Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M K
MELANIE KLOKE (AUTHOR)
Excerpt
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
7. Conclusion
8. Bibliography
1. Introduction
In Elizabethan England the genre of the revenge tragedy was very popular. Many plays of this kind by
several different playwrights, including William Shakespeare, were written and staged in the 16th and 17th
centuries. The success of the genre was not only due to it’s bloody, criminal, and therefore exciting action
but also to the topicality of revenge at that time. In revenge plays questions were raised which concerned
the Elizabethans and which made them reflect on their own situations and attitudes. It was around 1570,
that English playwrights took over the concept of the revenge tragedy from foreign authors such as Seneca.
[1]
However, the genre was so successful and widely spread among the English, that a new Elizabethan
revenge tragedy was developed. The Spanish Tragedy by Thomas Kyd, which can be regarded as the
prototype of the English revenge drama, constituted a pattern containing the basic elements of a revenge
play, which a lot of contemporary authors, such as Shakespeare, are said to have followed. [2] In the
following, the success of the Elizabethan revenge play will be examined with respect to the attitude
towards vengeance at that time. Furthermore, the relevance of the revenge tragedies for the Elizabethan
audience will be taken into consideration. Afterwards, the pattern introduced with Kyd’s The Spanish
Tragedy, the Kydian formula[3], will be depicted before it’s basic constituents will be related to Hamlet, the
most famous Shakespearean tragedy, in which revenge is an important motive.
[...]
Cf. Robert N. Watson, “Tragedies of Revenge and Ambition”, in: The Cambridge Companion to
[1]
[3]
Cf. Fredson Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642 (Princeton: Princeton UP 1971), p.71.
[4]
Cf. Ibid., p.4.
[5]
Cf. Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642, p.6ff.
[6]
Cf. Eleanor Prosser, Hamlet and Revenge (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1971), p.3ff.
[7]
Cf. Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642, p.11ff.
[8]
Cf. Prosser, Hamlet and Revenge, p.3ff.
[9]
Cf. Ibid., p.18.
[10]
Cf. Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642, p.10f.
[11]
Cf. Prosser, Hamlet and Revenge, p.10ff.
[12]
Cf. Bowers, The Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642, p.35ff.
[13]
Cf. Ibid., p.39f.
[14]
Cf. Watson, “Tragedies of Revenge and Ambition”, p.160ff.
Cf. Paul N. Siegel, Shakespearean Tragedy and the Elizabethan Compromise. A Marxist Study( New
[15]
[16]
Cf. Watson, “Tragedies of Revenge and Ambition”, p.6.
[17]
Cf. Michael Mangan, A Preface to Shakespeare’s Tragedies (New York: Longman, 1991), p.68f.
[18]
Cf. Bowers, The Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642, p.16ff.
[19]
Cf. Stadter, Hyperion to a Satyr, p.84f.
[20]
Cf. Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642, p. 42ff.
[21]
Cf. Ibid., p.65.
[22]
Cf. Stadter, Hyperion to a Satyr, p. 36ff.
[23]
Cf. Stadter, Hyperion to a Satyr, p. 42ff.
[24]
Cf. Bowers, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy 1587-1642, p.42ff.
[25]
Cf. Stadter, Hyperion to a Satyr, p. 53f.
[26]
Cf. John Russel Brown, Shakespeare: The Tragedies ( Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), p.135