Escaneado con CamScannerot te dng a omen any sree Sr elemiaiy ts ae pec eee faces py oe a feito, Sa mt wih kg miesimtag cette oem sar. ky argues that language ohana Ieee inn powing han eurang =the matunga Praclepatc Tocris ent ere an Decker ae en Seng aad tae f a Teeter inary + hry we ha Siege the minal apni wo lng evidence Sp pre mone pn eps bao UC mee at Ps (Choa Pp) Ee ts econ ks ican oa Sere emrcerncn coc iene geen carers ta ater cee Sete he cgi iheonehle ‘per appr i to ech ante pe 2 ee etek ane aaa rea ak ncaa Sr ae oe Se ao ae Sen ee ache ae ae ioe So Set epee ee Seer | ‘tp ob le a ap eter Coon Pei cn de a ae ‘Sei pened thee ys Nash oe a sate (rie ace eee Co SOUL Sa ee aa Sic aes pale ae a Escaneado con CamScannerge-like behaviour that, observers t languay know. It Re cso begin to tap the complexity 0 Re oe cnaky’s jronic comment compares how well guage” ‘ith how well apes speak; pethaps ‘the distinction be beings oe d flying is arbitrary, a matter of degree: Petals ci Ping ‘Xe birds, only not so well’ (Chomsky, 1976, p. 41), Sy us jection is that the languages involved do not thing resembling the principles of UG: whatever the ape has it is not core grammar. The.ape’s knowledge might be it might be functional knowledge of how to achieve gestures or signs but it is not language knowledge as.a UG 5} Chomsky’s main objection is that the learning described does 1 resemble language acquisition in children because it is taught rat than ‘picked up’. Children learn language from positive evidence: than reinforcement by their parents. The apes, however, are all t language;(in the wild, apes do not develop language for The child "does not choose to learn, and cannot fail to lea normal conditions’ (Chomsky, 1976, p. 71). The role of the en ‘ment to the child is triggering; it sets things off rather than pro precise controlled instruction. Even if the attempt to teach language: apes were successful, it would not prove how animals could ac language. To sum up, ‘the interesting investigations of the capacity of the higher apes to acquire symbolic systems seem to me to sUj the traditional belief that even the most rudimentary properties language lie well beyond the capacities of an otherwise intelli ape’ (Chomsky, 1980a, p. 239). Escaneado con CamScanner