Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00266-013-0080-x
Received: 6 September 2012 / Accepted: 12 January 2013 / Published online: 16 February 2013
Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2013
Introduction
Method
Masseter muscle hypertrophy was first described by Legg
in 1880 in the case of a 10-year-old girl with bilateral Eight female patients (age range = 24–32 years) under-
went surgery in our department between March 4, 2011 and
J. Xu (&) Y. Yu June 20, 2012. All of the patients fit the following
Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, conditions:
College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou,
Zhejiang 310003, People’s Republic of China • The patient had a strong desire to alter her facial lines
e-mail: xujinghong2008@gmail.com on both the profile and the frontal view.
123
Aesth Plast Surg (2013) 37:216–221 217
Fig. 2 The buccal fat pad will show itself after separating the
Fig. 1 A horizontal intraoral incision is made *1.5 cm in the buccal buccinator
mucosa at the bite level
For all eight patients, surgery was offered for cosmetic Discussion
reasons and no complications occurred during surgery. All
patients were satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of both According to Poch’s classification, there are ten face types.
the profile and the frontal view. Follow-up of more than Among them the oval face is recognized as the most
6 months has revealed no prospective complications beautiful, especially for Asian people. In many Chinese
(Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). classics, the face of beauty is always described as an oval
123
218 Aesth Plast Surg (2013) 37:216–221
123
Aesth Plast Surg (2013) 37:216–221 219
123
220 Aesth Plast Surg (2013) 37:216–221
Fig. 11 Preoperative views of a 29-year-old woman showing obvious Fig. 13 Preoperative views of a 25-year-old woman showing obvious
bilateral masseter muscle hypertrophy and mild buccal fat pad bilateral masseter muscle hypertrophy and buccal fat pad overgrowth,
overgrowth, especially in the left side of the face. Postoperative views especially in the right side of the face. Postoperative views at
at 6 months showing substantial improvement of the lower face 7 months showing substantial improvement of the lower face
Conclusion
123
Aesth Plast Surg (2013) 37:216–221 221
2. Gurney CE (1947) Chronic bilateral benign hypertrophy of the 7. Du BJ, Liu DL, Liu YS, Zheng JS, Su B (2006) Establishment of
masseter. Am J Surg 73:137–139 animal model of selectively denervated masseter in rabbits.
3. Becker HL (1977) Masseteric muscle hypertrophy and its intra- J Fourth Mil. Med. Univ China 27(10):890–893
oral surgical correction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 5(1):28–35 8. Carbonell A, Salavert A, Planas J (1991) Resection of the buccal
4. Ham JW (2009) Masseter muscle reduction procedure with fat pad in the treatment of hypertrophy of the masseter muscle.
radiofrequency coagulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:457–463 Aesthet Plast Surg 15(3):219–222
5. Wu WT (2010) Botox facial slimming/facial sculpting: the role of 9. Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK et al (1990) The anat-
botulinum toxin-A in the treatment of hypertrophic masseteric omy and clinical applications of the buccal fat pad. Plast Reconstr
muscle and parotid enlargement to narrow the lower facial width. Surg 85:29–37
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 18(1):133–140 10. Matarasso A (1991) Buccal fat pad excision: aesthetic improve-
6. Ahn KY, Kim ST (2007) The change of maximum bite force after ment of the midface. Ann Plast Surg 26(5):413–418
botulinum toxin type A injection for treating masseteric hyper-
trophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1662–1666
123