You are on page 1of 11

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203

DOI 10.1007/s10554-014-0541-6

ORIGINAL PAPER

A prospective two-center study on the associations


between microalbuminuria, coronary atherosclerosis and long-
term clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus: evaluation by coronary CT angiography
Jin-Jin Kim • Byung-Hee Hwang • Ik Jun Choi • Eun-Ho Choo • Sungmin Lim •

Yoon-Seok Koh • Jong Min Lee • Pum-Joon Kim • Ki-Bae Seung •


Seung-Hwan Lee • Jae-Hyung Cho • Jung Im Jung • Kiyuk Chang

Received: 8 June 2014 / Accepted: 23 September 2014 / Published online: 4 October 2014
Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Abstract This study assessed the associations between by CCTA, was defined as maximum intra-luminal stenosis
microalbuminuria in asymptomatic patients with type 2 C50 %. Patients with and without microalbuminuria were
diabetes and the presence, extent, and severity of coronary compared in terms of obstructive CAD prevalence, and the
atherosclerosis, as measured by coronary computed extent and severity of coronary atherosclerosis. They were
tomography angiography (CCTA), and the long-term evaluated using the following data: coronary artery calcium
clinical outcomes. In total, the study enrolled 284 consec- score (CACS), atheroma burden obstructive score (ABOS),
utive eligible asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes segment involvement score (SIS) and segment stenosis
and without known coronary artery disease (CAD), who score (SSS). All-cause mortality within a follow-up period
then underwent CCTA and 24 h urine albumin measure- of 5 years was also compared. Compared to patients
ments. Microalbuminuria was defined as 30–300 mg/day without microalbuminuria, patients with microalbuminuria
urinary albumin excretion. Obstructive CAD, as measured were more likely to have obstructive CAD (p = 0.004).
Microalbuminuria was associated with higher ABOS
(p = 0.010), SIS (p = 0.029), and SSS (p = 0.011),
J.-J. Kim  I. J. Choi  E.-H. Choo  S. Lim  P.-J. Kim  except for CACS (p = 0.058). Multivariable analyses
K.-B. Seung  K. Chang (&) adjusted for conventional cardiovascular risk factors
Cardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, Seoul St. revealed that microalbuminuria was an independent pre-
Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Banpodong
dictor of obstructive CAD [odds ratio 2.255, confidence
505, Seochogu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea
e-mail: kiyuk@catholic.ac.kr intervals (CI) 1.121–4.538, p = 0.023] and all-cause
mortality (hazard ratio 3.469, CI 1.319–9.121, p = 0.012).
B.-H. Hwang In asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, microal-
Cardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, St. Paul’s
buminuria was associated with increased risk of CAD and
Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of
Korea poorer clinical outcomes.

Y.-S. Koh  J. M. Lee Keywords Microalbuminuria  Diabetes  Coronary CT


Cardiovascular Center and Cardiology Division, Uijeongbu St
angiography
Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea,
Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea

S.-H. Lee  J.-H. Cho Introduction


Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine,
Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea,
Seoul, Republic of Korea Type 2 diabetes is associates with an increased risk of
coronary artery disease (CAD). Population-based studies
J. I. Jung (&) have shown that patients with type 2 diabetes have a 2- to
Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The
fourfold increase in the number of cardiovascular events
Catholic University of Korea, Banpodong 505, Seochogu,
Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea compared to subjects without type 2 diabetes [1, 2]. Vari-
e-mail: jijung@catholic.ac.kr ous risk factors of CAD have been identified. Of these,

123
194 Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203

microalbuminuria is considered an independent predictor simultaneously enrolled into a non-CCTA group. The
of CAD and cardiovascular death not only in patients with present study only analyzed the CCTA group to evaluate
diabetes and/or hypertension, but also in healthy individ- the presence, extent, and severity of coronary atheroscle-
uals [3, 4]. rosis according to the presence of microalbuminuria.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) Patients were excluded if they had type 1 diabetes,
has emerged recently as a noninvasive imaging modality angina or angina-equivalent symptoms by the Rose ques-
for the detection or exclusion of CAD since it allows the tionnaire [13], or if already taking anti-angina medication,
extent and severity of coronary atherosclerosis to be mea- history of myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascu-
sured [5]. Two studies using CCTA found that asymp- larization (either by percutaneous coronary intervention or
tomatic patients with type 2 diabetes had a higher bypass), cardiac transplantation, absence of stable sinus
prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis than subjects with- rhythm during investigation, life-threatening conditions, or
out diabetes [6, 7]. Moreover, recent multicenter studies contraindications for the use of iodinated contrast media.
have shown that CCTA-detected coronary atherosclerosis Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
is highly useful for predicting mortality and other major \30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were also excluded.
adverse cardiac events [8, 9]. There was no industry involvement in the design, con-
In the pre-CCTA era, several studies investigated the duct or analysis of the study. This prospective observa-
association between microalbuminuria and CAD prognosis tional study was approved by the institutional review board
in patients with diabetes [10–12], but these outcome-based of our institution and performed in accordance with
analyses did not assess the prevalence, extent, and severity strengthening the reporting of observational studies in
of coronary atherosclerosis. The aim of the present study epidemiology guidelines [14]. All patients provided written
was to evaluate the association between microalbuminuria informed consent.
in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, as well as Before the CCTA examination, the patients underwent a
the presence, extent, and severity of coronary atheroscle- structured interview with a physician or allied health pro-
rosis, through CCTA measurement, and to assess the fessional to ascertain the demographic and clinical data,
associated long-term clinical outcome. and to obtain additional anthropometric data, including the
height, weight, and waist-to-hip ratio. Patients underwent
blood and urine laboratory testing. The blood samples were
Methods collected in the morning after an overnight fast to measure
the serum hemoglobin A1C, fasting plasma glucose, and
Study population lipid profiles. All laboratory tests were performed using
standard methods.
The CRONOS-ADM (CoROnary CT aNgiography evalu- Type 2 diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by using the
ation for clinical OutcomeS in Asymptomatic patients with 2010 criteria of the American Diabetes Association,
type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) registry is a large, prospective namely, fasting glucose C126 mg/dl, glycated hemoglobin
observational registry of demographic, clinical, laboratory (HbA1C) C6.5 % or C48 mmol/mol, and/or post-chal-
and coronary CT angiographic data, with long-term clinical lenge glucose (glucose at 2 h after a 75 g oral glucose load)
outcome of asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes C200 mg/dl [15]. Patients with a self-reported or docu-
without a history of CAD. Since the primary objective of mented history of type 2 diabetes, or treatment with oral
the CRONOS-ADM registry was to assess whether antidiabetics or insulin were also considered to be diabetic.
screening for coronary atherosclerosis with the use of Diabetes onset was defined as the point in time when the
CCTA would beneficially affect clinical outcome in attending physicians made the diagnosis. The information
asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, the registry on diabetes onset in patients with known type 2 diabetes
was composed of two separate populations: a CCTA group was obtained through self-report. If it was not possible to
versus a non-CCTA group. determine when a patient was diagnosed by interviewing
Consecutive asymptomatic patients of more than the patient, their medical records were examined. The
30 years of age with type 2 diabetes undergoing CCTA duration of diabetes was calculated as the difference
were prospectively enrolled into a CCTA group from the between the current age of the patient and the age at dia-
division of endocrinology and cardiology at two affiliated betes onset.
hospitals of The Catholic University of Korea between Systemic arterial hypertension was diagnosed if the
January 2006 and December 2010: Seoul St. Mary’s Hos- systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure exceeded 140 and/
pital, Seoul, Korea and St. Vincent’s Hospital, Suwon, or 90 mmHg, or if there was a history of hypertension,
Korea. Within 3 months of enrollment, two age- and sex- which was evident through the use of antihypertensive
matched asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes were medications. A current smoker was defined as current

123
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203 195

smoking or cessation of smoking within 6 months before Ltd., Seoul, Korea) 1 h before the scan and a 0.3 mg
the study enrollment. An ex-smoker was defined as a per- sublingual dose of nitroglycerin was administered just
son who was formerly a daily smoker but currently did not before the scan. Estimated radiation doses ranged from 5 to
smoke at all for more than 6 months. Patients were con- 14 mSv.
sidered to have a positive smoking history when they were Images were reconstructed immediately after complet-
defined as either current smokers or ex-smokers. Whether ing the scan to identify motion-free coronary artery images.
or not there was a family history of premature coronary The reconstructed CT image data were transferred to a
heart disease was determined by asking the patients. computer workstation (MDCT: Advantage Windows 4.3,
GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA; DSCT: Syngo
Scan protocol and image reconstruction Multimodality Workplace, version 2008, Siemens Health-
care, Forchheim, Germany) for post-processing, including
CCTA were performed with a 64-slice MDCT (LightSpeed axial, multiplanar reformat, maximum intensity projection,
VCT 64; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) or a dual and short-axis cross-sectional views. In all individuals,
source CT (DSCT) (Somatom definition, Siemens Health- irrespective of the image quality, every arterial segment
care, Forchheim, Germany). Scan protocols for each CT was scored in an intent-to-diagnose fashion.
scanner were as follows: for the 64-slice MDCT san pro-
tocol, slice collimation of 64 9 0.625 mm; gantry rotation CCTA analysis
time of 350 ms; pitch of 0.2; tube voltage of 100–120 kV
(depending on BMI); tube current of 600 mAs. The ECG- All scans were analyzed by two radiologists with experi-
triggered tube current modulation was switched on to ence in interpreting over several thousand CCTA scans. In
reduce the radiation dose. Heart rates of all patients were direct accordance with the Society of Cardiovascular
determined 1 h before examinations. If heart rate was [65 Computed Tomography guidelines, coronary segments
beats per minute (bpm), the patient was orally administered were visually scored for the presence of coronary plaque by
40–80 mg of oral beta-blocker propranolol hydrochloride using a 16-segment coronary artery model in an intent-to-
(indenol at 40 mg/tablet) was given to patients except those diagnose fashion [16]. Only segments with a diameter
with contraindications to beta-blockers. A 0.3 mg sublin- [1.5 mm were included for analysis. Coronary plaques
gual dose of nitroglycerin was administered just before the came into consideration when structures [1 mm2 were
scan. A two-phase contrast medium protocol was used for detected within or adjacent to the coronary artery lumen
adjusting the scan duration. The first phase consisted of and could be clearly distinguished from the vessel lumen
administration of 80 mL of iodinated contrast agent and the surrounding pericardial tissue.
(iopromide, Ultravist 370; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) The severity of luminal diameter stenosis was scored as
at a rate of 5.0 mL/s for 16 s, while the s phase included none (0 % luminal stenosis), nonobstructive (plaques with
50 mL of 15 % contrast medium and 85 % saline solution maximum stenosis \50 %), obstructive (plaques with
at a rate of 5.0 mL/s for 10 s. A test bolus of 15–20 mL at a maximum stenosis C50 %) or severe obstructive (plaques
rate of 4–5 mL/s was administered with sequential scan- with maximum stenosis C70 %). A diagnosis of CAD was
ning every 2 s at the level of the left main (LM) coronary made on the basis of the maximum intra-luminal stenosis in
artery, with the region of interest set as the aortic root in any of the segments of the major epicardial coronary
order to determine the optimum scan delay for each patient. arteries at the C50 % stenosis threshold. Obstructive CAD
Next, for the DSCT scan protocol, slice collimation in the diagonal branches, obtuse marginal branches, and
2 9 32 9 0.6 mm by means of a z-flying focal spot, gantry posterolateral branches was considered to be part of the left
rotation time 330 ms, pitch 0.2–0.5, tube voltage 100–120 anterior descending (LAD) artery, left circumflex (LCX)
kVp (depending on BMI), and reference tube current 320 artery, and right coronary artery (RCA) system, respec-
mAs. Scans were performed with ECG-controlled tube tively. Depending on the coronary artery dominance, the
current modulation. In each patient, 80 mL of iodinated posterior descending artery was considered to be part of the
contrast (Iomeron 350, Iomeprol, Bracco, Milano, Italy) RCA or LCX system. For each patient, the number of
were injected at a flow rate of 5 mL/s followed by 50 mL diseased vessels was calculated through the assignation of
of contrast mixture (15 % contrast medium and 85 % sal- one, two, three, or LM coronary artery vessels.
ine solution) at the same rate. Contrast material adminis- The extent and severity of the coronary atherosclerosis
tration was controlled by bolus tracking in the ascending was measured by several coronary CT angiographic scores
aorta (signal attenuation threshold 120 HU). The scan delay [17, 18], including the coronary artery calcium score
was 7 s. In the absence of contraindications, patents with a (CACS), the atheroma burden obstructive score (ABOS),
heart rate [80 bpm received an intravenous selective the segment involvement score (SIS), and the segment
beta1-blocker, esmolol (Jeil Brevibloc, Jeil Phama Co., stenosis score (SSS). The CACS was assessed by applying

123
196 Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203

dedicated software (Smartscore version 3.5, GE Health- Different models were constructed by adjusting for con-
care, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Aquarius 3D Workstation, founding risk variables such as age, sex, hypertension,
TeraRecon, San Mateo, CA, USA). Coronary artery cal- body mass index, diabetes duration, smoking history,
cium was identified as a dense area in the coronary artery HbA1C levels, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol
that exceeded the threshold of 130 Hounsfield units [19]. levels, and administration of statin.
An overall Agaston score was recorded for each patient. Patients’ follow-up was performed by each institution
The ABOS was defined as the number of plaques with by a dedicated physician. The primary endpoint of this
[50 % stenosis in the entire coronary artery tree. The SIS registry was all-cause mortality. The data for cardiac death
was calculated as the total number of coronary artery were also collected. All clinical outcomes of interest were
segments that exhibited plaque, irrespective of the degree confirmed by source document and were centrally adjudi-
of luminal stenosis within each segment (minimum = 0; cated by a local events committee at the Cardiovascular
maximum = 16). The SSS was used as a measure of the Center of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital consisting of an
overall extent of the coronary atherosclerosis. In order to independent group of clinicians whose members were
determine the SSS, each individual coronary segment was unaware of patient status. For validation of complete fol-
graded as having no to severe plaque (i.e., scores from 0 to low-up data, information on censored survival data and
3) based on the extent of the obstruction of the coronary cause of death was obtained from the Korean Office of
luminal diameter. The extent scores of all 16 individual Statistics.
segments were then summed to yield a total score ranging Cumulative event rates were calculated with the Kap-
from 0 to 48. lan–Meier method and compared by using log-rank statis-
tics. To assess the relationship between the presence of
Statistical analysis microalbuminuria and all-cause mortality, Cox propor-
tional hazards analysis was performed, first unadjusted and
The baseline and biochemical characteristics were sum- then adjusted for age, sex, and hypertension. This analysis
marized as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous generated hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % CIs. Bilateral
variables, and as absolute numbers and percentages for p \ 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
discrete variables. The presence of microalbuminuria in All data were analyzed by using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute,
each patient was evaluated by measuring the albumin in Cary, NC, USA).
their urine over a 24-h collection period. Urine albumin
concentration was measured by a commercially available
radioimmunoassay kit (Immunotech, Prague, Czech Results
Republic). Microalbuminuria was defined as levels of uri-
nary albumin excretion between 30 and 300 mg/day [20]. Characteristics of the overall study population
Patients with and without microalbuminuria were com- and the groups with and without microalbuminuria
pared in terms of these variables as well as the CCTA
results by using either an independent sample t test or The baseline characteristics of the study cohort are shown
Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables, and either in Table 1. Between January 2006 and December 2010,
a Chi square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, 955 asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes under-
as appropriate. went CCTA. Of these, 671 were excluded: 16 (1.7 %)
The eGFR was calculated using the 4-variable Modifi- because they had CAD, 78 (8.2 %) because eGFR is
cation of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation \60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 550 (57.6 %) because the albumin
[21]. In this study, only the patients with eGFR C60 mL/ in their 24 h urine had not been measured, and 27 (2.8 %)
min/1.73 m2 were included for analysis because patients because their urinary albumin excretion exceeded
with eGFR \60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were defined as those 300 mg/day. Thus, 284 patients (166 males/118 females)
with stages 3–5 CKD, irrespective of albuminuria [20]. were eligible for the study analyses. These patients were
Patients were then divided into two groups (an eGFR of divided into two groups according to the presence of
60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 or an eGFR of C90 mL/min/ microalbuminuria.
1.73 m2) to define the impact of microalbuminuria on The mean age of the overall patient cohort was
coronary atherosclerosis separately by the existence of 64.9 ± 9.5 years, the mean body mass index was
CKD. 24.3 ± 3.2 kg/m2, and the mean duration of diabetes was
To identify independent predictors of obstructive CAD, 13.1 ± 9.8 years. When the patients with and without
as detected by CCTA, multivariable, stepwise logistic microalbuminuria were compared in terms of baseline
regression analyses were performed and odds ratios (OR) characteristics, those with microalbuminuria had signifi-
with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were generated. cantly longer duration of diabetes.

123
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203 197

Table 1 Baseline No microalbuminuria Microalbuminuria p value


characteristics (mg/24 h) (mg/24 h)

Number (n = 284) 218 66


Age (years) 64.6 ± 9.2 65.9 ± 10.3 0.339
Age C65 years (%) 113 (51.8) 37 (56.1) 0.547
Male (%) 125 (57.3) 41 (62.1) 0.490
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.2 ± 3.1 24.6 ± 3.6 0.389
Body mass index (kg/m2 \25) 91 (55.2) 29 (50.0) 0.498
Waist–Hip ratio 0.95 ± 0.07 0.98 ± 0.07 0.072
Duration of diabetes (year) 12.1 ± 9.3 16.6 ± 10.7 0.001
Hypertension (%) 123 (56.4) 40 (60.6) 0.732
Duration of hypertension (years) 9.6 ± 8.8 7.6 ± 7.2 0.243
Smoking history (%) 52 (29.4) 25 (41.0) 0.095
Previous CVA (%) 26 (12.9) 11 (17.5) 0.359
Laboratory findings
Hemoglobin (mg/dL) 13.6 ± 1.5 13.3 ± 1.6 0.303
Glucose (mL/dL) 151.6 ± 59.7 172.8 ± 74.1 0.036
Postprandial plasma glucose (mL/dL) 207.6 ± 70.3 234.8 ± 95.1 0.056
HbA1C (%) 8.5 ± 2.2 9.2 ± 2.1 0.029
Cr (mg/dL) 0.87 ± 0.14 0.89 ± 0.18 0.384
2
GFR (mL/min/1.73 m ) 86.2 ± 18.1 85.6 ± 18.2 0.838
Total cholesterol (mL/dL) 166.0 ± 36.7 173.8 ± 40.7 0.149
Triglyceride (mL/dL) 133.9 ± 91.0 149.1 ± 96.5 0.245
HDL cholesterol (mL/dL) 49.2 ± 13.5 45.4 ± 13.1 0.045
LDL cholesterol (mL/dL) 96.4 ± 36.4 103.1 ± 37.7 0.301
Calcium (mg/dL) 9.06 ± 0.48 9.08 ± 0.45 0.818
Phosphorus (mg/dL) 3.60 ± 0.57 3.67 ± 0.75 0.599
Data are given as mean ± SD hs-CRP (mg/L) 1.06 ± 3.01 1.11 ± 2.78 0.932
or n (%) Medication use
CVA cerebrovascular accident, Oral hypoglecemic agents 146 (67.6) 30 (45.5) 0.001
GFR glomerular filtration rate,
HbA1C glycosylated Insulin 18 (8.3) 7 (10.6) 0.570
hemoglobin, HDL high-density Both OHA and insulin 31 (14.4) 25 (37.9) \0.001
lipoprotein, LDL low-density Aspirin 105 (51.5) 30 (50.8) 0.933
lipoprotein, hs-CRP high-
Statin 113 (51.8) 36 (54.5) 0.699
sensitivity C-reactive protein,
OHA oral hypoglycemic agent, Beta-blocker 22 (10.1) 12 (18.2) 0.076
ACE angiotensin converting ACE inhibitor or ARB 99 (45.4) 40 (60.6) 0.031
enzyme, ARB angiotensin Diuretics 49 (22.5) 12 (18.2) 0.457
receptor blocker

The patients with microalbuminuria also had significantly determined by CCTA. Nonobstructive CAD was detected
higher fasting glucose and HbA1C levels than the patients in 103 patients (36.3 %), while obstructive CAD was
without microalbuminuria, but the two groups did not differ detected in 124 patients (43.7 %). Severe obstructive CAD
in creatinine and eGFR levels. The patients with microal- was observed in 34 patients (12.0 %).
buminuria were more likely to be treated with both oral Patients with microalbuminuria were significantly more
hypoglycemic agents and insulin, and angiotensin-convert- likely to have obstructive and severe obstructive CAD than
ing enzyme inhibitors or an angiotensin receptor blocker. those without microalbuminuria (obstructive, p = 0.004;
severe obstructive, p \ 0.001). They were also more likely
CCTA CAD findings to have obstructive two-vessel disease (2VD) and three-
vessel disease (3VD) or LM disease (2VD, p = 0.021;
The CCTA results are summarized in Table 2. In total, 57 3VD or LM disease, p = 0.017). Severe obstructive CAD
patients (20.1 %) had normal coronary arteries, as showed similar results (2VD, p = 0.036, 3VD or LM

123
198 Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203

Table 2 CCTA findings No microalbuminuria Microalbuminuria p value


(mg/24 h) (mg/24 h)

Number (n = 284) 218 66


Normal (%) 49 (22.5) 8 (12.1) 0.066
Nonobstructive (1–49 %) 84 (38.5) 19 (28.8) 0.149
CAD by stenosis C50 % (%) 85 (39.0) 39 (59.1) 0.004
CAD by stenosis C70 % (%) 17 (7.8) 17 (25.8) \0.001
Vessels affected; stenosis C50 % (%)
1VD (%) 47 (21.6) 14 (21.2) 0.952
2VD (%) 25 (11.5) 15 (22.7) 0.021
3VD or LM disease (%) 13 (6.0) 10 (15.2) 0.017
Data are given as mean ± SD
or n (%) Vessels affected; stenosis C70 % (%)
CCTA coronary computed 1VD (%) 10 (4.6) 7 (10.6) 0.081
tomography angiography, CAD 2VD (%) 6 (2.8) 6 (9.1) 0.036
coronary artery disease, VD 3VD or LM disease (%) 1 (0.5) 4 (6.1) 0.011
vessel disease, LM left main

Logistic regression analysis

The presence of microalbuminuria associated indepen-


dently with obstructive CAD after adjusting for age, sex,
and the presence of hypertension (Fig. 2, model 1: OR
2.182, CI 1.225–3.884, p = 0.008). These associations
remained significant even after controlling for body mass
index, diabetes duration, and smoking status (model 2: OR
2.278, CI 1.160–4.473, p = 0.017). Additional adjustment
for HbA1C levels, LDL cholesterol levels, and the use of
statins did not significantly affect the results (model 3: OR
2.255, CI 1.121–4.538, p = 0.023). Therefore, the pre-
sence of microalbuminuria associated with an increased
risk of obstructive CAD, independent of conventional
cardiovascular risk factors.

Fig. 1 Coronary computed tomography angiographic scores. The


differences between the groups with and without microalbuminuria in
Presence of microalbuminuria and risk of all-cause
terms of coronary artery calcium score, atheroma burden obstructive mortality
score, segment involvement score, and segment stenosis score are
shown. Most scores were significantly higher in the patients with During the median follow-up period of 3.5 years (inter-
microalbuminuria than in the patients without microalbuminuria
except coronary artery calcium score
quartile range 2.3–4.8), there were 9 deaths (4.1 %) in the
patients without microalbuminuria, and 9 deaths (13.6 %)
disease, p = 0.011). Compared to the patients without in those with microalbuminuria. Patients with microalbu-
microalbuminuria, the patients with microalbuminuria had minuria had a significantly higher all-cause death rate than
significantly higher ABOS (p = 0.010), SIS (p = 0.029), the patients without microalbuminuria (p = 0.017). In
and SSS (p = 0.011), except CACS (p = 0.058 by Mann– addition, the presence of microalbuminuria associated with
Whitney U test), as indicated by their CCTA scans (Fig. 1). an increased risk of all-cause mortality (Fig. 3). Even after
Patients were subdivided into two groups according to adjusting for conventional risk factors (age, sex, and
the eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 or C90 mL/min/ hypertension), the presence of microalbuminuria was an
1.73 m2. In patients with eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2, independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 3.469, CI
the CCTA CAD findings were similar with those of overall 1.3196–9.121, p = 0.012).
participants. However, in patients with eGFR C90 mL/ In addition, the presence of microalbuminuria associated
min/1.73 m2, there were no significant differences between with an increased all-cause of mortality in patients with
the patients with and without microalbuminuria. The eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Fig. 4a). However, there
results of subgroup analysis are summarized in Table 3. was no significant group difference in all-cause of

123
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203 199

Table 3 Subgroup analysis


60 B eGFR \ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 eGFR C 90 mL/min/1.73 m2
No microalbuminuria Microalbuminuria p value No microalbuminuria Microalbuminuria p value
(mg/24 h) (mg/24 h) (mg/24 h) (mg/24 h)

Number (n = 284) 143 42 75 24


Baseline characteristics
Age (years) 65.8 ± 8.8 68.8 ± 9.2 0.059 62.4 ± 9.7 60.9 ± 10.4 0.527
Male (%) 74 (51.7) 26 (61.9) 0.246 51 (68.0) 15 (62.5) 0.619
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.3 ± 2.9 24.9 ± 3.7 0.288 24.1 ± 3.3 24.2 ± 3.5 0.934
Waist–Hip ratio 0.95 ± 0.08 0.98 ± 0.07 0.156 0.95 ± 0.06 0.97 ± 0.05 0.312
Duration of diabetes (year) 12.9 ± 9.3 18.6 ± 10.8 0.001 10.6 ± 9.0 12.9 ± 9.6 0.271
Hypertension (%) 86 (60.1) 25 (59.5) 0.943 37 (49.3) 15 (62.5) 0.261
Duration of hypertension 9.2 ± 8.3 8.0 ± 8.0 0.556 10.4 ± 9.9 7.1 ± 6.3 0.270
(years)
Smoking history (%) 29 (26.4) 13 (34.2) 0.355 23 (34.3) 12 (52.2) 0.130
Previous CVA (%) 16 (12.2) 7 (17.5) 0.391 10 (14.1) 4 (17.4) 0.740
CCTA Findings
Normal (%) 33 (23.1) 3 (7.1) 0.022 16 (21.3) 5 (20.8) 0.958
Nonobstructive (1–49 %) 60 (42.0) 13 (31.0) 0.199 24 (32.0) 6 (25.0) 0.516
CAD by stenosis C50 % (%) 50 (35.0) 26 (61.9) 0.002 35 (46.7) 13 (54.2) 0.522
CAD by stenosis C70 % (%) 11 (7.7) 12 (28.6) \0.001 6 (8.0) 5 (20.8) 0.129
Vessels affected; stenosis C50 % (%)
1VD (%) 28 (19.6) 9 (21.4) 0.792 19 (25.3) 5 (20.8) 0.654
2VD (%) 14 (9.8) 10 (23.8) 0.017 11 (14.7) 5 (20.8) 0.528
3VD or LM disease (%) 8 (5.6) 7 (16.7) 0.047 5 (6.7) 3 (12.5) 0.397
Calcium score (Agaston) 241.3 ± 489.5 429.1 ± 636.9 0.030* 287.6 ± 619.0 232.9 ± 382.7 0.729*
Atheroma burden obstructive 0.81 ± 1.49 1.81 ± 2.06 0.005 1.20 ± 1.88 1.63 ± 2.65 0.388
score
Segment involve score 1.97 ± 2.41 3.14 ± 2.96 0.022 2.29 ± 2.99 2.50 ± 2.87 0.765
Segment stenosis score 3.00 ± 4.05 5.71 ± 5.74 0.006 3.87 ± 5.47 4.67 ± 6.16 0.547
Data are given as mean ± SD or n (%)
CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography, CAD coronary artery disease, VD vessel disease, LM left main
* Statistical significance test was done by Mann–Whitney U test

mortality between patients with and without microalbu- prevalence, extent, and severity of CCTA-measured coro-
minuria whose had normal renal function (Fig. 4b). nary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic patients with type 2
diabetes, but also the long-term clinical outcome of such
patients. There findings suggest that microalbuminuria may
Discussion be a risk marker for more advanced coronary atheroscle-
rosis, in which case, the subgroup of asymptomatic type 2
This prospective two-center study revealed that, compared diabetic patients with microalbuminuria would benefit in
to patients without microalbuminuria, asymptomatic particular from closer follow-up and more aggressive pre-
patients with type 2 diabetes without a history of CAD with ventive strategies.
microalbuminuria had a higher prevalence, extent, and There is considerable evidence showing that diabetes is
severity of coronary atherosclerosis, as well as all-cause a major risk factor for CAD, which is the most common
mortality. Furthermore, after adjusting for coexisting risk cause of mortality in diabetic patients [22–24]. However,
factors, microalbuminuria was an independent predictor of previous studies have also shown that diabetic patients vary
both obstructive CAD (as measured by CCTA) and all- widely in terms of their development of CAD and that this
cause mortality. To our knowledge, this study is the first to risk depends on the presence of concomitant cardiovascular
examine the effect of microalbuminuria on not only the risk factors [25, 26]. Thus, it remains unclear whether

123
200 Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203

Fig. 2 Association between the presence of microalbuminuria and variables, as follows. Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, and hypertension;
obstructive coronary artery disease, as detected by coronary computed Model 2 adjustment of model 1 plus for body mass index, diabetes
tomography angiography. Microalbuminuria associated indepen- duration, and smoking history; Model 3 adjustment of model 2 plus
dently with obstructive coronary artery disease, as indicated by the for glycosylated hemoglobin levels, low-density lipoprotein choles-
odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) obtained from terol levels, and administration of statin
multivariate logistic regression analyses with adjustments for several

correlates with markers of endothelial dysfunction and


inflammation, both of which are directly involved in ath-
erosclerosis [34].
The present study showed that asymptomatic type 2
diabetic patients with microalbuminuria indeed had higher
rates of obstructive CAD and all-cause mortality than those
without microalbuminuria. This study also found that even
after adjustment for coexisting risk factors, microalbu-
minuria remained an independent predictor of not only
CCTA-measured obstructive CAD, but also all-cause
mortality. By using CCTA to directly measure the extent
and severity of coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic
patients with type 2 diabetes, this study provided non-
invasive coronary anatomy data to support prior pivotal
studies suggesting that microalbuminuria may have prog-
nostic importance in identifying asymptomatic patients
Fig. 3 Cumulative survival of patients with and without microalbu-
with type 2 diabetes who have a high cardiovascular risk
minuria. The patients with microalbuminuria had a higher rate of all-
cause mortality than the patients without microalbuminuria [31, 32].
Previous studies demonstrated an elevated risk of all-
cause mortality associated with decreased eGFR [35, 36].
diabetes alone can be considered equivalent to CAD when To minimize this confounding factor, we subdivided
assessing the risk of future cardiovascular events [27–30]. patients in the CRONOS-ADM registry according to eGFR
In this regard, microalbuminuria has been found to be an in the following ranges: 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2 and
important risk factor that can be used to estimate the C90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Presence of microalbuminuria is an
prevalence of CAD or CAD-associated mortality in important factor in determining the incidence, extent, and
patients with diabetes [31–33]. The mechanisms behind the severity of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with eGFR
adverse effect of microalbuminuria on cardiovascular risk 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2. Also, they have higher all-cause
are poorly understood. However, microalbuminuria may be mortality compared to patients without microalbuminuria.
an index of generalized vascular damage because it However, in patients with normal renal function, there is no

123
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203 201

Fig. 4 Cumulative survival according to presence of microalbumin- eGFR (eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.74 m2). b Survival analysis of patients
uria in patients with or without reduced estimated glomerular with normal renal function (eGFR C90 mL/min/1.74 m2)
filtration rate. a Survival analysis of patients with mildly reduced

significant difference according to the presence of micro- relatively small and thus did not allow for separate analyses
albuminuria. Therefore, microalbuminuria is significantly between genders or stratification according to cardiovas-
associated with an increased risk of prevalence, severity, cular risks. Second, this study had an observational design,
and extent of coronary atherosclerosis as well as all-cause which means that it cannot yet be said with certainty that
mortality, regardless of eGFR in patients with mildly there is a causal association between microalbuminuria and
decreased eGFR. long-term clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with
The current American Diabetes Association consensus type 2 diabetes. Moreover, as with any observational study,
guidelines recommend that patients with type 2 diabetes be despite including many variables in our analyses, it remains
screened for CAD if they present with cardiovascular possible that other hidden factors affected the relationship
symptoms [37]. However, there is no detailed consensus observed between microalbuminuria, CAD, and mortality
regarding the evaluation of CAD in asymptomatic patients in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition,
with type 2 diabetes. Similarly, professional societal this study was only conducted at two centers. This means
appropriate-use criteria generally endorse the use of CCTA that the ability to generalize these results in other patient
to assess CAD in symptomatic low-to-intermediate risk population under different settings remains unclear. Third,
patients [38]. However, coronary atherosclerosis involves a information about the patients’ medications and glucose
prolonged asymptomatic developmental phase, and its first control (as reflected by HbA1C levels) during the 5 year
manifestations often result in sudden cardiac death or follow-up period after CCTA was not available. Thus,
nonfatal MI [39]. Regardless of the cause of ischemia, it is although patients with microalbuminuria had worse
clear that reduced appreciation of ischemic pain can impair HbA1C levels when they underwent CCTA than patients
the timely recognition of myocardial ischemia or infarction without microalbuminuria, the effect of longitudinal dia-
and thereby delay appropriate therapy [40]. The present betic control or medication changes on all-cause mortality
study has demonstrated that microalbuminuria may be a after the CCTA investigation could not be ascertained.
marker for high cardiovascular risk and that CAD screen-
ing by noninvasive CCTA in the subgroup of asymptomatic
patients who have type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria Conclusions
may be warranted. However, large-scale controlled clinical
trials that determine whether routine CAD screening of this This prospective two-center study of asymptomatic
subgroup improves clinical outcome are further required. patients with type 2 diabetes showed that microalbuminuria
Despite the important findings of this study and its is significantly associated with a greater prevalence, extent,
clinical implications regarding CAD management in and severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Furthermore,
asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, the present microalbuminuria was proven to be an independent pre-
study had some limitations. First, the sample size was dictor of all-cause mortality.

123
202 Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203

Conflict of interest None. 16. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al (2009) SCCT guidelines
for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomo-
graphic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:122–136
17. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB et al (2007) Prognostic value of
References multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for
prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1161–1170
1. Becker A, Bos G, de Vegt F et al (2003) Cardiovascular events in 18. Hadamitzky M, Hein F, Meyer T et al (2010) Prognostic value of
type 2 diabetes: comparison with nondiabetic individuals without coronary computed tomographic angiography in diabetic patients
and with prior cardiovascular disease. 10-year follow-up of the without known coronary artery disease. Diabetes Care
Hoorn Study. Eur Heart J 24:1406–1413 33:1358–1363
2. Schramm TK, Gislason GH, Kober L et al (2008) Diabetes 19. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ et al (1990) Quantifica-
patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics tion of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed
with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832
risk: a population study of 3.3 million people. Circulation 20. National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice
117:1945–1954 guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification,
3. Gerstein HC, Mann JF, Yi Q et al (2001) Albuminuria and risk of and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39:S1–S266
cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and 21. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al (1999) A more accurate
nondiabetic individuals. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 286:421–426 method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creati-
4. Arnlov J, Evans JC, Meigs JB et al (2005) Low-grade albumin- nine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal
uria and incidence of cardiovascular disease events in nonhy- Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470
pertensive and nondiabetic individuals: the Framingham Heart 22. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T et al (1998) Mortality from
Study. Circulation 112:969–975 coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in
5. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O et al (2007) 64-multislice nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarc-
detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential tion. N Engl J Med 339:229–234
alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic 23. Lotufo PA, Gaziano JM, Chae CU et al (2001) Diabetes and all-
review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 28:3042–3050 cause and coronary heart disease mortality among US male
6. Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV et al (2008) Preva- physicians. Arch Intern Med 161:242–247
lence of coronary artery disease and plaque morphology assessed 24. Cho E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ et al (2002) The impact of dia-
by multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography and betes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction on mortality from
calcium scoring in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. all causes and from coronary heart disease in men. J Am Coll
Heart 94:290–295 Cardiol 40:954–960
7. Rivera JJ, Nasir K, Choi EK et al (2009) Detection of occult 25. Howard BV, Best LG, Galloway JM et al (2006) Coronary heart
coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes disease risk equivalence in diabetes depends on concomitant risk
mellitus using non-invasive cardiac angiography. Atherosclerosis factors. Diabetes Care 29:391–397
203:442–448 26. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH et al (2011) Impact
8. Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY et al (2011) Age- and sex-related of diabetes on cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality
differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary com- in older men: influence of age at onset, diabetes duration, and
puted tomography angiography findings results from the Inter- established and novel risk factors. Arch Intern Med 171:404–410
national Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography 27. Evans JM, Wang J, Morris AD (2002) Comparison of cardio-
Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter vascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who
Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery dis- had had a myocardial infarction: cross sectional and cohort
ease. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:849–860 studies. BMJ 324:939–942
9. Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y et al (2011) Incremental prognostic 28. Vaccaro O, Eberly LE, Neaton JD et al (2004) Impact of diabetes
value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease and previous myocardial infarction on long-term survival:
using CONFIRM: COroNary computed tomography angiography 25-year mortality follow-up of primary screenees of the Multiple
evaluation for clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Arch Intern Med 164:1438–1443
registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:463–472 29. Buyken AE, von Eckardstein A, Schulte H et al (2007) Type 2
10. Valmadrid CT, Klein R, Moss SE et al (2000) The risk of car- diabetes mellitus and risk of coronary heart disease: results of the
diovascular disease mortality associated with microalbuminuria 10-year follow-up of the PROCAM study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev
and gross proteinuria in persons with older-onset diabetes mel- Rehabil 14:230–236
litus. Arch Intern Med 160:1093–1100 30. Bulugahapitiya U, Siyambalapitiya S, Sithole J et al (2009) Is
11. Mattock MB, Barnes DJ, Viberti G et al (1998) Microalbuminuria diabetes a coronary risk equivalent? Systematic review and meta-
and coronary heart disease in NIDDM: an incidence study. Dia- analysis. Diabet Med 26:142–148
betes 47:1786–1792 31. Mattock MB, Morrish NJ, Viberti G et al (1992) Prospective
12. Yuyun MF, Dinneen SF, Edwards OM et al (2003) Absolute level study of microalbuminuria as predictor of mortality in NIDDM.
and rate of change of albuminuria over 1 year independently Diabetes 41:736–741
predict mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with dia- 32. Weir MR (2004) Microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetics: an
betic nephropathy. Diabet Med 20:277–282 important, overlooked cardiovascular risk factor. J Clin Hyper-
13. Rose G, McCartney P, Reid DD (1977) Self-administration of a tens 6:134–141; quiz 42–43
questionnaire on chest pain and intermittent claudication. Br J 33. Rein P, Vonbank A, Saely CH et al (2011) Relation of albuminuria
Prev Soc Med 31:42–48 to angiographically determined coronary arterial narrowing in
14. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG et al (2007) Strength- patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable or
ening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 107:1144–1148
(STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18:805–835 34. de Zeeuw D, Parving HH, Henning RH (2006) Microalbuminuria
15. American Diabetes Association (2010) Diagnosis and classifica- as an early marker for cardiovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol
tion of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care Jan 33(Suppl 1):S62–S69 17:2100–2105

123
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2015) 31:193–203 203

35. Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC et al (2003) Kidney 38. Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA et al (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA
disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic
a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Founda-
Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure tion/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guide-
Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Preven- lines. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:e50–e103
tion. Circulation 108:2154–2169 39. Lauer MS (2010) Screening asymptomatic subjects for subclini-
36. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D et al (2004) Chronic kidney disease cal atherosclerosis: not so obvious. J Am Coll Cardiol
and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. 56:106–108
N Engl J Med 351:1296–1305 40. Vinik AI, Maser RE, Mitchell BD et al (2003) Diabetic auto-
37. American Diabetes Association (2013) Standards of medical care nomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 26:1553–1579
in diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care 36(Suppl 1):S11–S66

123

You might also like