You are on page 1of 2

Morphology of the Turbellaria at the ultrastructural level

Reinhard M. Rieger
Dept. o/Zoology, Univ. o/North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Wilson Hall 046 A. Chapel Hill. NC 27514, U.S.A.

Keywords: Turbellaria, morphology, ultrastructure, body wall, nervous system, protonephridia, paren-
chyma, digestive system, reproductive system

Abstract

The paper reviews the following systems: body wall, nervous system, protonephridia, parenchyma,
digestive system, reproductive system, and includes a summary of the literature. New information is
presented for the catenulid and neoophoran body wall-construction, the kalyptorhynch proboscis, the
catenulid and haplopharyngid proto nephridial construction, and the prolecithophoran spermatozoon and
female germ cell. Examples of new features, as well as examples of how electron microscopy has clarified the
relative position of structures and their substructures are given from the subcellular level to the organization
of whole organs. Fine structural features linking different turbellarian orders are summarized. They
apparently support Karling's (1974) latest assessment of the affinities between the turbellarian orders which is
based primarily on light histological data, they add the recognition of a special link between the
Macrostomida and Haplopharyngida and they suggest the existence of three main evolutionary lines within
the Turbellaria.

Introduction (Eakin 1962; Ktimmel 1962; Reisinger & Kelbetz


1964; Hendelberg 1965). Although fine structural
Over 270 papers on various aspects of turbella- information was used early in combination with
rian fine structure have been published since the light microscopy for a species description (Reisinger
first published electron micrograph of turbellarian 1968), it is only recently that this approach has been
tissue, namely that of a planarian eye by Wolken used more frequently (e.g. Sterrer & Rieger 1974;
(1958). The vast majority of these papers have used Rieger & Sterrer 1975; Crezee 1975; Crezee & Tyler
transmission electron microscopy. Only recently 1976; Lanfranchi 1978). Today about one third of
has scanning electron microscopy been applied the ultrastructural information deals with some
increasingly to the Turbellaria (e.g. Reuter 1978; aspect ofthe body wall, about one fifth with gametes
Smales & Blankespoor 1978; Williams 1978). The and another fifth with regeneration. The last sub-
order Tricladida figured greatly in the early phase ject and related aspects have been excluded from
of Turbellarian fine structural research (e.g., Klima this present review, since they are summarized by
1959, 1961; Pedersen 1959a, b, 1961a; Skaer 1961) Gremigni (1981). Relatively little is still known
but the interest soon expanded to include other about the comparative fine structure of the intes-
orders, especially the Acoela (e.g. Pedersen 1964; tine, the parenchyma and especially about the
Dorey 1965; Klima 1967). The turbellarian photo- gonoducts and associated structures.
receptor, cyrtocyte, rhabdite and spermatozoon A complete listing of ultrastructural literature
became the first ultrastructural features used for was not intended in this paper, but the given
investigating various systematic relationships references should provide a first summary of the

Hydrobiologia 84,213-229 (1981). 0018-8158/81/0843-0213/$03.40.


©Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
214

available literature. In several instances a new phora, Proseriata, Tricladida, Rhabdocoela) and
synthesis of the data is presented to stimulate the the Polycladida (Fig. 4). The main characteristic
search for further ultrastructural information. feature of this type of epidermal organization is the
Finally, an attempt is made to relate our present presence of a well-developed basement membrane
knowledge of turbellarian ultrastructure to the (see Bowen & Ryder 1974; Hori 1979) with a 20-40
understanding of turbellarian systematics as re- nm thick limiting layer of granular fibrous appear-
vealed by the light microscope. ance at the epidermal base and a microfibrillar layer
of varying thickness (0.2-4 Mm).l Often additional
extracellular materials are deposited between basal
Body wall foldings of the epidermis and the outer limiting
layer of the basement membrane (e.g. coagulated
The fine structure of the epidermis was the fluid in Gieysztoria and Dalyellia, see Bedini &
subject of one of the first truly comparative ultra- Papi 1974; electron-lucent zone in Dugesiajapo-
structural investigations of free-living flatworms by nica, see Hori 1979).
Bedini & Papi (1974). Twenty-three species of ten The microfilaments in the deeper layer average
different families and eight different orders have 80-120 nm in diameter; they are most likely col-
been studied by these authors. From these data and lagenous in chemical composition and they may
various subsequent studies on turbellarian ultra- exhibit complex three dimensional arrangements
structure, four basic types of epidermis can be (e.g. twisted fiber orientations, Fig. 6, see Bouligand
discerned (Figs. 1-4). 1972, for discussion). With some exceptions (e.g.
The first type can be called the neoophoran Florianella bipolaris, see Rieger & Sterrer 1975) the
epidermis because it is characteristic for all neo- microfibrillar layer lacks an inner limiting layer
ophoran orders (Lecithoepitheliata, Prolecitho- towards the body wall musculature; instead the

2 3 4

Fig. 14. Diagrammatic representation of different types of the body wall in Turbellaria as seen in longitudinal sections; rostral end of
animal towards left side of Figure. Diagonal muscle system not considered (1) the catenulid type (2) the acoel-nemertodermatid type (3)
the macrostomid-haplopharyngid type (4) the neoophoran-polyclad type. Cell junctions (zonulae adherentes, septate junctions) are
indicated between epidermal cells only. Septate junctions are not illustrated in (2), since septa. if present, are often indistinct (Bedini &
Papi 1974; Tyler & Rieger 1977). Terminal web and basement membrane are illustrated in relative thickness between the types. Small
circles next to ciliary rootlets represent ultrarhabdites. Cell body below muscle layers symbolize sunken epidermal cells, which are seen
most commonly in Acoela. The neoophoran-polyclad epidermal cells are shown partly in a transition towards a syncytium, which is
common in several lines of the neoophorans.

You might also like