Case Laws

Balfour vs. Balfour

 Mrs. Balfour became ile and was advised by the doctore say back I England.

 Due to work pressure husband goes back to ceylone leaving his wife back in England.

 Mr. Balfour has agreed to pay Rs. 30 every month to his wife.

 Due to some issues Mr. balfour has stopped sending money to his wife .

 In the court stayed this agreement, Since they were a humerous arranged.

 In this case they made a excuted contract.

Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Datt

 The nephew of gauri datt flees from the house so gauri datt orders lalman Shukla to go
and search for his nephew

 Defendant’s nephew that whoever brings back his nephew will be awarded Rs. 501 /-.

 Later reward Rs. 501/- is known to him he wants to claim that amt and files a suit

 The court dismissed the case and held that the reward can only be claimed when there
is a contract between the parties.

 Plaintiff to bring back the nephew ,and hence no reward will be given to him.

Charlill vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball

 A lady, Carlill starts to use the product as per the description and still catches influenza
and thus demands Rs. 100 /- from the company and files a suit

 There is no specific time limit. Secondary, there was no intention to enter into a legal
obligation with the plaintiff

 If they are infected with any dieses then they can claim Rs. 1000/-
 If any individual satisfies all the conditions started wherein

 The plaintiff will be given the reward of Rs. 100/- .

 Aravinth s 21mba016