The unjust reduction to the lay state of Bishop Claudio Gatti

On October 18, 2002, one of the blackest and saddest pages in the
history of the Church was written. The "last blow of satan" against
bishop Claudio Gatti consisted of the following: Those who fight
against the Eucharist, unjustly condemned the bishop ordained by
God, Claudio Gatti, by reducing him to the lay state.

The three ecclesiastics who committed this diabolical plan were

those who at that time were Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Bishop
Tarcisio Bertone and Cardinal Camillo Ruini. The latter saying
against Bishop Claudio Gatti: "I will take revenge and I will crush
him."

At that time, Cardinal Ratzinger took advantage of the precarious

health conditions of Pope John Paul II, to make him sign, without
him knowing it, the decree of dismissal from the clerical state of
Bishop Claudio Gatti, during the conciliar audience of 18 October
2002.

The dismissal from the clerical state can occur ex-officio, that is,
without the consent of the interested party, through a request of the
bishop to the Pontiff, but it cannot be established by particular law
(can. 1317) and, since it is a penalty perpetual, not even by decree
(can. 1342 § 2). It must be declared only by judicial means, by a
tribunal of three or five judges (can. 1425).

1
Cardinal Ruini, with the letter “prot. 1455/02”, delivered to the home
of Bishop Claudio Gatti on November 16, 2002, he simply informed
the bishop that he had been reduced to the lay state in accordance
with the letter “prot. 174/95-15938”

In accordance with this, the letter "prot. 174/95-15938" would be the

pontifical decree of the reduction to the lay state of Bishop Claudio
Gatti signed by Pope John Paul II on October 16, 2002, without the
Pope himself knew its content.

Cardinal Ruini at least should have attached to his communication a

certified photocopy of the letter "prot. 174/95-15938", processed by
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the Vicariate of
Rome, but he did not.

The executors of this diabolical plan, not knowing what crime to

accuse Bishop Claudio Gatti of, did not place any crime.

To reduce to the lay state a priest it is necessary to have committed

one of the following serious crimes: to become apostate, heretical,
schismatic; desecrate the Eucharist; use physical violence against
the Pope; commit certain grave sins against the sixth
commandment; contained in canons 1364, 1367, 1370 § 1, 1387,
1394 § 1, 1395 of the Code of Canon Law.

2
The bishop ordained by God, Claudio Gatti, never did any of this.
Furthermore, the bishop was denied the right to defense.

Since the bishop did not commit any of the crimes provided for in the
Code of Canon Law, Cardinal Ratzinger, Cardinal Ruini and Bishop
Bertone, architects of the reduction to the lay state of Bishop
Claudio Gatti, have committed a moral act illicit and legally invalid,
because they have abused their authority, have acted against the
Code of Canon Law, and above all, by condemning an innocent
person, have seriously lacked charity and offended the truth.

Bishop Claudio Gatti will soon be rehabilitated within the Church and
the works of the enemies of the Eucharist will be condemned.

Appendix:

Jesus himself said about the last blow of satan (the reduction to the
lay state of the Bishop Claudio Gatti):

"They have involved the Holy Father, although he does not know it,
because they make him sign the letters without knowing the content.
The Pope has signed, not the letter that has come to you, but the
document that remains in the Vatican, in the Vicariate" (Letter of
God of 11.17.2002).
3
In the Marian apparition “Mother of the Eucharist” on November 16,
2002, the day on which the communication from Cardinal Ruini
reached the Bishop, Our Lady allowed Bishop Claudio to ask him
some questions:

Our Lady - Excellency, you can ask me what you want.

Bishop - I'm interested in knowing if there really is a document

signed by the Pope.

Our Lady - The document signed with deception is there, but the
Pope has not read it. He has signed many letters, without ever
reading them, because they bring him the letters already written and
he signs them without reading them. The Pope has nothing to do
with Satan's blow, he signed the decree without knowing what he
was signing, if he had read it he would not have signed it.

Bishop - Who are responsible for satan's blow?

Our Lady - It is Messrs. Ratzinger, Ruini and Bertone who have tried
to make believe that the decision comes from the Holy Father. The
Pope is not well and they take advantage of it. They feel big and
powerful and want to take revenge on you, because you bother
them a lot.

4
Bishop - But can't God stop these ecclesiastics?

Our Lady - Yes and it will, but not immediately, because the blow of
satan will still have to last for peace in the world.

(Letter of God of November 16, 2002)

Appendix 2:

Since the signing of the decree had been done under deceit, without
the Pope knowing what he was signing and since with this decree
the Bishop ordained by God was unjustly condemned, the Lord
ordered Our Lady to take this document away from the lords of the
Church.

For the Vicariate and the Vatican, this document was the only
element they had in hand to demonstrate that the decision to reduce
the Bishop to the lay state was the Pope's and therefore
unappealable.

This document will reappear when God wills and will be delivered
into the hands of the Pope who, according to God's plans, will have
to revive the Church.

5
The removal of the pontifical document from the hands of powerful
ecclesiastics is one of God's first interventions to rehabilitate in the
Church the Bishop whom He himself ordained.

Presumably for this reason, Cardinal Ruini never showed Bishop

Claudio Gatti the pontifical decree of reduction to the lay state, nor
did he provide the bishop with a certified copy of it, since the
Vicariate did not have it in its possession.

Appendix 3:

We are sure that if the Pope John Paul II had known that the letter to
be signed was the condemnation of the bishop Claudio Gatti, he
would have never signed it for the following reasons:

1) The Pope knew the bishop and the seer, because meeting them,
he addressed them saying: "You are those of Our Lady".

2) Many times Marisa was in bilocation at the Pope to talk with him
about some important problems of the Church.

3) The Pope recited the prayers dictated by the Mother of the

Eucharist.

6
4) The Holy Father adored the Eucharist, given by Our Lady to
Marisa and subsequently brought by Don Claudio into the Vatican
on December 7, 1997.

5) John Paul II in the general audience of June 13, 2001 finished his
catechesis saying: "May Mary, Mother of the Eucharist, protect you
all"; this invocation was then censored by his collaborators and
removed of the website of the Vatican.

6) The Pope's secretary, through a common polish friend, asked

Marisa to pray for the Pope's health and sent her, as a sign of
gratefulness, a picture reproducing Jesus' face.