You are on page 1of 4

RIZAL DID NOT REALLY RETRACTED

The first evidence presented for those people we I mean who


believed that Rizal did not retracted is the retraction document
itself is forgery or peke, as pointed by pascual the handwriting
on the retraction is questionable parang isang tao lang yung
gumawa sa retraction kase isa lang yung sulat or concsistent
yung way ng sulat sa retraction and another is yung pagamin
nung mismong taong gumawa ng pekeng dokumento kay
Antonio abad noong august 13, 1901. So sinabi nya don na
napag utusan lang tong taong to at binayaran sya ng mga pari
para gumawa ng pekeng retraction at gumawa ng maraming
kopya
…………………………………………………………………..
2nd evidence is some informations or facts do not fit well with
the retraction story and some of the ff are the retraction
document was not made in public until 1935 so hindi sya
lumabas bago mag 1935 so hindi sya na publicize and ang
dagdag pa dito kahit yung family ni rizal o yung mga taong
malapit kay rizal ay hindi rin nila Nakita yong document ng
retraction, so kung I aanalyze natin yung event dec 30, 1896
namatay si rizal and hindi na publicize yung retraction
document kung sakaling nagkaroon nga ng retraction
document si rizal until 1935 so anong nangyari nung mga
times na namatay sya and then nung 1935 lang nailabas o
yung nai publicize yung retraction document
3rd evidence that was presented is that no effort was made to
save rizal from death penalty even after saying his execution
right, so there’s a point. Kung talagang nag retract si rizal
binawi na nya lahat ng sinabi nya against catholic church,
binawi na rin nyam ga criticisms nya na sinabi sa Spanish
government and sana hindi sya pinapatay or himdi natuloy yung
kanyang death penalty kaya lang walang nangyaring ganun so
medyo kataka taka din yung nangyari or cineclaim na retraction
……………………………………………………………………
4th evidence rizal’s death was kept in secret and nailibing sya
outside the paco cemetery and ang nakahanap sa labi nya ay ang
kanyang kapatid na si narcisa 2 days after ng kanyang execution.
……………………………………………………………………
5th evidence the record of his burial was not placed on the entrys
of dec 30, 1896 but rather it was placed on special page so
namaty sya ng dec 30 kaya lang dun sa record ng dec 30. 1896
hindi dun na indicate yung kanyang pagkamatay so nailagay sya
sa special page so ang nagiung conclusion po naming who don’t
believed that rizal retracted is either dinagdagan ng panibagong
page para maisingit dun sa record
According to Mr. MARCOS RIAL in his document argument
that Rizal did not retract, sinasabi roon na Rizal did not died as a
Roman Catholic because if he really retracted malamang
talagang siya ay bibigyan ng proper and decent na libing, ngunit
hindi ito naibigay sa kanya, he did not retract because he was
buried in a ground, may isang tradisyon ang mga katoliko na
bago ang libing ay magkakaroon ng isang misa para sa patay, at
pagkatapos ng mis ana ito ay magkakaron ng maaayos na
paglilibing. Ngunuit nung disyembre a trenta 1896, pagkatapos
ng pagbitay sa ating pambansang bayani ang bangkay ni Rizal
ay dinala sa San Juan De Dios Hospital at sa mismong araw na
iyon ay inilibing ang labi ng ating pambansang bayani sa Paco
Cemetery at sa isang walang markang libingan ang giving the
idea that catholics are strict when it comes on their beliefs, dapat
nagkaroon ng maayos na libing si Rizal ngunit wala gayundin
ang misa na walang naganap held by catholics noong kanyang
libing, Father Estanislao and Father Jose Villaclara accompanied
rizal to the execution site ni hindi sila nagpa utos upang bigyan
ng Christian burial siguro nung mga panahong iyon ay alam na
din nila na walang rertraction na naganap
……………………………………………………………………
6th evidence, there is no marriage certificate or public record of
rizal’s marriage to Josephine Bracken so walang Nakita na
certificate na magpapatunay na kinasal nga sa simbahang
katolika si Josephine at si Rizal.
…………………………………………………………………..
7th evidence rizal’s behavior did not point a conversion during
his last 24 hours before his execution, so sa kanyang
masterpiece na Mi Ultimo Adios at yung mga letters na binigay
nya sa mga taong malalapit sa kanya especially sa kanyang
family walang nagsasabi o nagpapatunay na sya ay nagbalik
loob na.
Last evidence the retraction itself is out of character, it is not
accurate or incongruent sya and irrelevant sya don sa mga
statement na nabanggit nya before regarding sa kanyang mga
pananaw when it comes to religion

You might also like