You are on page 1of 38

Steering and Braking in Autonomous Driving

Maria Guitart Corominas


4th-5th October 2022
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving

Summary

A2Mac1 Automotive Benchmarking

Trends in Autonomous Driving & Considered Solutions

Strategies in Steering Systems

Strategies in Braking Systems

Conclusions
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 4

Unmatched precision on a full-vehicle scale


Constantly increasing the level of granularity to understand the overall topology

Vehicle Level • Component Level Subcomponent Level Topologies & Architectures


• Vehicle acquisition • Vehicle disassembly (over 1500 • Further disassembly • Determine cross-system design
• General Specifications parts) • Documentation of sub-components considerations
• Concept Descriptions • 3D scanning & rendering • Insight on manufacturing processes , • Document electrical architecture &
• KPIs & Overview • Extensive documentation (weight, effort and procedure create block diagrams by harvesting
dimensions, material, supplier) • Additional analysis to define material data from pin-to-pin studies
grades
• Fully comprehensive documentation of
electronics content (BOM)
• 2D sections of crucial entities
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 5

Unmatched precision on a full-vehicle scale


Constantly increasing the level of granularity to understand the overall topology

Vehicle Level • Component Level Subcomponent Level Topologies & Architectures


• Vehicle acquisition • Vehicle disassembly (over 1500 • Further disassembly • Determine cross-system design
• General Specifications parts) • Documentation of sub-components considerations
• Concept Descriptions • 3D scanning & rendering • Insight on manufacturing processes , • Document electrical architecture &
• KPIs & Overview • Extensive documentation (weight, effort and procedure create block diagrams by harvesting
dimensions, material, supplier) • Additional analysis to define material data from pin-to-pin studies
grades
• Fully comprehensive documentation of
electronics content (BOM)
• 2D sections of crucial entities
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 6

Trends in Autonomous
Driving & Considered
Solutions
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 7

How much sensors for ADAS are mounted in an average vehicle?


Average number of Sensors
Ultrasonic sensors:
9.00
• Already commoditized in
Substantial increase of ADAS-sensors in an average vehicle today‘s vehicle. 8-12 sensors
8.00 +16.3% are used in most of the vehicles

7.00 +14.2%
-4.2%
+20.3%
6.00
Average number of sensors

Cameras:
• Strong increase of number of
5.00
cameras in recent years
• Further accelaration can be
4.00 expected in the upcoming years
+8.8%
+17.0% Radar:
3.00 +7.9% • Strong increase of number of
+54.1% radars in recent years
+16.3%
2.00 +6.6% +8.1%
+21.8%
LiDAR:
+59.3% • Solid-state radars begin to
1.00 +7.6%
appear in production vehicles.
• Will strongly come to market in
0.00 the next years
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Camera LiDAR Ultrasonic sensors Radar


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 8

Redundancy Strategies
How to realize a fallback solution

Past Practices
The Future
Sensing
External Input
Modules

Control Control Module


Control Complementary
with Internal or
Module Redundancy Module Verification ECU

Driver

Actuation Actuation Actuation


Module Module Module
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 10

ADAS redundancy approaches


Electronics

Tesla Model Y: Redundancy in computation chips


• 2x Tesla FSD chips for redundant sensor data processing
• Twice as much peripherie needed to ensure chip
functionality: power supply, memory, commodity
components
• Two independent power supply paths towards ADAS ECU

Lucid Air: Triple redundancy in ADAS ECU


• Three identical PCBs inside Lucid Air ADAS ECU with 1x
Nvidia Xavier on each chip
• Parallel processing of ADAS data on all three computation
boards

Conclusion: To ensure autonomous driving, the vehicle has to implement a certain degree of
redundancy to guarantee high degree of reliability and satisfactory performance even if a part of
the system is failing
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 11

Level 2.0 Autonomous Driving


Considered Platforms from the North American Market

Ford Blue Cruise GM SuperCruise Tesla Autopilot Lucid DreamDrive

• Available only on designated • System can be engaged in more • No activation restrictions • Blend of various sensing
‘Blue Zones’ locations • Able to follow highway interchanges modules, incl. Lidars
• No input from the side of rear of • GPS predictive functionality • Reliant on camera input • High-speed Ethernet ring
the vehicle as of now • Lane changes possible even • No efforts on driver monitoring electrical architecture
• Assisted lane changes in progress while towing • Decision validation between
dedicated ECU & software
control platform
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 12

Strategies in Steering Systems


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 13

Steering System
Peripheral elements involved with autonomous steering

ADAS ECU Torque & Angle sensor Driver

To be phased out

Steering Motor

How to ensure fail-safe


steering operation?
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 14

Steering System
Ford Mustang Mach-E Chevrolet Bolt Lucid Air Dream Edition Tesla Model Y
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 15

Steering System
Electronics - Board
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla

Redundancy – 2 identical No redundancy


circuits Redundancy – 2 identical circuits Redundancy – 2 identical
circuits
➢ 2 independent power ➢ 2 independent power
supplies supplied by the supplies supplied by ➢ 2 independent power
same battery individual battery supplies (supplied by the
same battery)
➢ 2 sets of windings ➢ 4 set of windings
(connections to motor ➢ 1 set of windings
phases)
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 16

Steering System
Mechanics – Motor phases
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla

6-phase 3-phase 12-phase 3-phase

➢ Normal operation using 6- ➢ Both circuits refer to the


➢ Normal operation using 12-
phases same 3-phases of the motor
➢ Only manual steering phase (assumption)
➢ Fail-safe mode enables to ➢ Fail-safe operation by
possible to bring the vehicle ➢ (Depending on the location
shut off one of the bridges switching off the defective
to a safe stop of the failure detected
and continue operation with inverter bridge and using the
(short circuted MOSFET)) 6-
50% of the power (3 phases) auxiliary circuit.
or 3-phase operation during
Higher ripple current ➢ Possibility of switching off
emergency time
(assumption) only one of the motor phases
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 17

Steering System
Electronics - Microcontroller
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla

SAK-TC234L
SAK TC387QP-160 TMS570LS1224

Identical Microcontrollers
Different Microcontrollers
Identical Microcontrollers Single circuit ➢ Infineon 3 core TriCore 32-
➢ One unidentified IC from bit System on a Chip (SoC)
➢ Infineon 4 core TriCore 32- ➢ Texas Instruments 32-bit ➢ Lockstep operation mode
Toshiba, presumably acting
bit System on a Chip (SoC). Dual Core microcontroller possible
as a pre-driver for the motor
AURIX family. 10MB Flash ➢ Lockstep operation mode ➢ Up to ASIL D
and the microcontrollers
➢ Capable of Lockstep possible ➢ 45 degrees of rotation for
from Renesas.
operation mode the microcontroller and
➢ 45 degree rotation for one of
➢ ASIL D compliant capable some ICs. 90 deg rotation for
the microcontrollers
some ceramic capacitors
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 18

Steering System
Electronics – Sensor & Inverter
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla

Double Hall effect sensor Double Hall effect sensor


➢ 2 Different position & angle Single Hall effect sensor Single Hall effect sensor ➢ 2 identical position & angle
sensor at either sides of the ➢ High precision Allegro ➢ Only one dedicated position sensor at either sides of the
board (both Infineon) Microsystems unit sensor from TDK corporation board (Allegro
Microsystems)
Bridge Inverter Bridge Inverter Bridge Inverter
➢ 9 MOSFETS per bridge ➢ 6 MOSFET arrangement from ➢ 3 Specific power modules per Bridge Inverter
➢ Different choice of Nexperia bidge. Problably capable of ➢ 9 MOSFETS per bridge
manufacturers per bridge current sensing (Toshiba)
(Infineon & NXP)
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 19

Steering
Vehicle level - BUS topology
➢ Typically shared BUS line between ADAS ECU, EPS motor, Brake Booster and ABS Pump (variability of additional connected devices such as
driver monitoring ECU (Ford Mustang Mach-E)

Ford Mustang Mach-E Tesla Model Y


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 20

Steering
Vehicle level - BUS topology
➢ Typically shared BUS line between ADAS ECU, EPS motor, Brake Booster and ABS Pump (variability of additional connected devices such as
driver monitoring ECU (Ford Mustang Mach-E)

➢ Tesla being the only vehicle opting for redundant BUS lines

Ford Mustang Mach-E (equivalent approach for Lucid Air and Chevrolet Tesla Model Y
Bolt)

ADAS ECU

ADAS CAN
ECU CAN
high high
speed speed

CAN
high
speed

EPS Motor

EPS Motor

EPS Motor

EPS Motor
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 21

Strategies in Braking Systems


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 22

Trends in Braking Systems


Integration & Decoupling
Numerous vehicles bridge the observed gap,
offering solutions integrating the master cylinder
and brake booster while the ABS pump remains an
independent entity

What is next?

Separate master cylinder, Integrated master


brake booster & ABS pump cylinder, brake booster, &
ABS pump
Reduce part count, weight complexity Shifting Point towards true brake-by-wire solutions
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 23

Trends in Braking Systems


Current Market Leading Solutions:

Bosch Discrete Fail-Operational System Approach


➢ iBooster and the ESP brake control modules independently control brake
actuation
➢ In case of singular failure, the unaffected entity takes over to ensure a safe
stop while maintaining the ability to steer

Other contributors in the field


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 25

* Continental & ZF Promotional Material

Trends in Braking Systems


The Next Step

MKC2
➢ Multi-logic architecture realized via two stand-alone pressure build-up modules
➢ The pedal is now fully decoupled from the pressure generating entities
➢ Enable topologies with the booster modules positioned away from the pedal

ZF Secondary Brake Module


➢ Auxiliary actuator for the hydraulic system in case of primary boost function
failure
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 26

Current Available Braking Solutions


Chevrolet Bolt, Tesla Model Y & Lucid Air ABS Pump
• 2 motor bridge driver ICs supplied by
STM indicate a need for external
current measuring in contrast to the
integrated custom solution seen in the
Lucid Air
• Duplication of crucial components
observed on the board

• Park brake functionality via


additional application-specific IC
supplied by STM

• 2 different versions of the same µC


by Texas Instruments seen on the
Tesla and GM vehicles, a Renesas
solution is seen for the Lucid
• Set of 2 fuses on each board
indicates redundant power supply
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 27

Current Available Braking Solutions


Lucid Air & Tesla Model Y Booster
Next generation µC by
Renesas with different
packaging & pin count

Different capacitors used


between product iterations

Additional H-Bridge
Different reverse battery Driver by STM
protection strategies

High Power 3 Phase


Bridge Driver
Similar but not quite the same!
Lucid’s version of the product integrates the parking brake functionality with a few adjustments on the board population
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 28

Current Available Braking Solutions


Chevrolet Bolt EUV Premier 2022 Booster

Hercules Microcontroller Power cut-off & reverse


Based on the ARM Cortex-R battery protection
Core by Texas Instruments
replaces Renesas solution

3-phase Bridge switches


incorporated to the lower
housing part

Bosch Customized Components


Presumed to be a system basis
IC interfacing with the
pressure sensor serving power
management, communication
& safety supervision
functionalities

A different approach!
Electronics mounted to structural parts
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 29

Current Available Braking Solutions


Mustang Mach E 3-in-1 Solution

• Sets of N-channel MOSFETS by Vishay along with a Dual N-channel


transistor by Infineon to realize the parking brake functionality
• 3 sets of 2 MOSFETs comprising the 3-phase B6 bridge
• IC to drive the bridge
• Only application with flash memory, 64 Mb SPI flash IC by Spansion
• Board is populated by customized ICs tailored for the application
supplied from:
➢ STMicroelectronics
➢ Presumably Infineon, bearing Ate Branding (ASIC)
➢ NXP

• Linear hall FET sensor


• Redundant linear position sensor
in the form of a PCBA
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 30

Case Study: Brake Booster


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 31

Brake Booster Market Benchmark


Integrated Solutions - Overview

Hyundai Ioniq5 Ford Mustang Mach-E

Chevrolet Trailblazer Chevrolet Suburban


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving
32

Brake Booster Market Benchmark


Mobis iMEB2 Conti. MKC1

High-Level Comparison

Mobis iMEB2 Continental MKC1 Bosch IPB ZF/TRW IBC

Comparison Scenario,
Korea 250k, 2022

Manufacturer Mobis Continental Bosch ZF / TRW

Production site Korea Germany Germany US


Inverter KPI

Bosch IPB
Weight [kg] 5.265 5.791 5.178 7.033

ZF/TRW IBC
Overall Dimension [mm³] 213 x 210 x 295 232 x 195 x 355 180 x 183 x 342 215 x 222 x 390
$$

Total Cost [250k p.a.]


Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving
33

Brake Booster Market Benchmark


Cost Breakdown

• Electronic module is consisting • The Hydraulic control unit of


of PCBAs, Coils and Housing. the Mobis solution has no
Brake Fluid Reservoir -Hydraulic Control additional functionality, in
• It has the highest contribution Overhead + Profit Assembly unit contrast to other solutions.
15% 2%
to the cost of the system in all 16%

brake boosters Total Production • Continental MK C1 has brake


12%
Motor Assembly lever cylinder and master
11% cylinder integrated.

• Bosch IPB has master cylinder,


MOH brake lever cylinder and air
3% accumulator tank integrated in.

Master Cylinder • ZF/TRW IBC hydraulic control


8%
unit apart from the master
Electronic cylinder and brake pedal
Module cylinder has the brake pedal
33%
simulator as an additional
These five assemblies will be considered during the integrated feature.
benchmark:
Reservoir, Hydraulic Block, Motor, Master Cylinder,
ELECTRONIC Electronic HYDRAURIC CONTROL
MODULE UNIT
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving
34

Brake Booster Market Benchmark


Example: Hydraulic Control Unit Benchmark

Mobis Hydraulic Control Unit: Continental Hydraulic Control Unit:

• Dimensions: 130 x 58 x 88 mm³ • Dimensions: 157 x 121 x 91 mm³


Weight: 892 g Weight: 1776 g
Material Aluminum Material Aluminum

• Additional functionalities: • Additional functionalities:

• 15 valves / 4 different types • 14 valves / 2 different types


• Cylinder housing is not integrated • Has RPM sensor and pressure vent integrated in
• 2 pressure sensors • 2 pressure sensors

Bosch Hydraulic Control Unit: ZF/TRW IBC Hydraulic Control Unit:

• Dimensions: 141 x 121 x 65 m³ • Dimensions: 150 x 130 x 95 mm³


Weight: 1363g Weight: 1885 g
Material Aluminum Material Aluminum

• Additional functionalities: • Additional functionalities:

• 14 valves / 4 different types • 14 valves / 3 different types


• Has an air accumulator tank and pressure vent integrated in the • There is a brake pedal simulator integrated
housing • 2 pressure sensors
• 2 pressure sensors
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving
35

Brake Booster Market Benchmark


Example: Rotor Benchmark

Mobis Rotor Continental Rotor

• Stack, 50c800, 49 Sheets: • Neodymium Sinter Magnets


weight: 229.7g (with overmolded magnets) • Straight Rotor Shaft
dimensions Ø 47.41x79.16 mm³ • Stack: 52 Disks, 0.65 mm, 1.5g/Disk Required
price: 5.272 $ weight: 78g
• Magnets are Overmolded dimensions: Ø 27.5x85 mm³
• Price: 6.144 $ Price: 0.43$
• Magnets are Overmolded (14 Magnets)
• Price: 6.837 $

Bosch Rotor ZF Rotor


• Rotor Shaft:
• Stack. 42 sheets: weight: 120 g
weight: 136.2 g dimensions: Ø 42x46 mm³
dimensions Ø 46.85 x 22.72 mm³ price: 3.225
price: 1.015 $ • Magnets are glued to the rotor and covered by a foil (10
• Magnets are slid in the Rotor (8 Magnets) Magnets)
• Price: 5.067 $ • Price: 7.549 $
• The production of shaft involves processes such as turning
(24s cycle time) and Broaching (12s cycle time) that are the
cost drives.
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving
36

Brake Booster Market Benchmark


Example: Main PCBA Benchmark
Mobis Continental Bosch ZF-IBC

Number of main
1 1 1 1
PCBAs
Dimensions 182x124x1.6 172x149x1.6 149x125x1.72 172x163x1.54

Number of Layers 8 8 6 6

Cu Thickness [µm] 70/35 105/70 70/70 105/105


Main PCB

Surface Treatment Imm.Sn Imm.Sn Imm.Sn Imm.Sn


Number of
components on the 426 276 256 566
top
Number of
components on 187 420 239 13
the bottom

PCB cost W/O components


$$

PCBA total
*PCBA Cost indicates cost of PCBs as well as all the mounted components
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving
37

Brake Booster Market Benchmark


Main Desing Highlights
Mobis Continental Bosch ZF
• Has a single functionality No • Different parts are integrated • Different parts are integrated • Production is more complex.
extra integration inside the • Has 14 Valves but of only 2 • Has 4 different types of valve • Different parts are
hydraulic Block. different types same as Bosch integrated
Hydraulic block • Has one Valve more than other and ZF • 3 types of valves
brake boosters

• The housing is die casted and it • Housing is deep drawn • Housing is deep drawn • Has an Expensive Housing
is expensive • Has a RMP sensor that needs • Rotor magnets assembly is the • Stator uses sets of stacks that
• The stator has a low-cost extra gearing system simplest. need to be welded together
design • Magnets are overmolded • For Rotor, The magnets first
Motor • Rotor has a simple design need to be glued then covered
by a foil

• Cylinder is not integrated in • Has a highly integrated cylinder • Has a highly integrated cylinder • Cylinder has many parts and
and needs extra housing • Complex design for master the design is more complex.
Cylinder • Relatively simple design cylinder • Has an extra Die casted base
which is expensive

• Motor Angle sensor integrated • Has 2 micro controllers • Has 4 types of PCBAs, • Has 2 micro controller
in the main PCBA • Inductor/ Capacitors inserted • Has only 2 types of coils • Housing base has many parts
• Simple Housing in the Housing • Simple housing integrated
• Has 4 types of coils • Housing Top is Deep Drawn • Housing Top is Deep Drawn.
Electronics
• Main PCBA is expensive • No hall sensor for travel sensor
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 38

Conclusions
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 39

Conclusions
Despite not being required to achieve ADAS level 2, indications of fail-safe designs can be
observed, in anticipation of autonomy levels 2.5 – 3 and above:

• Steering Systems:
• Hardware redundancy efforts in electronics, mechanical and vehicle level
➢ Power supply, microcontrollers (Lockstep operation), inverter bridge, sensing unit…
➢ Higher number of phases in the actuator
➢ Communication Buses, redundancy in the 12V battery
• Broad spectrum of propososed solutions within the considered options in terms of design
and presumably also in cost

• Braking Systems:
• Currently focusing around refinements & integration of functionalities, improving spacing
& flexibility
• Redundancy-relevant efforts mainly around the pedal positioning aspect
• 1st indication of module duplication to take place down the line
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 40

Encuesta de opinión
Sesión 4 Steering and braking
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 41

1. https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0266

2. https://www.bosch.com/stories/redundant-systems-automated-driving/

3. https://www.bosch-mobility-solutions.com/en/solutions/driving-safety/ibooster/

4. https://www.zf.com/products/en/cars/products_64252.html

5. https://www.continental-automotive.com/en-gl/Passenger-Cars/Technology-Trends/Electric-Vehicle/MK-C2

6. http://en.btl-auto.com/index.php/WCBS/

7. Kelling, Nico A., and Worthy Heck. “The BRAKE Project - Centralized Versus Distributed Redundancy for Brake-by-Wire Systems.” SAE Transactions, vol. 111,
2002, pp. 141–50. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44699407. Accessed 1 Jul. 2022.

You might also like