mechanism must be offered to all customers.
1
E𝑅 = 0 𝑏 𝑁 1−𝑏 𝑁 − 1 1 (𝑏)𝑁−2 d𝑏
1
= 𝑁(𝑁 − 1) 0 (1 − 𝑏)𝑏 𝑁−1 d𝑏
1
𝑏𝑁 𝑏 𝑁+1
= 𝑁(𝑁 − 1) −
𝑁 𝑁+1 0
𝑁−1
= which converges to 1 as N gets large.
𝑁+1
In our example, the agent with the second highest valuation does not win
the auction, and so looses out on gaining 𝑢2 .
The impact for all other agents is unchanged – as they would not have won
the auction in any case.
So the “opportunity cost” of agent 1’s participation for the other agents in
the auction is 𝑢2 , and this is the price agent 1 pays.
Thus the SPSB auction is a Vickrey Auction.
But clearly the bidding strategy adopted by buyers is a little more complicated than
in the English auction - as buyers will wish to ‘shave’ their bids to ensure they pay
less than their valuation if they win.
Buyers’ strategy:
in the uniform distribution example the (symmetric) equilibrium bidding strategy is
𝑁−1
𝑏𝑖 = 𝑢𝑖
𝑁
Proof:
Originally Vickrey 1962
See Kirshna Auction Theory ch.3.
Michaelmas Term 2022 E100: Microeconomics. Dr. Rupert Gatti 19
Implications of RET
No matter which auction mechanism is adopted – the expected revenue
earned by the seller is the same, namely (for the uniform distn case)
𝑁−1
E[𝑅] =
𝑁+1
And the same will be true for lots of other ‘bizarre’ auctions that satisfy RET
conditions – like, say,
“third-best auctions”; or
auctions were the winner pays the “average” bid; or
“all-pay” auctions where everybody has to pay their bid whether they
win or not (this is used to model lobbying activities sometimes)
By setting the reserve equal to the posted price, the revenue earned by
the seller can’t be lower with an auction – and may be higher – than
the posted price alone.
1 𝑁−1 1 1 𝑁
have, E 𝑅|𝑟 = = + ( )
2 𝑁+1 𝑁+1 2
Note that, when N=1 this gives the same solution as a posted-price,
and as N becomes large, the expected revenue from the SP auction
approaches the optimal.
If we care about efficiency, then the RET holds – and we know that
a Vickrey Auction (second priced auction without a reserve) is as good
as we can do.
Michaelmas Term 2022 E100: Microeconomics. Dr. Rupert Gatti 31
Why are posted prices so prevalent then?
Significant transaction costs associated with auctions, for both buyers and sellers:
Sellers:
need to coordinate buyers to engage simultaneously
requires communication between all buyers – allowing dynamic submission of bids, and
bid processing
more costly to implement
competition between sellers for sale of identical product
Buyers:
need to wait for auction to complete (impatience)
may require more direct engagement in the bidding process
outcome remains uncertain until the end
may have a desirable alternative option available (before auction completes)
Note: The
fixed auction
end time eBay introduced
means eBay is “good till cancelled”
posted price listing
NOT a pure
second-price
auction.
Source: Einav et al. 2018
Michaelmas Term 2022 E100: Microeconomics. Dr. Rupert Gatti 34
Auction versus Posted Prices 2
Many sellers list the same item as both auction and “buy it now” – often
simultaneously.