Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
Conclusions
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 4
Trends in Autonomous
Driving & Considered
Solutions
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 7
7.00 +14.2%
-4.2%
+20.3%
6.00
Average number of sensors
Cameras:
• Strong increase of number of
5.00
cameras in recent years
• Further accelaration can be
4.00 expected in the upcoming years
+8.8%
+17.0% Radar:
3.00 +7.9% • Strong increase of number of
+54.1% radars in recent years
+16.3%
2.00 +6.6% +8.1%
+21.8%
LiDAR:
+59.3% • Solid-state radars begin to
1.00 +7.6%
appear in production vehicles.
• Will strongly come to market in
0.00 the next years
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Redundancy Strategies
How to realize a fallback solution
Past Practices
The Future
Sensing
External Input
Modules
Driver
Conclusion: To ensure autonomous driving, the vehicle has to implement a certain degree of
redundancy to guarantee high degree of reliability and satisfactory performance even if a part of
the system is failing
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 11
• Available only on designated • System can be engaged in more • No activation restrictions • Blend of various sensing
‘Blue Zones’ locations • Able to follow highway interchanges modules, incl. Lidars
• No input from the side of rear of • GPS predictive functionality • Reliant on camera input • High-speed Ethernet ring
the vehicle as of now • Lane changes possible even • No efforts on driver monitoring electrical architecture
• Assisted lane changes in progress while towing • Decision validation between
dedicated ECU & software
control platform
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 12
Steering System
Peripheral elements involved with autonomous steering
To be phased out
Steering Motor
Steering System
Ford Mustang Mach-E Chevrolet Bolt Lucid Air Dream Edition Tesla Model Y
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 15
Steering System
Electronics - Board
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla
Steering System
Mechanics – Motor phases
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla
Steering System
Electronics - Microcontroller
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla
SAK-TC234L
SAK TC387QP-160 TMS570LS1224
Identical Microcontrollers
Different Microcontrollers
Identical Microcontrollers Single circuit ➢ Infineon 3 core TriCore 32-
➢ One unidentified IC from bit System on a Chip (SoC)
➢ Infineon 4 core TriCore 32- ➢ Texas Instruments 32-bit ➢ Lockstep operation mode
Toshiba, presumably acting
bit System on a Chip (SoC). Dual Core microcontroller possible
as a pre-driver for the motor
AURIX family. 10MB Flash ➢ Lockstep operation mode ➢ Up to ASIL D
and the microcontrollers
➢ Capable of Lockstep possible ➢ 45 degrees of rotation for
from Renesas.
operation mode the microcontroller and
➢ 45 degree rotation for one of
➢ ASIL D compliant capable some ICs. 90 deg rotation for
the microcontrollers
some ceramic capacitors
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 18
Steering System
Electronics – Sensor & Inverter
Ford GM Lucid Air Tesla
Steering
Vehicle level - BUS topology
➢ Typically shared BUS line between ADAS ECU, EPS motor, Brake Booster and ABS Pump (variability of additional connected devices such as
driver monitoring ECU (Ford Mustang Mach-E)
Steering
Vehicle level - BUS topology
➢ Typically shared BUS line between ADAS ECU, EPS motor, Brake Booster and ABS Pump (variability of additional connected devices such as
driver monitoring ECU (Ford Mustang Mach-E)
➢ Tesla being the only vehicle opting for redundant BUS lines
Ford Mustang Mach-E (equivalent approach for Lucid Air and Chevrolet Tesla Model Y
Bolt)
ADAS ECU
ADAS CAN
ECU CAN
high high
speed speed
CAN
high
speed
EPS Motor
EPS Motor
EPS Motor
EPS Motor
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 21
What is next?
MKC2
➢ Multi-logic architecture realized via two stand-alone pressure build-up modules
➢ The pedal is now fully decoupled from the pressure generating entities
➢ Enable topologies with the booster modules positioned away from the pedal
Additional H-Bridge
Different reverse battery Driver by STM
protection strategies
A different approach!
Electronics mounted to structural parts
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 29
High-Level Comparison
Comparison Scenario,
Korea 250k, 2022
Bosch IPB
Weight [kg] 5.265 5.791 5.178 7.033
ZF/TRW IBC
Overall Dimension [mm³] 213 x 210 x 295 232 x 195 x 355 180 x 183 x 342 215 x 222 x 390
$$
Number of main
1 1 1 1
PCBAs
Dimensions 182x124x1.6 172x149x1.6 149x125x1.72 172x163x1.54
Number of Layers 8 8 6 6
PCBA total
*PCBA Cost indicates cost of PCBs as well as all the mounted components
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving
37
• The housing is die casted and it • Housing is deep drawn • Housing is deep drawn • Has an Expensive Housing
is expensive • Has a RMP sensor that needs • Rotor magnets assembly is the • Stator uses sets of stacks that
• The stator has a low-cost extra gearing system simplest. need to be welded together
design • Magnets are overmolded • For Rotor, The magnets first
Motor • Rotor has a simple design need to be glued then covered
by a foil
• Cylinder is not integrated in • Has a highly integrated cylinder • Has a highly integrated cylinder • Cylinder has many parts and
and needs extra housing • Complex design for master the design is more complex.
Cylinder • Relatively simple design cylinder • Has an extra Die casted base
which is expensive
• Motor Angle sensor integrated • Has 2 micro controllers • Has 4 types of PCBAs, • Has 2 micro controller
in the main PCBA • Inductor/ Capacitors inserted • Has only 2 types of coils • Housing base has many parts
• Simple Housing in the Housing • Simple housing integrated
• Has 4 types of coils • Housing Top is Deep Drawn • Housing Top is Deep Drawn.
Electronics
• Main PCBA is expensive • No hall sensor for travel sensor
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 38
Conclusions
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 39
Conclusions
Despite not being required to achieve ADAS level 2, indications of fail-safe designs can be
observed, in anticipation of autonomy levels 2.5 – 3 and above:
• Steering Systems:
• Hardware redundancy efforts in electronics, mechanical and vehicle level
➢ Power supply, microcontrollers (Lockstep operation), inverter bridge, sensing unit…
➢ Higher number of phases in the actuator
➢ Communication Buses, redundancy in the 12V battery
• Broad spectrum of propososed solutions within the considered options in terms of design
and presumably also in cost
• Braking Systems:
• Currently focusing around refinements & integration of functionalities, improving spacing
& flexibility
• Redundancy-relevant efforts mainly around the pedal positioning aspect
• 1st indication of module duplication to take place down the line
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 40
Encuesta de opinión
Sesión 4 Steering and braking
Steering & Braking in Autonomous Driving 41
1. https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0266
2. https://www.bosch.com/stories/redundant-systems-automated-driving/
3. https://www.bosch-mobility-solutions.com/en/solutions/driving-safety/ibooster/
4. https://www.zf.com/products/en/cars/products_64252.html
5. https://www.continental-automotive.com/en-gl/Passenger-Cars/Technology-Trends/Electric-Vehicle/MK-C2
6. http://en.btl-auto.com/index.php/WCBS/
7. Kelling, Nico A., and Worthy Heck. “The BRAKE Project - Centralized Versus Distributed Redundancy for Brake-by-Wire Systems.” SAE Transactions, vol. 111,
2002, pp. 141–50. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44699407. Accessed 1 Jul. 2022.