Performance appraisals can be negatively impacted if [1] standards are unclear and ambiguous, allowing for unfair assessments, or [2] if raters let biases influence their evaluations instead of focusing on specific job qualities. To avoid these problems, organizations should [1] clearly define the standards and metrics that will be used for assessment, [2] use 360-degree feedback from multiple evaluators, and [3] discuss career goals with employees to foster development and unbiased reviews.
Performance appraisals can be negatively impacted if [1] standards are unclear and ambiguous, allowing for unfair assessments, or [2] if raters let biases influence their evaluations instead of focusing on specific job qualities. To avoid these problems, organizations should [1] clearly define the standards and metrics that will be used for assessment, [2] use 360-degree feedback from multiple evaluators, and [3] discuss career goals with employees to foster development and unbiased reviews.
Performance appraisals can be negatively impacted if [1] standards are unclear and ambiguous, allowing for unfair assessments, or [2] if raters let biases influence their evaluations instead of focusing on specific job qualities. To avoid these problems, organizations should [1] clearly define the standards and metrics that will be used for assessment, [2] use 360-degree feedback from multiple evaluators, and [3] discuss career goals with employees to foster development and unbiased reviews.
1. What barriers might prevent an appraisal having a positive impact on
performance?
- Performance appraisal is beneficial for assessing strengths and
weaknesses of an employee. It enables to find out tasks in which the employee is competent. Basically, the process is useful for identifying true potential and interests of the employees. The manager/team head shares evaluation result with the respective employees. Such feedback is useful as it enables employees to focus on improving their strengths. The managers also suggest ideas and methods through which employees can overcome their weaknesses. The process involves recognizing & rewarding employee’s efforts and performance. It boosts their morale and confidence. Further, greater awareness of one’s true potential motivates employees to give their best performance. The organization acknowledges efforts of employees by giving higher salary, higher responsibilities, certificates and other monetary and non-monetary benefits.
2. What are the problems to avoid in performance appraisal?
Unclear Standards – Ambiguous traits and degrees of merit can result in
an unfair appraisal. Halo Effect – The influence of a rater’s general impression on ratings of specific qualities can be a problem. Central Tendency – This occurs when supervisors stick to the middle of the rating scales, thus rating everyone average. Leniency or Strictness – Supervisors have the tendency to rate everyone either high or low. Bias – The tendency to allow individual differences such as age, race, and sex affect employee appraisal ratings is a problem. 3. How can performance appraisal biases be avoided?
-Use 360-degree feedback, overcome any one rater's biases by inviting
multiple people to participate in an employee's evaluation. Create career development avenues. Discuss career goals with employees at every level of the organization and be a partner in their professional development.