Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Año 2022
Mecanismos moleculares de defensa de las plantas a los
virus
⚫ Inmunidad innata
⚫ Silenciamiento de ARN
Types of RNA
Conlcuding remarks
RNA interfering in Plants
Antisense Technology
1995 - First noticed that sense RNA was as effective as antisense RNA for
suppressing gene expression in the worm Caenorhabditis elegans
Guo, S. and Kemphues, K.J. (1995) par-1, a gene required for establishing
polarity in C. elegans embryos, encodes a putative Ser/Thr kinase that is
asymmetrically distributed. Cell 81: 611-620.
Is a free-living,
transparent nematode
(roundworm), about
1 mm in length, which
lives in temperate soil
environments.
C. elegants
RNA interfering in Plants
1995 - The phenomenon of PTGS had been observed in all three Kingdoms of
multicellular organisms
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M.K., Kostas, S.A., Driver, S.E. and Mello, C.C.
(1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in
Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391:806-811.
1998 - Mick Graham and his colleagues at CSIRO Plant Industry established the
role of double-stranded RNA in triggering PTGS in plants
Waterhouse, P.M., Graham, M.W. and Wang, M.-B. (1998) Virus resistance and
gene silencing in plants can be induced by simultaneous expression of sense
and antisense RNA. Proceeding of National Academic of Science USA 95: 13959-
13964.
RNA interfering in Plants
1999 - It was found that PTGS in plants was accompanied by short RNA
molecules whose sequence corresponded to parts of the mRNA (messenger
RNA) of the silenced gene
Hamilton, A.J. and Baulcombe, D.C. (1999) A species of small antisense RNA in
posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science 286: 950-952.
RNA interfering in Plants
2000 - The proteins comprising the silencing complex began to be teased out
and were found to bear striking resemblances between all organisms
These results raise the possibility that PTGS, or at least some of its elements,
could participate in the regulation of gene expression during development in
plants.
Fagard, M., Boutet, S., Morel, J.-B., Bellini, C. and Vaucheret, H. (2000) AGO1,
QDE-2, and RDE-1 are related proteins required for post-transcriptional gene
silencing in plants, quelling in fungi, and RNA interference in animals.
Proceeding of National Academic of Science USA 97: 11650-11654.
RNA interfering in Plants
The RNase III enzyme that is evolutionarily conserved and contains helicase
and PAZ domains, as well as two dsRNA-binding domains.
Bernstein et al. Role for a bidentate ribonuclease in the initiation step of RNA
interference. Nature 2001 409: 363-366.
RNA interfering in Plants
Many excellent reviews of RNAi are available, among which are the
following:
Sen, G.L. and Blau, H.M. (2006) A brief history of RNAi: the silence of the
genes. FASEB Journal 20: 1293-1299.
The use of the RNAi pathway to eliminate gene products has greatly
facilitated the understanding of gene function. Behind this remarkable
pathway is an intricate network of proteins that ensures the degradation of
the target mRNA. In this review, they explore the history of RNAi as well as
highlighting recent discoveries
Kodama, H. and Komamine, A. (2011) RNAi and plant gene function analysis:
methods and protocols. Humana Press (Springer). 210 pp
Types of RNA
miRNA
RNA interfering in Plants
dsRNA
Dicer
Products of Dicer
RISC
Sources of
dsRNA
Products
siRNA: Twenty to 25 nucleotide dsRNA fully base-paired of Dicer
with a 2 nucleotide 3’ overhang. It is complementary only
to the dsRNA from which it arose.
RISC
- RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) includes, besides the si-
or mi-RNA, the members of the Argonaute (AGO) protein
family and various accessory factors.
- AGO proteins are 100 kDa and have a PAZ domain and a PIWI
domain, which is related to RNaseH endonuclease and
functions in slicer activity.
- Various AGO proteins are probably associated with the
variations of the basic silencing pathway.
- Arabidopsis encodes 10 putative AGOs, with AGO1 being
involved in the RISC.
RNA interfering in Plants
Overcoming Silencing
Viruses and viroids have developed two basic strategies to suppress RNA
silencing:
- Suppression of silencing
Protein suppressors
Nucleic acid suppressors
- Avoidance silencing
RNA interfering in Plants
Protein suppressors
- Viral suppressors often also have other functions and frequently are
identified as “pathogenicity determinants.” However, these other
functions, such as replication enhancement, determining virus movement,
and symptom production, can be attributed to the suppression of
silencing.
- Silencing suppressors bind dsRNA, some binding both long and short
dsRNAs and others just binding ds siRNA like p19 of tombusviruses, p20 of
closteroviruses, p15 of Peanut clump virus, TGB1 of Barley stripe mosaic
virus, and HC-Pro of potyviruses.
- Silencing suppressors inhibit the assembly of RISC by competing more
efficiently for the ds siRNA than the RISC assembly complex.
- HC-Pro, p19, and p21 suppressors bind 21-nt siRNA duplexes more
efficiently than 24-nt siRNA duplexes; however, p21 and HC-Pro require a
2-nt 3’ end overhang, whereas p19 does not.
- Not all suppressors function by binding ds RNA and thereby inhibiting the
assembly of RISC. For instance, 2b of Cucumber mosaic virus interacts with
Argonaute 1 protein in RISC and inhibits its cleavage activity.
RNA interfering in Plants
Viroids do not encode any proteins. Yet, the finding of viroid-specific siRNAs
shows that their highly structured RNAs are processed by the silencing
pathway. That viroids successfully infect plants indicates that they must be
able to suppress the silencing. It is suggested that the secondary structure
may also have the property of suppressing silencing of the replication of, at
least, some viroids.
Viroids are plants pathogens that consist of a short stretch of highly complementary,
circular, single-stranded RNA without the typical viral coat protein.
RNA interfering in Plants
Avoidance of Silencing
For some viruses no suppressor of silencing has yet been identified. The
susceptible stage in the viral replication cycle to the silencing
defense system is when dsRNA is exposed at stages such as RNA
replication or translation.
- Recovery
- miRNA
- siRNA effects
- Synergistic effects
RNA interfering in Plants
Recovery
For other viruses, such as Alfalfa mosaic virus, the virus content in the plant
can increase and decrease with concomitant changes in symptoms
sometimes in a cyclical manner. These recovery phenomena likely reflect
changes in the balance between silencing and suppression.
RNA interfering in Plants
Recovery in tobacco
plants infected with
Tobacco ringspot virus
RNA interfering in Plants
miRNA
siRNA effects
This suggests that the siRNAs might be responsible for the symptom
production possibly by targeting plant genes for RNA silencing.
RNA interfering in Plants
Synergistic Effects
- The effects of the combined infection by two viruses are more severe than that
of either of the constituent viruses alone. It can be caused by the infection with
two viruses that belong to the same genus or by two viruses from different
genera. The silencing suppressor of one virus can affect the replication of
another virus in a joint infection leading to synergistic effects.
- African cassava mosaic virus (UgACMV) is caused by synergism between two
begomoviruses: African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) and East African cassava
mosaic virus (EACMV). The synergistic effect is mediated by the differential and
complementary suppression of silencing by the AC4 gene of ACMV and the AC2
gene of EACMV.
- The joint infection of tobacco plants with PVX and PVY is characterized by
severe veinal necrosis in the first systemically infected leaves. Leaves showing
this synergistic reaction contain up to 10 times as much PVX as with single
infections but only the same amount of PVY. The HC-Pro silencing suppressor
from PVY is responsible for the increase in the amount of PVX.
RNA interfering in Plants
Applications
To protect the genome from viruses (or other invading DNAs or RNAs)
- Antiviral defense
- Suppress transposon activity
- Response to aberrant RNAs
Genetic tool: Probing gene function
Advantages
- Highly gene specific
- High gene silencing efficiency
- Screening targeted plants takes less time
- Highly inducible (heat shock gene promoter)
- Fast
Disadvantages
- It does not knockout a gene for 100%
- siRNA tends to activate unwanted pathways
- Expensive
RNA interfering in Plants