PEP Manual - V1 PDF

Contents
Table of figures 3 2.5 Task packages of the Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 17
1 Introduction 4 2.5.1 PRU 1 Costs and duration of validation 17
The product development process (PEP) from the customer inquiry up to six months after 2.5.2 PRU 2 Capacity planning and availability 17
1.1 4
SOP 2.5.3 PRU 3 Initial sample tests 17
1.2 Terms and definitions 6 2.6 Task package of the SCM Project Manager 17
1.2.1 What is the VDA maturity level? 6 2.7 Task packages of the Plant Manager 18
1.2.2 What is a milestone? 7 2.7.1 WL 1 Approval of the offer basis 18
1.2.3 What is the PEP map? 9 2.7.2 WL 2 Investment approval 18
1.2.4 What are results, partial results, activities, task packages? 9 2.8 Task packages of the Participation Controller and the Corporate Investment Controller 18
1.2.5 What is key documentation? 9 2.8.1 CON 1 Profitability calculation (WiRe) and CON 2 Investment reservation 18
1.2.6 What is a project? 10 2.8.2 CON 3 Project controlling (finance) 18
2 Explanation of task packages in PEP 11 2.9 Task packages of the Project Manager 20
2.1 Task packages of the Project Coordinator 12 2.9.1 PMT 1 Project planning 20
2.1.1 VER 1 Inquiry decision 12 2.9.2 PMT 2 Project management 20
2.1.2 VER 2 Inquiry processing 12 2.9.3 PMT 3 Project completion 20
2.1.3 VER 3 Submission/tracking of offer 12 2.9.4 PMT 4 Project timetable prior to commissioning 20
2.1.4 VER 4 Customer commissioning 13 2.10 Task packages of the Production Engineer 20
2.1.5 VER 5 Settlement of customer project costs 13 2.10.1 IND 4 Process FMEA 20
2.2 Task packages of the Application Engineer 13 2.10.2 IND 5 Flowchart 21
2.2.1 ENT 1 Component definition 13 IND 6 Tools and operating resources - requirement specifications, acceptance, documen-
2.10.3 21
2.2.2 ENT 2 Producibility assessment 13 tation
2.2.3 ENT 3 Design FMEA (D-FMEA) 14 2.10.4 IND 8 Evaluation of measuring systems 21
2.2.4 ENT 4 Component qualification 14 2.11 Task packages of the Quality Pre-Planner 21
2.2.5 ENT 5 Verification of material//structure 14 2.11.1 Q 1 QM plans 21
2.3 Task packages of the Project Buyer 14 2.11.2 Q 2 Initial sampling of sales part 21
2.3.1 EIN 1 Determination of costs and analysis 14 2.11.3 Q 3 Test and gage concept 22
2.3.2 EIN 2 Selection, commissioning and qualification of direct material for series production 15 2.11.4 Q 4 Quality pre-planning of direct material 22
2.3.3 EIN 3 Selection, commissioning and qualification of tools and operating resources 15 2.11.5 Q 5 Process acceptance 22
2.3.4 EIN 4 Selection and commissioning of raw materials 15 2.11.6 Q 6 CCC certification (CCC = China Compulsory Certification) 22
2.3.5 EIN 5 Purchasing volumes checked and optimized 16 2.11.7 Q 7 Defective part analysis 22
2.4 Task packages of the Industrial Engineer 16 2.11.8 Q 8 Q offer 22
2.4.1 IND 1 Work system design 16 2.12 Task packages of the Plant Container Management Administrator 22
2.4.2 IND 2 Tool / investment requirements 16 2.13 Task packages of the Team Manager Production 23
2.4.3 IND 3 Calculation of manufacturing costs 16 2.13.1 PRO 1 Production readiness 23
2.4.4 IND 7 Work preparation 16 2.13.2 PRO 2 Process capability study 23
2 | Veritas PEP Manual

2.14 Task package of the Launch Coordinator 23 Table of figures
3 PEP map for innovation projects 24
4 PEP map for application projects 30 Fig. 1 "Overview of phases“ 4
5 PEP map for capacity expansion projects 36 Fig. 2 "Quality gates at Veritas“ 5
6 PEP map for global sourcing projects 41 Fig. 3 "VDA maturity levels for Veritas' quality gates and milestones“ 6
7 PEP map for semi-finished products 43 Fig. 4 "Milestone plan“ 7
8 Change management 44 Fig. 5 "Preconditions for milestones" 8
9 Committees and escalations 45 Fig. 6 "Connection between the quality gate, milestone and key documentation“ 9
9.1 Inquiry Committee 45 Fig. 7 "Project types" 10
9.2 Escalation management from the inquiry through to customer commissioning 45 Fig. 8 "Functional structural plan as of March 10, 2016" 11
9.3 Steering Committee 46 Fig. 9 "Investment approval process" 19
9.4 Escalation management from customer commissioning up to six months after SOP 47 Fig. 10 "PEP map for innovation projects“ 24
10 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 48 Fig. 11 "Preconditions for quality gates in innovation projects“ 26
10.1 KPIs from the inquiry up to customer commissioning 48 Fig. 12 "PEP map for application projects“ 30
10.2 KPIs from customer commissioning up to six months after SOP 48 Fig. 13 "Preconditions for quality gates in application projects“ 32
11 Internal project audits 48 Fig. 14 "PEP map for capacity extension projects“ 36
12 Annex 49 Fig. 15 "Preconditions for quality gates in capacity extension projects“ 38
12.1 Task package: Descriptions of each function holder 49 Fig. 16 "PEP map for global sourcing projects“ 41
12.1.1 Project Coordinator 49 Fig. 17 "Preconditions for quality gates in global sourcing projects“ 42
12.1.2 Application Engineer 51 Fig. 18 "PEP map for semi-finished products“ 43
12.1.3 Project Buyer 54 Fig. 19 "Change management process description" 44
12.1.4 Industrial Engineer 56 Fig. 20 "Escalation scenario from the inquiry up to customer commissioning" 45
12.1.5 Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 58 Fig. 21 "Steering Committee" 46
12.1.6 SCM Project Manager 60 Fig. 22 "Escalation scenario after customer commissioning" 47
12.1.7 Plant Manager 60 Fig. 23 "Magic triangle of project goals" 48
12.1.8 Participation Controller and Corporate Investment Controller 61
12.1.9 Project Manager 63
12.1.10 Production Engineer 65
12.1.11 Quality Pre-Planner 67
12.1.12 Plant Container Management Administrator 71
12.1.13 Team Manager Production 71
12.1.14 Launch Coordinator 72
12.2 Summary of key documents 73
12.3 Glossary 74
|3
1 | Introduction
1.1 The product development process (PEP)

from the customer inquiry up to six months after SOP
PEP is regarded as the development process for a series production at Veritas. This Manual examines and cess is subdivided into small clear sections, so-called
product - starting with pre-development, then the cus- describes the process steps from the customer inquiry project phases:
tomer inquiry and finishing six months after the start of up to six months after SOP. For this purpose, this pro-
Fig 1: "Overview of phases“
Responsibility Sales Project Management
Project Phase Request Quote Product- and Processdevelopment Production Preparation Pre-Series Series
Project Quality Gates QG1 QG2 QG3 QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7
Request Quote Project B-release Pre serial Serial Project

released released approval Veritas released production closing
released
Sales is responsible for the inquiry and offer phase. Project Management, the sampling coordination meet- The so-called quality gates are located between the
Project
ProjectManagement
Milestones is responsible
MS1 for theMS3following
MS2 MS4 MS5 ing, nomination
MS6 of ourMS7suppliers MS8and the preparation
MS9 MS10 phases. MS11 A quality gate
MS12 is a point in time in the
MS13 MS14 project
phases: product and process Project development,

start Technical Startproduc-
of of specific
Calculation Completion documents Startwork-
Quote sent such as the plant
Customer designdrawing,
First serialDVP
off-tool, Process-whenand defined
Process requirements are checked
Process approval/ EMBP/ PPAP in sent
order to en-
SOP Customer/
done definition calculation closed Meeting shop realized freeze done/ parts available Production handover SOP Veritas issued Customer description: Action date
tion preparation, pre-series production and series pro-
done for D-FMEA, P-FMEA, flowchart andCustomer
realized requirement
B-Approval
received
specifi-
Customer description: sure the project maturity level. If theMUPrequired
approval for closed Customer description: 0-Series/ saleable/ progress
production ESWT/ VFF/ PPV/ PVL direct Material SWFT/ PVS/ non yellow
duction. costs cations. The production preparation phase only starts and has
Sub-part
issued
not been made, the next
saleable/ VS
phase is not approved or
with procurement approval. This is then followed, for is only approved after measures have been defined.
The inquiry phase includes, for example, the start of example, by commissioning of suppliers, approval of
inquiry processing. During this phase, the component direct material, acceptance of the tools, operating re-
is defined in technical terms, producibility is assessed,
Responsibility Sales sources and gages, their handover to Production, cre- Project Management
the test and logistics costs are calculated, the work

Project Phase Request
ation of production readiness and packaging planning.
Quote Product- and Processdevelopment Production Preparation Pre-Series Series
system is designed, the manufacturing costs are de- The pre-series phase includes acceptance of the pro-
termined and, if necessary, a profitability calculation cess as the most important result (2-day production).
is performed. During the offer phase, for example, the The series-production phase involves, for example,
offer is prepared, sent out, tracked and revised if Sales
Responsibility nec- initial sampling, launch coordination, settlement of the Project Management
essary. A decision by the customer regarding the offer

Project Phase Request customer's project costs, a target-actual comparison
Quote Product- and Processdevelopment Production Preparation Pre-Series Series
is also obtained
Project during this phase.
Quality Gates QG1 Product and proof QG2
costs and revenues,
QG3 completion ofQG4 the project and, QG5 QG6 QG7
cess development starts with customer Request commissioning thus, handover

Quote for
Projectseries production. B-release Pre serial Serial Project
and includes, for example, handover of the project to released

Fig. 2: "Quality gates at Veritas"

released
Project Milestones MS1 MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 MS6 MS7 MS8 MS9 MS10 MS11 MS12 MS13 MS14
Project start Technical Start of Calculation Completion Quote sent Startwork- Customer design First serial off-tool Process- and Process Process approval/ EMBP/ PPAP sent SOP Customer/
done for realized B-Approval Customer description: approval for closed Customer description: 0-Series/ saleable/
The figure shows the seven quality gates at Veritas. production project. All other quality gates open automatically in Customer received ESWT/ VFF/ PPV/ PVL direct Material SWFT/ PVS/ non MUP yellow
costs and Sub-part saleable/ VS
The inquiry to be processed is approved for all process the system if the preconditions are fulfilled, i.e. all stip- issued
participants at quality gate 1. The offer is approved at ulated partial results and results have been achieved.
quality gate 2 so that it can be sent to the customer. The preconditions for the quality gates are described
Quality gate 3 opens on receipt of the customer com- in the chapters of the particular PEP map from Chapter
mission. The project is therefore approved.Request
Project Phase
Veritas pro- 3 onwards.Quote Product- and Processdevelopment Production Preparation Pre-Series Series
curement approval is granted at quality gate 4. Pre-se-
ries production is approved at quality gate 5. Approval
of the launch of series production takes place at quality
gate 6. The project is completed at quality gate 7.
Quality gate 1 is approved by the Inquiry Committee,
see Chapter 9.1, if the stipulated preconditions are ful-
filled. Quality gate 2 is approvedreleased
with investment res- released approval Veritas released production closing
released
ervation or, when there is no need for investment, with
approval of the offer basis by the Plant Manager. Qual-
ity gate 7 is approved by the Steering Committee, see
Chapter 9.3, after validation of the completion of the
|5
1 | Introduction
1.2 Terms and definitions

1.2.1 What is the VDA maturity level?
The VDA volume "Common quality management in the rity in scopes of supply. The maturity of the component gates or milestones at Veritas.
supply chain - product development/maturity level as- is checked along quality gates and milestones on the The maturity level is checked at the respective quality
surance for new parts" is regarded as a guideline for basis of defined requirements in order to guarantee its gate or milestone by the Project Manager by means of
implementation of maturity level assurance for com- series launch. a defined questionnaire. If required, confirmation of the
panies in the automotive industry. Maturity level assur- The following figure shows the assignment of maturity maturity level is also sent to the customer.
ance is a standardized method for ensuring part matu- levels according to the VDA to the respective quality
Fig. 3: "VDA maturity levels for quality gates and milestones at Veritas“
Concept Phase Ongoing Series
RG 0 RG 1 RG 2 RG 3 RG 4 RG 5 RG 6 RG 7
Project completion,
Innovation Requirements Supply chain Release of Firs parts from Approval of
Production responsibility’s
released management is defined technical series tool and Product and
planning handing over to
for series for awarding and volumes specifications serial equipment Process
is done series, starting
development circumferences allocated availabe
requalification
QG3 QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7
Project B-release Pre serial Serial Project

approval Veritas released production closing
released
MS8
Customer design
freeze done/
B-Approval Customer
received
RG x RG = Reifegrad = Level of Maturity

1.2.2 What is a milestone?
A milestone is a defined event in the course of the pro- for targeted control of the phase. The "Milestone Plan"
ject with a measurable result. Milestones subdivide the shows the milestones at Veritas.
respective project phases and provide starting points
Fig. 4: "Milestone Plan“

released
Project Milestones MS1 MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 MS6 MS7 MS8 MS9 MS10 MS11 MS12 MS13 MS14
Project start Technical Start of Calculation Completion Quote sent Startwork- Customer design First serial off-tool Process- and Process Process approval/ EMBP/ PPAP sent SOP Customer/
done for realized B-Approval Customer description: approval for closed Customer description: 0-Series/ saleable/
production Customer received ESWT/ VFF/ PPV/ PVL direct Material SWFT/ PVS/ non MUP yellow
costs and Sub-part saleable/ VS
issued

released
|7
1 | Introduction
The following figure shows the preconditions and responsibility for fulfillment of the milestones.
Fig. 5: "Preconditions for the milestones“
Milestone Designation of the milestone Precondition Responsibility
MS1 Project starts System input: Inquiry generation Project Coordinator

Approval of QG 1: Approval of inquiry
MS2 Technical definition performed System input: Component defined and document: Producibility assessment Application Engineer
MS3 Start of calculation of manufacturing costs System input: Test sequence complete Industrial Engineer
MS4 Profitability assessment completed Document: DBRG "Project title“ + lifetime Participation Controller
MS5 Final meeting held System input: Final meeting held Project Coordinator
Approval of QG 2: Approval of offer
MS6 Offer submitted Document: Offer_series Project Coordinator

Approval of QG 3: Approval of project
MS7 Kick-off workshop held Document: Minutes of kick-off workshop Project Manager
MS8 Customer design freeze carried out/ B approval received from customer (RG*3) System input: B approval or document Project Coordinator
Approval of QG 4: Approval of procurement by Veritas
MS9 First-off series tool parts available at Veritas System input: Meeting with customer System control
Customer designation.: ESWFT/ VFF/ PPV/ PVL
MS10 Process/product approval granted for direct material and semi-finished products Document: EMPB direct material Quality Pre-Planner
MS11 Process handover completed Document: Handover report Production Engineer
Approval of QG 5: Approval of pre-series production
MS12 Process acceptance/ SOP at Veritas completed/ customer designation.: SWFT/ PVS/ non Document: Process acceptance report Quality Pre-Planner
saleable/ VS
Approval of QG 6: Approval of series production launch
MS13 EMPB sent/ customer designation: 0 series/ saleable/ MUP yellow Document: EMPB Quality Pre-Planner
MS14 SOP at customer/ deployment date System input: Date of SOP at customer System control
Approval of QG 7: Completion of project

1.2.3 What is the PEP map? 1.2.5 What is key- shows that both milestones and key documentation are
documentation? "keys". The door of the quality gate opens when all keys
The PEP map provides an overview of every result in are available. Only after the door has opened can the
each phase. It shows at what time and with what func- Key documentation is assigned to every partial result activities behind it be seen.
tion holder a result or a partial result must have been and result of a task package. This is either at least a
attained at the latest. document, e.g. "QM Plan Series Production" or at least
a system input, e.g. "customer procurement approv-
al". Key documentation is used as a basis to measure
1.2.4 What are results, whether the result or the partial result has been attained.
partial results, activities, The following Figure 6 shows the connection between
task packages? a quality gate, the milestones and key documentation. It
A result comes at the end of an activity sequence. Activi- Fig. 6: "Connection between the quality gate, milestone and key documentation“
ties are individual process steps within a task package
with a defined beginning and end. Each process step is
assigned to a responsible function holder. Several func-
tion holders cooperate in each activity.
A task package is a self-contained task with a result and Quality Gate 4
is assigned to a responsible person. It has a defined start
and a defined end. The task package description contains
all the important information relating to the task package:
task package designation, responsible function holder, MS7 MS7 First serial off-tool parts available
preconditions, partial results, results and the necessary MS8 MS8 Process- and Production approval for direct Material and Sub-part issued
activities which lead to the result. Responsible and co- MS9 MS9 Process handover closed
operating function holders are assigned to the activities. Dok Dok Acceptance log
The task packages in PEP are described in Chapter 2. Dok Dok PPAP purchased parts
The task package descriptions are shown for each func-
tion holder in Chapter 12. .
Partial results divide the task package into clear units
and enable the maturity level check to be carried out at
every quality gate or milestone.
|9
1 | Introduction
1.2.6 What is a project?
According to DIN 69901-5, a project is a complex task defined responsibility for results. A project calls for in- There are four different "project types" at Veritas: In-
with a defined goal, a defined beginning and a defined terdisciplinary cooperation in a project-specific organi- novation projects, application projects, capacity exten-
end, which is characterized by limited resources and zation. sion projects and global sourcing projects.
The difference between the project types lies in the

Fig. 7: "Project types"
process flow and process costs. The process flows
are described in the PEP map for each project type,
see Chapter 3 onwards. Consequently, only the func-
» new manufacturing process at the manufacturing location
tion holders with whom activities are connected are
Innovation Project » new material
» new function incorporated in the different flow paths of the project
types. The objectives of the project types are efficient
processing and purposeful integration of resources.
» known manufacturing process at the manufacturing location
Application Project » known material
» known function Change management, see Chapter 8, takes place if
changes are made to the design, the production pro-
» same manufacturing process (otherwise change management)
cess or the production location. Change management
Capacity-Increase-Project » same manufacturing location can be instigated both by internal function holders and
» additional tools/equipment needed by means of an external change request.
» Parts already in serial production at Veritas

Global-Sourcing-Project » Cost Optimization needed that the Contract stays at Veritas,
Design doesn´t change
» existing serial contract

Change Management » Design change, Manufacturing process change
and/or manufacturing location change

2 | Explanation of the task packages in PEP
The defined task packages in PEP at Veritas are shown in the "functional structural plan".
Fig. 8: "Functional structural plan as of March 10, 2016"
RFQ decision RFQ processing

Submission of a tender and
Customer commissioning Settlement of customer All task packages of all project types are shown. The
Project Coordinator follow-up project costs
AP-Nr. VER 1 AP-Nr. VER 2 AP-Nr. VER 3 AP-Nr. VER 4 AP-Nr. VER 5 structural plan shows which function holder is respon-
Component definition
Manufacturability
assessment Design FMEA Component qualification
Verifi cation
Material/ Construction
sible for which result in the project. A distinction is
Application Engineer
AP-Nr. ENT 1 AP-Nr. ENT 2 AP-Nr. ENT 3 AP-Nr. ENT 4 AP-Nr. ENT 5 made as to whether a task package in the inquiry/offer
Determination of costs Selection, appointment and Selection and ordering of Checks why
Project Buyer and analysis
Selection, appointment and qualifi-
cation of direct material for series
qualification of tools and
operating resources raw materials LoI is pending
phase or the order phase is involved, whereby there
AP-Nr. EIN 1 AP-Nr. EIN 2 AP-Nr. EIN 3 AP-Nr. EIN 4 AP-Nr. EIN 5
are also task packages which start in the inquiry/offer
Tool/ investment Determination of
Industrial Engineer
Work system design
requirement manufacturing costs
Work scheduling phase and are continued in the order phase, see the
AP-Nr. IND 1 AP-Nr. IND 2 AP-Nr. IND 3 AP-Nr. IND 7
task package "Component definition" of the "Applica-
Validation costing and
Project Coordinator
Testing Laboratory
duration
Capacity planning First sampling testing tion Engineer" function holder.
AP-Nr. PRU 1 AP-Nr. PRU 2 AP-Nr. PRU 3
Logistics Concept
SCM Project Manager and Cost Calculation In this Chapter all task packages for each function
AP-Nr. SCM 1
holder are summarized - according to the sequence in
Approval of offer‘s basics Investment Approval
Plant Manager the "functional structural plan“. This chosen sequence
AP-Nr. WL 1 AP-Nr. WL 2
Project Controlling
is based on the description of the process in the PEP
Pre-investment analysis
(financial)
Investment Controller map. The detailed descriptions for each task package
AP-Nr. CON 1 AP-Nr. CON 3
can be found in the Annex in the same order.

Corporate Investment reservation
Investment Control
AP-Nr. CON 2
Project schedule
Project planning Project Management Project conclusion
Project Manager (before LoI)
AP-Nr. PMT 1 AP-Nr. PMT 2 AP-Nr. PMT 3 AP-Nr. PMT 4
Tools and operating resources Measuring system

FMEA process Flowchart - performance specifications,
Production Technician acceptance, documentation evaluation
AP-Nr. IND 4 AP-Nr. IND 5 AP-Nr. IND 6 AP-Nr. IND 8
Advanced quality planning

QM-Plans Initial sampling sales part Test and gauge concept Process approval CCC-Certification Defective part analysis Q-Offer
Advanced Quality Planner direct material
AP-Nr. Q 1 AP-Nr. Q 2 AP-Nr. Q 3 AP-Nr. Q 4 AP-Nr. Q 5 AP-Nr. Q 6 AP-Nr. Q 7 AP-Nr. Q 8
Plant staffer administrative Packaging planning/

container management
AP-Nr. SCM 2
Production Readiness Process capability study

Team Manager Production
AP-Nr. PRO 1 AP-Nr. PRO 2
Startup coordination
Startup Coordinator
AP-Nr. SCM 3 A task has a result in a project and it is dedicated to a responsible person. Request phase Order phase
| 11
2.1 The task packages ing price, tool costs, investments) are then transferred 2.1.4 VER 4 Customer commissioning
of the Project Coordinator to the document template "Lifetime“ which is stored in
the system for further processing - with the objective of On receipt of the customer commission, the contract
approving the offer basis. components are first checked against the offer last
2.1.1 VER 1 Inquiry decision
sent in order to obtain any corrections made to the con-
This task package involves evaluating incoming cus- Optionally, the final meeting is ultimately held. This tract by the customer. If all the necessary information
tomer inquiries regarding Veritas' product-market strat- meeting is necessary if the Inquiry Committee has stip- is complete and correct, "nomination“/ "series order“/
egy. Irrelevant customer inquiries are rejected immedi- ulated in the inquiry decision that such a meeting is es- "nomination letter“ is stored in the system and the re-
ately. Inquiries of interest to Veritas are generated in the sential. Further action regarding processing of the in- lated customer confirmation is implemented in the re-
system as a new internal inquiry and are presented to quiry is defined with the affected group of participants spective customer portal. The internal project applica-
the Inquiry Committee, see Chapter 9.1. This Committee during this meeting. tion is also sent to Project Management for handover.
makes a final decision on whether the customer inquiry
is or is not processed internally. The objective of this The second phase of the task package involves data
2.1.3 VER 3 Submission/
procedure is merely to internally integrate the customer maintenance analogous to Veritas' sales checklist in or-
tracking of offer
inquiries which appear expedient to the company. der to update all necessary information in the system.
After the "offer basis" has been approved, final agree-
ment on the offer values to be submitted is reached in- Customer B approval must also be obtained by the
2.1.2 VER 2 Inquiry processing
side the department. The offer is then issued and sent Project Coordinator as quickly as possible. B approval
As part of this task package, an invitation to the inquiry in full to the customer. A copy of the offer is stored in is an essential precondition to realize the fixed drawing
meeting is initially sent. The objective of the meeting is to the system. status both internally and externally.
inform all function holders involved in the process about
the new customer inquiry. Based on the related report, This is followed by the offer tracking phase, i.e. nego- 2.1.5 VER 5 Settlement of
items in need of processing are queried, the milestones tiations with the customer. Depending on target com- customer project costs
in the inquiry and offer phase are fixed, and open topics munication, various task packages of the respective
are discussed. This provides the initial basis for smooth function holders must again be carried out optionally in The costs incurred in the customer project are settled
inquiry processing and the internal inquiry is initiated. order to optimize the customer offer based on revised in the last task package of the Project Coordinator. For
Every function holder is clear who is responsible for input variables. The customer offer is sent again to the this purpose, all negotiated assumptions of costs of
what result and by when.. customer and is stored in the system. tools must first be entered in the system. On receipt of
In the second part of the task package the cost break- the related tool order, including the customer's inven-
down (CBD) is prepared based on the available re- The VER3 task package is concluded with the decision tory numbers, they are supplemented in the system.
sults. All relevant data (e.g. manufacturing costs, sell- by the customer. When the inventory numbers are entered, the responsi-

ble function holders are informed what inventory plates 2.2 Task packages of the the first parts. The plan drawing now becomes part of
have to be procured and affixed to the particular tools.
Application Engineer the test sequence so that the approved plant drawing
is available on completion of the task package. The
The related tool order is then created and scheduled
2.2.1 ENT 1 Component definition Project Buyer therefore commissions the suppliers for
in the system. On receipt of the necessary documen-
direct material and the Production Engineer can ap-
tation, the tool costs can be settled analogous to the
This task package involves the technical definition of prove tool design.
customer's specifications.
the component both in the inquiry phase and in the
product and process development phase. Component
Optionally, development costs and/or abort costs are 2.2.2 ENT 2 Producibility
definition includes verification of customer data, speci-
settled analogous to the customer's specifications. assessment
fications, requirement specifications and component
creation in the system, including the parts list for the The producibility assessment is a method in which pro-
individual components and preparation and approval ducibility is evaluated in a standardized form based on
testing of the plant drawings. 3-D data and drawings during early phases of prod-
uct development in order to determine whether the
The component for the inquiry is initially defined in product can be manufactured and assembled in the
the inquiry phase, i.e. it is created with a parts list in intended design with the allocated resources. In this
the system and is available for all participating func- task package the producibility assessment is initiated
tion holders. The customer data (3-D model, specifi- by the Application Engineer and is then carried out
cations, requirement specifications) are approved as by the following function holders: Industrial Engineer,
the next partial result. The component definition from Quality Pre-Planner and SCM Manager. Finally, the as-
the inquiry phase is then reviewed and all components sessment is sent to the Project Coordinator in order to
are given the status-related subject group "series-com- include the results in the offer elaborations. If the result
missioned" so that sample requirements or pre-series of the producibility is "cannot be produced", a coor-
requirements can now be planned. The plant draw- dination meeting is held between every participant in
ing "Plant drawing free for industrialization + supplier order to jointly define the further action to be taken. The
nomination + sample construction" is then produced. objective of this task package is to ascertain risks and
With this plant drawing the Project Buyer provision- deviations at an early stage and instigate the measures
ally nominates the suppliers, the Production Engineer that are needed to offer the product accordingly.
produces the requirement specifications, the Project
Buyer commissions the suppliers for tools and oper-
ating resources, and the Sample Builder can produce
| 13
2.2.3 ENT 3 Design FMEA 2.2.5 ENT 5 Verification 2.3 Task packages
(D-FMEA) of material/structure of the Project Buyer
Design FMEA (FMEA: Failure Mode and Effects Analy- The objective of the task package is the approved ma-
sis) is an analytical method for evaluating possible fail- terial or structure which is used to produce the prod-
2.3.1 EIN 1 Determination of costs
ures which may occur during the design of a product. uct. . For this purpose, the material/structure for the and analysis
In accordance with their importance for the customer, inquiry phase must first be defined and approved in
The Project Buyer can start his/her work in the inquiry
their likelihood of occurrence and their probability of agreement with the corresponding function holder in
phase as soon as the general data on the inquiry are
detection, these failure causes are each evaluated with Purchasing and with the Application Engineer. If the
available from the Project Coordinator and the compo-
an indicator. D-FMEA is a living document in which new corresponding application has not been approved in-
nent definition with the parts list and advance drawings
findings, e.g. complaints, are included during regular ternally, material and function tests are carried out to
of the Application Engineer have been received. The
D-FMEA reviews. There are product-specific D-FMEA grant basic approval. This takes places as part of the
Project Buyer must also examine the logistics concept
teams consisting of an Application Engineer, a Quality pre-development process. If required, general cus-
in order to take account of possible cost-related de-
Pre-Planner and a Production Engineer. A D-FMEA is tomer-specific approval is also obtained. The material/
mands on the purchasing volumes.
initially produced in this task package. This is why im- structure for manufacturing the product can then be
plementation measures are defined if necessary. During used. Finally, the IMDS data are generated so that the
The objective is to check the market availability of the
a second step these measures are examined and the material/structure can be documented during initial
required purchasing volumes and collate the maximum
D-FMEA is completed.. sampling.
costs and implementation period as quickly as possible
based on inquiries from suppliers or in-house estimates.
2.2.4 ENT 4 Component qualification It must be noted in this respect that the quantities of
indirect material (tools, equipment, gages, etc.) are pro-
During component qualification customer-specific re- cessed by the Industrial Engineer. However, if a tool is
quirements are shown in a test plan, the tests are de- required, for example, for a purchased part, responsibil-
scribed, and acceptance criteria, target values, test ity for determining the costs lies with the Project Buyer.
quantities and a timetable are agreed with the test labo-
ratory. This test plan is the DVP (design verification plan) The data determined in this task package form the basis
and the first partial result of the task package. The DVP for Veritas' binding external offer. Conscientious colla-
tests then start in the test laboratory with the produced tion is therefore the decisive factor for the receipt of the
or purchased test items. At the end of the DVP tests, the order and Veritas' subsequent profit or loss.
results are analyzed and summarized in the DVP. The
DVP and also the task package are therefore completed.

2.3.2 EIN 2 Selection, commissioning If the Quality Department does not approve initial sam- completion of their design work. The suppliers propose
and qualification of direct ples or only approves them with conditions, it is the task the exact date themselves in the timetables to be sent.
material for series production of the Project Buyer to order new samples immediately
and optimize the delivery date in the best possible way. It should also be noted that non-project-related invest-
At the start of the activities in the order phase the Project The Project Manager must also be informed about the ments are not normally handled via the task packages
Buyer needs the plant drawings "Plant drawing free for deviation in the timetable. in PEP. The investment application workflow is available
industrialization + supplier nomination + sample con- for this purpose.
struction" and the logistics concept. Inquiries can there- The last partial result can be executed as soon as the
initial samples are approved. The suppliers receive the
fore be carried out on the market, offer comparisons 2.3.4 EIN 4 Selection and
can be produced and the suppliers can be selected and series contracts and are requested to complete the
commissioning of
provisionally nominated. Required tools are assigned "Handover sheet scheduling". The new components are
handed over by the Project Buyer to the responsible Fin-
raw materials
inventory numbers in the system and the loan tool con-
tract is concluded or updated. ished Part Coordinator in series production. The task package is handled in the same way as EIN
2. In order to nominate the raw material suppliers, both
After quality gate 4 and approval of the plant drawing The objective of attaining series readiness of direct ma- the general project data and the parts lists from ENT
and the template for the packaging datasheets, the sup- terial is therefore achieved. 1.3 are required to calculate the necessary quantities
pliers can be commissioned. The suppliers must proof raw materials.
vide a realistic timetable on the Veritas template. This 2.3.3 EIN 3 Selection, commissioning
timetable is firstly integrated in the project plan by the If the supplier is offering a new raw material or a raw
and qualification of tools
Project Manager and then forms the basis for the orders material that has been adapted for Veritas, or a pro-
and operating resources
to be placed. The suppliers specify in this case what in- cess change or similar was carried out for Veritas, the
formation or components have to be provided by Veritas Since the Industrial Engineer is responsible for tools and supplier must also prepare a timetable for this raw ma-
at what time in order to comply with the delivery date. operating resources in the inquiry phase, a handover ini- terial based on a Veritas template.
tially takes place. This task package is then handled in Individual orders must be used for project-related raw
Photo documentation is an integral part of sampling with the same way as EIN 2, but with some special aspects: material orders even if the raw materials are already
the customer's own tools. This documentation clearly "Plant drawings free for industrialization + supplier being utilized in series production. This is the only way
indicates the (costumer's) inventory numbers affixed to nomination + sample construction" are not necessarily to ensure that the additionally ordered quantities are
the tools. The Project Buyer must ensure that the suppli- required as a precondition for the inquiries. The inquiry also reserved for the new project.
er receives the required information promptly so that the is already possible with 3-D datasets and other speci-
latter can produce the complete sampling documents fications. The approved plant drawings are only re-
in good time. quired after commissioning of the suppliers, i.e. before
| 15
2.3.5 EIN 5 Purchasing volumes 2.4 Task packages of the operating resources which are required for production.
checked and optimized Industrial Engineer The objective is to calculate the required capacities for
producing the products forming the subject of the in-
This task package is only processed as part of a global quiry. The Industrial Engineer compares the required
2.4.1 IND 1 Work system design
sourcing project of the customer. In this case Veritas is capacities with the available capacities and defines the
already a series supplier, but the customer wants an ad- The Industrial Engineer can start his/her work as soon necessary investments and the tools to be purchased.
ditional price discount. The purchasing volumes must as component definition has been completed and pro-
therefore be checked in this task package in regard to cessing of the inquiry has commenced. 2.4.3 IND 3 Calculation of
further price optimizations. . The Project Coordinator The objective is to plan a work system which is used to manufacturing costs
also needs a qualified estimate of developments on the calculate the manufacturing costs. Producibility must
relevant purchasing markets to ensure that the order be considered and evaluated in this case. It must be The objective is to calculate the manufacturing costs
remains with Veritas by means of a competitive offer, possible to manufacture the product with process reli- after considering all relevant costs.
but also that this does not lead to any negative busi- ability under series conditions. The Industrial Engineer
ness. must process several aspects as a precondition for Calculation parts (if necessary several, for each pro-
work system planning: Firstly, it is evaluated by means duction variant) are stored in the system. The data
of a process FMEA what production methods are to be from the task packages EIN 1, SCM 2 and IND 2 are
selected and how they are to be ensured. The flowchart included in these spreadsheet parts and are used to
can be produced simultaneously to visually depict the finally calculate the manufacturing costs. The Industrial
processing sequence. The processing times are then Engineer checks the values for plausibility and, if nec-
calculated by means of MTM and the work system is essary, the planning data (e.g. batch size). The emer-
clocked. A layout is derived from clocking and the MTM gency plan must be considered during calculation of
analysis. All the data are included in the preparation of the manufacturing costs since it may lead to additional
the work plan which is used as the basis for calculating costs. The calculation is made available in the system
the manufacturing costs. and is processed further by the Project Coordinator
and Participation Controller.
2.4.2 IND 2 Tool/
investment requirements 2.4.4 IND 7 Work preparation
As soon as the task package "Work system design" has The objective of the task package is to hand over the
been completed, the Project Coordinator can use the purchased work system, including all documents from
inquiry data (unit numbers, etc.) to define the tools and work system design IND 1, to the Team Manager Pro-

duction. The work system must first be linked for this 2.5.2 PRU 2 Capacity planning uring reports and the material and function report in
purpose and structured as planned. A design analysis and availability the system.
is then carried out based on this test setup and is com-
pared by the Industrial Engineer with the planning data. Precise scheduling of the individual partial results and
If necessary, the data are adapted in the system (work results in PEP are vital for project scheduling. Capacity 2.6 Task package of the
plan, layout, etc.). planning for the tests in the test laboratory therefore SCM Project Manager
represent an important aspect.
If all documents have been updated and the work sys-
The tasks of the Project Coordinator in the Test Labora-
SCM 1 Logistics concept
tem is ready to be handed over, it becomes the respon-
sibility of Production. tory include scheduling of the tests and any planning and costing
and requisition notes for equipment, measuring sys-
If the inquiry documents and the component definition
tems and other resources.
are available, a logistics concept is planned. The objec-
2.5 Task packages of the tive is to guarantee the supply concept of Production
Project Coordinator He/she receives the information required here in coop-
and the customer, and show cost-related requirements
in the Test Laboratory eration with the Application Engineer and the Project
for calculating the logistics costs. In order to prepare
Manager from the DVP, the requirement specifications,
the calculation of the logistics costs, the Project Buyer
the customer's specifications and the kick-off work-
2.5.1 PRU 1 Validation costs shop (ENT 1.2 and PMT 1.2).
optionally obtains offers or already existing estimated
and duration values are used. Once all logistics costs are recorded,
they are taken into account in the calculation of the
It is important when preparing the offer to estimate the Scheduling and resource planning are carried out in
manufacturing costs. If customer commissioning takes
test costs and the duration of testing at an early stage. close cooperation with the individual groups in the text
place after submission of the offer, implementation of
laboratory.
the logistics concept starts. This is based on the plan
In the task package PRU 1 the "Project Coordinator and logistics cost calculation which was produced dur-
in the Test Laboratory" uses the available inquiry data 2.5.3 PRU 3 Initial sample tests ing the inquiry phase. This task package can only be
from the customer (drawings, specifications, require- completed on attainment of the result of task package
ment specifications) and the planned materials for the It is essential that the measuring report and the ma- SCM 2.
product to estimate the duration and costs of the vali- terial and function report are available for initial sam-
dation tests. He/she then enters them in the system in pling of sales parts. The "Project Coordinator in the
the boxes intended for this purpose. Test Laboratory“ monitors the prompt preparation of
the measuring and test reports for initial sampling. The
task package is completed with approval of the meas-
| 17
2.7 Task packages of the 2.8 Task packages of the ment Controlling uses the data determined in the pro-
Plant Manager Participation Controller and fitability calculation to prepare a decision-making basis
the Corporate Investment for the Board of Management. Investments in excess of
2.7.1 WL 1 Approval Controller ¤ 500,000 must also be approved by the Supervisory
Board. The detailed connection between both task pa-
Offer basis
2.8.1 CON 1 Profitability ckages is shown in Figure 9 "Investment approval pro-
In this task package the profitability calculation and/or cess“.
calculation and
the lifetime are checked for completeness and compli-
CON 2 Investment reservation
ance with the stipulated target figures, and are appro- 2.8.2 CON 3 Project controlling
ved. Approval of the offer basis is the precondition for When processing the inquiry it is necessary to prepare
(Finance)
investment reservation (if required) and also for prepa- the data generated during inquiry processing (manufac-
ration of the offer by the Project Coordinator. turing costs, sales prices, investments, etc.) in a struc- In order to ensure a permanently effective management
tured form in order to create a valid economic decisi- function for controlling and to evaluate the profitability
on-making basis for the Board of Management or the of an individual project, structured and transparent pro-
2.7.2 WL 2 Investment approval
Supervisory Board. The Board of Management or the Su- ject controlling is necessary. Evaluation of the project is
Since the investments in the inquiry phase were already pervisory Board ultimately defines the price floor down to based on the customer project plan stored in the system.
reserved in task package CON 2, they only need to be which the Project Coordinator may go with the customer. This plan must always be oriented towards the award
applied for after commissioning. For this purpose, the date and the premises valid at the time. Project planning,
Production Engineer enters the required investments in The profitability calculation (WiRe) compares the ear- see PMT 1, includes manufacturing costs, investments,
the system, the Investment Cost Center Manager ap- nings (parts, tool and development sales) with the pro- tools, sales revenues, material costs and internal settle-
plies for the investments and Controlling cancels the ject costs and investments. In addition to the manufac- ments.
reservations and approves the investment cost center. turing costs of the individual sales parts, costs for tools
and development are also included in the analysis. In- As part of project controlling, the actual figures from the
vestments which are necessary for accepting the inquiry stipulated items are compared with the planning data in
must be included in the profitability calculation in order to order to then evaluate where the project differs from the
then create the basis for task package CON 2. plan. After SOP of a project, it is possible to compare
the target Rol with the actual Rol in order to measure the
Task package CON 2 uses the key figures determined profitability of the entire project.
in the profitability calculation and then reserves the re-
quired investments. Investments in excess of ¤ 50,000
must be approved by the Board of Management. Invest-

Fig. 9:"Investment approval process“
Manufacturing costs
Responsibility: Industrial Engineer
Lifetime
Responsibilty: Project Coordinator
Yes Investments over No

50.000 ¤
Profitability calculation Approval of offer basis

Responsibility: Participation Controller Responsibility: Plant Manager
Investments over ¤ 50,000, approval by Board of Management

Responsibility: Corporate Investment Controller
Approval by Supervisory Board Yes Investments over

Responsibility: Corporate Investment Controller 500.000 ¤
No
Yes
Investment reservation
Responsibility: Corporate Investment Controller
Investment application
Responsibility: Plant Manager
Create eBM for investments Approval of reserved investments

Responsibility: Requester Responsibility: Corporate Investment Controller
| 19
2.9 Task packages of the 2.9.2 PMT 2 Project management 2.9.4 PMT 4 Project timetable
Project Manager In this task package the Project Manager must manage
before commissioning
the project tasks up to quality gate 6. For this purpose, The objective is to prepare a project timetable for im-
2.9.1 PMT 1 Project planning he/she firstly uses the regular status meetings and portant innovation projects in the inquiry phase. This
deviation analyses, including the initiation of suitable project timetable is required for the customer offer. The
This task package starts with the handover of the pro-
measures in the event of data variances or cost dif- Project Manager produces the project timetable based
ject by the Project Coordinator to an assigned Project
ferences. If required, escalation management, change on the customer milestones from the inquiry, the com-
Manager. The objective is to prepare and approve the
management, risk management and documentation of ponent definition and the tool and investment require-
project timetable and the project cost and revenue
lessons learned are used in the lessons learned park- ments.
plan. For this purpose, the project input variables are
ing area. The last aspect is analyzed and documented
first checked, a project order containing all the key
at the end of the project. The contents of this work
data relating to the project is produced, and a detailed
package also include monitoring of the maturity level 2.10 Task packages of the
project timetable based on the partial results and re-
and its confirmation by the Quality Pre-Planner to the
sults is drawn up. A kick-off workshop is then held with Production Engineer
customer if this is necessary. The partial results of the
the participation of the entire project team. The objec-
task package are quality gate approvals.
tives of the kick-off workshop are to incorporate all par- 2.10.1 IND 4 Process FMEA
ticipating function holders, inform them about the key
data relating to the project, jointly agree the dates in In this task package a new Failure Mode and Effects
2.9.3 PMT 3 Project completion
the project timetable and therefore produce an obliga- Analysis (FMEA) is carried out and is evaluated by the
tion for all participants. In order to discover any risks The objectives of the task package are to prepare the separately formed FMEA team or the existing FMEA
in advance, the project team carries out a project risk completion of the project and hand it over to the pro- from inquiry phase, IND 1, is revised. The team mem-
analysis and formulates measures to counter the risks. duction plant responsible for series production. This bers are selected on an interdivisional basis from a
Another important part of the kick-off workshop is de- starts by sending confirmation of maturity level 6 to the wide range of function holders. The findings from the
termination of the required quantities at all production customer. At the end of the project a final workshop FMEA must be included in the design of the work sys-
stages, e.g. for tool acceptance or internal process ac- is held in which the lessons learned parking area, for tem. The existing work system is subsequently exam-
ceptance. After the kick-off workshop, the project time- example, is evaluated and processed. The results of ined in regard to the implementation of the planned
table and the cost and revenue plan are finalized and the final workshop and lessons learned, as well as the prevention measures or discovery measures.
activated by the Project Manager. comparison of target-actual costs, revenues and dead-
lines are included in the final report. Finally, confirma-
tion of maturity level 7 is sent to the customer and the
Project Manager applies for quality gate 7.

2.10.2 IND 5 Flowchart supplier is given the green light to produce the commis- used for process assurance in production. Task pack-
sioned items. age Q 1 takes account of the QM plans for prototypes,
(German: Flussdiagramm)
pre-series parts and series parts for each of which there
The flowchart depicts the process steps in their depend- Prior to final tool acceptance, it is possible to carry out a is a separate QM plan which is the responsibility of the
encies and their time sequence. The flowchart typifies preliminary acceptance inspection at the supplier. Dur- Quality Pre-Planner (QPP). The P-FMEA from the sys-
the individual process steps in "activity", activity and ing tool acceptance the non-connected items are ex- tem SCIO acts as a precondition and also as a basis for
testing, decision, test step, provide parts, dispatch" and amined in regard to compliance with the requirement preparation.
must, because it is produced using the same system, specifications and functionality.
be regarded in direct connection with the FMEA. 2.11.2 Q 2 Initial sampling of
2.10.4 IND 8 Evaluation of measuring sales parts
2.10.3 IND 6 Tools and operating system
Through initial sampling Veritas proves to the customer
resources - requirement that our products comply with the stipulated require-
In this task package the measuring system is approved
specifications, acceptance, in accordance with VA74. The responsible Quality Co- ments relating to functionality and quality. Initial sam-
documentation ordinator is instructed by the Production Engineer to pling is present in the form of an initial sample test report
carry out approval. The capability of the gages and/or (EMPB). All relevant documents (e.g proof of functional
In this task package the requirement specifications for
measuring system is examined and the final document requirements, measuring reports, QM plan, etc.) are
the required tools and operating resources are pro-
is entered in the system. enclosed with the EMPB. Approval of initial sampling
duced, the requisition note is issued, and acceptance
is a precondition for settlement of costs incurred with
and documentation of the supplied items are performed.
the customer. The basis for initial sampling is the sam-
The items, including gages, for the production system
pling coordination meeting (SCM) which the Quality
are initially created with a Veritas identification number
and are described in the requirement specifications. The 2.11 Task packages of the Pre-Planner conducts with the customer. Based on the
SCM, Project Support Sales creates the corresponding
measures defined in the process FMEA are included in Quality Pre-Planner
initial sample order (IS order) in the system and sched-
the description in the requirement specifications.
ules it. Responsibility for this task package lies with the
2.11.1 Q 1 QM plans Quality Pre-Planner of the particular production plant.
After quality gate 4 "Procurement approval by Veritas“
The activities for orders relating to internal plant-to-plant
has been approved, the Project Buyer commissions the The QM plans (quality management plans) represent a
sampling of semi-finished products and implementation
supplier to carry out the planning work. On receipt of process description for a product. The QM plans de-
of customer sampling are the responsibility of the Initial
the approved plant drawing, the supplier will review his scribe production while the resources, responsibilities
Sampler.
tool design and submit it to the Production Engineer for and quality tests, including test materials, relating to the
approval. With design approval for indirect material, the particular process step are stipulated. The QM plan is
| 21
2.11.3 Q 3 Test and gage concept phase. The task package consists of two partial results 2.11.7 Q 7 Defective part analysis
starting with necessary "internal process acceptance"
The test and gage concept is formulated in task pack- With defective part analysis a concept is formulated that
and optional "customer process acceptance“. Internal
age IND 6 by the Production Engineer. This concept is can be used to analyze a product forming the subject
process acceptance is managed by the Quality Pre-
checked by the Quality Pre-Planner and supplemented of complaint in a damage case. Different test steps are
Planner at the production plant. The preconditions are
by the contact persons. The concept is then sent to the defined here. They must be worked through consecu-
successful realization of production readiness, see PRO
customer for agreement. Agreement will enable the cus- tively until the cause of the defect forming the subject of
1, and preparation of internal process acceptance by
tomer to incorporate change requests in the sales part complaint has been determined. The concept of defec-
the Team Manager Production. Deviations may lead to
gage. If no feedback is received from the customer, the tive part analysis must be formulated for every sales part
rejection of process acceptance, which then results in
concept will be deemed to have been accepted and of Veritas.
a delivery block. If the customer requests performance
agreed within 5 working days. .
of his own process acceptance, it is also organized and
monitored by the Quality Pre-Planner at the production 2.11.8 Q 8 Q offer
2.11.4 Q 4 Quality pre-planning of plant.
direct material The quality offer (Q offer) is a currently new requirement
by individual customers in innovation projects. This re-
The objective of this task package is approval of di-
2.11.6 Q 6 CCC certification quirement involves the provision of detailed information
rect material.. It is therefore subdivided into three par- (CCC = China Compulsory Certification) to the customer regarding implementation of the project
tial results: "Quality pre-planning of direct material", during the inquiry/offer phase. Due to complexity, prep-
"Process acceptance by the supplier" and "Approval of China Compulsory Certification involves validation of
aration of the Q offer is a very time-intensive activity and
direct material“. Approval of direct material must take critical components. This is demanded by the Chinese
calls for cooperation between different function holders.
place for every new purchased part. The partial results government and is controlled by the customs authori-
"Quality pre-planning of direct material" and "Process ties. CCC affects, for example, passenger compartment
acceptance by the supplier" are only used with critical materials, brake lines, tires, etc. This certification calls
for separate tests which must be sent to the Chinese 2.12 Task package of the
purchased parts. Critical purchased parts are defined
accordingly with all participating function holders in the authorities. Samples requiring detailed photo documen- Plant Container
kick-off workshop. tation are also requested. After all the necessary docu- Management Administrator
ments have been submitted, a processing period of up
2.11.5 Q 5 Process acceptance to 6 months must be assumed. The product in question SCM 2 Packaging planning/
may not be exported to China without the corresponding
Process acceptance entails evaluation and approval of
approval.
the production process with the objective of approving The precondition for this task package is calculation of
the series process and starting the series production the logistics costs. Based on the formulated information

regarding supply to production, packaging proposals evaluation of the special, quality-related characteristics
The PEP map
innovation projects
are once again examined and agreed with the customer, from different series batches. The Quality Coordinator,
PEP map for

supplier and Production. If the number of containers has the DSK (decentral master data and capacity manage- for innovation projects
to be increased, the required requisition notes are is- ment) employee and the Team Manager Production
sued and included in the approval cycle. work together in order to attain these results. An innovation project exists if the production pro-
cess is new at the production plant and/or the ma-
terial and/or the function are new. The innovation
project may originate in the pre-development phase
2.13 Task packages of the 2.14 Task package of the
or concept development phase, and is included in
Team Manager Production Launch Coordinator this case with the first customer commission in an
innovation project.
2.13.1 PRO 1 Production readiness SCM 3 Launch and
The objective is to create production readiness so that
discontinuation coordination The following PEP map shows the process sequence
and the participating function holders.
internal process acceptance and prompt initial sam- Launch coordination starts when the project timetable
pling are ensured. The precondition here is handover of is approved. The Launch Coordinator is responsible for
the tools and operating resources by the Industrial En- creating the order and agreeing the time schedule with
gineer to the Team Manager Production. The connected the customer's production plants. This leads to monitor-
tools and operating resources are integrated in this work ing and a plausibility assessment of the delivery call-
package. The series personnel are planned and quali- offs. The task package is completed after customer
fied for this purpose, and the "Emergency plan series" is SOP with handover of planning to the "Area Manager for
produced. Process acceptance, work package Q 5, is Scheduling of Finished Parts at Plant".
finally scheduled and prepared.
2.13.2 PRO 2 Process capability study

The first partial result is short.term process capability.
The special. quality-related characteristics of the draw-
ing are checked and measured in short.term process
capability. A statement on the quality capability of the
process is made in this case. Long-term process ca-
pability includes the 2000:0 series launch test and an
| 23
3 | PEP map forInnovationsprojekte
PEP-Landkarte innovation projects
Fig. 10: "PEP map for innovation projects"
Verantwortung Vertrieb
Projektphasen Anfrage Angebot Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung
Projekt Quality Gates QG1 QG2 QG3
Anfrage- Angebots- Projektfreigabe

Projekt Meilensteine MS1 freigabe MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 Freigabe MS6 (RG2*) MS7
Projekt Technische Start Herstellkosten WIRE Abschlussgespräch Angebot Startworkshop

Teil-/Ergebnis startet Definition erfolgt ermitteln abgeschlossen durchgeführt abgegeben durchgeführt
VER 1.1 VER 1.2 VER 2.1 VER 2.2 VER 2.3 VER 3.1 VER 3.2 VER 3.3 VER 4.1
Anfrage Anfrage- Anfrage- Lifetime Abschluss- Angebot Optimiertes Kunden- Projekt an
Projektkoordinator im System entscheidung bearbeitung liegt vor gespräch abge- Angebot entscheidung Projektmanager
eingestellt abgeschlossen starten stattgefunden geben abgegeben liegt vor übergeben
ENT 1.1 Bauteil für Anfrage ENT 1.2 ENT 1.3 Statusgerechte Sachgruppe ENT 1.4 Werkszeichnung
definiert und statusgerecht Kundendaten/ aller Bauteile im System frei für IND + Lieferanten-
Application Engineer ENT 2 Herstellbarkeitsbewertung Lastenheft ENT 3.1 Konstruktions-FMEA erstellt nominierung + Musterbau
durchgeführt freigegeben ENT 4.1 Dokument DVP erstellt (Status 114)
EIN 1 EIN 2.1 Lieferanten vorläufig
Kosten und nominiert für Direktes Material
Projekteinkäufer Verfügbarkeiten EIN 4.1 Lieferanten vorläufig
ermittelt nominiert für Rohstoffe
IND 1 IND 2 Kosten u. Liefertermine für
Arbeitssystem- Werkzeuge und Investitionen geplant
Industrial Engineer gestaltung
IND 3
abgeschlossen Herstellkosten ermittelt
PRU 1 PRU 2.1
Projektkoordinator Validierungskosten/ Kapazitätsplanung
Prüflabor -dauer im System durchgeführt
eingetragen
SCM 1.1 SCM 1.2
Erstellung Erstellung
SCM Projektmanager Logistik- Logistik-
konzept kalkulation
WL 1
Angebots-
Werksleitung grundlage
freigegeben
Funtkion
CON 1
Wirtschaftlich-
Beteiligungscontroller keitsrechnung
erstellt
CON 2.1 CON 2.2
Corporate Investitionen reserviert/ Investitionen verbindlich
Investitionscontroller abgelehnt oder unver- reserviert/ abgelehnt
bindlich reserviert
PMT 4 PMT 1.1 Startworkshop stattgefunden
Projektterminplan
Projektmanager vor Beauftragung PMT 1.2 Projektplanung
erstellt freigegeben
IND 4.1
P-FMEA erstellt
Produktionstechniker IND 5
Flowchart erstellt
Q8 Q 1.1
Angebots- QM-Plan Prototypen erstellt
Qualitätsvorausplaner grundlage Q 2.1
freigegeben Bemusterungsabstimmungsgespräch stattgefunden
Sachbearbeiter
Administratives
Behältermanagement Werk
Teammanager Produktion
Anlaufkoordinator
ENT 5.1 ENT 5.2

Vorentwicklung Fachgebiets- Werkstoff/ Aufbau Werkstoff/
leiter/Produktentwickler für Anfrage definiert Aufbau ermitteln
und statusgerecht
*RG = Reifegrad gem. VDA Kdbez. = Kundenbezeichnung Teilergebnis Ergebnis

Projektmanagement
Produktionsvorbereitung Vorserie Serie
innovation projects
PEP map for
QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7
Beschaffungs-Freigabe Vorserien-Freigabe Freigabe Serienanlauf Projekt-

MS8 Veritas (RG*4) MS9 MS10 MS11 (RG*5) MS12 (RG*6) MS13 MS14 Abschluss
(RG*7)
Kunden Design Freeze erfolgt/ Erste serienwerkzeugfallende Prozess-/ Produktfreigabe Prozessübernahme Prozessabnahme/ SOP Veritas abgeschlossen EMPB versendet SOP Kunde/
B-Freigabe Kunde erhalten (RG*3) Teile Veritas verfügbar Direktes Material und abgeschlossen Kdbez.: SWFT/ PVS/ non saleable/ VS Kdbez.: 0-Serie/ saleable/ MUP gelb Einsatztermin
Kdbez.: ESWFT/ VFF/ PPV/ PVL
Halbzeuge erteilt
VER 4.2 VER 5.1 VER 5.2
B-Freigabe Inventarnummern Kunden-
Kunde liegt vor hinterlegt projektkosten
abgerechnet
ENT 1.5 Werkszeichnungen freigegeben (Status 230) ENT 4.2
ENT 3.2 Maßnahmen zur Konstruktions-FMEA abgeschlossen DVP abgeschlossen
EIN 3.1 Lieferanten EIN 2.2 Lieferanten für Direktes Material beauftragt EIN 2.3 Liefe- EIN 2.4 EIN 3.3 EIN 2.5 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Direktes Material hergestellt EIN 3.4
vorläufig nomi- ranten für Kaufteile Projektbestellungen Projektbestellungen Einkaufsarbeiten
EIN 3.2 Lieferanten für Indirektes Material beauftragt EIN 4.3 Projektbestellungen Rohstoffe beliefert
niert für Indirektes mit Beistellung Direktes Material Indirektes Material Indirektes Material
Material EIN 4.2 Lieferanten für Rohstoffe beauftragt beauftragt beliefert beliefert EIN 4.4 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Rohstoffe hergestellt abgeschlossen
IND 7
Produktionsübergabe
stattgefunden
PRU 2.2
Mess- und Prüfvorrichtungen PRU 3.1 Messbericht liegt vor
verfügbar PRU 3.2 Freigegebener Werkstoff- und Funktionsbericht liegt vor
SCM 1.3
Umsetzung
Logistikkonzept
abgeschlossen
WL 2
Investitions-
kostenstelle
freigegeben
CON 3
Report nach
Übergabe an
Standort iegt vor
PMT 2.1 PMT 2.2 PMT 2.3 PMT 3.1 Abschluss-

QG4 freigegeben QG5 freigegeben QG 6 freigegeben bericht freigegeben
PMT 3.2
QG7 freigegeben
IND 6.1 IND 6.2 IND 6.3 IND 6.4 Werkzeuge, Lehren, Betriebsmittel abgenommen
Lastenhefte Betriebs- Konstruktionsfreigabe Vorabnahme
mittel, Werkzeuge, Indirektes Material IND 4.2 Maßnahmen zur Prozess-FMEA abgeschlossen
Indirektes Material
Lehren erstellt durchgeführt IND 8 Messsystem freigegeben
Q 3 Prüf- und Q 4.1 Q 4.2 Q 4.3 Direktes Material freigegeben Q 5.1 Q 6 CCC- Q 7 Schadteil- Q 5.2 Kundenprozessabnahme abgeschlossen
Lehrenkonzept mit Qualitätsvoraus- Prozessabnahme Q 1.2 QM-Plan Vorserie erstellt Interne Prozess- Bedruck- analysekonzept
Kunde abgestimmt planung Direktes Lieferant Direktes abnahme ungserlaubnis abgestimmt
Material abgeschlossen Material abgeschlossen Q 1.3 QM-Plan Serie erstellt abgeschlossen liegt vor Q 2.2 EMPB versendet Q 2.3 Kundenfreigabe liegt vor
SCM 2.1 SCM 2.2
Verpackungsplanung/ Verpackungsplanung/
Behältermanagement Behältermanagement
Lieferant abgeschlossen abgeschlossen
PRO 1 PRO 2.1 PRO 2.2
Produktions- Prozessfähigkeit Prozessfähigkeit
bereitschaft Kurzzeit liegt vor Langzeit liegt vor
hergestellt
SCM 3
Anlaufkoordination
abgeschlossen
ENT 5.3
Werkstoff/
Aufbau
freigegeben
siehe PEP-Landkarte Halbzeuge
| 25
3 | Preconditions for quality gates in innovation projects
Fig. 11: "Preconditions for quality gates in innovation projects"
Task packa- Result/partial result Precondition Responsibility APQP
ge number
VER 1.1 Inquiry entered in the system System input: Inquiry generation Project Coordinator 1
VER 1.2 Inquiry decision taken System input: Statistical updating of the inquiry (processing approved or reject Project Coordinator 1
inquiry)
VER 2.1 Start inquiry processing System input: System cycle for inquiry Project Coordinator 1
ENT 1.1 Component for inquiry defined and in line with status System input: Status "Component defined" Application Engineer 10
ENT 5.1 Material/ structure for inquiry defined System input: Material/ structure for inquiry free (status 140) Head of Pre-Development Department/ Product 10
Developer
ENT 2 Producibility assessment carried out Document: Producibility assessment Application Engineer 11
EIN 1 Costs and availabilities calculated System input: Costs and availability have been calculated Project Buyer 6
IND 1 Work system design completed Document: Document folder Industrial Engineer 16
PRU 1 Validation costs/duration entered in the system System input: Validation costs and duration Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 5, 21
SCM 1.1 Preparation of logistics concept Document: Logistics concept SCM Project Manager 17
SCM 1.2 Preparation of logistics calculation Document: Logistics calculation SCM Project Manager 17
IND 2 Costs and delivery dates planned for tools and investments System input: Technical data/details, document: Capacity calculation Industrial Engineer 7
PMT 4 Project timetable prepared before commissioning Document: Project timetable Project Manager 0
Q8 Q-offer prepared Document: Q offer Quality Pre-Planner 2
IND 3 Manufacturing costs calculated Document: Calculation printout Industrial Engineer 1
VER 2.2 Lifetime is available Document: Lifetime Project Coordinator 1
CON 1 Profitability calculation prepared Document: DBRG "Project title“ + lifetime Participation Controller 1
WL 1 Offer basis approved System input: Offer basis approved Plant Manager 1
VER 2.3 Final meeting held System input: Final meeting held Project Coordinator 1
CON 2.1 Investments reserved/rejected or reserved with non-binding effect System input: Investment approved/rejected/reserved with non-binding effect Corporate Investment Controller
Approval of QG 2: Offer approval
VER 3.1 Offer submitted Document: Offer_series Project Coordinator 1

CON 2.2 Investments reserved/ rejected with binding effect System input: Investment reserved/rejected Corporate Investment Controller
VER 3.2 Optimized offer submitted Document: Offer_series Project Coordinator 1
VER 3.3 Customer decision received System input: System updating of inquiry in line with status Project Coordinator 1
VER 4.1 Project handed over to Project Manager Document: Series order Project Coordinator 1

ge number
PMT 1.1 Kick-off workshop has taken place Document: Minutes of kick-off workshop Project Manager 0
PMT 1.2 Project plan approved Documents: Project timetable and project cost plan Project Manager 0
Q 1.1 QM plan for prototypes prepared Document: QM plan for prototypes Quality Pre-Planner 8
Q 2.1 Sampling coordination meeting held Document: Sampling coordination meeting held Quality Pre-Planner 22
ENT 1.2 Customer data / requirement specifications approved System input: Status of customer data approved Application Engineer 2
ENT 5.2 Material/ structure determined in line with status System input: Material/ structure determined (status 190) Head of Pre-Development Department/ Product 10
Developer
ENT 1.3 Subject group of all components in line with status in the system System input: Subject group of all components in line with status in the system Application Engineer 10
ENT 3.1 Design FMEA prepared Document: D-FMEA Application Engineer 3
ENT 4.1 Document DVP prepared System input: Status change (mailing for tests) Application Engineer 5
PRU 2.1 Capacity planning carried out System input: Capacity planning has been carried out Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 5, 21
ENT 1.4 Plant drawing free for IND + supplier nomination + sample construction (status Document: Plant drawings status 114 Application Engineer 10
114)
EIN 2.1 Suppliers provisionally nominated for direct material System input: Suppliers have been nominated and entered Project Buyer 6
EIN 4.1 Suppliers provisionally nominated for raw materials System input: Suppliers have been nominated and entered Project Buyer 6
IND 4.1 P-FMEA prepared Document: P-FMEA Production Engineer 13
IND 5 Flowchart produced Document: Flowchart Production Engineer 12
IND 6.1 Requirement specifications for operating resources, tools and gages produced Document: Requirement specifications, Production Engineer 7
System inputs: List of tools, test equipment list complete
Q3 Test and gage concept agreed with customer System input: Gage concept agreed/ customer informed (change of status) Quality Pre-Planner 7
EIN 3.1 Suppliers provisionally nominated for indirect material System input: Suppliers have been nominated and entered Project Buyer 7
VER 4.2 B approval of customer available System input: Customer procurement approval Project Coordinator 1
WL 2 Investment cost center approved System input: Investment approved Plant Manager
PMT 2.1 QG 4 approved System input: Approve QG 4 Project Manager 0
Approval of QG 4: Procurement approval by Veritas
SCM 2.1 Packaging planning/ container management supplier completed Document: Packaging datasheet/regulations of supplier Plant Container 17
Management Administrator
EIN 4.2 Suppliers commissioned for raw materials System input: Order confirmations are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
EIN 3.2 Suppliers commissioned for indirect material System input: Order confirmations are booked in the system Project Buyer 7
IND 6.2 Design approval for indirect material Document: Design approval for indirect material (e-mail) Production Engineer 7
ge number
| 27
3 | Preconditions for quality gates in innovation projects
ENT 1.5 Plant drawings approved (status 230) Document: Approve plant drawings status 230 Application Engineer 10
Document: Parts history 4
ENT 3.2 Measures for design FMEA completed Document: D-FMEA Application Engineer 3
EIN 2.2 Suppliers commissioned for direct material System input: Order confirmations are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
EIN 2.3 Suppliers commissioned for purchased parts with supply System input: Purchased parts with supply commissioned Project Buyer 6
Q 4.1 Quality pre-planning of direct material completed Document: QVP checklist for direct material Quality Pre-Planner 6
VER 5.1 Inventory numbers stored System input: Sales data for tools Project Coordinator
IND 6.3 Preliminary acceptance of indirect material performed Document: Acceptance report Production Engineer 7
EIN 2.4 Project orders for direct material delivered System input: Deliveries/incoming goods are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
Q 4.2 Process acceptance for suppliers of direct material completed Documents: Process acceptance report Quality Pre-Planner 6
SCM 2.2 Packaging planning/ container management completed Document: Packaging datasheet/ regulations Plant Container 17
EIN 3.3 Project orders for indirect material delivered System input: Deliveries/incoming goods are booked in FOSS Project Buyer 7
Q 4.3 Direct material approved Document: EMPB direct material Quality Pre-Planner 6
IND 6.4 Tools, gages and operating resources accepted Document: Acceptance report approved Production Engineer 7
Q 1.2 QM plan for pre-series production prepared Document: QM plan for pre-series production Quality Pre-Planner 15
IND 8 Measuring system approved Documents: Measuring report, gage capability, MSA Production Engineer 14
IND 4.2 Measures for process FMEA completed Document: P-FMEA approved Production Engineer 13
PRU 2.2 Measuring and test equipment available System input: Purchased measuring and test equipment available Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 21
IND 7 Production handover has taken place Document: Handover report Industrial Engineer 16, 25
Q 1.3 QM plan for series production prepared Document: QM plan for series production Quality Pre-Planner 19
PRO 1 Production readiness created Document: Checklist for production readiness, emergency plan Team Manager Production 24
EIN 4.3 Project orders for raw materials delivered System input: Deliveries/incoming goods are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
EIN 4.4 Series readiness of raw material suppliers created System input: Series readiness of suppliers has been created Project Buyer 6
EIN 2.5 Series readiness of direct material suppliers created System input: Series readiness of suppliers has been created Project Buyer 6
SCM 1.3 Implementation of logistics concept completed Document: Logistics concept SCM Project Manager 17
Approval of QG 5: Pre-series approval

Task Result/partial result Precondition Responsibility APQP
package
number
PRO 2.1 Short-term process capability exists Document: Short-term process capability study Team Manager Production 20
EIN 3.4 Purchasing of all tools and equipment completed System input: All project orders for tools and equip- Project Buyer 7
ment are completed
Q 5.1 Internal process acceptance completed Document: Process acceptance report Quality Pre-Planner 18
Approval of QG 6: Approval of series launch
The PEP map for
application projects
PEP map for
ENT 4.2 DVP completed
CCC printing license is available
System input: Status change of DVP approved
Documents: CCC printing license, CCC certificate
Quality Pre-Planner
5
2
Q6
PRU 3.1 Measuring report is available Document: Test report MW Project Coordinator in the 21
Test Laboratory
An application project exists if the production pro-
PRU 3.2 Approved material and function report is available Document: EMPB_LAB Project Coordinator in the 21 cess at the production plant, the material and the
Test Laboratory function holder are known.
ENT 5.3 Material/structure approved System input: Material/ structure free (status 230) Head of Pre-Development 10
Department/ Product
Developer The following PEP map shows the process sequence
Q7 Defective part analysis concept agreed Document: Defective part analysis concept Quality Pre-Planner 20 and the participating function holders.
Q 2.2 EMPB sent Document: EMPB Quality Pre-Planner 22
Q 5.2 Customer process acceptance completed Document: Customer-specific acceptance report Quality Pre-Planner 18
Q 2.3 Customer approval available Document: Customer approval Quality Pre-Planner 23
PRO 2.2 Long-term process capability exists Document: Long-term process capability study Team Manager Production 20
SCM 3 Launch coordination completed Document: Handover report KSC Launch Coordinator 25
VER 5.2 Customer project costs calculated System input: Status of tool costs or development Project Coordinator 1
and cancellation costs calculated
CON 3 Report after handover to plant is available Document: Target-actual comparison Participation Controller 0
PMT 3.1 Final report approved Document: Final report Project Manager 0
| 29
4 | PEP map
PEP-Map for application
Application Projectprojects
Fig. 12: "PEP map for application projects“
Responsibility Sales
Project Phase Request Quote Product- and Processdevelopment
Project Quality Gates QG1 QG2 QG3
Request Quote Project approval

Project Milestones MS1 released MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 released MS6 (RG2*) MS7
Project Technical Start of calculation for Calculation Completion Quote Startworkshop

Partial results/ Results start done definition done production costs closed Meeting realized sent realized
RFQ RFQ decision Start RFQ Lifetime is Final dis- Quotation Submit Customer Submit project
Project Coordinator inputted in completed processing available cussion team submitted optimized decision has to project
the system completed quotation been received manager
ENT 1.1 Component for RFQ ENT 1.2 ENT 1.3 Status-relevant category of ENT 1.4 Working drawing re-
defined and with proper status Release all components in the system leased for Industrial.+Supplier.
Application Engineer ENT 2 Manufacturability customer ENT 3.1 Design FMEA created Nomination+Pattern design
assessment performed data (3D ENT 4.1 DVP document (Status 114)
EIN 1 model, Spec. EIN 2.1 Suppliers preliminary
Costs and Drawing)/ nominated for direct material
Project Buyer availabilities performance
EIN 4.1 Suppliers preliminary
determined specifications
nominated for raw materials
IND 1 IND 2 Costs and schedules for tools
Work system and investment planned
Industrial Engineer design complete
IND 3
Manufacturing costs determined
PRU 1 PRU 2.1
Project Coordinator Enter the costs/ Capacity planning
Testing Laboratory duration of validation conducted
in the system
SCM 1.1 SCM 1.2
Preparation Preparation of
SCM Project Manager of logistics logistics cost
concept calculation
WL 1
Approval
Plant Manager of offer‘s
basics
Function
CON 1
Economic Efficiency
Investment Controller Calculation (EEC)
created
CON 2.1 CON 2.2
Corporate Investments reserved/ Investment reserved/
Investment Control rejected or reserved Investment rejected
provisionally
PMT 1.1 Launch workshop completed
Project Manager PMT 1.2 Approval project
planning
IND 4.1
FMEA process created
Production Technician IND 5
Flow chart created
Q 1.1
QM-Plan Prototypes compiled
Advanced Quality Planner Q 2.1
Sampling coordination meeting has been held
Plant staffer administrative

Startup Coordinator
* Level of Maturity according VDA Partial result Result

Project management
Production Preparation Pre-Series Series
QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7
B-release Pre serial released Serial production released Project

MS8 Veritas (RG*4) MS9 MS10 MS11 (RG*5) MS12 (RG*6) MS13 MS14 closing
(RG*7)
Customer design freeze done/ First serial off-tool Process- and Production Process Process approval/ SOP Veritas issued EMBP/ PPAP sent SOP Customer/
B-Approval Customer received (RG*3) parts available approval for direct handover closed Customer description: SWFT/PVS/ non saleable/ VS Customer description: 0-Series/ Action date
Customer description: ESWT/VFF/PPV/PVL
saleable/MUP yellow
Material and Sub-part
VER 4.2 VER 5.1 VER 5.2
issued
B release has Customer inventory Customer
been received numbers saved project costs
settled
ENT 1.5 Working drawing released (Status 230) ENT 4.2
ENT 3.2 Measures for Design FMEA completed DVP completed
PEP map for

EIN 3.1 Suppliers EIN 2.2 Suppliers nominated for direct material EIN 2.3 Suppliers for EIN 2.4 EIN 3.3 EIN 2.5 Series readiness of Suppliers of direct material established EIN 3.4
preliminary purchase parts with Project purchase Project purchase Purchasing procedures
EIN 3.2 Suppliers nominated for indirect material EIN 4.3 Project purchase orders raw materials delivered
nominated for provision of material orders direct orders indirect material for indirect material
indirect material EIN 4.2 Suppliers for raw materials commissioned commissioned material delivered delivered EIN 4.4 Series readiness of Suppliers of raw materials completed
established
IND 7
Production handover
has taken place
PRU 2.2
Procured metrology and PRU 3.1 The measurement report is available in the system
testing devices available PRU 3.2 The released measurement report is available in the system
SCM 1.3
Implementation
of logistics con-
cept concluded
WL 2
Investment
Approval
CON 3
Report available
after delivery
to location
PMT 2.1 PMT 2.2 PMT 2.3 PMT 3.1

Release Quality Gate 4 Release Release Release final report
Quality Gate 5 Quality Gate 6 PMT 3.2
Release Quality Gate 7
IND 6.1 IND 6.2 IND 6.3 IND 6.4 Tools, gauges, operating resource are accepted
Performance specifications Design release for Preliminary accept-
or operating resources, ance of indirect IND 4.2 Measures for the FMEA process completed
indirect material
tools, gauges material carried out IND 8 Measurement system is released
Q 3 Coordinate test Q 4.1 Q 4.2 Q 4.3 Direct Material released Q 5.1 Q6 Q 7 Defective Q 5.2 Customer process approval concluded
and gauge concept Advanced quality Advanced quality Q 1.2 QM-Plan Prototypes compiled Internal process CCC- parts analysis
with customer planning direct material planning direct material approval con- Certification concept Q 2.3 Customer approval/
concluded concluded Q 1.3 QM-Plan Series compiled cluded Q 2.2 EMPB sent release is available
SCM 2.1 SCM 2.2
Supplier packaging planning/ Supplier packaging planning/
container management container management
completed completed
Production Short-term process Long-term process
Readiness capability exists capability exists
achieved
SCM 3
Startup coordination
completed
see PEP-Map Semi-finished products
| 31
4 | Preconditions for quality gates in application projects
Fig. 13: "Preconditions for quality gates in application projects"
ge number
inquiry)
ENT 1.1 Component for inquiry defined and in line with status System input: Status of component defined Application Engineer 10
ENT 2 Producibility assessment carried out Document: Producibility assessment Application Engineer 11
EIN 1 Costs and availabilities calculated System input: Costs and availability have been calculated Project Buyer 6
PRU 1 Validation costs/duration entered in the system System input: Validation costs and duration Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 5, 21
SCM 1.2 Preparation of logistics calculation Document: Calculation of logistics costs SCM Project Manager 17
CON 2.1 Investments reserved/rejected or reserved with non-binding effect System input: Investment approved/rejected/reserved with non-binding effect Corporate Investment Controller

CON 2.2 Investments reserved/ rejected with binding effect System input: Investment approved/ rejected Corporate Investment Controller

ge number
PMT 1.1 Kick-off workshop held Document: Minutes of kick-off workshop Project Manager 0
Q 1.1 QM plan for prototypes prepared Document: QM plan for prototypes Quality Pre-Planner 8
Q 2.1 Sampling coordination meeting held Document: Sampling coordination meeting held Quality Pre-Planner 22
ENT 1.2 Customer data / requirement specifications approved System input: Status of customer data approved Application Engineer 2
ENT 1.3 Subject group of all components in line with status in the system System input: Subject group of all components in line with status in the system Application Engineer 10
ENT 3.1 Design FMEA prepared Document:D-FMEA Application Engineer 3
ENT 4.1 Document DVP prepared System input: Status change (mailing for tests) Application Engineer 5
ENT 1.4 Plant drawing free for IND + supplier nomination + sample construction (status Document: Plant drawings status 114 Application Engineer 10
114)
IND 4.1 P-FMEA prepared Document: P-FMEA Production Engineer 13
IND 5 Flowchart produced Document: Flowchart Production Engineer 12
Q3 Test and gage concept agreed with customer System input: Gage concept agreed/ customer informed (change of status) Quality Pre-Planner 7
VER 4.2 Procurement approval of customer is available System input: Customer procurement approval Project Coordinator 1
SCM 2.1 Packaging planning/ container management at supplier completed Document: Packaging datasheet/regulations of supplier Plant Container 17
ENT 1.5 Plant drawings approved (status 230) Document: Approve plant drawings status 230 Application Engineer 10
Document: Parts history 4
ge number
| 33
4 | Precondition for quality gates in application projects
ENT 3.2 Measures for design FMEA completed Document: D-FMEA Application Engineer 3
Q 4.1 Quality pre-planning of direct material completed Document: QVP checklist for direct material Quality Pre-Planner 6
EIN 2.4 Project orders for direct material delivered System input: Deliveries/ incoming goods are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
Q 4.2 Process acceptance for suppliers of direct material completed Document: Process acceptance report Quality Pre-Planner 6
SCM 2.2 Packaging planning/ container management completed Document: Packaging datasheets/ regulations Plant Container 17
Q 1.2 QM plan for pre-series production prepared Document: QM plan for pre-series production Quality Pre-Planner 15
IND 4.2 Measures for process FMEA completed Document: P-FMEA approved Production Engineer 13
PRU 2.2 Measuring and test equipment available System input: Purchased measuring and test equipment available Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 21
Q 1.3 QM plan for series production prepared Document: QM plan for series production Quality Pre-Planner 19
EIN 4.3 Project orders for raw materials delivered System input: Deliveries/ incoming goods are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
EIN 4.4 Series readiness of suppliers of raw materials created System input: Series readiness of suppliers has been created Project Buyer 6
EIN 2.5 Series readiness of suppliers of direct material created System input: Series readiness of suppliers has been created Project Buyer 6
SCM 1.3 Implementation of logistics concept completed Document: Logistics concept SCM Project Manager 17
Approval of QG 5: Pre-series approval

Task Result/partial result Precondition Responsibility APQP
package
number
EIN 3.4 Purchasing of all tools and equipment completed System input: All project orders for tools and equip- Project Buyer 7
ment are completed
ENT 4.2 DVP completed System input: Status change of DVP completed Application Engineer 5
Q6 CCC printing license is available Documents: CCC printing license, CCC certificate Quality Pre-Planner 2
PRU 3.1 Measuring report is available Document: Test report MW Project Coordinator in the 21
Test Laboratory
PRU 3.2 Approved material and function report is available Document: EMPB_LAB Project Coordinator in the 21
Test Laboratory
PEP map for capacity exten-

Q7 Defective part analysis concept agreed Document: Defective part analysis concept Quality Pre-Planner 20 The PEP map for capacity
sion projects
Q 2.2
Q 5.2
EMPB sent
Customer process acceptance completed
Document: EMPB
Document: Customer-specific acceptance report
Quality Pre-Planner
Quality Pre-Planner
22
18
extension projects
Q 2.3 Customer approval received Document: Customer approval Quality Pre-Planner 23
Capacity extension projects may be initiated both
by the customer and Production. Customer capa-
city extension projects are included in the form of
VER 5.2 Customer project costs calculated System input: Status of tool costs or development Project Coordinator 1
and cancellation costs calculated capacity extension inquiries. Internally, capacity in-
CON 3 Report after handover to plant is available Document: Target-actual comparison Participation Controller 0 creases can be included via the workflow "Capacity
PMT 3.1 Final report approved Document: Final report Project Manager 0 bottlenecks", see Work Instruction EDV6_AA_1551
PMT 3.2 QG 7 approved System input: Approve QG 7 Project Manager 0 in this respect. A capacity extension project exists
Approval of QG 7: Completion of project if the same production process is used at the same
production plant, but additional operating resources
and/or tools are required.
The following PEP map shows the process sequence

and the participating function holders.
| 35
5 | PEP map forfür
PEP-Landkarte capacity extension projects
Kapazitätserweiterungsprojekte
Fig. 14: "PEP map for capacity extension projects"
Projektphasen Anfrage Angebot Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung
Projekt Quality Gates QG1 QG2 QG3
Anfrage- Angebots- Projektfreigabe

Projekt Meilensteine MS1 freigabe MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 Freigabe MS6 (RG2*) MS7
Projekt Technische Start Herstellkosten WIRE Abschlussgespräch Angebot Startworkshop

Teil-/Ergebnis startet Definition erfolgt ermitteln abgeschlossen durchgeführt abgegeben durchgeführt
Anfrage Anfrage- Anfrage- Lifetime Abschluss- Angebot Optimiertes Kunden- Projekt an
Projektkoordinator im System entscheidung bearbeitung liegt vor gespräch abge- Angebot entscheidung Projektmanager
eingestellt abgeschlossen starten stattgefunden geben abgegeben liegt vor übergeben
EIN 1 EIN 2.1 Lieferanten vorläufig

Kosten und nominiert für Direktes Material
Projekteinkäufer Verfügbarkeiten EIN 4.1 Lieferanten vorläufig
ermittelt nominiert für Rohstoffe
IND 1 IND 2 Kosten u. Liefertermine für
Arbeitssystem- Werkzeuge und Investitionen geplant
IND 3
abgeschlossen Herstellkosten ermittelt
PRU 2.1
Projektkoordinator Kapazitätsplanung
Prüflabor durchgeführt
SCM 1.1 SCM 1.2

Erstellung Erstellung
SCM Projektmanager Logistik- Logistik-
konzept kalkulation
WL 1
Angebots-
freigegeben
Funtkion
CON 1
Wirtschaftlich-
erstellt
CON 2.1 CON 2.2
Corporate Investitionen reserviert/ Investitionen verbindlich
Investitionscontroller abgelehnt oder unver- reserviert/ abgelehnt
bindlich reserviert
PMT 1.1 Startworkshop stattgefunden
Projektmanager PMT 1.2 Projektplanung
freigegeben
IND 4.1
P-FMEA erstellt
Produktionstechniker IND 5
Flowchart erstellt
Qualitätsvorausplaner Q 2.1
Bemusterungsabstimmungsgespräch stattgefunden
Sachbearbeiter
Administratives
Teammanager Produktion
Anlaufkoordinator

Projektmanagement
Produktionsvorbereitung Vorserie Serie
QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7
Beschaffungs-Freigabe Vorserien-Freigabe Freigabe Serienanlauf Projekt-

MS8 Veritas (RG*4) MS9 MS10 MS11 (RG*5) MS12 (RG*6) MS13 MS14 Abschluss
(RG*7)
Kunden Design Freeze erfolgt/ Erste serienwerkzeugfallende Prozess-/ Produktfreigabe Prozessübernahme Prozessabnahme/ SOP Veritas abgeschlossen EMPB versendet SOP Kunde/
B-Freigabe Kunde erhalten (RG*3) Teile Veritas verfügbar Direktes Material und abgeschlossen Kdbez.: SWFT/ PVS/ non saleable/ VS Kdbez.: 0-Serie/ saleable/ MUP gelb Einsatztermin
Halbzeuge erteilt
VER 5.1 VER 5.2
Inventarnummern Kunden-
hinterlegt projektkosten
abgerechnet
EIN 3.1 Lieferanten EIN 2.2 Lieferanten für Direktes Material beauftragt EIN 2.3 Liefe- EIN 2.4 EIN 3.3 EIN 2.5 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Direktes Material hergestellt EIN 3.4
vorläufig nomi- ranten für Kaufteile Projektbestellungen Projektbestellungen Einkaufsarbeiten
EIN 3.2 Lieferanten für Indirektes Material beauftragt EIN 4.3 Projektbestellungen Rohstoffe beliefert
niert für Indirektes mit Beistellung Direktes Material Indirektes Material Indirektes Material
Material EIN 4.2 Lieferanten für Rohstoffe beauftragt beauftragt beliefert beliefert EIN 4.4 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Rohstoffe hergestellt abgeschlossen
IND 7
stattgefunden
PEP map for capacity exten-

PRU 3.1 Messbericht liegt vor
PRU 3.2 Freigegebener Werkstoff- und Funktionsbericht liegt vor
sion projects
WL 2
Investitions-
kostenstelle
freigegeben
CON 3
Report nach
Übergabe an
Standort iegt vor
PMT 2.1 PMT 2.2 PMT 2.3 PMT 3.1 Abschluss-

QG4 freigegeben QG5 freigegeben QG 6 freigegeben bericht freigegeben
PMT 3.2
QG7 freigegeben
IND 6.1 IND 6.2 IND 6.3 IND 6.4 Werkzeuge, Lehren, Betriebsmittel abgenommen
Lastenhefte Betriebs- Konstruktionsfreigabe Vorabnahme
mittel, Werkzeuge, Indirektes Material Indirektes Material
Lehren erstellt durchgeführt IND 8 Messsystem freigegeben
Q 4.1 Q 4.2 Q 4.3 Direktes Material freigegeben Q 5.1 Q 5.2 Kundenprozessabnahme abgeschlossen
Qualitätsvoraus- Prozessabnahme Interne Prozess-
planung Direktes Lieferant Direktes abnahme
Material abgeschlossen Material abgeschlossen abgeschlossen Q 2.2 EMPB versendet Q 2.3 Kundenfreigabe liegt vor
SCM 2.2
Verpackungsplanung/
Behältermanagement
abgeschlossen
Produktions- Prozessfähigkeit Prozessfähigkeit
hergestellt
SCM 3
Anlaufkoordination
abgeschlossen
siehe PEP-Landkarte Halbzeuge
| 37
5 | Preconditions for quality gates in capacity extension projects
Fig. 15: "Preconditions for quality gates in capacity extension projects"
ge number
inquiry)
EIN 1 Costs and availabilities calculated System input: Costs and availabilities have been calculated Project Buyer 6
SCM 1.2 Preparation of logistics calculation Document: Calculation of logistics costs SCM Project Manager 17
CON 2.1 Investments reserved/ rejected or reserved with non-binding effect System input: Investment approved/ rejected/ reserved with non-binding effect Corporate Investment Controller

CON 2.2 Investments reserved/ rejected with binding effect System input: Investment reserved/ rejected Corporate Investment Controller
PMT 1.1 Kick-off workshop held Document: Minutes of kick-off workshop Project Manager 0
Q 2.1 Sampling coordination meeting held Document: Sampling coordination meeting Quality Pre-Planner 22
ge number

EIN 2.4 Project orders for direct material delivered System input: Deliveries/incoming goods are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
Q 4.2 Process acceptance for suppliers of direct material completed Documents: Process acceptance report Quality Pre-Planner 6
SCM 2.2 Packaging planning/ container management completed Document: Packaging datasheets/ regulations Plant Container 17
EIN 4.3 Project orders for raw materials delivered System input: Deliveries/incoming goods are booked in the system Project Buyer 6
EIN 4.4 Series readiness of suppliers of raw materials created System input: Series readiness of suppliers has been created Project Buyer 6
EIN 2.5 Series readiness of suppliers of direct material created System input: Series readiness of suppliers has been created Project Buyer 6
Approval of QG 5: Approval of pre-series

ge number
| 39
5 | Preconditions for quality gates in capacity extension projects
EIN 3.4 Purchasing of all tools and equipment completed System input: All project orders for tools and equipment are completed Project Buyer 7
PRU 3.1 Measuring report is available Document: Test report MW Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 21
PRU 3.2 Approved material and function report is available Document: EMPB_LAB Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 21
Q 2.2 EMPB sent Docent: EMPB Quality Pre-Planner 22
Q 5.2 Customer process acceptance completed Document: Customer-specific acceptance report Quality Pre-Planner 18
Q 2.3 Customer approval available Document: Customer approval Quality Pre-Planner 23
VER 5.2 Customer project costs calculated System input: Status of tool costs or development and cancellation costs Project Coordinator 1
calculated
CON 3 Report after handover to plant is available Document: Target-actual comparison Participation Controller 0
PMT 3.1 Final report approved Document: Final report Project Manager 0

6 | PEP map forfür
PEP-Landkarte global sourcing projects
Global-Sourcing-Projekte
Fig. 16: "PEP map for global sourcing projects"
Projektphasen Anfrage Angebot
Projekt Quality Gates QG1 QG2
Anfrage- Angebots-
Projekt Meilensteine MS1 freigabe MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 Freigabe MS6
Projekt Technische Start Herstellkosten WIRE Abschlussgespräch Angebot

Teil-/Ergebnis startet Definition erfolgt ermitteln abgeschlossen durchgeführt abgegeben
VER 1.1 VER 1.2 VER 2.1 VER 2.2 VER 2.3 VER 3.1 VER 3.2 VER 3.3
Anfrage Anfrage- Anfrage- Lifetime Abschluss- Angebot Optimiertes Kunden-
Projektkoordinator im System entscheidung bearbeitung liegt vor gespräch abge- Angebot entscheidung
eingestellt abgeschlossen starten stattgefunden geben abgegeben liegt vor
EIN 5
Einkaufsumfänge
Projekteinkäufer geprüft und
optimiert
IND 3
Herstellkosten
Industrial Engineer ermittelt
Projektkoordinator
Prüflabor
SCM Projektmanager
WL 1
Angebotsgrundlage
Werksleitung freigegeben
Funtkion
CON 1
Wirtschaftlich-
erstellt
The PEP map for
global sourcing projects

Corporate
Investitionscontroller
global sourcing projects
PEP map for

Projektmanager
Produktionstechniker A global sourcing project exists if the component

is already in series production at Veritas, but cost
Qualitätsvorausplaner optimizations to retain the order in the company are
Sachbearbeiter
necessary and the design is maintained.
Administratives
The adjacent PEP map shows the process sequence
Teammanager Produktion and the participating function holders.
Anlaufkoordinator
| 41
6 | Preconditions for quality gates in global sourcing projects
Fig. 17:"Precondition for quality gates in global sourcing projects"
ge number
inquiry)
Approval of QG 1: Approval of pre-series
EIN 5 Purchasing volumes checked and optimized System input: Purchasing volumes checked and optimized Project Buyer 6
VER 2.2 Lifetime is available Document: Lifetime Project Coordinator
Approval of QG 2: Approval of offer


7 | PEP map for semi-finished products
PEP-Landkarte für Halbzeuge
Fig. 18: "PEP
PEP-Landkarte
PEP-Landkarte map for semi-finished products"
für Kapazitätserweiterungsprojekte
für Kapazitätserweiterungsprojekte
Verantwortung Vertrieb Projektmanagement
Verantwortung Vertrieb Projektmanagement
The PEP map

Projektphasen Anfrage Angebot Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung Produktionsvorbereitung Vorserie Serie
Projektphasen Anfrage Angebot Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung Produktionsvorbereitung Vorserie Serie
Projekt Quality Gates QG1 QG2 QG3 QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7
Projekt Quality Gates QG1 QG2 QG3 QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7
Anfrage- Angebots- Projektfreigabe Beschaffungs-Freigabe Vorserien-Freigabe Freigabe Serienanlauf Projekt-
Projekt Meilensteine MS1 freigabe
Anfrage- MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 Freigabe
Angebots- MS6 (RG2*)
Projektfreigabe MS7 MS8 Veritas (RG*4)
Beschaffungs-Freigabe MS9 MS10 MS11 (RG*5)
Vorserien-Freigabe MS12 (RG*6) Serienanlauf
Freigabe MS13 MS14 Abschluss
Projekt-
Projekt Meilensteine MS1 freigabe MS2 MS3 MS4 MS5 Freigabe MS6 (RG2*) MS7 MS8 Veritas (RG*4) MS9 MS10 MS11 (RG*5) MS12 (RG*6) MS13 MS14 (RG*7)
Abschluss
Projekt Technische Start Herstellkosten WIRE Abschlussgespräch Angebot Startworkshop Kunden Design Freeze erfolgt/ Erste serienwerkzeugfallende Prozess-/ Produktfreigabe Prozessübernahme Prozessabnahme/ SOP Veritas abgeschlossen EMPB versendet SOP Kunde/ (RG*7)
Teil-/Ergebnis startet
Projekt Definition erfolgt
Technische ermitteln
Start Herstellkosten abgeschlossen
WIRE durchgeführt
Abschlussgespräch abgegeben
Angebot durchgeführt
Startworkshop B-Freigabe
Kunden Kunde
Design erhalten
Freeze erfolgt/
(RG*3)
Teile serienwerkzeugfallende
Erste Veritas verfügbar Direktes Material
Prozess-/ und
Produktfreigabe abgeschlossen
Prozessübernahme Kdbez.: SWFT/ PVS/ non
Prozessabnahme/ SOPsaleable/
VeritasVSabgeschlossen Kdbez.:versendet
EMPB 0-Serie/ saleable/ MUP gelb SOP
Einsatztermin
Kunde/
Teil-/Ergebnis startet Definition erfolgt ermitteln abgeschlossen durchgeführt abgegeben durchgeführt B-Freigabe Kunde erhalten (RG*3)
Teile Veritas verfügbar Halbzeuge
Direktes erteiltund
Material abgeschlossen Kdbez.: SWFT/ PVS/ non saleable/ VS Kdbez.: 0-Serie/ saleable/ MUP gelb Einsatztermin
VER 1.1 VER 1.2 VER 2.1 VER 2.2 VER 2.3 VER 3.1 VER 3.2 VER 3.3 VER 4.1 VER 5.1
Kdbez.: ESWFT/ VFF/ PPV/ PVL VER 5.2
for semi-finished products

Anfrage Anfrage- Anfrage- Lifetime Abschluss- Angebot Optimiertes Kunden- Projekt Halbzeuge erteilt
VER 1.1 VER 1.2 VER 2.1 VER 2.2 VER 2.3 VER 3.1 VER 3.2 VER 3.3 VER 4.1 an Inventarnummern
VER 5.1 Kunden-
VER 5.2
Projektkoordinator im System
Anfrage entscheidung
Anfrage- bearbeitung
Anfrage- liegt vor
Lifetime gespräch
Abschluss- abge-
Angebot Angebot
Optimiertes entscheidung Projekt
Kunden- Projektmanager
an hinterlegt projektkosten
Kunden-
Inventarnummern
Projektkoordinator eingestellt
im System abgeschlossen
entscheidung starten
bearbeitung liegt vor stattgefunden
gespräch geben
abge- abgegeben entscheidung
Angebot liegt vor übergeben
Projektmanager hinterlegt abgerechnet
projektkosten
eingestellt abgeschlossen starten stattgefunden geben abgegeben liegt vor übergeben abgerechnet
EIN 1 EIN 2.1 Lieferanten vorläufig EIN 3.1 Lieferanten EIN 2.2 Lieferanten für Direktes Material beauftragt EIN 2.3 Liefe- EIN 2.4 EIN 3.3 EIN 2.5 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Direktes Material hergestellt EIN 3.4
Kosten
EIN 1 und nominiert
EIN für Direktes
2.1 Lieferanten Material
vorläufig vorläufi
EIN g nomi-
3.1 Lieferanten EINLieferanten
2.2 Lieferanten für DirektesMaterial
Materialbeauftragt
beauftragt ranten
EIN für Kaufteile
2.3 Liefe- Projektbestellungen
EIN 2.4 Projektbestellungen
EIN 3.3 EIN 2.5 Serienbereitschaft Einkaufsarbeiten
EIN 3.4
Projekteinkäufer niert für Indirektes
EIN 3.2 für Indirektes EIN 4.3 Projektbestellungen Rohstoffeder Lieferanten Direktes Material hergestellt
beliefert
Verfügbarkeiten
Kosten und nominiert für Direktesvorläufi
EIN 4.1 Lieferanten Materialg vorläufig nomi- mit Beistellung
ranten für Kaufteile Direktes Material
Projektbestellungen Indirektes Material
Projektbestellungen Indirektes Material
Einkaufsarbeiten
Projekteinkäufer ermittelt
Verfügbarkeiten nominiert
EIN für Rohstoffe
4.1 Lieferanten vorläufig Material
niert für Indirektes
EIN
EIN3.2
4.2Lieferanten
LieferantenfürfürIndirektes
RohstoffeMaterial beauftragt
beauftragt mitbeauftragt
Beistellung beliefertMaterial
Direktes beliefert Material
Indirektes
EIN 4.3 Projektbestellungen Rohstoffe beliefert
EIN 4.4 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Rohstoffe hergestellt abgeschlossen
Indirektes Material
IND 1 ermittelt
IND 2 Kosten u. Liefertermine für nominiert für Rohstoffe Material EIN 4.2 Lieferanten für Rohstoffe beauftragt beauftragt beliefert beliefert IND 7 EIN 4.4 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Rohstoffe hergestellt abgeschlossen
Arbeitssystem-
IND 1 Werkzeuge
IND 2 Kostenund Investitionen geplant
u. Liefertermine für Produktionsübergabe
IND 7
Arbeitssystem- Werkzeuge stattgefunden
Industrial Engineer INDund
3 Investitionen geplant Produktionsübergabe
abgeschlossen
gestaltung Herstellkosten ermittelt stattgefunden
IND 3
abgeschlossen Herstellkosten ermittelt PRU 2.1
Projektkoordinator Kapazitätsplanung
PRU 2.1
PRU 3.1 Messbericht liegt vor
Projektkoordinator
Prüflabor durchgeführt
Kapazitätsplanung PRU 3.1 Messbericht liegt vor
PRU 3.2 Freigegebener Werkstoff- und Funktionsbericht liegt vor
durchgeführt
Semi-finished products must already be in series

Prüflabor PRU 3.2 Freigegebener Werkstoff- und Funktionsbericht liegt vor
SCM 1.1 SCM 1.2
Erstellung
SCM 1.1 Erstellung
SCM 1.2
SCM Projektmanager Logistik-
Erstellung Logistik-
Erstellung
SCM Projektmanager konzept
Logistik- kalkulation
Logistik-
konzept kalkulation WL 1 WL 2
WLAngebots-
1 WLInvestitions-
2
Angebots- kostenstelle
Investitions-
Werksleitung freigegeben
grundlage freigegeben
kostenstelle
production at milestone 10 "Process and product ap-

Funtkion
CON 1 freigegeben freigegeben CON 3

Funtkion
Wirtschaftlich-
CON 1 Report
CON 3 nach
Wirtschaftlich- Übergabe
Report nachan
Beteiligungscontroller erstellt
keitsrechnung Standort an
Übergabe iegt vor
erstellt CON 2.1 CON 2.2 Standort iegt vor
Corporate Investitionen
CON 2.1 reserviert/ Investitionen
CON 2.2 verbindlich
Corporate
Investitionscontroller abgelehnt oder
Investitionen unver-
reserviert/ reserviert/ abgelehnt
Investitionen verbindlich
Investitionscontroller bindlich reserviert
abgelehnt oder unver- reserviert/ abgelehnt
proval granted for direct material and semi-finished

bindlich reserviert PMT 1.1 Startworkshop stattgefunden PMT 2.1 PMT 2.2 PMT 2.3 PMT 3.1 Abschluss-
PMT 1.1 Startworkshop stattgefunden QG42.1
PMT freigegeben QG52.2
PMT freigegeben QG 62.3
PMT freigegeben bericht
PMT 3.1 freigegeben
Abschluss-
Projektmanager PMT 1.2 Projektplanung QG4 freigegeben QG5 freigegeben QG 6 freigegeben bericht freigegeben
PMT 3.2
Projektmanager freigegeben
PMT 1.2 Projektplanung QG7 3.2
PMT freigegeben
freigegeben IND 4.1 IND 6.1 IND 6.2 IND 6.3 QG7 freigegeben
IND 6.4 Werkzeuge, Lehren, Betriebsmittel abgenommen
P-FMEA
IND 4.1 erstellt Lastenhefte
IND 6.1 Betriebs- Konstruktionsfreigabe
IND 6.2 Vorabnahme
IND 6.3
Produktionstechniker P-FMEA
IND 5 erstellt mittel, Werkzeuge,
Lastenhefte Betriebs- Indirektes Material
Konstruktionsfreigabe Indirektes Material
Vorabnahme
IND 6.4 Werkzeuge, Lehren, Betriebsmittel abgenommen
Produktionstechniker Flowchart
IND 5 erstellt LehrenWerkzeuge,
mittel, erstellt Indirektes Material durchgeführt
Indirektes Material IND 8 Messsystem freigegeben
products". The processes required for this purpose

Flowchart erstellt Lehren erstellt Q 4.1 Q durchgeführt
4.2 IND 8 Messsystem freigegeben
Q 4.3 Direktes Material freigegeben Q 5.1 Q 5.2 Kundenprozessabnahme abgeschlossen
QQualitätsvoraus-
4.1 QProzessabnahme
4.2 Q 4.3 Direktes Material freigegeben QInterne
5.1 Prozess- Q 5.2 Kundenprozessabnahme abgeschlossen
Qualitätsvorausplaner Q 2.1 planung Direktes
Qualitätsvoraus- Lieferant Direktes
Prozessabnahme abnahme
Interne Prozess-
Qualitätsvorausplaner QBemusterungsabstimmungsgespräch
2.1 stattgefunden MaterialDirektes
planung abgeschlossen Material Direktes
Lieferant abgeschlossen abgeschlossen
abnahme Q 2.2 EMPB versendet Q 2.3 Kundenfreigabe liegt vor
Bemusterungsabstimmungsgespräch stattgefunden Material abgeschlossen Material abgeschlossen abgeschlossen Q 2.2 EMPB versendet Q 2.3 Kundenfreigabe liegt vor
Sachbearbeiter SCM 2.2
Sachbearbeiter Verpackungsplanung/
SCM 2.2
Administratives Behältermanagement
Verpackungsplanung/
Administratives
Behältermanagement Werk abgeschlossen
Behältermanagement
are depicted in a separate PEP map.

abgeschlossen PRO 1 PRO 2.1 PRO 2.2
Produktions-
PRO 1 Prozessfähigkeit
PRO 2.1 Prozessfähigkeit
PRO 2.2
Teammanager Produktion bereitschaft
Produktions- Kurzzeit liegt vor Langzeit liegt vor
Prozessfähigkeit Prozessfähigkeit
Teammanager Produktion hergestellt
hergestellt SCM 3
Anlaufkoordination
SCM 3
Anlaufkoordinator abgeschlossen
Anlaufkoordination
Anlaufkoordinator abgeschlossen
*RG = Reifegrad gem. VDA Kdbez. = Kundenbezeichnung Teilergebnis Ergebnis siehe PEP-Landkarte Halbzeuge
*RG = Reifegrad gem. VDA Kdbez. = Kundenbezeichnung Teilergebnis Ergebnis siehe PEP-Landkarte Halbzeuge
Verantwortung Projektmanagement
Projektphasen Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung Produktionsvorbereitung
Projekt Quality Gates QG4 QG5
Beschaffungs-Freigabe Erste serienwerkzeugfallende Vorserien-Freigabe

Projekt Meilensteine MS7 Startworkshop MS8 Veritas (RG*4) MS9 Teile Veritas verfügbar MS10 (RG*5)
durchgeführt Kdbez.: ESWFT/ VFF/PPV/ PVL
Kunden Design Freeze erfolgt/ Prozess-/ Produktfreigabe

MS MS MS MS MS MS MS Direktes Material und
Projekt Meilensteine Halbzeuge HZ 7 HZ 8 B-Freigabe Kunde erhalten (RG*3)
HZ 9 HZ 10 HZ 11 HZ 12 HZ 13
Halbzeuge erteilt
Startworkshop Kunden Design Freeze erfolgt/ Erste serienwerkzeugfallende Prozess-/ Produktfreigabe Prozessübernahme Prozessabnahme/ SOP Veritas abge- EMPB versendet
durchgeführt B-Freigabe Kunde erhalten (RG*3) Teile Veritas verfügbar abgeschlossen Kdbez.: 0-Serie/ saleable/ MUP gelb
Teil-/Ergebnis Kdbez.: ESWFT/ VFF/ PPV/ PVL
Direktes Material und Halbzeuge schlossen Kdbez.: SWFT/ PVS/ non saleable/ VS
erteilt
ENT 1.4 Werkszeichnung ENT 1.5
frei für IND + Lieferanten- Werkszeichnungen
Application Engineer nominierung + Musterbau freigegeben
(Status 114) (Status 230)
EIN 2.4 EIN 3.3 EIN 2.5 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Direktes Material hergestellt
Projektbestellungen Projektbestellungen
Projekteinkäufer Direktes Material Indirektes Material
EIN 4.3 Projektbestellungen Rohstoffe beliefert
beliefert beliefert EIN 4.4 Serienbereitschaft der Lieferanten Rohstoffe hergestellt
IND 7
Industrial Engineer stattgefunden
Funtkion
IND 4.1 IND 6.1 IND 6.2 IND 6.3 IND 6.4 Werkzeuge, Lehren, Betriebsmittel abgenommen
P-FMEA erstellt Lastenhefte Betriebs- Konstruktionsfreigabe Vorabnahme
Produktionstechniker IND 5 mittel, Werkzeuge, Indirektes Material Indirektes Material
IND 4.2 Maßnahmen zur Prozess-FMEA abgeschlossen
for semi-finished products

Flowchart erstellt Lehren erstellt durchgeführt IND 8 Messsystem freigegeben
Q 4.3 Direktes Material freigegeben Q 5.1 Q 2.2 EMPB versendet
Interne Prozess- (nur bei Fertigungsstandortwechsel)
Qualitätsvorausplaner Q 1.2 QM-Plan Vorserie erstellt
abnahme
Q 1.3 QM-Plan Serie erstellt
PEP map
abgeschlossen
Sachbearbeiter SCM 2.2
Verpackungsplanung/
Administratives Behältermanagement
Behältermanagement Werk abgeschlossen
Produktions- Prozessfähigkeit Prozess-
Teammanager Produktion bereitschaft Kurzzeit liegt vor fähigkeit
hergestellt Langzeit
liegt vor
| 43
8 | Change management
Changes may be made to both the Fig. 19: "Process description of change management“
product and the process. A change
occurs if either the design or the pro-
Change request external or internal need to send to project coordinator
duction method or the production Responsible: Change Initiator
plant changes during an existing se-
ries order. A change may be instigated VER 1.1 Adjust of the change request
Responsible: Project Coordinator
externally by the customer, by a sup-
plier or internally. The Project Control-
Change request
meeting
Change request meeting
ler is responsible for entering a change
QG1 What will change? Who will be affected? How we will go ahead?
both externally and internally. The fol- Responsible: Project Coordinator / Collaboration: Application Engineer, Startup coordinator,
Industrial Engineer, Project Manager, Advanced Quality Planner / Optional: Project buyer
lowing figure describes the process.
With effect from the planned date of yes Price the change request no
across-the-board?*
milestone 8 "Customer design freeze
carried out/ procurement approval
ENT 2 Manufacturability assessment Flow according specified
from customer received", but at the Responsible: Application Engineer Task Packages
Participant: Application Engineer, Industrial Engineer, Responsible Request phase: Project Coordinator
latest 3 months before SOP, no further Project Manager, Advanced Quality Planner / no Responsible Order phase: Project Manager
changes may be made to the product Optional: Project buyer Collaboration: Application Engineer, Industrial Engineer,
Project Manager, Advanced Quality Planner
or process. These changes must be Optional: Project buyer
Manufacturability assessment green?
entered, planned and implemented
yes
after SOP.
ENT 1.1 Component for RFQ defined and with proper status
Responsible: Application Engineer
VER 2.2 Lifetime is available

Flow according specified Task
WL 1 Quote base approved Packages including IND1, 2, 3
Responsible: Plant Manager QG2
Responsible: Project Manager
Collaboration: Application Engineer, Industrial Engineer,
Project Coordinator, Advanced Quality Planner
VER 3 Quote was send and Customer decision has been received Optional: Project buyer
VER 4.1 Submit project to Project Manager

Responsible: Project Coordinator QG3
* just for application “change catalog”

9 | Committees and escalations
9.1 Inquiry Committee The fixed dates for the milestones are monitored by In the event of problems or differences which endanger
means of a traffic light system: the customer offer date, the Project Coordinator is able
In future all inquiries corresponding to Veritas' product-
Green: In the inquiry cycle means the completed milestones- to escalate within three stages and request the required
market strategy will be submitted to the Inquiry Commit-
are reached on time. countermeasures. The following figure show the three-
tee by the Project Coordinator prior to the processing
Yellow: At least one completed milestone was not reached on stage escalation scenario.
cycle. The Committee meets daily and comprises man- time. The inquiry item can reach the status green again
agers from Sales, Development, Purchasing, Industriali- in the further course if a following milestone is com-
pleted on time.
zation and the respective works representatives..
Red: The milestone "Customer offer by" has been exceeded.
This Committee makes a final decision on

whether the customer inquiry is or is not pro-
cessed internally. The objective of this proce- Step 1 Actions:
» Automatic message, through the system, to the causing function and the Project
dure is merely to integrate the customer in- A milestone has been exceeded Coordinator.
» Causing function announces actions and completion date up to 12:00 a.m. on the
quiries internally that appear expedient to the following day to the Project Coordinator
» Project Coordinator checks, whether milestone “Offer done” is at risk. If yes,
company. Escalation additional actions must be done to meet the milestone.
Step 2 Actions:
Deescalation
9.2 Escalation management Step 1 not effective or a second
» Project Coordinator informes the causative function and their superiors and their
own superiors about step 2.
from the inquiry to milestone has been exceeded » Causing functions announce actions and completion date up to 12:00 a.m. on the
following day to the Project Coordinator and the superiors.
customer commissioning » Project Coordinator checks, whether milestone “Offer done” is at risk. If yes,
additional actions must be done to meet the milestone.
During the inquiry meeting, see task package

VER 2, the following milestones for inquiry Step 3 Actions:
» Project Coordinator informes the causative function and their superiors and their
Step 2 not effective or milestone own superiors and the Section Manager/Division Manager about step 3.
items are scheduled. » The superioer announces actions and completion date up to 12:00 a.m.. on the
“Offer done” has been exceeded
following day to the Project Coordinator and all other superiors.
» MS2: Technical definition carried out
» MS3: Start of calculation of manufacturing
costs
Reasons for Escalation:
» MS4: Profitability calculation completed
Deadline of milestones MS2 Technical defintion is done, MS3 Start manufacturing costs determine, MS4 Economic
» MS5: Optional: Final meeting held Efficiency Calculation done, MS5 Final conversation done, MS6 Offer done
» MS6: Offer submitted
Reasons for Downgrading:
Implemented actions on time; the next milestone will be fulfilled on time
| 45
9 | Committees and escalations
9.3 Steering Committee

The Steering Committee is an important committee from The task of the Steering Committee is to monitor the quality gates 3 to 6 open automatically in the system
customer commissioning onwards. The task, the partici- status of innovation projects and support and prioritize if the preconditions are fulfilled, i.e. all stipulated par-
pants and the contents are shown and explained in the them in the event of escalations at stage 3 by means tial results and results have been achieved. If this is not
following figure "Steering Committee". of the escalation report. As described in Chapter 1.1, the case and there are different reasons for approval of
the quality gate, the Project Manger submits the project
status including the outstanding scheduled measures to
Fig. 21:"Steering Committee"
the Steering Committee for approval of the quality gate.
Project Steering Committee

Date monthly meeting
Participants Manager of Purchasing, Research & Development, Quality Management, Supply Chain
Management, Sales, Production Management, Project Management, Testing Laboratory,
Plant Manager, Board of Management; Escalation: increase to cause function
Innovation Projects Application Projects Global-Sourcing-Projects

Content
Status Report
Quality Gate
Approval by
deviation
Escalation Report
Main tools
Status Report Gate Approval Escalation Report
Task » Follow project status for Innovation Projects

» Quality Gate Approval, if requirement for automatically Gate Approval not full filled
» Support and prioritization for escalation level 3
Responsible for Timing organization and implementation: Manager Project Management

9.4 Escalation management
from customer commissioning
up to six months after SOP
In the event of problems or differences which endanger escalate within three stages and request the required following figure "Escalation scenario from customer com-
the customer offer date, the Project Manager is able to countermeasures. They are shown and explained in the missioning".
Fig. 22: "Escalation scenario after customer commissioning"
Step 1 Actions:
» Send information to concerned project staff
Escalation reason causes problems » Agreed actions with appointments and timeline
during project process » Documentation in project status report/actions
Escalation
Deescalation
Step 2 Actions:
» Send information to concerned project staff and their superiors
Escalation reason causes a delay in » Agreed actions with appointments and timeline
customers target dates, deviations in » Documentation in project status report/actions
product quality and/ or project costs/ » There must be a communication towards the client
-revenues
Actions:
Step 3 » Send information to concerned project staff and their superiors
Escalation reasons causes critical » Agreed actions with appointments and timeline
impacts on customers target dates, » Documentation in project status report/actions
» Escalation to steering committee and showing the consequences
product quality and/or Project cost/-
» There must be a communication towards the client
revenues
Reasons for Escalation:

Deadline; Planned completion is not reached, Risk assessment, Quality of results insufficient, deviations in cost and revenue planning
Reasons for Downgrading:

Actions carried-out on schedule; no risks on customer target dates
| 47
10 | Key Performance Indicator (KPI) 11 | Internal project audits
A Key Performance Indicator is a value used to measure Fig. 23: "Magic triangle of project goals“
Internal project audits
the progress or the fulfillment level of important objec-
Performance
tives or critical success factors. Internal project audits are carried out four times a year
by the internal auditor. The objective of internal project
10.1 KPIs from the inquiry audits is to ensure process quality in PEP. The project
up to customer commissioning team is informed about the audits in advance. They are
carried out based on the PEP process description. In
During the inquiry/offer phase the ongoing and com- the event of deviations, measures are formulated with
pleted inquiry items are monitored by means of the the superior of the affected function holder, are sched-
defined milestones, see Chapter 9.2. The objectives of uled and are implemented by the auditor. Internal pro-
Costs Date ject audits ensure that the stipulated processes and the
this monitoring are to measure the level of adherence to
deadlines and show the deviations in order to instigate, required quality are permanently implemented.
if necessary, measures to improve performance. Mem-
bers of the Board of Management, the affected Heads This also normally ensures that the customer is satisfied.
of Division and Departmental Heads are informed about
monitoring of the defined milestones. If improvement The success of the project can only be evaluated if the
measures are necessary, they are initiated by the Head KPIs are clearly defined in advance and were planned
of the Sales Division by inviting the affected Heads of during the planning phase, see PMT 1.
Division to a coordination meeting.
During the course of the project, the project status re-
port provides information on the success of the project
10.2 KPIs from customer
and shows whether additional measures have to be initi-
commissioning up to ated in order to guarantee project success. The follow-
six months after SOP ing KPIs are analyzed in the project status report:
The KPIs after customer commissioning provide infor- » Milestone deadlines

mation on the success of the project. Generally speak- » Project costs and revenues
ing, a project is successful if the deadlines and costs » Number of complaints
are observed and the services are provided » Reject quota

12 | Annex Task package: Descriptions for each function holder
The detailed work package descriptions for each work package now follow according
Task Package: Description
to the sequence in the "functional structural plan". This chosen sequence is based on
the description of the process in the PEP map. Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
Task package number VER 2

Task package designation Inquiry processing
Person responsible for task package
Account Manager
Task Package: Description (Function)
Task package team
Key Account Manager
(Functions)
Global Account Manager

Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
Sales Director
From
Task package designation Inquiry decision Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/ partial
activity number
Person responsible for task package result number
Account Manager
(Function)
1. Component definition VER 2.2.2 ENT 1.1
Task package team
Key Account Manager 2. Costs and delivery times of tools to supplier VER 2.2.2 EIN 1
(Functions)
Global Account Manager 3. Optional: Q offer VER 2.2.2 Q1

Committee 4. Optional: Calculation of logistics costs VER 2.2.2 SCM 1.2
From 5. Costs and delivery times for tools and investment VER 2.2.2 IND 2
Precondition for
activity number 6. Calculation / internal cost breakdown (CBD) VER 2.2.2 IND 3
result number
Optional: Determination of need for and group of
1. Customer inquiry data VER 1.1.1 Customer 7. VER 2.3.1 VER 1.2
participants in final meeting
8. Optional: Approval of offer basis VER 2.3.1 WL 1
Responsible
Partial results and activities Cooperation
person (Functions) Responsible
(Function)
Global Account Key Account person (Functions)
Activity VER 1.1.1 Examine inquiry including preliminary decision analogous to product-market strategy (Function)
Manager Manager
Issue invitation to inquiry meeting (group of participants = Decision-Making
Global Account Key Account Activity VER 2.1.1 Account Manager
Activity VER 1.1.2 Forward inquiry to be entered to Project Coordinator Sales Committee)
Manager Manager
Hold inquiry meeting, clarify open topics, schedule inquiry processing analogous to Inquiry Processing
Activity VER 1.1.3 Record inquiry in the system and generate inquiry number Account Manager Activity VER 2.1.2 Account Manager
minutes and save it in the system Team
Partial result VER 1.1 Inquiry entered in the system I System input: Inquiry generation Activity VER 2.1.3 Enter minutes of inquiry meeting in the system and save the inquiry
Optional:
Account Manager
Key Account Activity VER 2.1.4 Account Manager

Activity VER 1.2.1 Present inquiry during the committee meeting with categorization proposal Account Manager Enter minutes of the final meeting in the system and leave at processing status
Manager
Activity
Decision on inquiry processing Yes/No analogous to product-market strategy,
VER 1.2.2 including system input of final inquiry categorization + input of reasons and committee Committee
Partial result VER 2.1 Start inquiry processing I System input: System cycle for inquiry
members in the system Activity VER 2.2.1 Prepare CBD Account Manager
Activity VER 1.2.3 Determine Inquiry Processing Team Committee Activity VER 2.2.2 Prepare lifetime and enter in the system with the designation "LT" Account Manager
Activity VER 1.2.4 Determine need for final meeting and, if necessary, nominate the meeting participants Committee Result VER 2.2 Lifetime is available I Document: Lifetime
Optional: "No" decision: Formulate and send rejection to customer. Then invalidate
Activity VER 1.2.5 Account Manager Optional:
inquiry in the system
Activity VER 1.2.6 Optional: "Yes" decision: Inform customer about offer preparation Account Manager Activity VER 2.3.1 Organize and hold final meeting according to the stipulations from activity VER 1.2.4 Account Manager
I
System input: Statistical updating of the inquiry (processing Take joint decision regarding further action:
Result VER 1.2 Inquiry decision taken
approved or reject inquiry) 1) Approve offer basis for further processing.
Activity VER 2.3.2 Final Meeting Team
2) Make minor optimizations of the offer basis and approve for further processing.
3) Stop inquiry. Index inquiry and renewed throughput.
Special risks (if required)
Optional
Result
VER 2.3 Final meeting held I System input: Final meeting held
Remarks (if required)
1. Which instance presents a new inquiry to the committee depends on the complexity. Special risks (if required)
| 49

Task package designation Offer submission and monitoring Task package number VER 4
Person responsible for task Task package designation Customer commissioning
Account Manager
package (Function)
Task package team Account Manager
Key Account Manager (Function)
(Functions)
Task package team
Global Key Account Manager
(Functions)
Inquiry Processing Team
From
Precondition for
From Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial
Precondition for activity number
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/ partial result number
activity number
result number
1. Series order VER 4.1.1 Customer
Approved "Economic efficiency calculation_offer
1. VER 3.1.1 WL 1
basis" (WiRe_Angebotsgrundlage) 2. Procurement approval by customer VER 4.2.4 Customer
Investment reserved / investment rejected or
reserved with non-binding effect
2. VER 3.1.1 CON 2.1 Responsible
From investment > €50,000.00 offer approval by
Board of Management person (Functions)
(Function)
Optional:
Investments reserved with binding effect / Activity VER 4.1.1 Check contract components against offer + obtain any corrections from customer Account Manager
3. investments rejected VER 3.1.1 CON 2.2 Activity VER 4.1.2 File contract/series order in the Veritas system Account Manager
From investment > €500,000.00 offer approval by
Supervisory Board Activity VER 4.1.4 Update customer portal (completion of purchasing) Account Manager
Optional: Results of task packages (CON 1, IND 1, Activity VER 4.1.3 Place project application via the system Account Manager
4. IND 2, IND 3, IND 7, ENT 1, ENT 2, EIN 2, EIN 3, VER 3.2.3 Various
LOG 1, PRU 1) Partial result VER 4.1 Project handed over to Project Manager
I Document: Series order
Update data analogous to sales checklist

Responsible 1) Items between receipt of series oder and QG 3 - Procurement approval.
Partial results and activities Cooperation Activity VER 4.2.1 Account Manager
person (Functions) 2) Items between QG 3 "Procurement approval" and QG5 "Approval of series
(Function) production launch"
Activity VER 3.1.1 Final agreement on offer values Account Manager
Activity VER 4.2.2 Optional: Check customer drawing for technical testing and approval Account Manager
Activity VER 3.1.2 Send offer (by B2B platform/e-mail) Account Manager Obtain procurement approval by customer regarding the technically approved drawing
Activity VER 4.2.3 Account Manager
Activity VER 3.1.3 Enter offer documents including CBD in the system Account Manager status
File document "Customer procurement (B) approval" in the system or place a tick in
Partial result VER 3.1 Offer submitted I Document: Offer_series Activity VER 4.2.4
the system if a document is not received
Account Manager
I System input: Customer procurement approval

Procurement approval from customer has been
Activity VER 3.2.1 Offer monitoring Account Manager Result VER 4.2 received
Optional throughput of task packages to optimize offer values (CON 1, IND Inquiry Processing
Activity VER 3.2.2
1, IND 2, IND 3, IND 7, ENT 1, ENT 2, EIN 2, LOG 1, PRU 1) Team
Activity VER 3.2.3 Prepare optimized offer based on revised input variables Account Manager Special risks (if required)
Key Account The series order may represent a " preliminary nomination". In this case further action with the respective Sales Manager must be agreed in
Manager/ Global Key 1.
Activity VER 3.2.4 Finally agree new offer values Account Manager advance. Make a distinction between the status "Customer nomination" and the status "Customer order"
Account Manager /
Planning should be carried out straight after nomination, but depends on procurement of information regarding installation and the internal system
Sales Director 2.
of the planning key. In the case of manual planning this can take place straight after nomination.
Activity VER 3.2.5 Change currently sent offer to invalid Account Manager 3. Official procurement approval from the customer may take place with a time delay. N.B.: Endangerment of SOP?
Activity VER 3.2.6 Send new offer (by B2B platform/e-mail) Account Manager
Activity VER 3.2.7 Enter offer documents including CBD in the system Account Manager Remarks (if required)
Partial result VER 3.2 Optimized offer submitted I Document: Offer_series
Activity VER 3.3.1 Customer decision on offer award including feedback to Veritas Customer
Customer decision "Yes" or "No" and adaptation of status of the system
Activity VER 3.3.2 Account Manager
generated inquiry
Key Account
Manager / Global
Activity VER 3.3.3 Send feedback on customer decision to the superior Account Manager
Key Account
Manager
Send feedback on customer decision to Head of Division and Board of
Activity VER 3.3.4 Key Account Manager
Management
Result VER 3.3 Customer decision received I System input: System updating of inquiry in line with status

During the renegotiations, a new variant of the inquiry must be considered if necessary in order to obtain a new economic efficiency
1.
calculation and approval from the Plant Manager/Board of Management/Supervisory Board
Task Package: Description Task Package: Description
Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016 Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
Task package number VER 5 Task package number ENT 1
Task package designation Invoice of customer project costs Task package designation Component definition
Person responsible for task package Person responsible for the task package
Account Manager Application Engineer
(Function)
(Function)
Task package team
Task package team CAD Designer
Project Buyer (Functions)
(Functions)
Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory
Industrial Engineer
Pre-Developer / VE Simulation
Account Support
Project Coordinator
From
Precondition for Pre-Development Product Developer (VE-PE)
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial
activity number
result number From
Precondition for
1. Customer approval VER 5.1.11 Q 2.3 Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial
activity number
result number
EIN 2.4
2. Photos of supplier's tools VER 5.1.10 1. Inquiry entered in the system ENT 1.1.1 VER 2.1
EIN 3.3
3. Photos of Veritas' tools VER 5.1.9 IND 6.4.4 2. Series order ENT 1.2 VER 4.1
Responsible Responsible
Cooperation Partial results and activities Cooperation
Partial results and activities person person (Functions)
(Functions)
(Function) (Function)
Update "sales data on tool costs" in the Veritas system after receipt of the series Project Coordinator Project Coordinator
Activity VER 5.1.1 Check customer inquiry data (customer inquiry drawing, 3D model, specifications,
order Sales Activity ENT 1.1.1 Application Engineer in the Test
send performance specifications to test circulate)
Laboratory
Activity VER 5.1.2 File customer series tool order in the Veritas system Project Support
Pre-Developer,
Activity VER 5.1.3 Confirm series tool order Project Support If necessary technical agreement with customer (inquiry drawing, 3D model, Project Coordinator
Activity ENT 1.1.2 Application Engineer
specifications, performance specifications) in the Test
Activity VER 5.1.4 Create system "Tooling Master Data" in the Veritas system Project Support Laboratory
Project Coordinator Check whether customer standards and general standards are available and up to
Activity VER 5.1.5 Create and schedule tool order Project Support Activity ENT 1.1.3 Application Engineer Project Coordinator
Sales date; if not, Sourcing through Project Coordinator
Activity VER 5.2.1 Update customer inventory number - customer's own tools in the Veritas system Project Support Create component in the system, create new project if necessary and link customer
Activity ENT 1.1.4 Application Engineer VE-PE
inquiry
Partial result VER 5.1 Customer inventory numbers stored
I System input: Sales data for tools Activity ENT 1.1.5 Create component parts list in the system and transfer in line with status Application Engineer
Mark customer's own tools used by Veritas according to customer's specifications Activity ENT 1.1.6 Drawing derivation from inquiry drawings (if required) CAD Designer Application Engineer
Activity VER 5.2.2 Industrial Engineer
(inventory sign) Project Coordinator
Mark customer's own tools used by supplier according to customer's specifications Activity ENT 1.1.7 Define development costs (duration) and enter in the system Application Engineer in the Test
Activity VER 5.2.3 Project Buyer Laboratory
(inventory sign)
Organize documentation (e.g. photos) of tools, operating resources and gages used Approve customer inquiry data (customer inquiry drawing, 3D model, specifications,
Activity VER 5.2.4 Industrial Engineer Activity ENT 1.1.8 Application Engineer
by Veritas, including inventory numbers, and file in the system performance specifications)
Organize documentation (e.g. photos) of tools, operating resources and gages used Activity ENT 1.1.9 Change inquiry status in the system Application Engineer
Activity VER 5.2.5 Project Buyer
by the supplier, including inventory numbers, and file in the system
I System input: Status "component defined"
Component defined for inquiry and in line with
Partial result ENT 1.1
Activity VER 5.2.6 Invoice customer tool costs according to customer agreement Project Support status
Optional: Project Coordinator Technical verification of customer data (send drawing or 3D data) according to offer
Activity VER 5.2.7 Project Support Activity ENT 1.2.1 status regarding commissioning status, send performance specifications to test Application Engineer
Invoice development costs analogous to customer's specifications Sales
circulate)
Optional: Project Coordinator
Activity VER 5.2.8 Project Support Activity ENT 1.2.2 If necessary, adapt customer data analogous to commission Application Engineer
Invoice cancellation costs analogous to customer's specifications Sales
I costs calculated
System: Status of tool costs or development and cancellation Obtain corrected customer data (drawing, specifications, performance specifications)
Result VER 5.2 Customer project costs invoiced Activity ENT 1.2.3 CAD Designer Project Coordinator
via customer portal and remote data transmission, and then ENT 1.2.1
I System input: Status "Customer data approved"

Customer data (3D model, specifications,
Special risks (if required) Partial result ENT 1.2
drawing)/ approve performance specifications
1. Tool photos including inventory signs must be clearly legible as otherwise the customer will not approve invoice specification. Activity ENT 1.3.1 Optional: With new developments: Check / calculate design with prototypes Application Engineer VE Simulation
Check whether material / structure is free in the system, initiate ENT5 and
Activity ENT 1.3.2 Application Engineer Test Laboratory
requalification if necessary
Check parts list in the system and readapt if necessary, correct customer drawing
N.B.: If the customer's inventory numbers - from the customer's perspective - have not been assigned up to subresult 5.1, the project may not be status and change parts status in the system
1.
stopped. The missing inventory numbers will be requested as quickly as possible.
I System input: Subject group in line with status in the system
Subject group of all components in line with
Partial result ENT 1.3
Inclusion of Sales if the customer's payments are not received by Financial Accounting. In this case Sales provides support by contacting the status in the system
2.
customer's Purchasing Department in order to speed up payment.
| 51
Task package number ENT 2 Task package number ENT 3
Task package designation Producibility assessment Task package designation Design FMEA
Person responsible for the task package Person responsible for the task package
Application Engineer Application Engineer
Task package team Task package team

Industrial Engineer Production Engineer
(Functions) (Functions)
Advanced Quality Planner Advanced Quality Planner
Supply Chain Manager From

Precondition for
Project Coordinator activity number
result number
From Approve customer data (3D model, specifications,
Precondition for 1. ENT 3.1.1 ENT 1.2
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial drawing) / performance specifications
activity number
result number
1. Approve customer inquiry data ENT 2.1 ENT 1.1.10 Responsible
person (Functions)
(Function)
Responsible Advanced Quality
person (Functions) Activity ENT 3.1.1 If family FMEA is not applicable, build and invite FMEA Team Application Engineer Planner, Production
(Function) Engineer
Create form in the system and fill with metadata. Enter development-related Advanced Quality
Activity ENT 2.1 characteristics regarding producibility in the document and place document in Application Engineer Activity ENT 3.1.2 Create FMEA Application Engineer Planner, Production
processing sequence. Engineer
Industrial Engineer Advanced Quality
Evaluation of producibility by individual departments based on available customer Advanced Quality Activity ENT 3.1.3 Define measures if necessary Application Engineer Planner, Production
Activity ENT 2.2 inquiry data (drawing, specifications, performance specifications) and evaluation of Planner Engineer
technical characteristics. Supply Chain- Activity ENT 3.1.4 Archive D-FMEA in the system Application Engineer
Manager
Activity ENT 3.1.5 If necessary, introduce D-FMEA to customer Application Engineer
Producibility assessment "green": Offer can be sent to the customer. The Project
Coordinator implements the last status change.. (Approved without remarks)
Partial result ENT 3.1 Design FMEA created I Document: D-FMEA
Producibility assessment "yellow": Offer can be sent to the customer with technically Advanced Quality
Activity ENT 2.3 described changes which are contained in the offer. (Approved with conditions) Project Coordinator Activity ENT 3.2.1 Carry out FMEA reviews and inform technical departments Application Engineer Planner, Production
Producibility assessment "Red": The Project Coordinator invites the relevant Functions Engineer
to a coordination meeting. Measures are jointly formulated in order to make an offer
Advanced Quality
regarding the inquiry. (Producibility rejected)
Activity ENT 3.2.2 If necessary, carry out measures regarding D-FMEA Application Engineer Planner, Production
Engineer
Only if producibility assessment is red: Application Engineer contacts the customer
Activity ENT 2.4 Application Engineer Advanced Quality
and clarifies necessary technical changes.
Activity ENT 3.2.3 If necessary, check measures regarding D-FMEA Application Engineer Planner, Production
Only if producibility assessment is red : If positive feedback is received from the Engineer
customer regarding the technical changes in the component forming the subject of the Advanced Quality
Activity ENT 2.5 Application Engineer
inquiry, the index of the document "Producibility assessment" is changed and a new Activity ENT 3.2.4 If necessary, adapt evaluation of D-FMEA Application Engineer Planner, Production
test sequence is started.. Engineer
Result ENT 2 Producibility assessment carried out I Document: Producibility assessment Result ENT 3.2 Measures for design FMEA completed I Document: D-FMEA
Special risks (if required) Special risks (if required)
Remarks (if required) Remarks(if required)

Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016 Task package number ENT 5
Task package number ENT 4 Task package designation Verification of material/ structure
Task package designation Qualification of components Person responsible for task package (Function) Head of Pre-Development (VE-FGL)/Pre-Development Product Developer (VE-PE)
Person responsible for the task package
Application Engineer Task package team
(Function) Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory
(Functions)
Task package team
Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory Application Engineer
(Functions)
Test Laboratory Administrator Supplier Administrator

Production Planner Material Developer Administrator
Production Engineer IMDS Manager
Project Manager From
Precondition for
Pre-Developer activity number
result number
From
Precondition for 1. Inquiry entered in the system ENT 1.1.1 VER 1.1
activity number
result number 2. Customer commissioning ENT 2.2 VER 4.2
Customer data (3D model, specifications, drawing) /
1. ENT 4.1.1 ENT 1.2
performance specifications approved Responsible
person (Functions)
Responsible (Function)
person (Functions)
New material/ structure: Check specifications, performance specifications, customer
Activity ENT 5.1.1 VE-PE/ VE-FGL
(Function) drawing in regard to material
Project Coordinator If necessary, technical agreement of customer specifications and performance
Activity ENT 5.1.2 Application Engineer VE-PE/ VE-FGL
Create DVP and, if necessary, agree upon with customer for extensive complex in the Test specifications with customer
projects (including deadline coordination, internal and external check) Laboratory, Pre-
Developer Application Engineer,
Activity ENT 5.1.3 Define new material/ structure VE-PE/ VE-FGL Raw Material
Check whether additional test equipment (internal/external) / jigs are essential; if Project Coordinator in Production
Activity ENT 4.1.2 Planning Manager
necessary, induce construct of test equipment via Production Engineering Design the Test Laboratory Engineer
Activity ENT 4.1.3 Enter DVP in the system Application Engineer Activity ENT 5.1.4 Create structure in the system VE-PE Application Engineer
Partial result ENT 4.1 Document DVP created I System input: Status change (trigger mailing for tests) Activity ENT 5.1.5 Create material in the system Supplier Administrator VE-FGL
Material Developer
Activity ENT 5.1.6 Create mixtures in the system VE-PE/ VE-FGL
Activity ENT 4.2.1 Create internal order for production of test items Production Planner Administrator
Activity ENT 4.2.2 Create and instruct test order in the system Application Engineer Activity ENT 5.1.7 Approve structure in the system for calculation VE-PE Application Engineer
Project Coordinator in Activity ENT 5.1.8 Check plant drawing for application and approve for calculation VE-FGL Application Engineer
Activity ENT 4.2.3 Plan test pieces (if necessary, award externally) the Test Laboratory, Project Coordinator
Pre-Developer Activity ENT 5.1.9 Define development costs and duration, and enter in the system VE-PE/ VE-FGL in the Test
Activity ENT 4.2.4 Produce test pieces and provide them the Application Engineer Production Planner Laboratory
Activity ENT 4.2.5

Deliver test pieces with test order to the Test Laboratory for material testing or
function testing
Application Engineer Partial result ENT 5.1 Material/ structure for inquiry defined I System input: Material/ structure for inquiry free (status 140)
Project Coordinator in If internal approval has not yet been received: Start pre-development process and
Test Laboratory Application Engineer,
Activity ENT 4.2.6 Perform tests, inform Application Engineer immediately in the event of deviations the Test Laboratory, Activity ENT 5.2.1 include and instigate tests in the DVP (material and function tests) . Process is VE-AL
Administrator VE-PE/ VE-FGL
Pre-Developer completed with basic approval by customer.
Project Coordinator in Application Engineer,
Test Laboratory Activity ENT 5.2.2 If necessary, obtain basic customer-specific approval VE-AL
Activity ENT 4.2.7 Conclude testing and documentation of the test results in the system the Test Laboratory,
Administrator VE-PE/ VE-FGL
Pre-Developer
Activity ENT 4.2.8 Evaluate results Application Engineer

Test Laboratory
Administrator Partial result ENT 5.2 Material/ structure determined in line with status I System input: Material/ structure determined (status 190)
Project Coordinator
Activity ENT 5.3.1 Document and prepare results for IMDS application IMDS Manager
in the Test
Activity ENT 4.2.9 If results NOK: analyze causes and define measures Application Engineer
Laboratory, Project Activity ENT 5.3.2 Generate IMDS entry IMDS Manager
Manager
Activity ENT 5.3.3 Report back 'Application approved' in the system (depends on ENT 5.2) VE-PE/ VE-FGL
Activity ENT 4.2.10 If necessary, inform customer about results Application Engineer
Activity ENT 4.2.11 Enter results in the DVP and in the system Application Engineer
Result ENT 5.3 Material/structure approved I System input: Material/structure free
(status 230)
Perform status change of all components in the system
(Status 215 free for initial sampling to the customer)
Result ENT 4.2 DVP completed I System input: Status change "DVP approved"
1. IMDS (International Material Data System; German: Internationales Materialdatensystem)
VE-PE: Responsible for hose/pipe structures
Remarks (if required) VE-FGL: No new materials may be tested or introduced without the inclusion of Heads of Department . Subdivision of FGL into:: | 53
2. • Polymer materials (thermoplastics, thermosets, TPEs, elastomer mixtures)
• Head of Metallic Materials
• Head of Yarns and Textile Reinforcement
Task Package: Description Task package number EIN 2
Task package designation Selection, commissioning and qualification of direct material for series production
Project Buyer
(Function)
Task package team
Purchased Parts Administrator
(Functions)
Task package number EIN 1
Task package designation Determination of costs and analysis
Purchasing archiving employee
Project Buyer
(Function) Supply Chain Manager - Direct Material Planning
Task package team Supply Chain Coordination - Finished Parts Manager
Purchased Parts Administrator
(Functions)
Head of Project Purchasing Department
From
Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial From
activity number Precondition for
result number Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial
activity number
Component definition on account of parts list and result number
1. EIN 1.1 ENT 1.1
preliminary drawing (status 230) 1. Plant drawing (PLM status 114) EIN 2.1.3 ENT 1.4
2. Customer's inquiry data EIN 1.3 VER 1.1 2. Logistics concept EIN 2.1.3 SCM 1.1
3. Logistics concept due to packaging information EIN 1.5 SCM 1.1 3. Approved plant drawing (PLM status 230) EIN 2.2.1 ENT 1.5
Procurement approval by customer and
4. EIN 2.2.1 PMT 2.1
Responsible quantity and type of required parts up to SOP
person (Functions)
5. Packaging datasheets of supplier EIN 2.2.1 SCM 2
(Function)
6. Customer's inventory numbers EIN 2.4.1 VER 5.1
Purchased Parts
Activity EIN 1.1 Risk analysis of market availability by already qualified suppliers or new suppliers Project Buyer
Administrator 7. Veritas' inventory numbers EIN 2.4.1 EIN 2.1
Activity EIN 1.2 Conclude necessary Non-Disclosure Agreements Project Buyer
8. Approved initial sample test reports EIN 2.5.1 Q 4.2
Define procurement strategy and opportunities (make-or-buy, dual sourcing, LCC,…)
Activity EIN 1.3 Project Buyer
per parts list component
Responsible
If possible: Calculate costs and volumes of similar components to validate own cost
Activity EIN 1.4
calculation as a reference
Project Buyer person (Functions)
(Function)
Calculate costs and dates of components (if necessary, including tools and other
Purchased Parts
Activity EIN 1.5 subsequent costs over the lifetime) by means of internal purchasing tools or external Project Buyer Activity EIN 2.1.1 Change new components from "AXAL“ to purchasing subject group "Samples"
Administrator
inquiries with offer analyses
Activity If new supplier:
Activity EIN 1.6 Provide feedback on the result relating to costs and dates in the system Project Buyer
Activity EIN 2.1.2 Handle supplier approval process according to Purchasing Manual Project Buyer
Result EIN 1 Costs and availabilities calculated I System input: Costs and availabilities have been calculated Activity EIN 2.1.3
Agree original inquiry status with supplier and/or new inquiries must be sent, if
necessary, to supplier according to the Bid List
Project Buyer
If necessary, finally agree technical questions regarding inquiry documents with

Activity EIN 2.1.4 Application Engineer
supplier - last opportunity for supplier to update offer
Activity EIN 2.1.5 Confirmation of capacities from suppliers has been received Project Buyer
Activity EIN 2.1.6 Check completeness of offers and use this to make complete offer comparisons Project Buyer
Remarks (if required) Head of Project
Approve contract award proposal based on the offer comparisons produced by the
Activity EIN 2.1.7 Project Buyer Purchasing
1. Documents which also apply to activities: Purchasing Manual Head of the Project Purchasing Department
Department
Re EIN1.1: If necessary, the Project Manager must be informed about the result so that it can be taken into account in the evaluation of the Activity EIN 2.1.8 Send provisional nominations to suppliers (e-mail, phone call, etc.) Project Buyer
2.
project risks
Re EIN1.5: In the case of external inquiries, suppliers must confirm producibility and capacities, the Project Buyer is responsible if internal Enter supplier nomination (offer comparison and decision, if necessary with reasons)
Activity EIN 2.1.9 Project Buyer
3. in the system
purchasing tools are used
Activity If tools are required, and property does not remain with the supplier:
Purchased Parts
Activity EIN 2.1.10 Create tools with inventory numbers in MACOS Project Buyer
Administrator
Activity EIN 2.1.11 Create tool loan contract / in order to update new tools and send to supplier Project Buyer
I System input: Suppliers have been nominated and entered

Suppliers provisionally nominated for direct
Partial result EIN 2.1
material
Request and finally store in the PLM suppliers' timetables based on Veritas' template
and, if necessary, requirement specifications and other documents (for parts not yet in
Activity EIN 2.2.1 series production); place all project-related orders for direct material (if necessary, Project Buyer
prototypes, other samples, ESWFT, EMPB, pre-series contracts, etc.) according to
agreed suppliers' timetables
If including tool
Request suppliers ' timetables based on Veritas ' template and send the orders to
suppliers after circulation of the eBMs produced in MACOS for required tools
Check order confirmations for all orders, clarify deviations, feedback in the system and Purchasing archiving
54 | Veritas PEP Manual Activity EIN 2.2.3
file in Easy Archiv
Project Buyer
employee
Partial result EIN 2.2 Suppliers commissioned for direct material I System input: Order confirmations are booked in the system
Task package number EIN 3 Task package number EIN 4
Task package designation EIN Selection, commissioning and qualification of tools and operating resources Task package designation Selection and commissioning of raw materials
Person responsible for the task package Project Buyer
Project Buyer (Function)
(Function)
Task package team
Task package team Purchasing archiving employee
Production Engineer (Functions)
(Functions)
Supplier Purchasing Administrator
Purchasing archiving employee
Raw Materials Purchasing Manager
From
Precondition for From
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial Precondition for
activity number Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial
result number activity number
result number
1. Performance specifications EIN 3.1.2 IND 6.1 Project planning (due to general data and
1. EIN 4.1.2 PMT 1.2
Plant drawings (PLM status 114), for lightweight 3D quantities)
2. EIN 3.1.2 ENT 1.4
data sets with tolerances, etc. 2. Plant drawings (status 114) EIN 4.1.2 ENT 1.4
Quantity and type of off-tool parts, including delivery Quantity, dates and delivery location of the raw
3. EIN 3.2.4 PMT 2.1 3. EIN 4.2.1 PMT 2.1
materials required up until SOP
location and dates also for interface validation
4. Customer's inventory numbers EIN 3.3.1 VER 5.1 Responsible

person (Functions)
5. Veritas' inventory numbers EIN 3.3.1 IND 6.1 (Function)
If new supplier:
Approved plant drawings (PLM status 230) or for
Activity EIN 4.1.1 Handle supplier approval process according to Purchasing Manual Project Buyer
6. injection molding parts: final 3D data sets containing EIN 3.3.2 ENT 1.5
information on tolerances and other requirements Agree original inquiry status with suppliers and/or new inquiries must be sent, if
necessary, to suppliers according to the Bid List
Acceptance reports with correct status can be seen IND 6.3 and Activity EIN 4.1.3 Confirmation of capacities from suppliers has been received Project Buyer
7. EIN 3.4.1
in the PLM IND 6.4
Activity EIN 4.1.4 Check completeness of offers and use this to make complete offer comparisons Project Buyer
Head of Project
Responsible Approve contract award proposal based on the offer comparisons produced by Head
Cooperation Activity EIN 4.1.5 Project Buyer Purchasing
Partial results and activities of the Project Purchasing Department
person (Functions)
Department
(Function) Activity EIN 4.1.6 Send provisional nominations to suppliers (e-mail, phone call, etc.) Project Buyer
If new supplier:
I
Suppliers provisionally nominated for raw
Partial result EIN 4.1 System input: Suppliers have been nominated and entered
Activity EIN 3.1.1 Handle supplier approval process according to Purchasing Manual Project Buyer materials
Agree original inquiry status with suppliers and/or new inquiries must be sent, if Place all project-related orders of raw materials and, if relevant, obtain timetable on
Activity EIN 3.1.2 Project Buyer Activity EIN 4.2.1 Project Buyer Production Engineer
necessary, to suppliers according to the Bid List Veritas' template
If necessary, finally agree technical questions regarding inquiry documents with Check order confirmations for all orders, clarify deviations, feedback in the system and Purchasing archiving
Activity EIN 3.1.3 Production Engineer Activity EIN 4.2.2 Project Buyer
suppliers - last opportunity for suppliers to update offer file in Easy Archiv employee
Activity EIN 3.1.4 Confirmation of capacities from suppliers has been received Project Buyer Partial result EIN 4.2 Suppliers commissioned for raw materials I System input: Order confirmations are booked in the system
Activity EIN 3.1.5 Check completeness of offers and use this to make complete offer comparisons Project Buyer Monitor raw material orders up to complete fulfillment. Foreseeable changes in the
Head of Project procedure must be reported immediately to the Project Manager
Approve contract award proposal based on the offer comparisons produced by the
Activity EIN 3.1.6 Project Buyer Purchasing
I
Head of the Project Purchasing Department System input: Deliveries/ incoming goods are booked in the
Department Partial result EIN 4.3 Project orders for raw materials delivered
system
Activity EIN 3.1.7 Send provisional nominations to suppliers (e-mail, phone call, etc.) Project Buyer
Activity EIN 4.3.1 Completely fill systems according to Purchasing Manual for series deliveries Project Buyer
Enter supplier nomination (offer comparison and decision, if necessary with reasons) Check order confirmations for all orders, clarify deviations, feedback in the system and
Activity EIN 3.1.8 Project Buyer Supplier Purchasing
in the system Activity EIN 4.3.2 Project Buyer
file in the Easy archive Administrator
I System input: Suppliers have been nominated and entered

Suppliers provisionally nominated for indirect Purchasing archiving
Partial result EIN 3.1 Activity EIN 4.3.3 File all project-related documents and contracts in Easy Archiv Project Buyer
material employee
Obtain and file in the PLM suppliers' time schedules based on Veritas' template and, if Send completed "Planning Handover Sheet" for every new raw material for the Raw Materials
Activity EIN 3.2.1 necessary, requirement specifications and other documents requested from other Project Buyer consumption location to the Raw Materials Purchasing Manager Purchasing Manager
I System input: Series readiness of suppliers has been created

departments Series readiness of raw material suppliers
Result EIN 4.4
Activity EIN 3.2.2 Final agreement with the supplier regarding prices and dates Project Buyer created
Activity EIN 3.2.3 Negotiate final conditions, place orders Project Buyer
Check order confirmations for all orders, clarify deviations, feedback in the system Purchasing archiving Special risks (if required
and file in Easy Archiv employee
If necessary, compare additional agreements (bank guarantees, transfer contract,
Activity EIN 3.2.5 down payment agreement) according to order and, if necessary, carry out invoice Project Buyer Remarks (if required)
approval workflow
1. Documents which also apply to activities: Purchasing Manual
Partial result EIN 3.2 Suppliers commissioned for indirect material I System input: Order confirmations are booked in the system 2. The approval process for new raw materials is described in the pre-development process
3. Re EIN 4.1.2: Plant drawings are required to determine the unit weights and inquire about the correct raw material quantities
4. Re EIN 4.2.1: The required eBMs are circulated by the Production Engineer | 55
Task package number IND 1
Task package designation Work system design

Industrial Engineer
(Function)
Task Package: Description Task package team

(Functions)
From
Precondition for
activity number
result number
1. Component defined in line with status IND 1.1 ENT 1.1
Task package number EIN 5
2. Start inquiry processing IND 1.1 VER 2.1
Task package designation Checks on the whereabouts of the order
Responsible
Person responsible for the task package Partial results and activities Cooperation
Project Buyer person
(Function) (Functions)
(Function)
Task package team Activity IND 1.1 Agree processing with semi-finished products and deadline agreement Industrial Engineer
Supplier Purchasing Administrator
(Functions)
Activity IND 1.2 Examine drawings Industrial Engineer
Purchasing archiving employee Activity IND 1.3 Select suitable production methods Industrial Engineer
From Activity IND 1.4 Process Development must be commissioned for new production methods Industrial Engineer
Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result / partial Activity IND 1.5 Decide whether new P-FMEA is required or can be taken over from comparison parts Industrial Engineer
activity number
result number
Activity IND 1.6 Evaluate possible errors Industrial Engineer
Project planning (due to general data and
1. EIN 5.1 VER 1.1 Activity IND 1.7 Determine suitable test methods Industrial Engineer
quantities)
Activity IND 1.8 File P-FMEA in the document folder "Planning documents" Industrial Engineer
Responsible Activity IND 1.9 Define production sequence Industrial Engineer

person (Functions)
Activity IND 1.10 Produce flow chart, if necessary using a comparison part Industrial Engineer
(Function) File flow chart in the document folder "Planning documents"
Activity IND 1.11 Industrial Engineer
Check the set prices and conditions of all parts list components in series production
Activity EIN 5.1 Project Buyer Activity IND 1.12 Determine structure of tools Industrial Engineer
based on the current general data
Activity IND 1.13 Analyze production times Industrial Engineer
Carry out purposeful renegotiations (e.g. for all parts list components for which the last
Activity EIN 5.2 Project Buyer
negotiations were > 11 months ago) Activity IND 1.14 If necessary, clock production system Industrial Engineer
Supplier Purchasing Activity IND 1.15 Complete MTM analysis Industrial Engineer
Activity EIN 5.3 Enter negotiation results in the system for costing Project Buyer
Administrator File MTM analysis in the document folder "Planning documents"
By e-mail to Project Coordinator: Qualified estimate of market developments in the next
Activity EIN 5.4 Project Buyer Activity IND 1.17 Create production variant in the system Industrial Engineer
3 years (or residual term) relating to parts list components
Activity IND 1.18 Select or create new suitable machine groups at the factory Industrial Engineer
Purchasing archiving
Activity EIN 5.5 File all relevant documents in Easy Archiv Project Buyer
employee Activity IND 1.19 Define batch sizes Industrial Engineer
Result EIN 5 Purchasing volumes checked and optimized I System input: Purchasing volumes checked and optimized Activity
Activity
IND 1.20
IND 1.21
Prepare work plan taking account of (flow chart, MTM analysis, etc.)
File work plan in the document folder "Planning documents"
Industrial Engineer
Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 1.22 Determine space requirements Industrial Engineer
Special risks ((if required) Prepare a production layout
Activity IND 1.24 File production system design (layout) in the document folder "Planning documents" Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 1.25 Consider given means of production at the production plant Industrial Engineer
1. Documents which also apply to activities: Purchasing Manual Activity IND 1.26 Consider available means of production in the group Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 1.27 Consider P-FMEA Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 1.28 Formulate an emergency concept Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 1.29 File risk assessment (emergency plan) in the document folder "Planning documents" Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 1.30 Summarize all data in a folder (including completed checklist) Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 1.31 Enter data (partial results) in the system Industrial Engineer
Check data relating to sales parts and semi-finished products for completeness and
summarize if necessary
Result IND 1 Work system design completed I Document: Document folder
1. Subjective evaluation of P-FMEA
2. Information losses (inter-factory communication to head office)
3. Different losses, discussions at a high technical level
4. Schedule control of semi-finished products through sales part
5. Uniform work based on stipulations, directives, methods and format essential

Task package number IND 2 Task package number IND 3
Task package designation Tool/investment requirements Task package designation Calculation of manufacturing costs
Person responsible for task package Person responsible for task package
Industrial Engineer Industrial Engineer

From From
Precondition for Precondition for
Preconditions (key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/ partial
activity number activity number
result number result number
1. Work system design completed IND 2.2 IND 1 1. Work system design completed IND 3.2 IND 1
2. Costs and availability have been calculated IND 3.2 EIN 1
Responsible
Partial results and activities Cooperation 3. Calculation of test costs entered IND 3.2 PRÜ 1
person (Functions)
(Function) 4. Component defined in line with status IND 3.1 ENT 1.1
Activity IND 2.1 Agree processing with semi-finished products and deadline agreement Industrial Engineer
5. Producibility assessment carried out IND 3.8 ENT 2
Activity IND 2.2 Adopt unit numbers from the inquiry Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 2.3 Adopt data from the work plan (times, rejects, batch size, etc.) Industrial Engineer Responsible
Activity IND 2.4 Prepare capacity requirements list and store in the system for examination Industrial Engineer person (Functions)
(Function)
Activity IND 2.5 Check capacity availability Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 3.1 Agree processing with semi-finished products and deadline agreement Industrial Engineer
Determine tools and machines, including costs, taking account of the emergency
Activity IND 2.6 Industrial Engineer Preparation of calculation parts//projects in the system
concept Activity IND 3.2 Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 2.7 Costs must be obtained from Process Development with new production methods Industrial Engineer Activity IND 3.3 Summarize all input data (purchasing, development, testing) Industrial Engineer
Prepare time schedule taking account of the dependencies with subcomponents Activity IND 3.4 Perform calculation Industrial Engineer
(average empirical values)
Activity IND 3.5 Check plausibility of calculation values (benchmark) Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 2.9 Enter tools and capital goods to be purchased, including costs, in the system Industrial Engineer
Check data relating to sales parts and semi-finished products for completeness and Activity IND 3.6 Generate calculation printout Industrial Engineer
summarize if necessary Activity IND 3.7 Any other variants due to risk analysis (investment, unit number, etc.) Industrial Engineer
I
Costs and delivery dates planned for tools and System input: Technical data/details Check data relating to sales parts and semi-finished products for completeness and
Result IND 2 Activity IND 3.8 Industrial Engineer
investments Document: Capacity calculation summarize if necessary

Result IND 3 Manufacturing costs calculated I Document: Calculation printout
Definition of unit numbers by the Project Coordinator --> No contractual regulation (unit number scenarios) for investments depending on the
1.
launch curve and allocated costs over the lifetime . Only estimates based on the unit numbers entered in the inquiry. Special risks (if required)
Remarks (if required) Remarks (if required)
| 57
Task package number IND 7 Task Package: Description

Task package designation Work preparation
Industrial Engineer Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
(Function)
Task package team Task package number PRU 1
(Functions)
Task package designation Validation costs and duration
Production Engineer
Health and Safety Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory
(Function)
Central Capacity Manager Task package team

Material Testing Test Laboratory Administrator
(Functions)
Project Manager
Measuring Systems Administrator Test Laboratory
From
Precondition for Function Testing Test Laboratory Administrator
activity number
result number Project Coordinator
1. Work system design from inquiry phase IND 7.1 IND 1 From
Precondition for
2. Tools, gages and operating resources accepted IND 7.1 IND 6.4 Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial
activity number
result number
3. Direct material approved IND 7.2 Q 4.2
1. Inquiry entered in the system PRU 1.1 VER 1.1
Responsible 2. Component definition PRU 1.2 ff. ENT 1.1

person (Functions)
Current specification/performance specifications in
3. PRU 1.2 ff. ENT 1.1
(Function) the system
Team Manager
Activity IND 7.1 Link approved individual objects at the series production plant Production Engineer Production, Health
Responsible
and Safety
person (Functions)
Activity IND 7.2 Plan process change in the system Industrial Engineer (Function)
Activity IND 7.3 Check and, if necessary, update planned work system from the inquiry phase Industrial Engineer Estimate test efforts by means of specifications/performance specifications/customer Project Coordinator in Test Laboratory
Activity PRU 1.1
drawings the Test Laboratory Administrator
Team Manager
Prepare provisional implementation analysis and compare with planning analysis
Activity IND 7.4 Industrial Engineer Production, Project Coordinator in Test Laboratory
(target-actual comparison) Activity PRU 1.2 Take over costs and duration of tests from the system
Production Engineer the Test Laboratory Administrator
If necessary, update capacity requirements list from the inquiry phase (planning Project Coordinator in Test Laboratory
Activity IND 7.5 Industrial Engineer Activity PRU 1.3 Enter data in the inquiry mask
status) the Test Laboratory Administrator
I System input: Validation costs and duration

Central Capacity
Activity IND 7.6 Check capacity availability (actual state) Industrial Engineer Result PRU 1 Validation costs/duration entered in the system
Manager
Activity IND 7.7 Compare available capacity with requirements Industrial Engineer
In the event of deviations, measures are defined or escalation takes place according
Activity IND 7.8
to the escalation scenario
Industrial Engineer Project Manager Special risks(if required)
Activity IND 7.9 Adapt and version the changed documents (work plan, layout, etc) and systems Industrial Engineer
Activity IND 7.10 Issue invitation to production handover meeting Industrial Engineer Remarks (if required)
Team Manager
Activity IND 7.11 Hold production handover meeting, check documents and objects Industrial Engineer Production,
Production Engineer
Result IND 7 Production handover has taken place I Document: Handover report
1. Deviations must be shown and measures must be defined in the Project Team

Task Package: Description Task package number PRU 3

Ask package designation Initial sample tests
Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016 (Function)
Task package team
Task package number PRU 2 Head of Test Laboratory Department Measuring Systems
(Functions)
Task package designation Capacity planning and availability Head of Test Laboratory Department Material Testing
Person responsible for task package Head of Test Laboratory Department - Function Testing
(Function)
Task package team Material Testing Test Laboratory Administrator
Head of Test Laboratory Department
(Functions)
Function Testing Test Laboratory Administrator
Test Laboratory Administrator
Measuring Systems Administrator Test Laboratory
Head of Test Laboratory Division
Initial Sample Processor Test Laboratory - Function Testing
From
Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial result Team Manager Production
activity number
number
From
1. Kick-off workshop has taken place PRU 2.1 PMT 1.2 Precondition for
activity number
Customer data / requirement specifications result number
2. PRU 2.1 ENT 1.2
approved
Procurement approval from customer has been 1. Specifications/performance specifications up to date PRU 2.1.5 ENT 1.2
3. PRU 2.2.2 VER 4.2
received
2. Approved customer drawing PRU 2.1.5 ENT 1.2
Responsible 3. Initial sample order PRU 2.2.2 Q 2.2.1
person (Functions)
(Function) 4. Parts from process acceptance PRU 2.2.1 Q 5.1
Head of Test Laboratory
Project Coordinator in Department
5. If necessary, measuring equipment available PRU 2.1.4 PRU 2.2
Activity PRU 2.1.1 Carry out and document capacity planning and scheduling
the Test Laboratory Test Laboratory
6. Define test quantities for initial sample tests PRU 2.2.1 Q 2.2.2
Administrator
Partial result PRU 2.1 Capacity planning carried out I System input: Capacity planning has been carried out
Responsible
Cooperation
Head of Test Laboratory Partial results and activities person (Functions)
Project Coordinator in Department (Function)
Activity PRU 2.2.1 Determine requirements for measuring equipment or test equipment
the Test Laboratory Test Laboratory Material Testing Test
Administrator Laboratory
Head of Test Laboratory Administrator
Activity PRU 3.1.1 Parts received by the Test Laboratory Measuring Systems
Project Coordinator in Department Team Manager
Activity PRU 2.2.2 Issue and circulate eBM for measuring and test equipment
the Test Laboratory Test Laboratory Production
Administrator Application Engineer
Head of Test Laboratory Measuring Systems
Project Coordinator in Division Activity PRU 3.1.2 Create document "Test report MW" in the PLM and change to status 605 Administrator Test
Activity PRU 2.2.3 Accept and put measuring and test equipment into operation
the Test Laboratory Test Laboratory Laboratory
Administrator Measuring Systems
PRU 3.1.3 Change document "Test report MW" in the PLM status 606 and process
I System input: Purchased measuring and test equipment available
Activity Administrator Test
Result PRU 2.2 Measuring and test equipment available Laboratory
Measuring Systems
Activity PRU 3.1.4 Measure parts based on stipulations in the customer drawing Administrator Test
Laboratory
Measuring Systems
Remarks (if required) Activity PRU 3.1.5 Prepare measuring report Administrator Test
Laboratory
Head of Test
Activity PRU 3.1.6 Sign measuring reports Laboratory Department
Measuring Systems
Initial Sample
Measuring Systems
Processor Test
Activity PRU 3.1.7 Enter measuring report in the system Administrator Test
Laboratory
Laboratory
- Function Testing
Partial result PRU 3.1 Measuring report is available I Document: Test report MW
| 59
Task package number SCM 1

Task package designation Logistics concept and cost calculation
SCM Project Manager
(Function)
Task package team
Plant Container Management Administrator
(Functions)
Plant Production Logistician

Head of Plant Distribution Logistics Task Package: Description
Indirect Material Administrator
From
Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
activity number
result number
Task package number WL 1
1. Inquiry documents SCM 1.1.1
VER 1.1 Task package designation Approval of offer basis
2. Component definition SCM 1.1.1 ENT 1.1
3. Packaging planning/container management SCM 1.3.1 SCM 2 Plant Manager
(Function)
Task package team
Industrial Engineer
Responsible (Functions)
person (Functions) From
(Function) Precondition for
For direct material and raw materials activity number
result number
Plan number of required containers, logistics FTEs, equipment, stocks and areas Plant Container
Activity SCM 1.1.1 (direct material & raw materials), incorporate 3PL if necessary; plan inbound SCM Project Manager Management 1. Lifetime WL 1.1 VER 2.2
transport Administrator Economic efficiency calculation
2. WL 1.1 CON 1
For semi-finished products / finished products (optional from €50,000.00)
Plan number of required containers logistics FTEs, equipment, stocks and areas Plant Production
Activity SCM 1.1.2 SCM Project Manager
(semi-finished products/finished products) Logistician Responsible
Plant Production Partial results and activities Cooperation
Activity SCM 1.1.3 Plan production supply concept SCM Project Manager person (Functions)
Logistician (Function)
For finished parts Activity WL 1.1 Check tool set-up for completeness as well as the manufacturing costs Industrial Engineer
Plan number of required containers, logistics FTEs, equipment, stocks and areas Head of Plant Check economic efficiency calculation and/or lifetime for completeness and that
Activity SCM 1.1.4 SCM Project Manager Activity WL 1.2 Plant Manager
(finished products), include 3PL if necessary, plan outbound transport Distribution Logistics specified target figures are not undershot
Activity WL 1.3 Approve offer basis in the system Plant Manager
Activity SCM 1.1.5 Prepare draft MiFA SCM Project Manager
Partial result SCM 1.1 Preparation of logistics concept I Document: Logistics concept Result WL 1 Offer basis approved I System input: Offer basis approved
Indirect Material
Activity SCM 1.2.1 Store logistics concept in the system to obtain offer (optional) SCM Project Manager
Administrator Special risks (if required)
Activity SCM 1.2.2 Examine offer documents (optional) SCM Project Manager
Calculate logistics costs based on the offers or estimated values after taking account
Activity SCM 1.2.3 SCM Project Manager Remarks (if required)
of the offer premises
Partial result SCM 1.2 Prepare calculation of logistics costs I Document: Calculation of logistics costs
For direct material and raw materials

Plan number of required logistics FTEs, equipment, stocks and areas (direct material
Plant Container
& raw materials), incorporate 3PL if necessary based on offer documents, especially
Activity SCM 1.3.1 SCM Project Manager Management
calculation of logistics costs, plan inbound transport, if necessary arrange
Administrator
recalculation
For semi-finished products / finished products
Plan number of required logistics FTEs, equipment, stocks and areas (semi-finished
Plant Production
Activity SCM 1.3.2 products/finished products) based on offer documents, especially calculation of SCM Project Manager
Logistician
logistics costs (if necessary arrange recalculation)
Activity SCM 1.3.3 Plan production supply concept SCM Project Manager
For finished parts
Plan number of required logistics FTEs, equipment, stocks and areas (finished
products), incorporate 3PL if necessary based on offer documents, especially plan Plant Production
Activity SCM 1.3.4 SCM Project Manager
calculation of logistics costs, plan outbound transport, if necessary arrange Logistician
recalculation
Head of Plant
Activity SCM 1.3.5 Finalize MIFA based on the defined parameters and enter in the system SCM Project Manager
Distribution Logistics
Activity SCM 1.3.6 Hand over to plant 3 months after SOP SCM Project Manager
Task package number CON 1

Task package designation Economic efficiency calculation
Participation Controller
(Function)
Task package team
(Functions)
From
Precondition for
Task Package: Description activity number
result number
1. Lifetime CON 1.1 VER 2.2
2. Calculation of logistics CON 1.1 SCM 1.2
Responsible
Task package number WL 2 Cooperation
Partial results and activities person (Functions)
Task package designation Investment approval (Function)
Person responsible for task package Activity CON 1.1 Adapt format template (DBRG, cash flow) Participation Controller
Plant Manager
(Function)
Activity CON 1.2 Copy sales data to template Participation Controller
Task package team
Production Engineer
(Functions)
Activity CON 1.3 Adopt tool costs, tool revenues, investments Participation Controller
Head of Corporate Investment Controlling (C-FiCoTax - I-CON)
Activity CON 1.4 Break down material costs per part Participation Controller
From
Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial Break down, dynamize personnel costs per part
activity number Activity CON 1.5 Participation Controller
result number
1. Investment reservation WL 1.1 CON 2 Activity CON 1.6 Break down operating resources per part Participation Controller
2. Customer commissioning WL 1.1 VER 3.3 Activity CON 1.7 Adjust overhead formulas Participation Controller
Activity CON 1.8 Enter investments and tools Participation Controller

Responsible
person (Functions) Activity CON 1.9 Adjust intra-factory transport, extra tour, etc Participation Controller
(Function)
Activity WL 2.1 Enter investment in the system Production Engineer Activity CON 1.10 Determine and use depreciation correction factor Participation Controller
Person responsible for
Activity WL 2.2 Apply for investments in the system Plant Manager
investment costs Activity CON 1.11 Check links (CF) Participation Controller
Head of Corporate
Activity WL 2.3 Approve investments in the system Investment Controlling Activity CON 1.12 Adjust ROI, PO and EBIT formula (CF) Participation Controller
(C-FiCoTax - I-CON)
Activity CON 1.13 Copy economic efficiency calculation and apply it to minimum, margin Participation Controller
Result WL 2 Investment cost center approved I System input: Investment approved Activity CON 1.14 Check plausibility Participation Controller
Update KPIs from the economic efficiency calculation in the "Decision template for the
Special risks (if required) Activity CON 1.15 Participation Controller
Board of Management" in the lifetime
Supplement economic efficiency calculation of the lifetime in the system, supplement

Activity CON 1.16 Participation Controller
Remarks (if required) designation "+economic efficiency calculation" and upload status of inquiry
Result CON 1 Economic efficiency calculation produced I Document: DBRG "Project title“ + lifetime
1. Calculations incorrect
2. Investments not fully checked
3. Logistics calculations may not be available, which means that the economic efficiency calculation is only meaningful to a limited extent
| 61
Task package number CON 2 Task package number CON 3
Task package designation Investment reservation Task package designation Project Controlling (Finance)
Person responsible for the task package Person responsible for the task package
Corporate Investment Controlling Manager (C-FiCoTax - I-CON) Participation Controller

Project Manager
From Project Team

Precondition for
activity number From
result number Precondition for
Approved economic efficiency calculation and activity number
1. CON 2.1.1 WL 1 result number
lifetime
1.
2. Final meeting held CON 2.1.1 VER 2.3
Responsible
Responsible Partial results and activities Cooperation
Cooperation person
Partial results and activities person (Functions)
(Functions) (Function)
(Function)
Activity CON 2.1.1 Check data, if necessary correct and concretize investment requirements C-FiCoTax - I-CON Activity CON 3.1 Book internal hourly settlement immediately for the project to the project cost center Project Team
Activity CON 2.1.2 Transfer to investment decision template for the Board of Management C-FiCoTax - I-CON Activity CON 3.2 Specify orders and external costs in conjunction with the project cost center Project Team
Activity CON 2.1.3 Submit decision template to the Board of Management C-FiCoTax - I-CON Activity CON 3.3 Target-actual comparison (automated) Participation Controller
I
Investments reserved/ rejected or reserved with System input: Investment approved/ rejected/ reserved with non-
Partial result CON 2.1 Check plausibility of ACTUAL figures
non-binding effect binding effect Activity CON 3.4 Participation Controller Project Manager
Optional with non-binding reservation: preparation of a decision template for the
Activity CON 2.2.1 C-FiCoTax - I-CON Activity CON 3.5 Enter report in the system Participation Controller
Supervisory Board
Activity CON 2.2.2 Submit the decision template to the Supervisory Board C-FiCoTax - I-CON
Result CON 3 Report after handover to plant is available I Document: Target-actual comparison
I System input: Investment approved/rejected
Investments reserved/ rejected with binding
Result CON 2.2
effect
Remarks (if required) The task package extends beyond the project management observation period and ends with EOP. Only then is it possible and meaningful to
1.
make a final and extensive evaluation of the project
After it has been handed over to the plant, the report can only provide a target-actual comparison on account of the above-mentioned restrictions.
2.
Other KPIs (ROI, payoff, etc.) can of course be analyzed at the end of the project

Task package: Description
Task package number PMT 2
Task Package: Description Task package designation Project management

Project Manager
(Function)
Task package team

Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016 Project Team
(Function)
Task package number PMT 1 Advanced Quality Planner
Task package designation Project planning Steering Committee for Projects

Person responsible for task package From
Project Manager Precondition for
(Function) Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/ partial
activity number
Task package team result number
Head of Project Management Division
(Function)
1. Start workshop done PMT 2.1.1 PMT 1.1
Project Team
From Responsible
Precondition for Cooperation
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial Partial results and activities person
activity number (Functions)
result number (Function)
Activity PMT 2.1.1 Prepare, carry out and document status meetings Project Manager Project Team
1. Project handover PMT 1.1.1 VER 4.1
Activity PMT 2.1.2 Update schedules in customer portals and prepare customer schedules if required Project Manager
Responsible Cooperation
Partial results and activities Activity PMT 2.1.3 Confirm maturity level stage 3 to customer
Advanced Quality Project Manager,
person (Functions) Planner Project Team
Head of Project
Activity PMT 1.1.1 Assign Project Manager to project Activity PMT 2.1.4 Carry out deviation analysis and introduce suitable measures Project Manager Project Team
Management Division
Check project application and generate specific project order, including draft of risk Activity PMT 2.1.5 Carry out escalation management if required Project Manager
Activity PMT 1.1.2 Project Manager Project Team
classification
Activity PMT 2.1.6 Carry out change management if required Project Manager Project Team
Activity PMT 1.1.3 Check PLM distribution list and produce project organigram if required Project Manager
Activity PMT 2.1.7 Document lessons learned in the parking area Project Manager Project Team
Head of Project
Activity PMT 1.1.4 Issue project order Activity PMT 2.1.8 Carry out risk management if required Project Manager Project Team
Management Division
Carry out planning of project costs and revenues in the system based on the input Activity PMT 2.1.9 Apply for quality gate Project Manager
Activity PMT 1.1.5 Project Manager
variables from the inquiry and offer phase
Activity PMT 1.1.6 Carry out project scheduling in the system Project Manager Partial result PMT 2.1 Quality gate 4 approved I System input: Approve QG 4
Activity PMT 1.1.7 Prepare and carry out start workshop Project Manager Project Team Advanced Quality Project Manager,
Activity PMT 2.2.1 Confirm maturity level stage 4 to customer
Planner Project Team
Activity PMT 1.1.8 In the start workshop: Plan required quantities during every stage of production Project Manager Project Team
Activity PMT 2.2.2 Carry out deviation analysis and introduce suitable measures Project Manager Project Team
Partial result PMT 1.1 Start workshop done I Document: Minutes of start workshop Activity PMT 2.2.3 Carry out escalation management if required Project Manager
Activity PMT 1.2.1 Risk Management Project Manager Project Team Activity PMT 2.2.4 Carry out change management if required Project Manager Project Team
Activity PMT 1.2.2 Finalize project cost and revenue plan and schedule Project Manager Activity PMT 2.2.5 Document lessons in the parking are Project Manager Project Team
Head of Project Activity PMT 2.2.6 Carry out risk management if required Project Manager Project Team
Activity PMT 1.2.3 Issue planning approval and therefore activate schedule
Management Division
Activity PMT 2.2.7 Apply for quality gate Project Manager
Result PMT 1.2 Project plan approved I Documents: Project timetable and project cost plan Partial result PMT 2.2 Quality gate 5 approved I System input: Approve QG 5
Special risk (if required) Planner Project Team
Activity PMT 2.3.2 Carry out deviation analysis and introduce suitable measures Project Manager Project Team
Remarks (if required) Activity PMT 2.3.3 Carry out escalation management if required Project Manager
Activity PMT 2.3.5 Document lessons in the parking area Project Manager Project Team
Activity PMT 2.3.6 Carry out risk management if required Project Manager Project Team
Result PMT 2.3 Quality gate 6 approved I System input: Approve QG 6


| 63
1. Escalation management according to the escalation scenario

Task package designation Project completion
Project Manager
(Function)
Task package team Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
Project Team
(Functions)
Advanced Quality Planner
Task package designation Project timetable before commissioning
Steering Committee for Projects
Head of Project Management Division Project Manager
(Function)
From Task package team

Precondition for Head of Project Management Division
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial (Functions)
activity number
result number Project Coordinator
1. Customer approval without conditions PMT 3.1.1 Q 2.3 From
Precondition for
activity number
Responsible result number
person (Functions) 1. Customer dates PMT 4.1 VER 1.1
(Function)
Delivery dates for tools and operating equipments
Advanced Quality Project Manager, 2. PMT 4.2 IND 2
Activity PMT 3.1.1 Confirm maturity level stage 6 to customer are available
Activity PMT 3.1.2 Carry out deviation analysis and introduce suitable measures Project Manager Project Team 3. Component definition PMT 4.2 ENT 1.1
Activity PMT 3.1.3 Carry out escalation management if required Project Manager
Responsible
person (Functions)
Activity PMT 3.1.5 Document lessons in the parking area Project Manager Project Team (Function)
Activity PMT 3.1.6 Carry out risk management if required Project Manager Project Team Head of Project Project Manager,
Activity PMT 4.1 Assign Project Manager to project
Management Division Project Coordinator
Prepare and carry out final workshop to securing of know-how and complete the
Activity PMT 3.1.7 Project Manager Project Team Activity PMT 4.2 Carry out project scheduling in the system Project Manager Project Team
project, and document lessons learned
I
Project schedule prepared before
Head of Project Result PMT 4 Document: Project schedule
Activity PMT 3.1.8 Prepare final report and submit for approval Project Manager commissioning
Management Division
Partial result PMT 3.1 Final report approved I Document: Final report Special risks (if required)
Result PMT 3.2 Quality gate 7 approved I System input: Approve QG 7




Task package designation Process FMEA Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
Person responsible for task package Task package number IND 5

Production Engineer
(Function)
Task package designation Flowchart
Task package team
Core FMEA Team
(Functions) Person responsible for task package
Production Engineer
(Function)
From
Precondition for Task package team
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial Industrial Engineer
activity number (Functions)
result number
Plant drawing free for industrialization, supplier From
1. IND 4.1.1 ENT 1.4 Precondition for
nomination and samples Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial
activity number
result number
2. Process FMEA from inquiry phase IND 4.1.1 IND 1
Plant drawing free for industrialization, supplier
1. IND 5.1 ENT 1.4
nomination and samples
Responsible
Partial results and activities Cooperation 2. Work system design IND 5.1 IND 1
person (Functions)
(Function)
Activity IND 4.1.1 Form and invite FMEA Team Production Engineer Responsible
Adapt existing process FMEA from the inquiry phase, update and evaluate, or person (Functions)
Activity IND 4.1.2 Production Engineer Core FMEA Team (Function)
produce new FMEA.
Activity IND 4.1.3 Enter process FMEA in the system in line with status Production Engineer Activity IND 5.1 Adapt and update existing flowchart, or produce new flowchart Production Engineer Industrial Engineer
Enter flowchart in the system
I Document: P-FMEA
Activity IND 5.2 Production Engineer
Partial result IND 4.1 Process FMEA produced
Activity IND 4.2.1 Implement measures regarding process FMEA Production Engineer
Result IND 5 Flowchart produced I Document: Flowchart
Activity IND 4.2.2 Version and approve process FMEA in the system Production Engineer
Result IND 4.2 Measures regarding process FMEA completed I Document: P-FMEA approved
1. Re 4.1.3 - With defined measures, the document must be approved "free with conditions"
| 65
Task package designation Tools and operating resources - requirement specifications, acceptance, documentation

Production Engineer
(Function)
Task package team
(Functions)
Production Planner Sample Construction Task Package: Description
Project Buyer
From
Precondition for Task package designation Evaluation of measuring system
activity number
result number Person responsible for task package
Production Engineer
(Function)
1. Work systems design from inquiry phase IND 6.1.1 IND 1
Task package team
2. Process FMEA IND 6.1.3 IND 4.1 Quality Coordinator
(Functions)
3. Suppliers commissioned for indirect material IND 6.2 EIN 3.2 Team Manager Production
4. Plant drawing approved IND 6.2 ENT 1.5 From
Precondition for
5. Project orders for direct material delivered IND 6.3 EIN 2.4 activity number
result number
6. Project orders for raw materials delivered IND 6.3 EIN 4.3
1. Gage concept (performance specifications) IND 8.4 IND 6.1
7. Project orders for indirect material delivered IND 6.4 EIN 3.3
2. Production handover has taken place IND 8.3 IND 7
8. Direct material approved IND 6.4 Q 4.2
Responsible
Responsible Partial results and activities Cooperation
Cooperation person (Functions)
Partial results and activities person (Function)
(Functions)
(Function) Check measuring report from the supplier of the gages or the certificate of the
Activity IND 8.1 Production Engineer
Activity IND 6.1.1 Create objects in the system Production Engineer supplier of the test equipment, and enter in the system under the particular object
Assign objects in the system to the directly related product (automatic listing of tools Send information on the performance of gage capability or MSA to the responsible
Activity IND 6.1.2 Production Engineer Activity IND 8.2 Production Engineer
in the PLM tab "Tools" as a tool overview and test equipment list) Quality Coordinator
Activity IND 6.1.3 Produce parts-specific performance specifications (LH_II) (VA43) (tool status 114) Production Engineer Team Manager
Activity IND 8.3 Provide required series production components (e.g. 25 pieces) (see VA74) Quality Coordinator
Production
Activity IND 6.1.4 File performance specifications under the related objects in the system Production Engineer Team Manager
Activity IND 8.4 Examine capability of gages and/or measuring equipment (see VA74) Quality Coordinator
Activity IND 6.1.5 Agree performance specifications with Production Department Production Engineer
Production File documents - gage capability, MSA and measuring report - in the system relating
The gage concept must be provided to the Advanced Quality Planner for agreement Activity IND 8.5 Production Engineer
Advanced Quality to the tool (see VA74)
Activity IND 6.1.6 Production Engineer
with the customer Planner
Activity IND 6.1.7 Check and approve tool overview and test equipment list Production Engineer
Result IND 8 Measuring system approved I Documents: Measuring report, gage capability, MSA
I
Requirement specifications for operating Document: Performance specifications,
Partial result IND 6.1
resources, tools and gages produced System inputs: "List of tools, "Test equipment list" complete
Special risk (if required)
Activity IND 6.2.1 Generate purchase requisition in the system (tool status 114) Production Engineer
Activity IND 6.2.2 Send the approved plant drawing (tool status 230) Production Engineer Application Engineer
Activity IND 6.2.3 Check the supplier's design for indirect material Production Engineer
Activity IND 6.2.4 Approve the supplier's design for indirect material Production Engineer 1. MSA = Measuring system analysis
Partial result IND 6.2 Design approval for indirect material I Document: Design approval for indirect material (e-mail)
Define components without a function (stereolithography, 3D printing, machined parts) Appl. Engineer
regarding their unit number and design, and trigger eBM or work order Internal Tool Maker
Production Planner
Activity IND 6.3.2 If necessary, inspect components Production Engineer
Sample Construction
Production Planner
Activity IND 6.3.3 Supply received components to supplier or internally Production Engineer
Sample Construction
Activity IND 6.3.4 Agree date for tool acceptance Production Engineer Project Buyer
Carry out tool acceptance (construction progress control) at the supplier according to
VA43
Activity IND 6.3.6 Prepare acceptance reports and enter in the system "with conditions approved" Production Engineer
I Document: Acceptance report
Preliminary acceptance of indirect material
Partial result IND 6.3
performed

Task package number Q2
Task package designation Initial sampling of sales part
Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016 Person responsible for task package
(Function)
Task package number Q1 Task package team
Initial Sampler
(Functions)
Task package designation QM plans
(Function) Project Coordinator
Task package team From
Project Team
(Functions) Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial result
activity number
From number
Precondition for
activity number 1. Minutes of kick-off workshop Q 2.1.1 PMT 1.1
result number
2. Approved plant drawing Q 2.2.4 ENT 1.5
1. D-FMEA Q 1.3 ENT 3.1
3. DVP Q 2.2.4 ENT 4.2
2. P-FMEA Q 1.3 IND 4.1
4. Test reports Q 2.2.4 PRU 2
3. Flowchart Q 1.3 IND 5
4. Approved plant drawing Q 1.3 ENT 1.5 Responsible
5. Series production equipment Q 1.3 IND 6.4 person (Functions)
(Function)
Hold sampling coordination meeting (BAG) with customer, complete BAG form and Advanced Quality
Activity Q 2.1.1
Responsible approve in the system Planner
person
(Function)
(Functions) Partial result Q 2.1 Sampling coordination meeting held I Document: Sampling coordination meeting
Advanced Quality Project Support /
Activity Q 1.1.1 Revise or prepare QM plan for prototypes Project Team Activity Q 2.2.1 Create initial sample order according to BAG in the system
Planner Project Coordinator
Advanced Quality Project Support /
Activity Q 1.1.2 Enter family QM plan for prototypes in the system Activity Q 2.2.2 If necessary, create construction sample order
Planner Project Coordinator
Partial result Q 1.1 QM plan for prototypes prepared I Document: QM plan for prototypes Activity
Activity
Q 2.2.3
Q 2.2.4
Define test quantities for initial sample tests
Create initial sample order for semi-finished products in the system
Initial Sampler
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 1.2.1 Revise or prepare QM plan for pre-series production Project Team Activity Q 2.2.5 Perform initial sampling of semi-finished products and make available Initial Sampler
Planner
Advanced Quality Activity Q 2.2.6 Prepare initial sampling of sales parts (check documentation) Initial Sampler
Activity Q 1.2.2 Enter family QM plan for pre-series production in the system
Planner Calculate weight of sales part and enter value in the PLM
Activity Q 2.2.7 Initial Sampler
Partial result Q 1.2 QM plan for pre-series production prepared I Document: QM plan for pre-series production Activity Q 2.2.8
Carry out initial sampling Note 1, compile documentation and enter in customer
portals and the PLM
Initial Sampler
Advanced Quality Activity Q 2.2.9 Enter EMPB in the system Initial Sampler
Activity Q 1.3.1 Prepare QM plan for series production in SCIO
Planner
Pack initial sample parts, if necessary incl. documentation, to customer and make
Advanced Quality Activity Q 2.2.10 Initial Sampler
Activity Q 1.3.2 Enter QM plan for series production as a PDF file in the system available for dispatch
Planner
Result Q 1.3 QM plan for series production prepared I Document: QM plan for series production Partial result Q 2.2 EMPB sent I Document: EMPB
Activity Q 2.3.1 Change (approve) status of sales part in the system Application Engineer
Activity Q 2.3.2 Monitor and maintain status of sampling Initial Sampler
Activity Q 2.3.3 Obtain series approval and approve in the system Initial Sampler
Remarks(if required) Result Q 2.3 Customer approval received I Document: Customer approval
| 67
Task package number Q4

Task package designation Advanced quality planning of direct material
(Function)
Task package team
Task Package: Description (Functions)
Supplier Purchased Part Sampling (LKB2)

Supplier Integration Management
Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016 Project Buyer
From
Task package number Q3 Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial result
activity number
Task package designation Test and gage concept number
Person responsible for task package 1. Approved Veritas drawing Q 4.1 ENT 1.5
(Function)
2. Initial sample order Q 4.1 EIN 2.4
Task package team
Production Engineer 3. Initial sample parts Q 4.1 EIN 2.4
(Functions)
From Complete documentation (according to QS9000 +

Precondition for 4. Q 4.1 EIN 2.4
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial regulations of VDA / AIAG)
activity number
result number
Responsible
1. Gage concept Q 3.1 IND 6.1 Partial results and activities Cooperation
person (Functions)
(Function)
Responsible Advanced Quality Application Engineer /

Activity Q 4.1.1 Agree special characteristics (SC/CC)
Partial results and activities Cooperation Planner Supplier Integration
person (Functions) Advanced Quality Application Engineer /
(Function) Activity Q 4.1.2 Check plausibility of supplier's producibility assessment
Planner Supplier Integration
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 3.1 Send gage concept in customer form Advanced Quality
Planner Activity Q 4.1.3 Check plausibility of timetable Project Buyer
Planner
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 3.2 Any correction loops / ask customer Production Engineer Advanced Quality Application Engineer /
Planner Activity Q 4.1.4 Sampling agreement with supplier incl. measuring concept
Advanced Quality Advanced Quality Application Engineer /
Activity Q 3.3 Enter customer approval in the PLM Agree test concept with supplier (accompanying series production/outgoing goods)
Planner Activity Q 4.1.5
Confirm in the system with which contact person the gage concept was agreed and Advanced Quality Ensure transmission of compliance with customer-specific requirements (CQI, CCC, Advanced Quality
Activity Q 3.4 Activity Q 4.1.6
when Planner …) Planner
I
System input: Gage concept agreed/ Advanced Quality Project Buyer / Supplier
Result Q3 Test and gage concept agreed with customer Activity Q 4.1.7 Quality Assurance Agreement if necessary
customer informed (change of status) Planner Integration
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 4.1.8 Process acceptance (if required) Application Engineer
Planner
I Document: QVP checklist for direct material
Advanced quality planning of direct material
Partial result Q 4.1
completed
Advanced Quality Application Engineer /
Remarks (if required) Activity Q 4.2.1 Process acceptance (if required)
Planner Project Buyer
I Document: Process acceptance report

Process acceptance for supplier of direct
Partial result Q 4.2
material completed
Activity Q 4.3.1 Check / assess parts based on specification LKB2
Activity Q 4.3.2 Check / assess documents for completeness LKB2
Activity Q 4.3.3 Enter final assessment in the system LKB2
Activity Q 4.3.4 Send approved EMPB to supplier LKB2
Activity Q 4.3.5 Change status of purchased part to "approved" Application Engineer
Activity Q 4.3.6 Archive document and retention sample LKB2
Result Q 4.3 Direct material approved I Document: EMPB direct material

Task package number Q5 Task package number Q6

Task package designation Process acceptance Task package designation CCC certification
Team Manager Industrial Engineer
Quality Coordinator Team Manager Production

Production Engineer From
Precondition for
Industrial Engineer activity number
result number
DSK (Decentral Master Data and Capacity Management)
1. Customer approval has been received Q 6.1 Q 2.3
From
Precondition for
Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition result/partial Responsible
activity number Cooperation
result number Partial results and activities person (Functions)
1. Document: Checklist for production readiness Q 5.1.1 PRO 1 (Function)
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 6.1 Contact certification authority
Planner
Responsible Advanced Quality
Partial results and activities Cooperation Activity Q 6.2 Complete supplied documents
person (Functions) Planner
(Function)
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 6.3 Request sample (according to certification authority)
Planner
Team Manager,
Carry out internal process acceptance (2-day production) according to document Advanced Quality Quality Coordinator, Activity Q 6.4 Commission sample Industrial Engineer
Activity Q 5.1.1
(Checklist for process acceptance, 2 TP) Planner Production Engineer,
Industrial Engineer Team Manager /
Activity Q 6.5 Produce sample
Deputy Team Manager
Circulate initial sample according to order (Initial Sample Team, Material Testing,
Activity Q 5.1.2 Team Manager Quality Coordinator Advanced Quality
Function Testing), Activity procedure Q10.2: Xeri EDV6_AA_1105 Activity Q 6.6 Produce photo documentation
Planner
Prepare customer-specific documentation based on "Internal process acceptance" Advanced Quality
Activity Q 5.1.3 Quality Coordinator Advanced Quality
(e.g. R@R, performance test) Planner Activity Q 6.7 Compile dispatch information and hand it over including sample to Dispatch
Planner
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 5.1.4 Enter customer-specific documents in the system Quality Coordinator Advanced Quality
Planner Activity Q 6.8 Carry out plant audit if necessary
Planner
Activity Q 5.1.5 Change subject group in the system to series production DSK Team Manager Advanced Quality
Activity Q 6.9 Enter CCC printing-license and CCC certificate in the system
Activity Q 5.1.6 Enter document "Internal process acceptance" in the system QVP Team Manager Planner
Partial result Q 5.1 Internal process acceptance completed I Document: Process acceptance report Result Q6 CCC printing license is available I Documents: CCC printing license, CCC certificate
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 5.2.1 Agree customer acceptance/audit
Planner
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 5.2.2 Manage customer acceptance/audit
Planner
Advanced Quality Remarks (if required)
Activity Q 5.2.3 Coordinate deviation management
Planner
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 5.2.4 Enter customer-specific acceptance report in the system
Planner
Result Q 5.2 Customer process acceptance completed I Document: Customer-specific acceptance report
1. Deviations are documented and monitored via the database "Task monitoring".
| 69
Task package number Q7 Task package number Q8

Task package designation Defective part analysis Task package designation Q offer
Application Engineer Project Team
Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory From
Precondition for
From activity number
Precondition for result number
activity number
result number 1. Component definition Q1 ENT 1.1
1. Approved customer drawing Q 7.1 ENT 1.2 2. Logistics concept Q1 SCM 1.1
2. Performance specifications Q 7.1 ENT 1.2 3. Inquiry data Q1 VER 2.1
3. DVP Q 6.1 ENT 4.2 4. Work system design Q1 IND 1
4. D-FMEA Q 6.1 ENT 3.2 5. Costs and availabilities Q1 EIN 1
5. P-FMEA Q 6.1 IND 4.2 6. Delivery dates for tools Q1 IND 2
Responsible Responsible
Partial results and activities Cooperation Cooperation
person (Functions) Partial results and activities person
(Function) (Functions)
(Function)
Advanced Quality
Advanced Quality / Project Coordinator Activity Q 8.1 Collate information Project Team
Activity Q 7.1 Formulate and sign draft of defective part analysis concept Planner
Planner in the Test
Laboratory Advanced Quality
Activity Q 8.2 Enter information in the customer portal Project Team
Planner
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 7.2 Make defective part analysis concept available to the customer
Obtain feedback from customer

Planner
Advanced Quality
Result Q8 Q offer prepared I Document: Q offer
Activity Q 7.3
Planner
Advanced Quality
Activity Q 7.4 File defective part analysis concept in the PLM Special risks (if required)
Planner
Result Q7 Defective part analysis concept agreed I Document: Defective part analysis concept Remarks (if required)

Task package number SCM 2
Ask package designation Packaging planning/container management

Plant Container Management Administrator
(Function)
Task package team
SCM Project Manager
(Functions)
Project Buyer
From
Precondition for
activity number
result number
1. Calculation of logistics costs SCM 2.1.1 SCM 1.2 Key data relating to the task package Position at April 5, 2016
Task package number PRO 1

Responsible
Partial results and activities Cooperation Task package designation Production readiness
person (Functions)
(Function)
Supplier packaging datasheet Team Manager
(Function)
Plant Container
Examine offer documents (especially calculation of logistics costs) in regard to SCM Project Task package team
Activity SCM 2.1.1 Management DSK (Decentral Master Data and Capacity Management)
packaging of direct material/raw materials Manager (Functions)
Administrator
Plant Container
SCM Project
Quality Coordinator (QK)
Activity SCM 2.1.2 Check packaging proposal and agree internally Management
Manager Production Engineering
Administrator
Plant Container
SCM Project From
Activity SCM 2.1.3 Agree packaging with supplier Management Precondition for
Manager Preconditions (Key documentation) Designation of the precondition
Administrator result/partial
activity number
Plant Container result number
SCM Project
Activity SCM 2.1.4 Carry out handover with report to order center Management
Manager 1. Document: Handover report PRO 1.1 IND 7
Administrator
Plant Container
Prepare required eBMs for circulated quantities and place in the approval cycle
Activity SCM 2.1.5 Management
(optional)
Administrator
Responsible
Plant Container person (Functions)
Prepare packaging instructions and store in the system for final agreement between (Function)
Activity SCM 2.1.6 Management Project Buyer
Purchasing and supplier
Administrator Production
Activity PRO 1.1 Create production folder QK
Engineering
I Document: Packaging datasheet/ regulations of supplier
Packaging planning/ container management at
Partial result SCM 2.1
supplier completed DSK, Production
Activity PRO 1.2 Prepare emergency plan for series production Team Manager
Engineering
Internal packaging datasheet (for semi-finished products)
Activity PRO 1.3 Qualify and plan series production personnel Team Manager
Plant Container
Examine offer documents (especially calculation of logistics costs) in regard to SCM Project
Activity SCM 2.2.1 Management Activity PRO 1.4 Check production readiness according to document Team Manager DSK
packaging of semi.finished products Manager
Administrator
Plant Container Activity PRO 1.5 Enter document "Checklist for production readiness" in the system Team Manager DSK
Plant Production
Activity SCM 2.2.2 Agree and define packaging for semi-finished products internally Management Activity PRO 1.6 Organize and fix date for process acceptance in production Team Manager DSK
Logistician
Administrator
Activity SCM 2.2.3 If necessary, validate investment costs or additional costs for packaging & handling
Plant Container
Management
SCM Project
Manager
Result PRO 1 Production readiness created I Document: Checklist for production readiness, emergency plan
Administrator
Plant Container
SCM Project
Activity SCM 2.2.4 Approve and sign packaging datasheet Management
Manager
Special risks(if required)
Administrator
Plant Container
Prepare required eBMs for circulated quantities of packaging and place in the approval
Activity SCM 2.2.5
cycle (optional)
Management Remarks (if required)
Administrator
Packaging datasheet of customer
Plant Container
Examine offer documents (especially calculation of logistics costs) in regard to SCM Project
packaging of sales parts Manager
Administrator
Plant Container
SCM Project
Activity SCM 2.2.7 Validate different packaging with customer Management
Manager
Administrator
Plant Container
SCM Project
Activity SCM 2.2.8 Confirm packaging datasheet of the customer Management
Manager
Administrator
Plant Container
If necessary, validate investment costs or additional costs for packaging & handling SCM Project
(optional) Manager
Administrator
Plant Container
Prepare required eBMs for circulated quantities of packaging and place in the approval
cycle (optional)
Administrator
Plant Container | 71
SCM Project
Activity SCM 2.2.11 Prepare packaging instructions and store in the system Management
Manager
Administrator
Task package number PRO 2 Task package number SCM 3
Task package designation Process capability study Ask package designation Launch Coordination
Team Manager Launch Coordinator

Quality Coordinator (QK) Plant Initial Sampler
DSK (Decentral Master Data and Capacity Management) Plant Planning Manager Finished Parts
Production Engineering From

Precondition for
From activity number
Precondition for result number
activity number 1. Project timetable SCM 3.1 PMT 1.2
result number
1. Document: Checklist for production readiness PRO 2.1.1 PRO 1
Responsible
2. Document: Process acceptance report PRO 2.2.1 Q 5.1 Partial results and activities Cooperation
person (Functions)
(Function)
Responsible Activity SCM 3.1 Create individual or general order in the system Launch Coordinator
person (Functions) Check whether deviation authorization (AWE)/ customer approval is available, block
Activity SCM 3.2 Launch Coordinator Plant Initial Sampler
(Function) the order if necessary
Activity PRO 2.1.1 Carry out short-term process capability study (Cmk, Ppk) QK Team Manager Activity SCM 3.3 Carry out launch planning Launch Coordinator
Activity PRO 2.1.2 Enter document "Short-term process capability study" in the system Team Manager DSK Plant Planning
Activity SCM 3.4 Carry out handover with report to order center Launch Coordinator Manager Finished
Partial result PRO 2.1 Short-term process capability exists I Document: Short-term process capability study Parts
Activity PRO 2.2.1 Include and perform 2000:0 check in the work plan DSK Team Manager Result SCM 3 Launch coordination completed I Document: Handover report KSC
Activity PRO 2.2.2 Remove parts from series production on a random basis QK Team Manager
Production
Activity PRO 2.2.3 Produce performance analysis DSK Special risks (if required)
Engineering
Activity PRO 2.2.4 Carry out long-term process capability study (Cpk) QK Team Manager
Activity PRO 2.2.5 Remove 2000:0 check from the sytems (work palm) DSK Team Manager Remarks (if required
Activity PRO 2.2.6 Enter document "Long-term process capability study" in the system Team Manager DSK
Result PRO 2.2 Long-term process capability exists I Document: Long-term process capability study

12 | Annex Summary of the key documents
The following figure "Key documents in PEP, arranged in alphabetical order", is an Key document Task Responsibility APQP
package
overview of all key documents in alphabetical order and the corresponding assign- number.
ment to the task packages and function holders. If templates for the key documents Calculation of logistics costs SCM 1 SCM Project Manager 17
are possible, they can be found in the PLM system under the menu item "§Forms". Measuring report IND 8 Production Engineer 14
MSA IND 8 Production Engineer 14
Key document Task Responsibility APQP Emergency plan PRO 1 Team Manager Production 24
package
number P-FMEA IND 4 Production Engineer 13
Acceptance report IND 6 Production Engineer 7 Project cost plan PMT1 Project Manager 0
Final report PMT 3 Project Manager 0 Project timetable PMT1/4 Project Manager 0
Offer_series VER 3 Project Coordinator 1 Process acceptance report Q5 Quality Pre-Planner 18
Sampling coordination meeting Q2 Quality Pre-Planner 22 Process acceptance report Q4 Quality Pre-Planner 6
Documents: CCC printing license, CCC certificate Q6 Quality Pre-Planner 2 Minutes of kick-off workshop PMT 1 Project Manager 0
Checklist for production readiness PRO 1 Team Manager Production 24 Short-term process capability study PRO 2 Team Manager Production 20
Checklist for QVP for direct material Q4 Quality Pre-Planner 6 Long-term process capability study PRO 2 Team Manager Production 20
DBRG "Project title“ + lifetime CON 1 Participation Controller 1 Test report MW PRU 3 Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 21
Document folder IND 1 Industrial Engineer 16 Q offer Q8 Quality Pre-Planner 2
EMPB Q2 Quality Pre-Planner 22 QM plan for prototypes Q1 Quality Pre-Planner 8
EMPB direct material Q4 Quality Pre-Planner 6 QM plan for series production Q1 Quality Pre-Planner 19
EMPB_LAB PRU 3 Project Coordinator in the Test Laboratory 21 QM plan for pre-series production Q1 Quality Pre-Planner 15
Flowchart IND 5 Production Engineer 12 Defective part analysis concept Q7 Quality Pre-Planner 20
Producibility assessment ENT 2 Application Engineer 11 Series order VER 4 Project Coordinator 1
Calculation printout IND 3 Industrial Engineer 1 Target-actual comparison CON 3 Participation Controller 0
D-FMEA ENT 3 Application Engineer 3 Parts history ENT 1 Application Engineer 4
Customer approval Q2 Quality Pre-Planner 23 Handover report IND 7 Industrial Engineer 16, 25
Customer-specific acceptance report Q5 Quality Pre-Planner 18 Handover report KSC SCM 3 Launch Coordinator 25
Requirement specifications IND 6 Production Engineer 7 Plant Container

Packaging datasheet/ regulations SCM 2 17
Gage capability IND 8 Production Engineer 14
Plant Container
Lifetime VER 2 Project Coordinator 1 Packaging datasheet/regulations of supplier SCM 2 17
Logistics concept SCM 1 SCM Project Manager 17 Plant drawings status 114 and 230 ENT 1 Application Engineer 10
| 73
12 | Annex Glossary
Activities CC characteristic Flowchart

are individual process steps within a task package with Critical characteristics; safety-related characteristics also flow diagram; depicts the process steps in their
a defined beginning and end, and which are each as- which are stipulated by the customer in the drawing. dependencies and their time sequence.
signed to a responsible function holder. Several func-
tion holders cooperate in each activity. Design freeze FMEA
indicates the point in a project when the product con- Failure Mode and Effect Analysis is an analytical meth-
Task package cept and all design specifications have been defined od for finding potential weak points. In accordance with
is a self-contained task with a result and is assigned and no more basic design changes can be made. their importance for the customer, their likelihood of oc-
to a responsible person. It has a defined start and a currence and their probability of detection, these failure
defined end. DVP causes are each evaluated with an indicator.
Design verification plan or program for verifying the
Task packages: Description suitability of the design and function by means of a Functional structural plan
contains all the important information relating to the fixed test plan. Shows all task packages of all project types per func-
task package: Task package designation, responsi- tion holder. i.e. what function holder is responsible for
ble function holder, preconditions, partial results, final eBM Electronic order notification. what result in the project.
results and the necessary activities which lead to the
result. EOP End of Production = IMDS International Material Data System =
End of series production. German: Internationales Materialdatensys-
Procurement approval tem.
Also called B approval, B approval from the customer Result
authorizes Veritas to start procurement of all necessary comes at the end of an activity sequence and can be D-FMEA
scopes (tools, gages, purchased parts, etc.). B ap- measured. Design FMEA is an analytical method for evaluating
proval for Veritas is quality gate 4. possible defects which may occur when designing a
EMPB product. In accordance with their importance for the
CBD Cost breakdown = Initial sample test report is used to document results customer, their likelihood of occurrence and their prob-
German: Kostenaufschlüsselung of initial sample from series launch. With the EMPB the ability of detection, these failure causes are each eval-
documented results are presented to the customer for uated with an indicator.
CCC approval.
China Compulsory Certification; Chinese certification,
necessary to import various products. ESWFT First series off-tool parts.

Milestone
also MS; is a defined event in the course of the project PVL Process precursor SWFT First-off series tool parts.
with a measurable result. Milestones subdivide the re-
spective project phases and provide starting points for PVS Production test series TBT Parts supply date
targeted control of the phase.
Quality Gate Partial result
MSA Measuring system analysis also called QG; is a point in time in the project when subdivides the task package into clear units and ena-
defined requirements are checked in order to ensure bles the maturity level check to be carried out at every
MUP Sample test the project maturity level. quality gate or milestone.
PEP Maturity level assurance VFF Pre-series approval for vehicles

Product development process, is regarded as the de- is a standardized method for ensuring component ma-
velopment process for a product - starting with pre-de- turity in scopes of supply. Along quality gates and mile- Preconditions
velopment, then the customer inquiry and finishing six stones the maturity of the part is checked on the basis are defined results or partial results which must have
months after the start of series production at Veritas. of defined requirements in order to guarantee its series been attained so that the downstream function holder
launch. can start the activities. Preconditions specifically relate
PEP map to the start of activities rather than the start of the entire
provides an overview and shows when what partial and RG Maturity level work package.
final results of a task package have to be attained at
the latest. Significant characteristic (SC) VS Pre-series
Significant characteristics; function-related character-
P-FMEA istics which are defined by the customer in the drawing. Zero series
P-FMEA is an analytical method for evaluating possi- Time when the first new vehicles are built on the assembly
ble defects which may occur when manufacturing a Key documentation line under series conditions.
product. In accordance with their importance for the is either at least a document (key document), e.g. "QM
customer, their likelihood of occurrence and their prob- plan for series production" or at least a system input,
ability of detection, these failure causes are each eval- e.g. "customer procurement approval":. The key docu-
uated with an indicator. mentation is used as a basis to measure whether the
result or the partial result has been attained.
PPF Product and process approval SOP Start of Production =
PPV Production Part Validation Start of series production.
| 75
Imprint
Publisher: Veritas AG, Stettiner Strasse 1-9, 63571 Gelnhausen
veritas@veritas.ag
Texts: Jörg Becker, Melanie Brandes, Ronny Frotscher, Jörg Hapli, Mayra Herrero Calleja,
Michael Kurtze, Alexandra Röder, Mohammed Siala, Manuela Stichel, Carina Strauch,
Manuel Uftring, Alexander Wimmer, Roland Zahn, Marcus Zuther
Layout: Marcus Brandes, brandesmedia mediengestaltung

PEP Manual - V1 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PEP Manual - V1 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Contents

2 | Veritas PEP Manual

1.1 The product development process (PEP)

Fig 1: "Overview of phases“

Responsibility Sales Project Management

Request Quote Project B-release Pre serial Serial Project

phases: product and process Project development,

the test and logistics costs are calculated, the work

essary. A decision by the customer regarding the offer

cess development starts with customer Request commissioning thus, handover

4 | Veritas PEP Manual

Responsibility Sales Project Management

Request Quote Project B-release Pre serial Serial Project

1.2 Terms and definitions

Concept Phase Ongoing Series

QG3 QG4 QG5 QG6 QG7

Project B-release Pre serial Serial Project

RG x RG = Reifegrad = Level of Maturity

6 | Veritas PEP Manual

Fig. 4: "Milestone Plan“

Responsibility Sales Project Management

Request Quote Project B-release Pre serial Serial Project

Responsibility Sales Project Management

Responsibility Sales Project Management

Request Quote Project B-release Pre serial Serial Project

Fig. 5: "Preconditions for the milestones“

Milestone Designation of the milestone Precondition Responsibility

MS1 Project starts System input: Inquiry generation Project Coordinator

MS6 Offer submitted Document: Offer_series Project Coordinator

8 | Veritas PEP Manual

1.2.6 What is a project?

The difference between the project types lies in the

» Parts already in serial production at Veritas

» existing serial contract

10 | Veritas PEP Manual

Fig. 8: "Functional structural plan as of March 10, 2016"

RFQ decision RFQ processing

can be found in the Annex in the same order.

Tools and operating resources Measuring system

Advanced quality planning

Plant staffer administrative Packaging planning/

Production Readiness Process capability study

12 | Veritas PEP Manual

14 | Veritas PEP Manual

16 | Veritas PEP Manual

18 | Veritas PEP Manual

Yes Investments over No

Profitability calculation Approval of offer basis

Investments over ¤ 50,000, approval by Board of Management

Approval by Supervisory Board Yes Investments over

Create eBM for investments Approval of reserved investments

20 | Veritas PEP Manual

22 | Veritas PEP Manual

PEP map for

2.13.2 PRO 2 Process capability study

Projektphasen Anfrage Angebot Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung

Projekt Quality Gates QG1 QG2 QG3

Anfrage- Angebots- Projektfreigabe

Projekt Technische Start Herstellkosten WIRE Abschlussgespräch Angebot Startworkshop

ENT 5.1 ENT 5.2

24 | Veritas PEP Manual

Produktionsvorbereitung Vorserie Serie

Beschaffungs-Freigabe Vorserien-Freigabe Freigabe Serienanlauf Projekt-