You are on page 1of 5

IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 21, NO.

2, FEBRUARY 2022 217

An UHF RFID Circularly Polarized Tag Antenna


With Long Read Distance for Metal Objects
Ping Wang , Member, IEEE, Wei Luo , Yu Shao , Member, IEEE, and Haiyan Jin , Member, IEEE

Abstract—In this letter, a circularly-polarized (CP) metal- containers, the inductance of the antennas increases rapidly, which
tolerant tag antenna with a long reading distance (RD) is results in poor impedance match, low efficiency, and high axial ratio
proposed for the ultra-high frequency (UHF) radio-frequency iden- (AR). Thus, it is a hard task to design a CP tag antenna mounted on
tification (RFID) systems. In order to realize CP radiation and high metallic objects.
gain, a cross slot is etched on top patch to provide two orthogonal Presently, very few CP metal-attachable tag antennas operating
polarizations, whereas the meandered strip on the central copper in UHF band were investigated [11]–[14]. Two coupling-feed CP
layer is used to obtain a 90° phase difference between adjacent tag antennas located on a metallic plate were proposed in [11] and
ports. An equivalent circuit model is established to better under- [12], but the maximum gains of the antennas are less than −8 dBi,
stand the operating mechanism and impedance characteristic. A and the RDs are 4 m. The design in [13] uses a star-shaped slot
prototype mounted on a 200 mm × 200 mm metal plate has been
on radiation patch to realize CP and antenna size reduction, and
manufactured and measured to verify the design and shows an
impedance bandwidth of 8 MHz (918–926 MHz) and axial ratio
similarly, the gain of the antenna is less than −8 dBi and achievable
bandwidth of 1.3 MHz (921.6–922.9 MHz). Also, a maximum gain RD is about 4.3 m. Other design methods including the use of the
of 2 dBi at 922 MHz and a maximum RD of about 22.4 m have been electromagnetic band gap [14] and L-shaped feed line [15] were also
demonstrated. demonstrated, but the designs still show a low gain and a shorted
RD.
Index Terms—Circular polarization (CP), high gain, metal- In this letter, an UHF metal-attachable tag antenna with CP
attachable, tag antenna. radiation is proposed. The proposed tag antenna is composed of a
cross slot and a single-arm feeding line. The cross slot is sequentially
fed by the feeding line. The U-shaped microstrip of the feeding line
I. INTRODUCTION provides a 90° phase lag to bring into sequential rotation of current
on the top patch for CP radiation. With structural arrangement, the
W ITH the rapid development of radio frequency iden-
tification (RFID) technology operating in ultra-high
frequency (UHF) band (860–960 MHz) in recent years, a lot of
proposed tag antenna shows high gain and long RD. Simulation
and analysis of the proposed tag antenna are performed using the
efforts had been made to design the UHF tag antenna in many ANSYS Electronics Desktop 2018. A prototype is also fabricated
potential applications [1]–[3]. However, a circularly polarized (CP) and measured to verify the design.
reader antenna is usually employed to increase orientation diversity
in a real RFID system, thus only half of the transmitted power is
II. ANTENNA STRUCTURE AND ANALYSIS
received by the tag owing to the polarization mismatch between
the reader and tag antenna if a linearly polarized (LP) tag antenna A. Antenna Structure
is utilized. Therefore, many studies were conducted on the CP tag
antenna to decrease the power loss [4]–[10]. In [4], a truncated patch Fig. 1 shows the geometry of the proposed CP antenna, which
was proposed to obtain CP radiation, and the antenna achieves a is attached to the center point of a metal plate with a size of
reading distance (RD) of 8 m, which is twice more than that of the LP 200 mm × 200 mm. It is composed of three copper layers: top
tag antenna. In [5], a crossed-dipole antenna was designed to realize patch (Layer 1) and ground plane (Layer 3) locating in the ex-
CP tag antenna, which exhibits a maximum RD of approximately terior of two dielectric substrates, the top substrate is 1.524 mm
7.6 m. Additionally, the meandered-loop antenna was preferred to (h1 ) thick Rogers 4003C with dielectric constant εr1 = 3.35,
design a planar CP tag antenna [6]–[10], and it obtains an RD of the bottom substrate is 1.56 mm (h2 ) thick Rogers Kappa 438
about 8.3 m. However, when these antennas are attached on metal (εr2 = 4.1), and the two dielectric substrates sandwiching the middle
objects directly, such as metallic bottles, vehicles, and shipping feed line (Layer 2), as shown in Fig. 1(c). An unequal cross slot is
etched on the top patch to produce two orthogonal electric fields,
whereas one end of the feed line in Layer 2 is shorted to the ground
Manuscript received October 3, 2021; accepted October 20, 2021. Date of plane, and open end of that is extended and coupled to feed the slot
publication October 27, 2021; date of current version February 3, 2022. This under the top patch sequentially. In order to realize CP radiation,
work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing
under Grant cstc2018jcyjAX0265074. (Corresponding author: Ping Wang.)
a U-shaped microstrip is loaded between two adjacent feedings
Ping Wang, Wei Luo, and Yu Shao are with the Chongqing Key Labora- to produce 90° phase difference, as shown in Fig. 1(d). It should
tory of Mobile Communications Technology, Engineering Research Center of be noticed that a blind-filled rectangle hole of sl (4 mm) × sw (5
Mobile Communications of the Ministry of Education, and School of Com- mm) × h1 is etched on top patch and the top substrate to facilitate
munication and Information Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and testing operation. Its effect has been included in simulation and test.
Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China (e-mail: wp@cqupt.edu.cn; Compared with the design in [11] and [12], there is no extra feeding
luoweixyc@163.com; shaoyu@cqupt.edu.cn).
Haiyan Jin is with the Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of
network area in this design.
Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China (e-mail: A Monza R6 chip [16] with an impedance of 11.8 − j118.4 Ω
uestcjhy@uestc.edu.cn). at 924 MHz and read sensitivity of −20 dBm is bonded to the feed
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3122871 line with a vertical distance py from center to realize the RFID

1536-1225 © 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See https://www.ieee.org/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
218 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 21, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2022

Fig. 3. Simulated and measured (a) input impedances and (b) PRC.

Cg = εr2 ε0 t1 {ln [0.25 + (h2 /g)2 ] + (g/h2 )tan-1 (2h2 /g)}/(2π ) [18].
The ac resistance [19] can be calculated using R = [ρl/(ti ×
hc )] × [KC /(1 – e-x )], where ρ = 1.72 × 10-8 Ω·m, l, ti and
hc = 0.035 mm are the resistivity, length, width, and thickness
of copper, respectively. The values of KC and x are achieved using
the formulas in [19]. The self-inductance also is estimated using
Fig. 1. Configuration of the proposed CP tag antenna (a) Top view, (b) Feed L = 0.2 l {ln [2l/(hc + ti )] + 0.50049 + (hc + ti )/(3l)} [20].
line, (c) Side view, and (d) U-shaped microstrip. The parameters are W = 60,
b1 = 51, b2 = 49.2, g1 = 4, g = 1, S1 = 19.8, py = 16, t1 = 2, t2 = 4,
Similarly, sections 2, 3, and 4 are modeled as an RLC paral-
t3 = 5, t4 = 5, d1 = 6, P22 = 6, P23 = 5, P24 = 16, P32 = 6, P33 = 5, P34 lel circuit (Ri+1 , Li+1 , Ci ), respectively. The Li+ 1 = Lself + 2
= 17, P42 = 6, P43 = 5, P44 = 16, P5 = 6 (unit: mm). × LM is the sum of self-inductance (Lself ) and mutual inductance
(LM ) of the U-shaped microstrip, where Lself is found by using
the
 aforementioned expression L, and LM = 0.2 pi4 ln {pi4 /D +
1 + (pi4 /D)2 }- 1 + (D/pi4 )2 + D/pi4 , D is the geometric mean
distance between two parallel arms and can be expressed as lnD =
lnd − {(ti /d)2 /12 + (ti /d)4 /60 + ··· + (ti /d)2n /[2n(n + 1)(2n + 1)]},
and d is the actual distance of two parallel arms. Then, a transformer
with a mutual inductance M and two additional inductances L6 and
L7 is used to indicate the proximity coupling effect between Layers
1, 2, and 3 [21]. R6 , L8 , C5 are denoted as the resistor, inductor,
and capacitor generated by the top patch, respectively, expressed
as R6 = 2ρ/δ , C5 = ε0 εr1 εr2 Ae /(h2 εr1 + h1 εr2 ), where Ae is the
effective surface area of the top patch. Also, the capacitive effect
from cross slot can be modeled as C6 = εr3 ε0 x3 {ln [0.25 + (h/g)2 ]
Fig. 2. Equivalent circuit. (R1 = 0.07 Ω, L1 = 14.4 nH, R2 = 0.11 Ω, + (g/h)tan-1 (2h/g)} /(2π ), where εr3 = εr1 εr2 h/(εr1 h2 + εr2 h1 ) is
L2 = 21.07 nH, C1 = 0.11 pF, R3 = 0.97 Ω, L3 = 15.85 nH, C2 = 1.66 the effective dielectric constant and h = h1 + h2 . Finally, the input
pF, R4 = 0.97 Ω, L4 = 11.86 nH, C3 = 1.94 pF, R5 = 0.97 Ω, L5 = 11.86 nH, impedance of the proposed CP tag antenna (Zant ) can be expressed
C4 = 1.94 pF, L6 = 1.44 nH, L7 = 56.7 nH, M = 10.13 nH, C5 = 33.44 pF, as
C6 = 0.59 pF, R6 = 0.016 Ω, L8 = 0.92 nH.).
Zant = R1 + jωL1 + ZA (2)
tag, as seen in Fig. 1(b). Therefore, the impedance of the proposed (R2 +jωL2 +1/jωC 1 +Z2 (ω)+Z3 (ω)+Z4 (ω)) × ZB
tag antenna should be designed around 11.8 + j118.4 Ω. The ZA =
R2 +jωL2 +1/jωC 1 +Z2 (ω)+Z3 (ω)+Z4 (ω)+ZB
power reflection coefficient (PRC) is used to evaluate the conjugate
(3)
matches between tag antenna and chip, which is defined as

 ∗  ZB = jωL6 + ω 2 M 2
(jωL7 + ZC ) (4)
 Zant − Zchip 
PRC = 20log10    (1)

Zant + Zchip ZC = 1/jωC6 +(R6 +jωL8 )/(1+jωC5 × (R6 +jωL8 )) (5)
where Zant and Zchip are the input impedances of the tag antenna where ω = 2π f (f is the operating frequency), Z2 (ω ), Z3 (ω ), Z4 (ω )
and the chip, respectively. (.)∗ denotes the complex conjugate. are the impedance in sections 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
Fig. 3 shows the input impedance and the PRC generated from the
B. Equivalent Circular Model ECM and the simulation. It is seen from Fig. 3(b) that the proposed
tag antenna can operate from 920 to 930 MHz with PRC less than
The equivalent circuit model (ECM) of the proposed CP tag −10 dB, covering the Chinese UHF band (920–925 MHz). Good
antenna is given in Fig. 2. The series R1 and L1 represent the agreement is found between the ECM and the simulation, which
whole inductance and resistance of the shorting end from chip implies that the ECM is reasonable.
in section 1 and the open stub in section 5. The resistance
and inductance of the rest in section 1 and four coupling lines
(d1 × ti , i = 1, 2, 3, 4) between adjacent sections are repre-
C. Parametric Analysis
sented by R2 , L2 . C1 denotes the sum of the capacitance (Cg ) The simulated current distributions on top patch at the time
of the chip gap and the capacitance (C15 ) between sections 1 phase 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° are shown in Fig. 4, which indicates
and 5, where C15 = ε0 εref t5 K(k0 ’)/K(k0 ), and εref , k0 , k0 ’, that the currents of the top patch are flowing along anticlockwise
K(k0 ), K(k0 ’) can be computed using the formulas in [17], and direction as ω t increases, that is, the current flows turning the
WANG et al.: UHF RFID CIRCULARLY POLARIZED TAG ANTENNA WITH LONG READ DISTANCE FOR METAL OBJECTS 219

Fig. 4. Current distributions on the top patch at 924 MHz. (a) ωt = 0°.
(b) ωt = 90°. (c) ωt = 180°. (d) ωt = 270°.

Fig. 7. Effects of the b1 on (a) input impedance, (b) AR, (c) amplitude
difference, and (d) phase difference.

Fig. 5. Effects of the t1 on (a) input impedance and (b) AR.

Fig. 8. (a) Photographs of the fabricated prototype and text fixture. (b) Test
environment for gain, AR, RD, and radiation pattern.

Fig. 6. Effects of the p24 on (a) input impedance and (b) AR.

x-axis into y-axis like a right-handed circularly polarized (RHCP)


wave.
A parametric analysis is performed to study the effects of the line Fig. 9. (a) Peak realized gain with different placement environments and
width (t1 ), arm length of the U-shape line (p24 ), slot length (b1 ). radiation efficiency, and (b) AR and RD.
The effects of varying the width (t1 ) on the impedance and AR are
presented in Fig. 5. It is seen that the resistance increases but the PRC are given in Fig. 3, which shows a good agreement with
reactance is reduced as t1 is increased from 2 mm to 4 mm, thus it can the simulated results. The conjugate impedance of the chip is
adjust the resonant frequency to the desired UHF band. Moreover, derived from a parallel lumped resistor of 1.2 kΩ and capacitor of
similar trends to AR are observed in Fig. 5(b). The effects of the arm 1.44 pF in [16] and is added into Fig. 3. It is seen that the intersecting
length p24 are studied in Fig. 6. It is found that increasing p24 from resistance and reactance appearing in 924 MHz are 12.7 Ω and
14 mm to 18 mm will lead to the enhancement of both the resistance 119.9 Ω, respectively, showing that the conjugate match is nearly
and reactance, and the AR becomes worse. Next, the effects of the achieved, and the measured PRC bandwidth of less than −10 dB is
horizontal slot length b1 are presented in Fig 7. Increasing slot 8 MHz (from 918 to 926 MHz), which is slightly smaller than the
length (b1 ) makes the resistance and reactance become smaller simulated bandwidth of 10 MHz.
and causes the resonant frequency to shift downward and the CP To perform the read performances of the proposed CP tag
performance gradually deteriorates. This is mainly attributed to the antenna in an outfield experimental environment, an RFID reader
fact that their corresponding phase difference (ϕx − ϕy ) is away module (impinj R420) with operating frequency of 902–928 MHz
from −270° though the amplitude difference (|rEx | - |rEy |) is close is selected to feed the reader antenna. In the measurement, the tag
to zero as longer b1 is selected. antenna is supported by a styrofoam with εr = 1, then is located
on the wooden stool with a distance of 1.5 m away from the earth
surface, whereas the reader antenna is placed at a distance (d =
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
2 m) away from the proposed tag antenna, as shown in Fig. 8(b).
A prototype of the designed antenna is fabricated and tested, Fig. 9(a) shows the peak realized gains in different placement
as shown in Fig. 8. The measured input impedance Zant and the environments (in free space, and a metal plate with different sizes).
220 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 21, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2022

TABLE I
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PROPOSED CP TAG ANTENNA AND OTHERS REPORTED CP TAG ANTENNAS

∗λ0 is the free-space wavelength at the center frequency.

Fig. 11. RD patterns at 922 MHz in xoz plane and yoz plane.

Fig. 10. Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed CP tag
antenna at 922 MHz. observed that the RD maintains above 10 m in the angular range of
−60° ≤ θ ≤ 60° approximately in the xoz and yoz planes.
Table I shows the comparison between the proposed CP tag
As is observed, a flat gain is produced from 910 to 920 MHz, and antenna and some of the CP UHF tag antennas. As can be seen
a maximum gain of −3.3 dBi is achieved at 912 MHz for the free in Table I, the CP tags in [5], [6], and [8]–[10] are not suitable
space. When the tag antenna is attached on a metal plate with a for metal objects though the tags have wider 3-dB AR band-
size of 200 mm × 200 mm, the gain is increased by 5.8 dBi and width. The tag in [11] can achieve a large 3-dB AR bandwidth of
is shifted upward, in which similar gain variations are also shown 20 MHz, but it has a much larger footprint and smaller RD of 4.25 m.
when other dimension of the metal plate is used. More importantly, Although the tag in [12] has a slightly larger AR bandwidth, its
the proposed antenna is less sensitive to the size of the metal plate. achievable RD and maximum gain are 4 m and −8 dBi, respectively.
The measured peak realized gain on a metal plate of 200 mm × Similarly, in [13], shorter RD and lower maximum gain with slightly
200 mm is shown for comparison, which shows that the maximum larger tag’s footprints can be observed when compared with the
gain is found to be about 2 dBi at 922 MHz. It is also seen that the proposed design. The tag in [14] has a slightly larger AR bandwidth,
radiation efficiency is about 33% within the operating bandwidth. but the RD and maximum gain are still much smaller than the
For the measurement of AR, the maximum power (Pth,max ) and proposed tag, and the profile of the tag is twice larger than that
minimum power (Pth,min ) of the backscattered signal are received of the proposed tag. Compared with the tag in [15], the proposed
from the tag antenna by an LP reader antenna as the tag antenna tag has a larger gain and it can be read from 22.4 m though the
keeps a rotation in the xoy plane with an interval of 10° [10], thus AR bandwidth is 1.3 MHz, which is suitable for applications that
the AR can be expressed as require long-range communications in a metal environment.
 
ARtag = Pth,max Pth,min . (6) IV. CONCLUSION
A UHF CP tag antenna with long RD has been demonstrated
The simulated and measured AR curves are plotted in for metal objects in this letter. A cross slot is etched on the top
Fig. 9(b). It can be observed that the CP mode is excited at patch to provide two orthogonal fields, and a proximity coupled-fed
922 MHz, and 3-dB AR bandwidth is about 1.3 MHz (921.6–922.9 microstrip line in this design is used to produce 90° phase shift
MHz), which has a little discrepancy with the simulated results between two adjacent feedings and improve the impedance match.
owing to the fabrication and experimental tolerances. An ECM is also constructed to provide an insight on the impedance
The RD at the boresight direction is measured by using an characteristics. It is demonstrated that the proposed tag antenna has
8 dBi RHCP reader shown in Fig. 9(b). It is seen that the maximum a 3 dB AR bandwidth of 1.3 MHz and a maximum gain of 2 dBi
RD is about 22.4 m at 922 MHz. Fig. 10 depicts the radiation at 922 MHz. The measured RD is about 22.4 m when the tag is
power pattern of the proposed CP tag antenna. It is clearly seen attached to a metal plate with a dimension of 200 mm × 200 mm.
that the simulated and measured patterns are in good agreement,
and the proposed tag antenna has a symmetrical and directional
pattern with RHCP radiation. Furthermore, the left-handed circular REFERENCES
polarization is 33 dB less than RHCP in broadside direction at [1] J. D. Griffin, G. D. Durgin, A. Haldi, and B. Kippelen, “RF tag antenna per-
922 MHz, which illustrates that a good RHCP radiation is produced. formance on various materials using radio link budgets,” IEEE Antennas
The corresponding RD patterns are also plotted in Fig. 11. It is Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 5, pp. 247–250, 2006.
WANG et al.: UHF RFID CIRCULARLY POLARIZED TAG ANTENNA WITH LONG READ DISTANCE FOR METAL OBJECTS 221

[2] S. Zuffanelli, G. Zamora, P. Aguila, F. Paredes, F. Martin, and J. Bonache, [12] H. D. Chen, S. H. Kuo, C. Y. D. Sim, and C. H. Tsai, “Coupling-feed
“Analysis of the split ring resonator (SRR) antenna applied to passive circularly polarized RFID tag antenna mountable on metallic surface,”
UHF-RFID tag design,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 3, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 2166–2174, May
pp. 856–864, Mar. 2016. 2012.
[3] S. R. Lee, E. H. Lim, F. L. Bong, and B. K. Chung, “High-efficient compact [13] T. Pan, S. Zhang, and S. He, “Compact RFID tag antenna with circular
folded patch antenna fed by T-shaped L probe for on-metal UHF RFID polarization and embedded feed network for metallic objects,” IEEE Trans.
tag design,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 152–160, Antennas Propag., vol. 13, pp. 1271–1274, 2014.
Jan. 2020. [14] G. G. Gao, X. P. Li, H. Zhu, N. Zhang, and Z. G. Qi, “Compact circularly
[4] C. Cho, I. Park, and H. Choo, “Design of a circularly polarized tag antenna polarized tag antenna based on EBG structure for metallic objects,” in
for increased reading range,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Microw. Conf., 2019, pp. 1733–1735.
no. 10, pp. 3418–3422, Oct. 2009. [15] H. Liu, C. Liu, Q. C. Liu, Y. F. Lu, and S. L. He, “Compact broad-
[5] H. H. Tran, S. X. Ta, and I. Park, “A compact circularly polarized crossed- band circularly polarized UHF RFID tag antenna for metallic mounting,”
dipole antenna for an RFID tag,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 989–1001, May
vol. 14, pp. 674–677, 2015. 2020.
[6] H. D. Chen, C. H. Tsai, C. Y. D. Sim, and C. Y. Kuo, “Circularly [16] IPJ-W1700 Monza R6 Tag Chip Datasheet, Rev4, Impinj, Seattle, WA,
polarized loop tag antenna for long reading range RFID applications,” USA, Aug. 2016.
IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 12, pp. 1460–1463, 2013. [17] M. Manteghi, “Analytical calculation of impedance matching for probe-
[7] X. Gao and Z. Shen, “UHF/UWB tag antenna of circular polarization,” fed microstrip patch antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3794–3802, Sep. 2016. no. 12, pp. 3972–3975, Dec. 2009.
[8] H. D. Chen, C. Y. Desmond, C. H. Tsai, and C. Kuo, “Compact circu- [18] M. Golio, The RF and Microwave Handbook, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL,
larly polarized meandered-loop antenna for UHF-band RFID tag,” IEEE USA: CRC Press, 2008.
Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 1602–1605, 2016. [19] The AC Resistance of Rectangular Conductors. Accessed: Feb. 2019.
[9] J. H. Lu and B. S. Chang, “Planar compact square-ring tag antenna with [Online]. Available: http://g3rbj.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/The-
circular polarization for UHF RFID applications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas ac-Resistance-of-RectaRectan-Conductors-Cockcroft2.pdf
Propag., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 432–441, Feb. 2017. [20] H. M. Greenhouse, “Design of planar rectangular microelectronic induc-
[10] A. S. M. Sayem et al., “Optically transparent flexible robust circularly tors,” IEEE Trans. Parts, Hybrids Packag., vol. HP-10, no. 2, pp. 101–109,
polarized antenna for UHF RFID tags,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Jun. 1974.
Lett., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2334–2338, Dec. 2020. [21] A. Hamani, M. C. E. Yagoub, T. P. Vuong, and R. Touhami, “A novel
[11] H. D. Chen, C. Y. D. Sim, and S. H. Kuo, “Compact broadband dual broadband antenna design for UHF RFID tags on metallic surface en-
coupling-feed circularly polarized RFID microstrip tag antenna mountable vironments,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 91–94,
on metallic surface,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60, no. 12, 2017.
pp. 5571–5577, Dec. 2012.

You might also like