Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 12
Lecture 12
Daniele Passerone
Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology
Ueberlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf
daniele.passerone@empa.ch
Outline
Tight binding
Atomic Structure and Microstructure of Materials: Lattice Planes and Miller Indices
http://www.doitpoms.ac.uk/tlplib/miller_indices/lattice_index.php
By
DoITPoMS,
Noel
Rutter,
Peter
Marchment,
released
under
CC
BY-‐NC-‐SA
2.0
license
Credits
Kaxiras, E. Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2003).
Reich,
S.,
Maultzsch,
J.,
Thomsen,
C.
&
Ordejón,
P.
Tight-‐binding
description
of
graphene.
Physical
Review
B
66,
035412
(2002).
Bena,
C.
&
Montambaux,
G.
Remarks
on
the
tight-‐binding
model
of
graphene.
New
Journal
of
Physics
11,
095003
(2009).
Liu,
J.,
Xue,
Y.,
Zhang,
M.
&
Dai,
L.
Graphene-‐based
materials
for
energy
applications.
MRS
Bulletin
37,
1265–1272
(2012).
Wakabayashi,
K.,
Sasaki,
K.,
Nakanishi,
T.
&
Enoki,
T.
Electronic
states
of
graphene
nanoribbons
and
analytical
solutions.
Science
And
Technology
Of
Advanced
Materials
11,
54504
(2010).
Novoselov, K. S. et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192–200 (2012).
Roman
Fasel,
Pascal
RufOieux,
Oliver
Gröning,
Jinming
Cai
(Empa/nanotech@surfaces
Lab)
-‐
Carlo
A.
Pignedoli,
Leopold
Talirz,
Stephan
Blankenburg
(Empa/
nanoteh@surfaces
Theory)
From
free
atoms...
to
band
structure
From isolated carbon atoms to diamond: creation of energy “bands” from energy levels
EMPTY
THE
ATOMS
FILLED
8
Crystalline
solids
and
valence
electrons
8 1 Atomic structure of crystals 1.1 Building crystals from atoms 9
Rb 37 Sr 38
Y 39 Zr 40 Nb* 41 Mo* 42 Tc 43 Ru* 44 Rh* 45 Pd** Ag*
46 47
Cd 48
In
49
Sn 50
Sb 51 52
Te 53
I
54
Xe
Rubidium Strontium Yttrium Zirconium Niobium Molybdenum Technetium Ruthenium Rhodium Palladium Silver Cadmium Indium Tin Antimony Tellurium Iodine Xenon
BCC 2.16 FCC 1.91 HCP 1.62 HCP 1.45 BCC 1.34 BCC 1.30 HCP 1.28 HCP 1.25 FCC 1.25 FCC 1.28 FCC 1.34 HCP 1.48 TET 1.44 TET 1.40 RHL 1.41 HCP 1.37 ORC 1.33 FCC
26.89 96.49 154.7 183.4 237.0 249.6 234.2 224.7 192.9 157.5 106.4 51.19 37.02 43.53 77.88 62.26 56.88 37.43
1.15 1.78 3.02 4.29 5.56 6.42 7.04 7.36 7.26 6.80 5.85 4.64 3.83 2.91 3.31 2.94 2.36 1.64
12.1 22.8 60 41.4 15.2 5.17 14 7.2 4.5 9.93 1.63 6.83 8.37 11 39 160 k
BCC 2.35 BCC 1.98 HCP 1.69 HCP 1.44 BCC 1.34 BCC 1.30 HCP 1.28 HCP 1.26 FCC 1.27 FCC 1.30 FCC 1.34 RHL 1.49 HCP 1.48 FCC 1.47 RHL 1.34
25.97 86.18 102.8 215.4 281.7 317.4 297.6 285.9 234.7 175.9 115.2 20.18 49.68 51.75 46.91
0.91 1.60 2.70 4.52 5.55 6.30 6.80 7.14 7.06 6.62 5.90 4.26 3.50 3.30 2.82
20 50 80 35.1 13.5 5.6 19.3 8.1 5.1 9.85 2.12 96 18 20.6 107
f 2d 0s2 f 3d 0s2 f 4d 0s2 f 5d 0s2 f 6d 0s2 f 7d 0s2 f 7d 1s2 f 8d 1s2 f 10d 0s2 f 11d 0s2 f 12d 0s2 f 13d 0s2 f 14d 0s2 f 14d 1s2
Ce 58 Pr 59
Nd 60 Pm 61 Sm 62 Eu 63 Gd 64 Tb 65 Dy 66 Ho 67 Er 68 Tm 69 Yb 70
Lu 71
Cerium Praseodymium Neodymium Promethium Samarium Europium Gadolinium Terbium Dysprosium Holmium Erbium Thulium Ytterbium Lutetium
FCC 1.65 HCP 1.65 HCP 1.64 RHL 1.62 BCC 1.85 HCP 1.61 HCP 1.59 HCP 1.59 HCP 1.58 HCP 1.57 HCP 1.56 FCC HCP 1.56
92.3 103.8 110.6 115.9 94.4 136.6 140.7 144.8 150.2 154.7 156.7 94.5 166.2
2.91 2.92 2.93 3.03 3.04 3.02 3.22 3.17 3.22 3.26 3.32 3.02 3.39
85.4 68.0 64.3 105.0 91.0 131.0 114.5 92.6 81.4 86.0 67.6 25.1 58.2
TheE.particular crystal
Kaxiras, Atomic and structure that noble-element
Electronic Structure atoms
of Solids (Cambridge assumePress,
University in solid is form weakly bonded solids in the FCC structure, in which the attractive interactions
form2003).
Cambridge,
called face-centered cubic (FCC). Each atom has 12 equidistant nearest neighbors are optimized by maximizing the number of nearest neighbors in a close packing
in this structure, which is shown in Fig. 1.2. arrangement. The only exception to this rule is He, in which the attractive interaction
Thus, in the simplest case, atoms that have no valence electrons at all behave like between atoms is so weak that it is overwhelmed by the zero-point motion of the
hard spheres which attract each other with weak forces, but are not deformed. They atoms. Unless we apply external pressure to enhance this attractive interaction,
sp2
hybridization
and
covalent
bonding
The
possibility
of
combining
atomic
orbitals
to
form
covalent
bonds
in
a
crystal
is
well
illustrated
by
the
two-‐dimensional
sp2
example.
p p
A 1 A 2 A B 1 B 2 B
1 = p s + p px 1 = p s + p px
3 3 3 3
1 A 1 1 A B 1 B 1 1 B
A
2 = p s p pAx + p py 2 = p s p pBx + p py
3 6 2 3 6 2
1 1 1 B 1 B 1 1
A
3 = p s
A
p pAx p pAy 3 = p s p pBx p pB y
3 6 2 3 6 2
A A B B
4 = pz 4 = pz
• The
eirst
three
hybrid
orbitals
build
up
the
bonded
network,
the
last
pz
orbitals,
perpendicular
to
the
graphite
plane,
or
to
the
fullerene
surface,
can
form
bonding
or
antibonding
combinations
with
neighboring
atoms.
Electrons
in
a
periodic
potential
Electrons
in
crystal
potential
A
crystal
is
described
in
real
space
in
terms
of
the
primitive
lattice
vectors
a1,
a2
and
a3
and
the
positions
of
atoms
inside
a
primitive
unit
cell
(PUC).
R = n1 a1 + n2 a2 + n3 a3
The
lattice
vectors
connect
all
equivalent
points
in
space
(Bravais
lattice).
The
PUC
is
deeined
as
the
volume
enclosed
by
the
three
primitive
lattice
vectors:
P UC = |a1 · a2 a3 |
We
only
need
to
know
all
relevant
real-‐space
function
for
r
within
the
PUC
since,
due
to
the
periodicity
of
the
crystal,
these
functions
have
the
same
value
at
an
equivalent
point
of
any
other
unit
cell
related
to
the
PUC
by
a
translation
R.
Reciprocal
lattice
is
the
inverse
space
of
the
real
lattice.
The
reciprocal
primitive
lattice
vectors
are
deeined
by:
ai · bj = 2⇡
(2⇡)3
ij b1 · (b2 b3 ) =
P UC
Electrons
in
crystal
potential
-‐
2
We
can
construct
vectors
connecting
all
equivalent
points
in
reciprocal
space,
which
we
call
G
in
analogy
to
the
Bravais
lattice
vectors:
G = m1 b1 + m2 b2 + m3 b3 , m1 , m2 , m3 : integers
R · G = 2 l, l = n1 m1 + n2 m2 + n3 m3 eiG·R = 1
for
all
G
and
R.
At
this
point,
we
can
write
any
function
with
the
periodicity
of
the
Bravais
lattice
as
X
f (r) = eiG·r f (G)
G
when the potential in the single-‐particle hamiltonian has the translational periodicity of the Bravais lattice:
V sp (r + R) = V sp (r)
then the single-‐particle wavefunctions have the same symmetry, up to a phase factor:
k (r + R) = eik·R k (r)
or, equivalently:
We
now
consider
the
crystal
as
composed
by
Nj
unit
cells
in
each
direction,
with
the
number
macroscopically
large,
and
assuming
periodic
boundary
conditions.
Then
the
number
of
distinct
values
that
k
may
take
is
N=N1N2N3
k (r) = k (r + N j aj )
nj
k = 1 b 1 + 2 b 2 + 3 b 3 ek·(Nj aj ) = 1 ) j = , nj any integer.
Nj
Nj Nj
nj = , . . . , 0, . . . , 1 (j = 1, 2, 3)
2 2
BRAGG PLANES So we have Nj consecutive values of the index nj.
Consider
now
a
plane
wave
of
incident
radiation
and
wave-‐vector
q,
scattered
by
the
planes
of
atoms
to
a
wave-‐vector
q’.
Squaring both sides, and recalling that it is elastic scattering:
This
is
the
deeinition
of
the
Bragg
plane:
formed
by
the
tips
of
all
vectors
q
that
satisfy
the
above
equation
for
a
given
G.
Varying
q,
we
can
identify
all
families
of
such
planes
(constructive
interference).
From
all
the
G
we
can
then
eind
all
R,
and
thus
the
structure
of
the
crystal
(Bravais
lattice).
BRAGG
PLANES
and
BRILLOUIN
ZONES
The projection of q on G is equal to half the length of G .
This allows to deOine the Oirst BZ: the volume enclosed by the Oirst set of Bragg planes around the origin is the Oirst BZ
But
values
of
k
are
equivalent
if
one
adds
to
them
any
vector
G.
So
we
need
to
solve
the
DFT
equations
for
values
of
k
within
the
Oirst
BZ
(or
any
single
BZ).
Band
structure
The
values
of
k
are
equivalent
if
one
adds
to
them
any
vector
G,
and
it
can
be
shown
that
the
eigenvalues
at
equivalent
k
points
are
equal.
This
leads
to
two
possible
representation
for
a
band
structure.
FILLED BAND
Within
any
single
BZ
and
for
the
same
value
of
k
there
may
be
several
solutions
of
the
single-‐particle
equation:
various
allowed
states.
So
we
have
a
“band
index”
labelling
the
solution
at
growing
energies.
In the free electron case, and with 2 electrons per primitive unit cell, the electrons will eill all the eirst band (Fermi level)
In
a
weak
periodic
potential
(right),
the
electron
will
eill
until
the
Fermi
level),
and
there
is
eirst
gap
(2V2)
which
is
referred
as
“band
gap”.
Density
of
states
Examples
of
density
of
states:
The
tight
binding
method
Bloch’s
theorem
can
be
easily
exploited
through
an
approximation
that
starts
from
atom-‐centered
wavefunctions
very
similar
to
atomic
states.
The
potential
CLOSE
to
the
atoms
is
similar
as
in
the
gas
phase...
⇥ m (r tj ) | l (r ti R)⇤ = lm ij (R)
⇥ m (r tj ) |Hsp | l (r ti R)⇤ = lm ij (R)✏l
⇥ m (r tj ) |Hsp | l (r ti R)⇤ = ((tj ti R) dnn )Vlm,ij
The secular equation is one-‐dimensional and easily leads to the dispersion relation
24
sp2-‐like
hybridized
carbon
nanostructures
• Electron
mobility
at
room
T:
15000
cm2V-‐1s-‐1
-‐
at
low
T:
200000
cm2V-‐1s-‐1
(Si:
1400
cm2V-‐1s-‐1)
27
Graphene
in
solar
cells
Supercapacitors are electrochemical devices that can store energy and release it with high power capability
Perfect complement for batteries or fuel cells in various applications
Electrostatic charge accumulation on the electrode-‐electrolyte interface (electric double layer capacitance)
The electric double-‐layer capacitance is proportional to the effective specieic surface area of an electrode material.
GRAPHENE HAS A THEORETICAL SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA OF 2.63 x 106 m2/kg
In a supercapacitor device two high-surface-area graphene-based electrodes (blue and purple hexagonal planes) are separated by a membrane (yellow).
Best
reported
capacitance
performance
for
all
bulk
carbon
materials
Specieic
capacitance:
231
F/g
Zhang,
L.
et
al.
Porous
3D
graphene-‐based
bulk
materials
with
exceptional
high
surface
area
and
excellent
conductivity
for
supercapacitors.
ScientiSic
reports
3,
1408
(2013).
The
case
of
graphene:
pz-‐nearest
neighbor
tight
binding
on
a
A-‐B
lattice
1 X ik·Rj
⇥kpz S (r) = p e pz (r tS Rj ) S = A, B
N j
The solution is chosen as linear combination of Bloch functions:
The
Hamiltonian
is
written
by
only
assuming
hopping
between
eirst
neighbor,
and
setting
on-‐site
energies
to
zero:
X
sp
H = t | A ⇤⇥ B | + h.c.
<i,j>
Two atoms in the unit cell correspond to two secular equations:
The diagonalization of the corresponding off-‐diagonal matrix leads to the expression for the eigenvalues:
q
(k) = ±t 3 + 2 cos( 3kx a) + 4 cos( 3kx a/2) cos( 3ky a/2)
Graphene
energy
bands
q
(k) = ±t 3 + 2 cos( 3kx a) + 4 cos( 3kx a/2) cos( 3ky a/2)
The
ab
initio
result
is
best
matched
with
t=2.7
eV.
This
leads
to
a
Fermi
velocity
at
K
of
about
106
m/s.