Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grouping of Seasons and Lunar Months from the Vedic age till Now
Abstract: Vartak proposed that the grouping of seasons and lunar months changes by one month
every 2,160 years due to precession, which was adopted by Oak, who uses a period of 2,000 years
for the change of one lunar month. I have called this hypothesis the “Vartak-Oak hypothesis”.
According to this hypothesis, seasons consist of different pairs of luni-solar months as time
changes. To confirm this hypothesis, the combinations of months and seasons were searched in
the Indian texts going back to the Vedas. The listings of explicit mentions of seasons and months
conform to the standard configuration from the earliest times till now. However, the combination
has changed in East Indian calendars. According to the “Vartak-Oak hypothesis,” the grouping of
seasons and lunar months should have changed by one month every 2,000 years due to precession.
There is no evidence of it in the Indian literature.
1. INTRODUCTION
In the previous eight articles of this series, Oak’s dating of the Rāmāyaṇa to 12209 BCE has been
refuted. There are four Astronomy Poison Pills for the dating of the Rāmāyaṇa according to Oak
[1]. The first Astronomy Poison Pill of “Caitra being in the Śarad season” was refuted in Part 2
[2]. I pointed out that according to the evidence in the Rāmāyaṇa, Caitra was in the Vasanta season.
I refuted the second Astronomy Poison Pill – that of “Āśvina month being part of the Vasanta
season” in Part 4 [3]. I pointed out that Caitra, not Āśvina month, was part of the Vasanta season
based on clear evidence in the Rāmāyaṇa. I refuted the third Astronomy Poison Pill – that of the
“Sun setting near pushya during Hemant season” in Part 3 [4]. I pointed out that Araṇyakāṇḍa
16.12 in the Rāmāyaṇa does not specify the position of the Sun. I refuted the fourth Astronomy
Poison Pill – that of “the description of Brahmarāśi/Vega/Abhijit as pole star” in Part 5 [5]. I
showed that Brahmarāśi cannot be the Abhijit (Vega) star because Mars can never be near Vega.
I refuted the assertion by Oak that a unique event involving a comet took place in 12209 BCE in
Part 6 [6]. I pointed out that a comet’s trajectory and magnitude cannot be predicted for even 100
years and Oak’s date is based on software-generated illusion. I refuted Oak’s claim that Rāvaṇa’s
Laṅkā was located on the Equator in Part 7 [7]. I pointed out that Laṅkā on the Equator was an
astronomical concept and a hypothetical city. I argued that there is only one Rama Setu, and it
connects India with Sri Lanka.
I refuted Oak’s claim of over 575 corroborations for the 12209 BCE date in the Rāmāyaṇa in Part
8 [8]. I showed that Oak does not have even one corroboration by going over each claim that is
described in the book “The Historic Rama”. I should point out that despite repeated requests in the
भारतीयविद्वत्पररषत् mailing group and on Twitter [9], Oak has failed to make public the exact details of
575+ corroborations he claims for 12209 BCE date of the Rāmāyaṇa. In the final two parts of this
series, I will focus on the fundamental basis of Oak’s dating of the Rāmāyaṇa.
2. VARTAK-OAK HYPOTHESIS
As stated in two earlier articles, Vartak proposed that the grouping of seasons and lunar months
changes by one month every 2,160 years due to precession, which was adopted by Oak, who uses
a period of 2,000 years for the change of one lunar month [10-11]. I have called this hypothesis
the “Vartak-Oak hypothesis” [10]. According to this hypothesis, seasons consist of different pairs
of luni-solar months as time changes. Based on the information given by Oak [12], Table 1
summarizes the important configurations according to the Vartak-Oak hypothesis [11].
According to Oak, Āśvina and Kārttika were part of Vasanta season, and Caitra and Vaiśākha were
part of Śarad season during Rāmāyaṇa times. I have shown in Part 2 [2] and Part 4 [3] of this series
that this is not the case. Wherever months and seasons or months or seasons are explicitly stated,
they always conform to the standard configuration. I had discussed the standard configuration of
seasons and months in Part 2 of the series [2].
With this information, let us look at the combination of months and seasons that we find in the
Indian texts going back to the Vedas.
Table 2: The Vedic/Hindu Calendar
6-month 2-month Tropical Synodic
ayana seasons months months
Śiśira Tapa Māgha
(late
Tapasya Phālguna
winter)
Madhu Caitra
Uttarāyaṇa Vasanta
(spring) Mādhava Vaiśākha
14. Now he draws the cups (for the seasons) therefrom, with 'Thou art taken with a support: thee for Madhu!'
the Adhvaryu takes (the first); with 'Thou art taken with a support: thee for Madhava!' the Pratiprasthātri (the
second). These two are the spring (months): because in spring plants sprout and trees are brought to ripeness,
therefore these two are Madhu (sweet) and Mādhava.
15. With 'Thou art taken with a support: thee for Śukra!' the Adhvaryu draws (the third); with 'Thou art taken
with a support: thee for Suchi!' the Pratiprasthātri (the fourth). These two are the summer (months): because
during them it burns fiercest, therefore these two are Śukra (clear) and Suchi (bright).
16. With 'Thou art taken with a support: thee for Nabhas!' the Adhvaryu draws (the fifth); with 'Thou art
taken with a support: thee for Nabhasya!' the Pratiprasthātri (the sixth). These two are (the months) of the
rainy season: it rains from yonder sky, and hence these two are Nabhas (mist, cloud) and Nabhasya.
17. With 'Thou art taken with a support: thee for Ish (sap)!' the Adhvaryu draws (the seventh); with 'Thou art
taken with a support: thee for Ūrj (food)!' the Pratiprasthātri (the eighth). These two are the autumn (months):
because in autumn food (ūrj) and juice, (namely) plants, ripen, therefore these two are Isha and Ūrja.
18. With 'Thou art taken with a support: thee for Sahas!' the Adhvaryu draws (the ninth); with 'Thou art taken
with a support: thee for Sahasya!' the Pratiprasthātri (the tenth). These two are the winter (months): because
the winter by force (sahas) brings these creatures into his power, therefore these two are Saha and Sahasya.
19. With 'Thou art taken with a support: thee for Tapas!' the Adhvaryu draws (the eleventh); with 'Thou art
taken with a support: thee for Tapasya!' the Pratiprasthātri (the twelfth). These two are (the months) of the
dewy season: because during them it freezes most severely, therefore these two are Tapas and Tapasya.
This is as listed in Table 2 and under standard configuration in Table 1. Please note that this verse
refers to the four-month long Varṣā season also known as Cāturmāsya.
Translation by Kisari Mohan Ganguli is as follows [15] (Please note that it is in 3.181):
“And, O Janamejaya, the holiest night, that of the full moon in the month of Kartika in the season
of autumn, was spent by them while dwelling there!”
The season Śarad and month Kārttika conform to the standard configuration.
The months of Māgha, Phālguna, Caitra, Vaiśākha, Jyeṣṭha and Āṣāḍha constitute Uttarāyaṇa (Northern transit).
The months of Śrāvaṇa, Bhādrapada, Āśvina, Kārttika,Mārgaśīrṣa and Pauṣa constitute Dakṣiṇāyaṇa.
The seasons and months conform to the standard configuration.
The six months, viz. Māgha, Phālguna, Caitra, Vaiśākha, Jyeṣṭha and Āṣāḍha are the months of Uttarāyaṇa
(northern transit of the sun). The six months, viz. Śrāvaṇa, Bhādrapada, Āśvina, Kārttika, Mārgaśīrṣa and Pauṣa
are the months of Dakṣiṇāyaṇa (southern transit of the sun).
“As Indra sends copious rain during the four months of the rainy season, even so let the king,
taking upon himself the office of Indra, shower benefits on his kingdom.”
It mentions the four months of the rainy season. The commentary by Kullūka on Manu Smṛti 9.304
says that four-month seasons start with Śrāvaṇa.
X. Arthasastra 2.20.62-72
The text is as follows:
dvau māsāvṛtuḥ ||62|| śrāvaṇaḥ proṣṭhapadaśca varṣāḥ ||63|| āśvayujaḥ kārtikaśca śarat ||64|| mārgaśīrṣaḥ
pauṣaaśca hemantaḥ ||65|| māghaḥ phālgunaśca śiśiraḥ ||66|| caitro vaiśākhaśca vasantaḥ ||67|| jyeṣṭhāmūlīya
āṣāḍhaśca grīṣmaḥ ||68|| śiśirādyuttarāyaṇaṃ ||69|| varṣādi dakṣiṇāyanaṃ ||70|| dvyayanaḥ saṃvatsaraḥ ||71||
1. Śrāvaṇa 1. Śrāvaṇa
Varṣā (rainy season)
2. Bhādrapada 2. Bhādrapada
Varṣā (Rainy)
3. Āśvina 1. Āśvina
Śarad (autumn)
4. Kārttika 2. Kārttika
1. Mārgaśīrṣa 1. Mārgaśīrṣa
Hemanta (early winter)
2. Pauṣa 2. Pauṣa
Hemanta (Winter)
3. Māgha 1. Māgha
Śiśira (late winter)
4. Phālguna 2. Phālguna
1. Caitra 1. Caitra
Vasanta (spring)
2. Vaiśākha 2. Vaiśākha
Grīṣma (Summer)
3. Jyeṣṭha 1. Jyeṣṭha
Grīṣma (summer)
4. Āṣāḍha 2. Āṣāḍha
As the months are determined by the position of moon on full moon day, Divyāvadāna follows
standard seasons and months as shown in Table 2.
After Caitra, for three months, there is an increase of the day and a decrease of the night by one muhūrta per
month; after that, there is an increase of the night and a decrease of the day by one muhūrta. After the month
of Āśvayuja, the same is reversed. As per the solar calendar, a month is the passing of the sun from one
constellation to the other, and the year is of two ayanas (half-years), the dakṣiṇāyana, starting with the
monsoon, and the uttarāyaṇa, starting with śiśira. … Therein, (the months of) Nabhas and Nabhasya are the
monsoon, Iṣa and Ūrja autumn, Sahas and Sahasya winter, Tapas and Tapasya śiśira, Madhu and Mādhava
spring, and Śukra and Śuchi summer.
Current description of seasons and months as given in Hindupedia is shown below [27]:
Each year consists of six Ritus or seasons. Each Ritu comprises two Maasas or months and three such ritus
constitute one kaala. Hence Aadaana and Visarga kaalas each consist of six months and three ritus. The six ritus
and their characteristics can be summarized in the following table:
Kāla Ṛtu Characteristics
(Semester) Māsa (Month)
(Season) of the Season
Māgha and
Phālguna (mid
Śiśira Cold and dewy
January to mid
Ādāna march)
Uttarāyana Caitra and Vaisākha
Vasanta (mid March to mid Spring
(Northern May)
Solstice)
Jyeṣṭha and Āṣāḍha
Grīṣma (mid May to mid Summer
July)
Śrāvaṇa and
Bhādrapada (mid
Varṣā Rainy
July to mid
Visarga September)
Dakṣināyana
Āśvina and Kārttika
(Southern Śarat (mid September to Autumn
Solstice) mid November)
Mārgaśīrṣa and
Pauṣa (mid
Hemanta Winter
November to mid
January)
The seasons and months, according to Hindupedia, conform to the standard configuration.
However, according to Wikipedia, there is a regional variation in the grouping of months and
seasons [28]. North, West, and Central Indian calendars conform to the standard configuration of
seasons and months. However, East Indian calendars, Bengali and Odia, have months shifted by
one month compared to the standard configuration as seen below.
5. EFFECT OF PRECESSION ON SEASONS AND MONTHS
From the above lists of explicit mentions of seasons and months, it is clear that they conform to
the standard configuration from the earliest times till now. However, the combination has changed
in East Indian calendars. According to the “Vartak-Oak hypothesis,” the grouping of seasons and
lunar months should have changed by one month every 2,000 years due to precession. Why there
is no evidence of it in the Indian literature? Why has the standard configuration started to change
now? An in-depth explanation will be provided in the concluding part of the series -- “Fatal logical
Errors in the Vartak-Oak Hypothesis”.
References:
1. https://nileshoak.wordpress.com/2017/08/02/astronomy-lynchpins-ramayana-mahabharata/.
2. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s astronomical dating of Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr. Raja
Ram Mohan Roy | May, 2021 | Medium.
3. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s Astronomical Dating of Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr. Raja
Ram Mohan Roy | May, 2021 | Medium.
4. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s Astronomical Dating of Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr. Raja
Ram Mohan Roy | May, 2021 | Medium.
5. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s Astronomical Dating of Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr. Raja
Ram Mohan Roy | May, 2021 | Medium.
6. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s Astronomical Dating of Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr. Raja
Ram Mohan Roy | May, 2021 | Medium.
7. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s Astronomical Dating of the Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr.
Raja Ram Mohan Roy | Jun, 2021 | Medium.
8. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s Astronomical Dating of the Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr.
Raja Ram Mohan Roy | Jun, 2021 | Medium.
9. https://twitter.com/RamMohanRoy108.
10. Sushruta Samhita was NOT written over 7,500 years ago | by Dr. Raja Ram Mohan Roy |
Medium.
11. Refutation of Nilesh Oak’s Astronomical Dating of Ramayana to 12209 BCE | by Dr. Raja
Ram Mohan Roy | Apr, 2021 | Medium.
12. https://twitter.com/NileshOak/status/1206824487590727680.
13. Keith, A.B., 1914, The Veda of the Black Yajus School entitled Taittiriya Sanhita, Part 2,
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 349-350.
14. Eggeling, J. (1885). The Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa according to the text of the Madhyandina
School. Part II, Books III and IV. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press., pp. 320-322.
15. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa, Book 3: Vana Parva, Translated into
English Prose from the Original Sanskrit Text by Kisari Mohan Ganguli.
16. Tagare, G.V., The Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002 Reprint, page 211.
17. Tagare, G.V., The Vāyu Purāṇa, Part I, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1987, page 345.
18. Bühler, G. (1886). “The Laws of Manu translated with extracts from seven commentaries”,
Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, p. 396.
19. Bhishagratna, K.K.L. (Editor) (1907). An English translation of The Sushruta Samhita based
on original Sanskrit Text, Vol. 1-Sutrasthanam. Calcutta: Kaviraj Kunja Lal Bhishagratna, pp.
46-47.
20. Shamasastry, R., Kautilya’s Arthashastra, Bangalore: Government Press, 1915, pp. 153-154.
21. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divyavadana
22. Divyāvadāna, edited by Vaidya, P.L., The Mithila Institute, Darbhanga, 1959, pp. 354-55.
23. Sharma, R., Byadgi, P.S. and Paliwal, M. (2011). “Glimpses on Roganidan by Vagbhata: A
bird’s eye view”,IJRAP, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp 1402-1404.
24. Vidyanath, R., Illustrated Aṣṭāṅga Hṛdaya of Vāgbhaṭa, Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati
Prakashan, 2013, pages 44-45.
25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajashekhara_(Sanskrit_poet)
26. Feller, D. (1995). “The seasons in Mahākāvya Literature”. Delhi: Eastern Book Linkers, p.
41.
27. http://www.hindupedia.com/en/Ritucharya
28. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritu_(Indian_season)