You are on page 1of 66

Generalidades sobre las interacciones planta-virus.

Sistema inmune en plantas

Orelvis Portal Villafaña, José Efraín González


Ramírez, Dariel Cabrera Mederos

Año 2022
Mecanismos moleculares de defensa de las plantas a los
virus

⚫ Inmunidad innata

⚫ Silenciamiento de ARN

⚫ Represión de la traducción de proteínas

⚫ Resistencia viral dominante atípica

⚫ Degradación de proteínas mediante ubiquitación y autofagia

⚫ Regulación de la traducción de ARN


Wu et al. (2019)
Plant Innate Immunity
Plant Innate Immunity

Microbial/pathogen-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs)


Plant Innate Immunity

“Remember that all models are wrong; the practical question is


what errors must be in order not to be useful” (George E.P. Box)
Plant Innate Immunity
Plant Innate Immunity

What are the limitations of the Zig-Zag exhibition model?

1. Molecular scope (pathogenesis concept)


2. Absence of environmental context
3. The ordering of events
4. The time scale
5. Physical scale
6. The model is qualitative
Plant Innate Immunity

Zvereva and Pooggin (2012)


Plant Innate Immunity
Plant Innate Immunity

Cucumber mosaic virus P6


RNA interfering in Plants

Timeline of RNA interfering

Types of RNA

RNA silencing pathway

RNA silencing movement

Overcoming Silencing. RNAi suppressors

Silencing and simptoms

Role of temperature in RNA silencing

Application of gene silencing in plants

Conlcuding remarks
RNA interfering in Plants

1990 - First description of post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) in plants

They attempted to overexpress chalcone synthase (CHS) in pigmented petunia


petals by introducing a chimeric petunia CHS gene. Unexpectedly, the
introduced gene created a block in anthocyanin biosynthesis. The mechanism
responsible for the reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans is
unclear, but the erratic and reversible nature of this phenomenon suggests the
possible involvement of methylation.

Napoli, C., Lemieux, C. and Jorgensen, R. (1990) Introduction of a chimeric


chalcone synthase gene into Petunia results in reversible co-suppression of
homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 2: 279-289.

Wild type PTGS


Strongly pigmented compounds
RNA interfering in Plants

1992 – Fungi (Quelling)

Up to 36% of Neurospora crassa transformants showing an albino phenotype


were recovered by transforming a wild-type strain with different portions of the
carotenogenic albino-3 (al-3) and albino-1 (al-1) genes.

Romano, N. and Macino, G. (1992) Quelling: transient inactivation of gene


expression in Neurospora crassa by transformation with homologous
sequences. Molecular Microbiology 6: 3343-3353.
RNA interfering in Plants

Antisense Technology

- Antisense technology has been used for ~25 years.


- Based on introducing an antisense gene (or antisense RNA) into cells or
organisms to try to block translation of the sense mRNA.
-The “antisense effect” was probably due to RNAi rather than inhibiting
translation
RNA interfering in Plants

1995 - First noticed that sense RNA was as effective as antisense RNA for
suppressing gene expression in the worm Caenorhabditis elegans

Guo, S. and Kemphues, K.J. (1995) par-1, a gene required for establishing
polarity in C. elegans embryos, encodes a putative Ser/Thr kinase that is
asymmetrically distributed. Cell 81: 611-620.

Is a free-living,
transparent nematode
(roundworm), about
1 mm in length, which
lives in temperate soil
environments.

C. elegants
RNA interfering in Plants

1995 - The phenomenon of PTGS had been observed in all three Kingdoms of
multicellular organisms

Understanding of the cellular processes responsible for PTGS (now known as


RNA interference, or RNAi) exploded in 1998 with the discovery that it was
triggered by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), a discovery that won Fire and
Mello the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M.K., Kostas, S.A., Driver, S.E. and Mello, C.C.
(1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in
Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391:806-811.

Andrew Z. Fire Craig C. Mello


RNA interfering in Plants

1998 - Mick Graham and his colleagues at CSIRO Plant Industry established the
role of double-stranded RNA in triggering PTGS in plants

Waterhouse, P.M., Graham, M.W. and Wang, M.-B. (1998) Virus resistance and
gene silencing in plants can be induced by simultaneous expression of sense
and antisense RNA. Proceeding of National Academic of Science USA 95: 13959-
13964.
RNA interfering in Plants

1999 - It was found that PTGS in plants was accompanied by short RNA
molecules whose sequence corresponded to parts of the mRNA (messenger
RNA) of the silenced gene

PTGS is a nucleotide sequence-specific defense mechanism that can target both


cellular and viral mRNAs.
Short RNA molecules were of uniform length, estimated at 25 nucleotides, and
their accumulation required either transgene sense transcription or RNA virus
replication. Thus, the 25-nucleotide antisense RNA is likely synthesized from an
RNA template and may represent the specificity determinant of PTGS.

Hamilton, A.J. and Baulcombe, D.C. (1999) A species of small antisense RNA in
posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science 286: 950-952.
RNA interfering in Plants

2000 – Rnase III (Dicer) processes dsRNA into 21-23-nt

Zamore et al. (2000) RNAi: double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent


cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 nucleotide intervals. Cell 101: 25-33.
RNA interfering in Plants

2000 - The proteins comprising the silencing complex began to be teased out
and were found to bear striking resemblances between all organisms

These results raise the possibility that PTGS, or at least some of its elements,
could participate in the regulation of gene expression during development in
plants.

Fagard, M., Boutet, S., Morel, J.-B., Bellini, C. and Vaucheret, H. (2000) AGO1,
QDE-2, and RDE-1 are related proteins required for post-transcriptional gene
silencing in plants, quelling in fungi, and RNA interference in animals.
Proceeding of National Academic of Science USA 97: 11650-11654.
RNA interfering in Plants

2001 – Dicer is Cloned

The RNase III enzyme that is evolutionarily conserved and contains helicase
and PAZ domains, as well as two dsRNA-binding domains.

Bernstein et al. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA
interference. Nature 2001 409: 363-366.
RNA interfering in Plants

2002 - In recognition of the overwhelming importance of RNAi as a biological


process and a universally applicable tool, the leading journal Science
announced it "The breakthrough of the year, 2002."

Meanwhile, work continued on dissecting the cellular complex that catalyses


RNAi…
RNA interfering in Plants

Many excellent reviews of RNAi are available, among which are the
following:

Sen, G.L. and Blau, H.M. (2006) A brief history of RNAi: the silence of the
genes. FASEB Journal 20: 1293-1299.

The use of the RNAi pathway to eliminate gene products has greatly
facilitated the understanding of gene function. Behind this remarkable
pathway is an intricate network of proteins that ensures the degradation of
the target mRNA. In this review, they explore the history of RNAi as well as
highlighting recent discoveries

Kodama, H. and Komamine, A. (2011) RNAi and plant gene function analysis:
methods and protocols. Humana Press (Springer). 210 pp

Feng, X., Fanga, B. and Qia, Y. (2016) RNAi in Plants: An Argonaute-Centered


View. The Plant Cell 28: 272–285

Rosa, C. et al. (2018) RNA Interference Mechanisms and Applications in Plant


Pathology. Annual Review of Phytopathology 56: 581-610.
RNA interfering in Plants

Types of RNA

Coding: messenger RNA (mRNA).


Non-coding:
- Ribosomal RNA (rRNA).
- Transfer RNA (tRNA).
- Small nuclear RNA (snRNA): includes spliceosomal RNAs.
- Small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA): most known snoRNAs are involved in rRNA
modification.
- Short interfering RNA (siRNA): active molecules in RNA interference;
degrades mRNA.
- Micro RNA (miRNA): short RNAs that regulate gene expression in eukaryotes
by translational inhibition or cleavage of complementary mRNAs. In plants,
miRNAs are known to target mostly transcription factors and are implicated in
diverse aspects of plant growth and development.
RNA interfering in Plants

RNA silencing pathways

- dsRNA is cleaved into small


fragments of 20–25 bp pairs
by a ribonuclease called DICER.
- siRNA fragments are separated to give
the guide strand, which is
complementary to the target mRNA and
the helper strand, which is further
degraded.
- The guide strand is then incorporated
into the RNA-induced silencing complex
(RISC), which targets it to the cognate
mRNA, forming a duplex with that RNA.
- The cognate mRNA strand
complementary to the bound siRNA is
cleaved by the slicer activity of RISC to
give siRNA fragments.
RNA interfering in Plants

Transcribed from endogenous gene as pri-miRNA, which is transcribed


from intergenic and intronic regions of the host genome as stem-loop
structure with imperfect base-pairing .
- Primary miRNA: long with multiple hairpins.
- Imperfect internal sequence complementarity.
- pri-miRNA is identified drosha due to its high affinity to
hairpin loops.
Pre-miRNA is exported to the cytoplasm by Exportin 5
Processed by the RNase III enzyme Drosha into a ~70 nt hairpins → Pre-
miRNA.
-Cleaved by Dicer into the mature miRNA
-Symmetric 2nt 3’ overhangs, 5’ phosphate groups
RNA interfering in Plants

miRNA
RNA interfering in Plants

Results of the System

- Target RNA degradation: Processing of the cognate viral RNA or mRNA


targeted by si- or mi-RNA in the RISC.

-Translational repression: Prevention of translation of mRNA due to


binding by siRNA (or miRNA).

-Transcriptional repression : Epigenetic effect caused by DNA methylation


or remodelling of the chromatin because of the presence of siRNA. There
is circumstantial evidence for methylation of both geminiviral DNA and of
modification of chromatin structure.
RNA interfering in Plants

Components of the System

dsRNA

Dicer

Products of Dicer

RISC
Sources of
dsRNA

A. Replicating ssRNA virus; note


that replicative intermediate
and secondary structure in the
ss form can be targets.
B. Replicating dsRNA virus.
C. Retro- and pararetro-virus. The
secondary structure in the
terminal repeats (TR) can be a
target.
D. Replicating ssDNA virus. The
overlapping ends of transcripts
from complementary strands can
be targets.
E. Viroids.
F. Structure of a hairpin construct
for transformation into plant to
give protection against the virus.
RNA interfering in Plants

The branched model

Vaucheret et al. (2001)


RNA interfering in Plants

- 200 kDa family of proteins that usually contain an ATPase/RNA Dicer


helicase domain, a PAZ domain, two RNaseIII domains, and a C-
terminal dsRNA binding domain.
- The distance between the two RNase III domains determines the size
of the siRNA that it produces.
- Dicer progressively cleaves dsRNA at 21–25 bp intervals
to generate siRNA with 2-nt 3’ overhangs and phosphorylated 5’
termini.
- Dicer cleaves pri-miRNA to give 20–25 bp fragments with blunt ends.
- There are various dicers that have distinct roles; those from plants
are called dicer-like (DCL).
RNA interfering in Plants

Products
siRNA: Twenty to 25 nucleotide dsRNA fully base-paired of Dicer
with a 2 nucleotide 3’ overhang. It is complementary only
to the dsRNA from which it arose.

miRNA. Twenty-one to 23 nucleotide dsRNA produced


from priming miRNA.

A. Structure of pri miRNA.

B. Diagram of the structure


of an siRNA showing a 19–21
base-pair RNA duplex with 2
nucleotide 3’ overhangs:
OH, 3’ hydroxyl; P, 5’
phosphate.
RNA interfering in Plants

RISC
- RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) includes, besides the si-
or mi-RNA, the members of the Argonaute (AGO) protein
family and various accessory factors.
- AGO proteins are 100 kDa and have a PAZ domain and a PIWI
domain, which is related to RNaseH endonuclease and
functions in slicer activity.
- Various AGO proteins are probably associated with the
variations of the basic silencing pathway.
- Arabidopsis encodes 10 putative AGOs, with AGO1 being
involved in the RISC.
RNA interfering in Plants

The silencing of a virus can spread systemically throughout the plant


after induction in the initially infected cell.
- Viral primary 21 nt siRNA produced by the dicer/RISC system in the
initially infected cell moves through plasmodesmata to about 10–15
surrounding cells either with or ahead of the infection front .
- The host RNA dependent RNA polymerase amplifies the siRNAs to give
ds forms, which are then processed into secondary siRNAs. These then
move to surrounding cells and are amplified.
- This reiterative process moves the siRNA signal to the vascular tissue
from where it, possibly associated with small-RNA binding proteins, is
distributed to other parts of the plant.
- This systemic movement of the silencing signal ahead of viral movement
primes the defense response prior to the arrival of the virus.
UV phenotypes of RNA silencing of a GFP transgene in N. benthamiana
(A) Not silenced; (B) spontaneous short-range local silencing; (C) induced local
silencing; (D) fully silenced; (E) systemic silencing; (F) systemic (centre and right-
hand leaves) and extensive local silencing (left-hand leaf).

Kalantidis et al. (2008)


RNA interfering in Plants

Overcoming Silencing

Viruses and viroids have developed two basic strategies to suppress RNA
silencing:

- Suppression of silencing
Protein suppressors
Nucleic acid suppressors

- Avoidance silencing
RNA interfering in Plants

Protein suppressors

- Viral suppressors often also have other functions and frequently are
identified as “pathogenicity determinants.” However, these other
functions, such as replication enhancement, determining virus movement,
and symptom production, can be attributed to the suppression of
silencing.
- Silencing suppressors bind dsRNA, some binding both long and short
dsRNAs and others just binding ds siRNA like p19 of tombusviruses, p20 of
closteroviruses, p15 of Peanut clump virus, TGB1 of Barley stripe mosaic
virus, and HC-Pro of potyviruses.
- Silencing suppressors inhibit the assembly of RISC by competing more
efficiently for the ds siRNA than the RISC assembly complex.
- HC-Pro, p19, and p21 suppressors bind 21-nt siRNA duplexes more
efficiently than 24-nt siRNA duplexes; however, p21 and HC-Pro require a
2-nt 3’ end overhang, whereas p19 does not.
- Not all suppressors function by binding ds RNA and thereby inhibiting the
assembly of RISC. For instance, 2b of Cucumber mosaic virus interacts with
Argonaute 1 protein in RISC and inhibits its cleavage activity.
RNA interfering in Plants

Silencing suppressors can inhibit the key components of RNA-silencing


pathways.

Song et al. (2011)


RNA interfering in Plants

Silencing suppressors can recruit endogenous negative regulators of RNA


silencing.

Song et al. (2011)


RNA interfering in Plants

Some silencing suppressors act by interacting with molecules from host


cells.

Song et al. (2011)


RNA interfering in Plants

Song et al. (2011)


LIiet al. (2001)
RNA interfering in Plants

Nucleic acid suppressors

Viroids do not encode any proteins. Yet, the finding of viroid-specific siRNAs
shows that their highly structured RNAs are processed by the silencing
pathway. That viroids successfully infect plants indicates that they must be
able to suppress the silencing. It is suggested that the secondary structure
may also have the property of suppressing silencing of the replication of, at
least, some viroids.

Viroids are plants pathogens that consist of a short stretch of highly complementary,
circular, single-stranded RNA without the typical viral coat protein.
RNA interfering in Plants

Avoidance of Silencing

For some viruses no suppressor of silencing has yet been identified. The
susceptible stage in the viral replication cycle to the silencing
defense system is when dsRNA is exposed at stages such as RNA
replication or translation.

Some viruses avoid exposure to the defense system by replicating in


inaccessible sites, such as vesicles. Furthermore, if a virus replicates and
expresses rapidly and then safely encapsidated its genome, it may
outcompete the defense system.
RNA interfering in Plants

Silencing and symptoms

Although some symptoms are attributable to silencing and suppression not


all are. Replication, movement, and accumulation of viruses in plants can
cause upsets to the physiology and metabolism of a plant.

- Recovery

- Dark Green Islands and Mosaics

- miRNA

- siRNA effects

- Synergistic effects
RNA interfering in Plants

Recovery

A virus-infected plant, especially with Nepoviruses, may show severe


viral symptoms on the inoculated and first systemically infected leaves;
however, new growth appears in which symptoms are milder or
absent.

For other viruses, such as Alfalfa mosaic virus, the virus content in the plant
can increase and decrease with concomitant changes in symptoms
sometimes in a cyclical manner. These recovery phenomena likely reflect
changes in the balance between silencing and suppression.
RNA interfering in Plants

The threshold model

Waterhouse et al. (1999)


Recovery

Recovery in tobacco
plants infected with
Tobacco ringspot virus
RNA interfering in Plants

Dark green islands and mosaics

One of the most common symptoms of virus


infection is a mosaic of light and dark green
areas on the leaves. The mosaic pattern
develops in leaves that are undergoing cell
division and leaf expansionand can include
well-defined dark green areas in which there
is no detectable virus and they are
resistant to subsequent virus infection.

It would appear that they result from one or a


small group of cells in which there is silencing but
no suppression and that divide to form a discrete
tissue zone.
RNA interfering in Plants

miRNA

As well as suppressing siRNA silencing, protein suppressors can


affect the miRNA pathway.
Not all suppressors impact upon this pathway, and not all miRNAs
are affected.
However, it is likely that the perturbation of the miRNA pathway
leads to some symptom production. There is evidence for this in
that some transgenic plants expressing suppressors of silencing
have the phenotype of virus infected plants even though there is
no virus present.
RNA interfering in Plants

siRNA effects

Transgenic tomato plants expressing portions of Potato spindle tuber


viroid contained viroid-specific siRNAs and had a phenotype
similar to the symptoms of viroid infection.

This suggests that the siRNAs might be responsible for the symptom
production possibly by targeting plant genes for RNA silencing.
RNA interfering in Plants

Synergistic Effects

- The effects of the combined infection by two viruses are more severe than that
of either of the constituent viruses alone. It can be caused by the infection with
two viruses that belong to the same genus or by two viruses from different
genera. The silencing suppressor of one virus can affect the replication of
another virus in a joint infection leading to synergistic effects.
- African cassava mosaic virus (UgACMV) is caused by synergism between two
begomoviruses: African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) and East African cassava
mosaic virus (EACMV). The synergistic effect is mediated by the differential and
complementary suppression of silencing by the AC4 gene of ACMV and the AC2
gene of EACMV.
- The joint infection of tobacco plants with PVX and PVY is characterized by
severe veinal necrosis in the first systemically infected leaves. Leaves showing
this synergistic reaction contain up to 10 times as much PVX as with single
infections but only the same amount of PVY. The HC-Pro silencing suppressor
from PVY is responsible for the increase in the amount of PVX.
RNA interfering in Plants

Szittya et al. (2003)


RNA interfering in Plants

Applications
To protect the genome from viruses (or other invading DNAs or RNAs)
- Antiviral defense
- Suppress transposon activity
- Response to aberrant RNAs
Genetic tool: Probing gene function

Advantages
- Highly gene specific
- High gene silencing efficiency
- Screening targeted plants takes less time
- Highly inducible (heat shock gene promoter)
- Fast

Disadvantages
- It does not knockout a gene for 100%
- siRNA tends to activate unwanted pathways
- Expensive
RNA interfering in Plants

Balcoumbe et al. (1999)


RNA interfering in Plants

Summary of features of VIGS vectors

Burch-Smith et al. (2004)


RNA interfering in Plants

Comparison of VIGS with other functional genomics approaches


RNA interfering in Plants
RNA interfering in Plants

Wang et al. 2001; Welse et al. (2001)


RNA interfering in Plants

• The RNA-silencing defence system is found in eukaryotes.


• The defence system is activated by dsRNA that is cleaved to give small RNA
molecules that target the cognate RNA.
• There are two main sources of dsRNA: perfectly base-paired from viruses,
transposons, transgenes, and aberrations in transcription, which are processed
to give small interfering (si)RNA; and imperfectly base-paired priming-micro
(pri-mi)RNA, which is processed to give micro (mi)RNAs that control host
development.
The dsRNAs are processed through three pathways that have a common basic
section that cleaves the dsRNA and targets the si- or miRNA to its cognate
mRNA.
• The three pathways lead to degradation of mRNA, translational repression of
mRNA, and transcriptional repression. Defense against RNA viruses is usually
by the first pathway and against DNA viruses by the first and third pathways.
The second pathway is frequently used by miRNA.
• In plants the silencing response spreads systemically and primes the defense
ahead of the virus infection front.
• Viruses encode suppressors of silencing that act as a counterdefence against
the silencing system.
Muchas Gracias

Dr. José E. González: jefrain@nauta.cu


Dr. C. Orelvis Portal: orelvispv@uclv.cu

You might also like